summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/stex/stex.tex
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/stex/stex.tex')
-rw-r--r--Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/stex/stex.tex538
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 538 deletions
diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/stex/stex.tex b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/stex/stex.tex
deleted file mode 100644
index 30a865014b0..00000000000
--- a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/stex/stex.tex
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,538 +0,0 @@
-% First a special index style for makeindex
-%
-\begin{filecontents}{stex.ist}
-actual '='
-quote '!'
-level '>'
-preamble
-"\n \\begin{theindex} \n \\makeatletter\\scan@allowedfalse\n"
-postamble
-"\n\n \\end{theindex}\n"
-item_x1 "\\efill \n \\subitem "
-item_x2 "\\efill \n \\subsubitem "
-delim_0 "\\pfill "
-delim_1 "\\pfill "
-delim_2 "\\pfill "
-% The next lines will produce some warnings when
-% running Makeindex as they try to cover two different
-% versions of the program:
-lethead_prefix "{\\bfseries\\hfil "
-lethead_suffix "\\hfil}\\nopagebreak\n"
-lethead_flag 1
-heading_prefix "{\\bfseries\\hfil "
-heading_suffix "\\hfil}\\nopagebreak\n"
-headings_flag 1
-
-% and just for source2e:
-% Remove R so I is treated in sequence I J K not I II III
-page_precedence "rnaA"
-\end{filecontents}
-
-\documentclass{ltxdoc}
-\usepackage{stex,cmathml,cmathmlx}
-\usepackage{lstdoc,textcomp,url,array,stex,float,chapterbib,amsfonts}
-\usepackage[show]{ed}
-\usepackage{hyperref}
-\makeindex
-\floatstyle{boxed}
-\newfloat{exfig}{thp}{lop}
-\floatname{exfig}{Example}
-
-\def\scsys#1{{{\sc #1}}\index{#1@{\sc #1}}}
-\def\stex{{\raisebox{-.5ex}S\kern-.5ex\TeX}}
-\def\sTeX{\stex}
-\def\xslt{{\scsys{xslt}}}
-\def\xml{\scsys{Xml}}
-\def\mathml{\scsys{MathML}}
-\def\omdoc{\scsys{OMDoc}}
-\def\openmath{\scsys{OpenMath}}
-\def\latexml{\scsys{LaTeXML}}
-\def\connexions{\scsys{Connexions}}
-\def\latexml{\scsys{LaTeXML}}
-\def\perl{\scsys{Perl}}
-\def\cmathml{Content-{\sc MathML}\index{Content {\sc MathML}}\index{MathML@{\sc MathML}!content}}
-\def\activemath{\scsys{ActiveMath}}
-\def\twin#1#2{\index{#1!#2}\index{#2!#1}}
-\def\twintoo#1#2{{#1 #2}\twin{#1}{#2}}
-\def\atwin#1#2#3{\index{#1!#2!#3}\index{#3!#2 (#1)}}
-\def\atwintoo#1#2#3{{#1 #2 #3}\atwin{#1}{#2}{#3}}
-
-% these macros are used in the short descriptions
-\def\connexions{\scshape{Connexions}}
-\def\cnxlatex{CNX\LaTeX}
-\def\cnxml{\scshape{CNXml}}
-
-%%%%%%%%%%%%%% begin copied from source2e.tex
-
-\listfiles
-
-% Do not index some TeX primitives, and some common plain TeX commands.
