latex2e (1nov23)

git-svn-id: svn://tug.org/texlive/trunk@68720 c570f23f-e606-0410-a88d-b1316a301751

1 files changed, 9 insertions, 9 deletions

diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/source/latex/tools/ftnright.dtx b/Master/texmf-dist/source/latex/tools/ftnright.dtx
index 00e98c3f773..663fa304a94 100644
--- a/Master/texmf-dist/source/latex/tools/ftnright.dtx
+++ b/Master/texmf-dist/source/latex/tools/ftnright.dtx
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
 %% Copyright (C) 1989-2004 Frank Mittelbach, all rights reserved.
 %<+package>\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}[1995/06/01]
 %<+package>\ProvidesPackage{ftnright}
-%<+package>         [2014/10/28 v1.1f footnote layout package (FMi)]
+%<+package>         [2023/07/08 v1.1f footnote layout package (FMi)]
 %
 % \fi
 %%
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@
 %
 % I also upgraded the documentation to conform to the \LaTeXe{}
 % terminology, e.g., this is a package since document classes will not
-% know about it. However it is very likely that i have missed some
+% know about it. However it is very likely that I have missed some
 % necessary corrections.
 %
 % \section{Introduction}
@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@
 %
 % The result of this effort is presented in this paper and the reader
 % can judge for himself whether it was successful or
-% not.\footnote{Please note, that this option only changed the
+% not.\footnote{Please note that this option changed only the
 % placement of footnotes. Since this article also makes use of the
 % {\tt doc} package \cite{bk:GMS94}, that assigns tiny numbers to
 % code lines sprinkled throughout the text, the resulting design is
@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@
 % footnote separator rule which is used in most publications prepared
 % with \TeX{}.\footnote{People who prefer the rule can add it by
 % redefining the command {\tt\bslash footnoterule}
-% \cite[p.~156]{book:LLa86}. Please, note, that this command should
+% \cite[p.~156]{book:LLa86}. Please note that this command should
 % occupy no space, so that a negative space should be used to
 % compensate for the width of the rule used.} Furthermore, I decided
 % to place the footnote markers\footnote{\label{thisftn}The tiny
@@ -572,7 +572,7 @@
 %    are only partly typeset on the preceding page are not resolved.
 %    They are held over until \LaTeX{} starts a page (or column)
 %    containing text besides floats again. For our current layout,
-%    this would mean, that if \LaTeX{} decided to make the right
+%    this would mean that if \LaTeX{} decided to make the right
 %    column of a page a float column, footnotes from the left column
 %    would appear on a later page. A real cure for this problem would
 %    be to rewrite two-thirds of \LaTeX{}'s output routine, so I am
@@ -615,8 +615,8 @@
 %    footnotes from the left column. So we have to change the output
 %    routine at least in the part that contributes floats to the next
 %    column. The macro involved is called |\@startcolumn|. The first
-%    thing we do is to check and see whether any deferred floats
-%    exists.
+%    thing we do is to check and see whether there are any deferred
+%    floats.
 %    \begin{macrocode}
 \def\@startcolumn{%
  \ifx\@deferlist\@empty
@@ -764,7 +764,7 @@
 %    and output the footnotes on a separate page in an
 %    emergency.\footnote{Otherwise, the footnotes are held over for
 %    ever, preventing \TeX{} from finishing the document successfully.
-%    Instead, \TeX{} will produce infinity many empty pages at the end
+%    Instead, \TeX{} will produce infinitely many empty pages at the end
 %    of the document, trying in vain to output the held over
 %    footnotes.  This problem was found by Rainer Sch\"opf when we
 %    prepared the paper for the Cork conference.}
@@ -790,7 +790,7 @@
 %    moment we simply detect it here, perhaps some better scheme can be
 %    implemented. One way to avoid this is to allow more than |\textheight| of
 %    footnotes in |\preparefootins|. However, that isn't such a good idea
-%    either as that means that a footnote from column one, might end up
+%    either since it means that a footnote from column one might end up
 %    completely on a later page.
 % \changes{v1.1f}{2010/02/25}{Check for split footnotes (pr/4099)}
 %    \begin{macrocode}