diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'usergrps/uktug/baskervi/6_6/editorial.tex')
-rw-r--r-- | usergrps/uktug/baskervi/6_6/editorial.tex | 46 |
1 files changed, 46 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/usergrps/uktug/baskervi/6_6/editorial.tex b/usergrps/uktug/baskervi/6_6/editorial.tex new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..075f32ba3a --- /dev/null +++ b/usergrps/uktug/baskervi/6_6/editorial.tex @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ +\title{Editorial: what's this issue all about?} +\providecommand\FAQ{\acro{FAQ}} +\begin{article} +\vspace*{-0.5\baselineskip} +Your committee has long aimed to ensure that the \acro{UK} makes a +valuable contribution to the world of \TeX: for example, it is +possible to claim that the \acro{UK} \TeX{} archive led the world in +comprehensive provision, and members of your committee continue to +take active part in maintaining the internationally-linked \acro{CTAN} +system of archives. + +The idea of maintaining the \acro{UK}'s profile motivated us to +produce the `Frequently Asked Questions' (\FAQ) issues that appeared +as `Christmas Editions' of Baskerville for 1994 and 1995. At the time +that we decided to prepare the 1994 \FAQ{}, we had noted the +great value of the \acro{NTG}'s 4All\TeX{} which had at the time just +been released. We knew then that we could not hope to produce a +\CDROM{} in the short term, but we agreed at the time that a similar +disc, targeted at Unix\textsuperscript{TM} systems would be a useful thing +to have. The rest is history (and is well explained in the +documentation of the \CDROM{}, that constitutes the only `article' of +this issue of \BV). + +Members will recall that we offered the first version of this \CDROM{} +to them, for sale. Considering the economics of the matter, and given +an assurance that useful software for other platforms (notably +Microsoft- and \acro{OS}/2-based \acro{PC}s and Macintoshes) could be +included on the disc, your committee decided to circulate every member +with a copy in lieu of two issues of \BV. + +I would welcome feedback from members on their views of the value of +the offering, and what (if anything) we might do to improve it. I +continue to maintain the \FAQ{}: would members welcome its +republication, perhaps as Baskerville Vol.~7 No.~6\Dash nominally the +1997 Christmas edition? + +As I mentioned in a brief `post-editorial' in Baskerville Vol.~6 +No.~4, the extreme lateness of that issue was almost exclusively my +fault. As a result, this double issue is following very closely on +the heels of the last, and Vol.~7 No.~1 is also in an advanced stage +of preparation. We maintain the fond hope that we will have brought +ourselves up-to-date before the end of 1997, but~\dots\ we continue to +rely, to a large extent, on external sources of articles for \BV. +Please do submit them to Sebastian Rahtz, as mentioned in the banner +line of each issue of \BV! +\end{article} |