-
-\DoNotIndex{\def,\long,\edef,\xdef,\gdef,\let,\global}
-\DoNotIndex{\if,\ifnum,\ifdim,\ifcat,\ifmmode,\ifvmode,\ifhmode,%
- \iftrue,\iffalse,\ifvoid,\ifx,\ifeof,\ifcase,\else,\or,\fi}
-\DoNotIndex{\box,\copy,\setbox,\unvbox,\unhbox,\hbox,%
- \vbox,\vtop,\vcenter}
-\DoNotIndex{\@empty,\immediate,\write}
-\DoNotIndex{\egroup,\bgroup,\expandafter,\begingroup,\endgroup}
-\DoNotIndex{\divide,\advance,\multiply,\count,\dimen}
-\DoNotIndex{\relax,\space,\string}
-\DoNotIndex{\csname,\endcsname,\@spaces,\openin,\openout,%
- \closein,\closeout}
-\DoNotIndex{\catcode,\endinput}
-\DoNotIndex{\jobname,\message,\read,\the,\m@ne,\noexpand}
-\DoNotIndex{\hsize,\vsize,\hskip,\vskip,\kern,\hfil,\hfill,\hss}
-\DoNotIndex{\m@ne,\z@,\z@skip,\@ne,\tw@,\p@}
-\DoNotIndex{\dp,\wd,\ht,\vss,\unskip}
-
-% Set up the Index and Change History to use \part
-\IndexPrologue{\part*{Index}%
- \markboth{Index}{Index}%
- \addcontentsline{toc}{part}{Index}%
- The italic numbers denote the pages where the
- corresponding entry is described,
- numbers underlined point to the definition,
- all others indicate the places where it is used.}
-
-\GlossaryPrologue{\part*{Change History}%
-% Allow control names to be hyphenated here...
- {\GlossaryParms\ttfamily\hyphenchar\font=`\-}%
- \markboth{Change History}{Change History}%
- \addcontentsline{toc}{part}{Change History}}
-
-% The standard \changes command modified slightly to better cope with
-% this multiple file document.
-\makeatletter
-\def\changes@#1#2#3{%
- \let\protect\@unexpandable@protect
- \edef\@tempa{\noexpand\glossary{#2\space\currentfile\space#1\levelchar
- \ifx\saved@macroname\@empty
- \space
- \actualchar
- \generalname
- \else
- \expandafter\@gobble
- \saved@macroname
- \actualchar
- \string\verb\quotechar*%
- \verbatimchar\saved@macroname
- \verbatimchar
- \fi
- :\levelchar #3}}%
- \@tempa\endgroup\@esphack}
-\makeatother
-
-% Produce a Change Log and (2 column) Index.
-\RecordChanges
-\CodelineIndex
-\EnableCrossrefs
-\OnlyDescription
-\setcounter{IndexColumns}{2}
-%%%%%%%%%%%%%% end copied from source2e.tex
-
-%\includeonly{}
-
-\title{{\stex}: Semantic Markup in {\TeX/\LaTeX}}
-\author{Michael Kohlhase\\
- Jacobs University, Bremen\\
- \url{http://kwarc.info/kohlhase}}
-
-\begin{document}
- \pagenumbering{roman}
- \maketitle
- \renewcommand\maketitle{}
- \begin{abstract}
- We present a collection of {\TeX} macro packages that allow to markup
- {\TeX/\LaTeX} documents semantically without leaving the document format,
- essentially turning {\TeX/\LaTeX} into a document format for mathematical
- knowledge management (MKM).
- \end{abstract}
-\newsavebox{\forgetbox}
-\renewenvironment{abstract}{\begin{lrbox}{\forgetbox}}{\end{lrbox}}
-\newpage
-\setcounter{tocdepth}{1}\tableofcontents
-\clearpage
-\pagenumbering{arabic}
-
-\part{The sTeX Collection}
-
-\section{Introduction}
-
-The last few years have seen the emergence of various content-oriented {\xml}-based,
-content-oriented markup languages for mathematics on the web, e.g.
-{\openmath}~\cite{BusCapCar:2oms04}, {\cmathml}~\cite{CarIon:MathML03}, or our own
-{\omdoc}~\cite{Kohlhase:omfmd05}. These representation languages for mathematics, that
-make the structure of the mathematical knowledge in a document explicit enough that
-machines can operate on it. Other examples of content-oriented formats for mathematics
-include the various logic-based languages found in automated reasoning tools
-(see~\cite{RobVor:hoar01} for an overview), program specification languages (see
-e.g.~\cite{Bergstra:as89}).
-
-The promise if these content-oriented approaches is that various tasks involved in ``doing
-mathematics'' (e.g. search, navigation, cross-referencing, quality control, user-adaptive
-presentation, proving, simulation) can be machine-supported, and thus the working
-mathematician is relieved to do what humans can still do infinitely better than machines:
-The creative part of mathematics --- inventing interesting mathematical objects,
-conjecturing about their properties and coming up with creative ideas for proving these
-conjectures. However, before these promises can be delivered upon (there is even a
-conference series~\cite{MKM-IG-Meetings:web} studying ``Mathematical Knowledge Management
-(MKM)''), large bodies of mathematical knowledge have to be converted into content form.
-
-Even though {\mathml} is viewed by most as the coming standard for representing
-mathematics on the web and in scientific publications, it has not not fully taken off in
-practice. One of the reasons for that may be that the technical communities that need
-high-quality methods for publishing mathematics already have an established method which
-yields excellent results: the {\TeX/\LaTeX} system: and a large part of mathematical
-knowledge is prepared in the form of {\TeX}/{\LaTeX} documents.
-
-{\TeX}~\cite{Knuth:ttb84} is a document presentation format that combines complex
-page-description primitives with a powerful macro-expansion facility, which is utilized in
-{\LaTeX} (essentially a set of {\TeX} macro packages, see~\cite{Lamport:ladps94}) to
-achieve more content-oriented markup that can be adapted to particular tastes via
-specialized document styles. It is safe to say that {\LaTeX} largely restricts content
-markup to the document structure\footnote{supplying macros e.g. for sections, paragraphs,
- theorems, definitions, etc.}, and graphics, leaving the user with the presentational
-{\TeX} primitives for mathematical formulae. Therefore, even though {\LaTeX} goes a great
-step into the direction of an MKM format, it is not, as it lacks infrastructure for
-marking up the functional structure of formulae and mathematical statements, and their
-dependence on and contribution to the mathematical context.
-
-\subsection{The {\xml} vs. {\TeX/\LaTeX} Formats and Workflows}
-
-{\mathml} is an {\xml}-based markup format for mathematical formulae, it is standardized
-by the World Wide Web Consortium in {\cite{CarIon:MathML03}}, and is supported by the
-major browsers. The {\mathml} format comes in two integrated components: presentation
-{\mathml}\twin{presentation}{MathML} and content {\mathml}\twin{content}{MathML}. The
-former provides a comprehensive set of layout primitives for presenting the visual
-appearance of mathematical formulae, and the second one the functional/logical structure
-of the conveyed mathematical objects. For all practical concerns, presentation {\mathml}
-is equivalent to the math mode of {\TeX}. The text mode facilitates of {\TeX} (and the
-multitude of {\LaTeX} classes) are relegated to other {\xml} formats, which embed
-{\mathml}.
-
-The programming language constructs of {\TeX} (i.e. the macro definition
-facilities\footnote{We count the parser manipulation facilities of {\TeX}, e.g. category
- code changes into the programming facilities as well, these are of course impossible for
- {\mathml}, since it is bound to {\xml} syntax.}) are relegated to the {\xml}
-programming languages that can be used to develop language extensions.
-transformation language {\xslt}~\cite{Deach:exls99,Kay:xpr00} or proper {\xml}-enabled
-The {\xml}-based syntax and the separation of the presentational-, functional- and
-programming/extensibility concerns in {\mathml} has some distinct advantages over the
-integrated approach in {\TeX/\LaTeX} on the services side: {\mathml} gives us better
-\begin{itemize}
-\item integration with web-based publishing,
-\item accessibility to disabled persons, e.g. (well-written) {\mathml} contains enough
- structural information to supports screen readers.
-\item reusability, searchabiliby and integration with mathematical software systems
- (e.g. copy-and-paste to computer algebra systems), and
-\item validation and plausibility checking.
-\end{itemize}
-
-On the other hand, {\TeX/\LaTeX}/s adaptable syntax and tightly integrated programming
-features within has distinct advantages on the authoring side:
-
-\begin{itemize}
-\item The {\TeX/\LaTeX} syntax is much more compact than {\mathml} (see the difference in
- Figure~\ref{fig:mathml-sum} and Equation ~\ref{eq:cmathml-sum}), and if needed, the
- community develops {\LaTeX} packages that supply new functionality in with a succinct
- and intuitive syntax.
-\item The user can define ad-hoc abbreviations and bind them to new control sequences to
- structure the source code.
-\item The {\TeX/\LaTeX} community has a vast collection of language extensions and best
- practice examples for every conceivable publication purpose and an established and very
- active developer community that supports these.
-\item There is a host of software systems centered around the {\TeX/\LaTeX} language that
- make authoring content easier: many editors have special modes for {\LaTeX}, there are
- spelling/style/grammar checkers, transformers to other markup formats, etc.
-\end{itemize}
-
-In other words, the technical community is is heavily invested in the whole
-{\index*{workflow}}, and technical know-how about the format permeates the
-community. Since all of this would need to be re-established for a {\mathml}-based
-workflow, the technical community is slow to take up {\mathml} over {\TeX/\LaTeX}, even in
-light of the advantages detailed above.
-
-\subsection{A {\LaTeX}-based Workflow for {\xml}-based Mathematical Documents}
-
-An elegant way of sidestepping most of the problems inherent in transitioning from a
-{\LaTeX}-based to an {\xml}-based workflow is to combine both and take advantage of the
-respective advantages.
-
-The key ingredient in this approach is a system that can transform {\TeX\LaTeX} documents
-to their corresponding {\xml}-based counterparts. That way, {\xml}-documents can be
-authored and prototyped in the {\LaTeX} workflow, and transformed to {\xml} for
-publication and added-value services, combining the two workflows.
-
-There are various attempts to solve the {\TeX/\LaTeX} to {\xml} transformation problem; the
-most mature is probably Bruce Miller's {\latexml} system~\cite{Miller:latexml}. It
-consists of two parts: a re-implementation of the {\TeX} {\index*{analyzer}} with all of
-it's intricacies, and a extensible {\xml} emitter (the component that assembles the output
-of the parser). Since the {\LaTeX} style files are (ultimately) programmed in {\TeX}, the
-{\TeX} analyzer can handle all {\TeX} extensions, including all of {\LaTeX}. Thus the
-{\latexml} parser can handle all of {\TeX/\LaTeX}, if the emitter is extensible, which is
-guaranteed by the {\latexml} binding language: To transform a {\TeX/\LaTeX} document to a
-given {\xml} format, all {\TeX} extensions\footnote{i.e. all macros, environments, and
- syntax extensions used int the source document} must have ``{\latexml}
-bindings''\index{LaTeXML}{binding}, i.e. a directive to the {\latexml} emitter that
-specifies the target representation in {\xml}.
-
-\section{The Packages of the sTeX Collection}\label{sec:packages}
-
-In the following, we will shortly preview the packages and classes in the {\stex}
-collection. They all provide part of the solution of representing semantic structure in
-the {\TeX/\LaTeX} workflow. We will group them by the conceptual level they
-address\ednote{come up with a nice overview figure here!}
-
-\subsection{Content Markup of Mathematical Formulae in {\TeX/\LaTeX}}
-
-The first two packages are concerned basically with the math mode in {\TeX},
-i.e. mathematical formulae. The underlying problem is that run-of-the-mill {\TeX/\LaTeX}
-only specifies the presentation (i.e. what formulae look like) and not their content
-(their functional structure). Unfortunately, there are no good methods (yet) to infer the
-latter from the former, but there are ways to get presentation from content.
-
-Consider for instance the following ``standard notations''\footnote{The first one is
- standard e.g. in Germany and the US, the third one in France, and the last one in
- Russia} for binomial coefficients: $\left(n\atop k\right)$, $_nC^k$, $\mathcal{C}^n_k$, and
-$\mathcal{C}^k_n$ all mean the same thing: $n!\over k!(n-k)!$. This shows that we cannot hope
-to reliably recover the functional structure (in our case the fact that the expression is
-constructed by applying the binomial function to the arguments $n$ and $k$) from the
-presentation alone.
-
-The solution to this problem is to dump the extra work on the author (after all she knows
-what she is talking about) and give them the chance to specify the intended structure. The
-markup infrastructure supplied by the {\stex} collection lets the author do this without
-changing\footnote{However, semantic annotation will make the author more aware of the
- functional structure of the document and thus may in fact entice the author to use
- presentation in a more consistent way than she would usually have.} the visual
-appearance, so that the {\LaTeX} workflow is not disrupted. . We speak of
-{\twintoo{semantic}{preloading}} for this process and call our collection of macro
-packages {\stex} (Semantic {\TeX}). For instance, we can now write
-\begin{equation}\label{eq:cmathml-sum}
- |\CSumlLimits{k}1\infty{\Cexp{x}k}| \qquad\hbox{instead of the usual}\qquad
- |\sum_{k=1}^\infty x^k|
-\end{equation}
-
-In the first form, we specify that you are applying a function (|CSumLimits| $\hat=$ Sum
-with Limits) to 4 arguments: ({\sl{i}}) the bound variable $k$ (that runs from)
-({\sl{ii}}) the number 1 (to) ({\sl{iii}}) $\infty$ (to infinity summing the terms)
-({\sl{iv}}) |\Cexp{x}k| (i.e. x to the power k). In the second form, we merely specify
-hat {\LaTeX} should draw a capital Sigma character ($\sigma$) with a lower index which is
-an equation $k=1$ and an upper index $\infty$. Then it should place next to it an $x$ with
-an upper index $k$.
-
-Of course human readers (that understand the math) can infer the content structure from
-this presentation, but the {\latexml} converter (who does not understand the math) cannot,
-but we want to have the content {\mathml} expression in Figure~\ref{fig:mathml-sum}
-\begin{exfig}
-\begin{verbatim}
- <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
- <apply>
- <sum>
- <bvar><ci>k</ci></bvar>
- <lowlimit><cn>1</cn></lowlimit>
- <uplimit><infinit/></cn></uplimit>
- <apply><exp/><ci>x</ci><ci>k</ci></apply>
- </apply>
- </math>
-\end{verbatim}\vspace*{-.6cm}
- \caption{Content {\mathml} Form of $\sum_{k=1}^\infty x^k$}\label{fig:mathml-sum}
-\end{exfig}
-
-Obviously, a converter can infer this from the first {\LaTeX} structure with the help of
-the curly braces that indicate the argument structure, but not from the second (because it
-does not understand the math). The nice thing about the |cmathml| infrastructure is that
-you can still run {\LaTeX} over the first form and get the same formula in the DVI file
-that you would have gotten from running it over the second form. That means, if the author
-is prepared to write the mathematical formulae a little differently in her {\LaTeX}
-sources, then she can use them in {\xml} and {\LaTeX} at the same time.
-
-
-\subsubsection{{\tt{cmathml}}: Encoding Content {\mathml} in {\TeX/\LaTeX}}
-
-The |cmathml| package provides a set of macros that correspond to the K-14 fragment of
-mathematics (Kindergarten to undergraduate college level ($\hat=14^{th}$ grade)). We have
-already seen an example above in equation (\ref{eq:cmathml-sum}), where the content markup
-in {\TeX} corresponds to a content {\mathml}-expression (and can actually be translated to
-this by the {\latexml} system.) However, the content {\mathml} vocabulary is fixed in the
-{\mathml} specification and limited to the K-14 fragment; the notation of mathematics of
-course is much larger and extensible on the fly.
-
-
-\subsubsection{{\tt{presentation}}: Flexible Presentation for Semantic Macros}
-
-The |presentation| package supplies an infrastructure that allows to specify the
-presentation of semantic macros, including preference-based bracket elision. This allows
-to markup the functional structure of mathematical formulae without having to lose
-high-quality human-oriented presentation in {\LaTeX}. Moreover, the notation definitions
-can be used by MKM systems for added-value services, either directly from the {\sTeX}
-sources, or after translation.
-
-\subsection{Mathematical Statements}
-
-\subsubsection{{\tt{statements}}: Extending Content Macros for Mathematical Notation}
-
-This package provides semantic markup facilities for mathematical statements like
-Theorems, Lemmata, Axioms, Definitions, etc. in {\stex} files. This structure can be
-used by MKM systems for added-value services, either directly from the {\sTeX}
-sources, or after translation.
-
-\subsubsection{{\tt{sproof}}: Extending Content Macros for Mathematical Notation}
-
-This package supplies macros and environment that allow to annotate the structure of
-mathematical proofs in {\stex} files. This structure can be used by MKM systems for
-added-value services, either directly from the {\sTeX} sources, or after translation.
-
-
-\subsection{Context Markup for Mathematics}
-
-\subsubsection{{\tt{modules}}: Extending Content Macros for Mathematical Notation}
-
-This package supplies a definition mechanism for semantic macros and a non-standard
-scoping construct for them, which is oriented at the semantic depency relation rather
-than the document structure. This structure can be used by MKM systems for
-added-value services, either directly from the {\sTeX} sources, or after translation.
-
-\subsection{Mathematical Document Classes}
-
-\subsubsection{Connexions Modules}
-
-{\cnxlatex} is a collection of {\LaTeX} macros that allow to write {\connexions} modules
-without leaving the {\LaTeX} workflow. Modules are authored in {\cnxlatex} using only a
-text editor, transformed to PDF and proofread as usual. In particular, the {\LaTeX}
-workflow is independent of having access to the {\connexions} system, which makes
-{\cnxlatex} attractive for the initial version of single-author modules.
-
-
-For publication, {\cnxlatex} modules are transformed to {\cnxml} via the {\latexml}
-translator and can be uploaded to the {\connexions} system.
-
-\subsubsection{OMDoc Documents}
-
-The |omdoc| package provides an infrastructure that allows to markup {\omdoc} documents in
-{\LaTeX}. It provides |omdoc.cls|, a class with the and |omdocdoc.sty|
-
-\subsubsection{Slides and Presentations}
-
-We present a document class from which we can generate both course slides and course
-notes in a transparent way. Furthermore, we present a set of {\latexml} bindings for
-these, so that we can also generate {\omdoc}-based course materials, e.g. for
-inclusion in the {\activemath} system.
-
-\subsection{Conclusion}\label{sec:concl}
-
-The {\stex} collection provides a set of semantic macros that extends the familiar and
-time-tried {\LaTeX} workflow in academics until the last step of Internet publication of
-the material. For instance, a {\connexions} module can be authored and maintained in
-{\LaTeX} using a simple text editor, a process most academics in technical subjects are
-well familiar with. Only in a last publishing step (which is fully automatic) does it get
-transformed into the {\xml} world, which is unfamiliar to most academics.
-
-Thus, {\stex} can serve as a conceptual interface between the document author and MKM
-systems: Technically, the semantically preloaded {\LaTeX} documents are transformed into
-the (usually {\xml}-based) MKM representation formats, but conceptually, the ability to
-semantically annotate the source document is sufficient.
-
-The {\stex} macro packages have been validated together with a case
-study~\cite{Kohlhase:smtl05}, where we semantically preload the course materials for a
-two-semester course in Computer Science at Jacobs University Bremen and transform them to
-the {\omdoc} MKM format, so that they can be used in the {\activemath}
-system~\cite{activemathAIEDJ01}. Another study of converting {\LaTeX} materials for the
-{\connexions} project is under way.\ednote{say some more}
-
-\subsection{Licensing, Download and Setup}\label{sec:setup}
-
-\ednote{talk about licensing}
-
-The {\stex} packages and classes can be obtained as a self-documenting {\LaTeX} packages:
-To obtain a package {\meta{package}} download the files \meta{package}|.dtx| and
-\meta{package}|.ins| from
-\begin{center}
- {\url{https://svn.kwarc.info/repos/kwarc/projects/stex/sty/}\meta{package}/}
-\end{center}
-To extract the {\LaTeX} package \meta{package}|.sty| and the {\latexml} bindings in
-\meta{package}|.ltxml|, run the {\LaTeX} formatter on |cmathml.ins|, e.g. by typing
-|latex cmathml.ins| to a shell. To extract the documentation (the version of this document that
-goes with the extracted package) run the {\LaTeX} formatter on |cmathml.dtx| e.g. by
-typing |latex |\meta{package}|.dtx| to a shell.
-
-Usually, the {\stex} distribution will also have the newest versions of the files
-\meta{package}|.sty|, \meta{package}|.ltxml|, and the documentation \meta{package}|.pdf|
-pre-generated for convenience, so they can be downloaded directly from the URL above.
-
-To install the package, copy the file \meta{package}|.sty| somewhere, where
-{\TeX}/{\LaTeX} can find it and rebuild {\TeX}'s file name database. This is done by
-running the command |texhash| or |mktexlsr| (they are the same). In |MikTEX|, there is a
-menu option to do this.
-
-\section{Utilities}\label{sec:utilities}
-
-To simplify dealing with {\stex} documents, we are providing a small collection of command
-line utilities, which we will describe here. For details and downloads go to
-{\url{http://kwarc.info/projects/stex}}.
-
-\begin{description}
-\item[{\tt{msplit}}] splits an {\stex} file into smaller ones (one module per file)
-\item[{\tt{rf}}] computes the ``reuse factor'', i.e. how often {\stex} modules are reused
- over a collection of documents
-\item[{\tt{sgraph}}] visualizes the module graph
-\item[{\tt{sms}}] computes the {\stex} module signatures for a give {\stex} file
-\item[{\tt{bms}}] proposes a sensible module structure for an un-annotated {\stex} file
-\end{description}
-
-\DocInclude{cnx}
-\DocInclude{cmathml}
-\DocInclude{modules}
-\DocInclude{statements}
-\DocInclude{sproof}
-\DocInclude{omdoc}
-\DocInclude{presentation}
-
-% Stop here if ltxdoc.cfg says \AtEndOfClass{\OnlyDescription}
-\StopEventually{\newpage
-\bibliographystyle{alpha}
-\bibliography{kwarc}
-\PrintIndex
-\newpage\PrintChanges
-\end{document}}
-
-\clearpage
-\pagestyle{headings}
-% Make TeX shut up.
-\hbadness=10000
-\newcount\hbadness
-\hfuzz=\maxdimen
-
-\bibliographystyle{alpha}
-\bibliography{../doc/macros/stex,../doc/macros/omdoc}
-
-\typeout{%
- \string # Produce change log with^^J%
- makeindex -s gglo.ist -o stex.gls stex.glo}
-
-
-\PrintChanges
-\clearpage
-
-% makeindex needs a symbol between the parts of composite page numbers
-% but we dont want one, so:
-\typeout{%
- \string # Produce index with^^J%
- makeindex -s stex.ist stex.idx}
-
-\PrintIndex
-
-% Make sure that the index is not printed twice
-% (ltxdoc.cfg might have a second \PrintIndex command)
-\let\PrintChanges\relax
-\let\PrintIndex\relax
-
-\end{document}
-%%% Local Variables:
-%%% mode: stex
-%%% TeX-master: t
-%%% End:
-
-% LocalWords: hoc LaTeXML nC CSumLimits cmathml DVI th sproof dtx mikoslides
-% LocalWords: ltxml pdf texhash mktexlsr MikTEX msplit rf sgraph sms bms un
-% LocalWords: cnx omdoc