diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/proposal/examples/fetopenstrep/methodology.tex')
| -rw-r--r-- | Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/proposal/examples/fetopenstrep/methodology.tex | 59 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 59 deletions
diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/proposal/examples/fetopenstrep/methodology.tex b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/proposal/examples/fetopenstrep/methodology.tex deleted file mode 100644 index 4614aeee0da..00000000000 --- a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/proposal/examples/fetopenstrep/methodology.tex +++ /dev/null @@ -1,59 +0,0 @@ -\svnInfo $Id: methodology.tex 22870 2012-01-02 11:01:58Z kohlhase $ -\svnKeyword $HeadURL: https://svn.kwarc.info/repos/kwarc/doc/macros/forCTAN/proposal/eu/examples/fetopenstrep/methodology.tex $ -\section[S/T Methodology]{S/T Methodology\footnote{Note that, whereas the scientific and technological methodology is evaluated -under the criteria ‘S/T quality’, the quality of the -actual workplan is evaluated under FET-Open under the criteria ‘Implementation’.}}\label{sec:methodology} -\begin{todo}{from the proposal template} -Provide a detailed description of the scientific and technological approach or methodology -by which you will attempt to reach your objectives. Demonstrate that you are aware of the -level and nature of the risks of failure, and that you have a good idea on how to address -these risks. Describe a progression of crucial milestones and decision points for your -project, and their expected timing. What would constitute success? What would you learn -from an eventual failure? Where relevant, show how your approach takes into account the -difficulties inherent to the multi-disciplinary nature of the idea or approach that you -are proposing. - A detailed work plan should be presented, broken down into work -packages\footnote{A work package is a major sub-division of the proposed project with a - verifiable end-point – normally a deliverable or an important milestone in the overall - project.} (WPs) which should follow the logical phases of the implementation of the -project, and include consortium management and assessment of progress and results. (Note -that your overall approach to management will be described later, in Section 2). - -Notes: The number of work packages used must be appropriate to the complexity of the work -and the overall value of the proposed project. The planning should be sufficiently -detailed to justify the proposed effort and allow progress monitoring by the Commission. - -\end{todo} -\newpage\input{workplan} - -\newpage -\subsection{Work Package List}\label{sec:wplist} - -\begin{todo}{from the proposal template} -Please indicate one activity per work package: -RTD = Research and technological development; DEM = Demonstration; MGT = Management of the consortium -\end{todo} - -%\makeatletter\wp@total@RM{management}\makeatother -\wpfig[pages,type] - -\newpage\input{../strep/deliverables} -\newpage\input{../strep/milestones} - -\subsection{Work Package Descriptions}\label{sec:workpackages} -\begin{workplan} -\input{../strep/wp-management}\newpage -\input{../strep/wp-dissem}\newpage -\input{../strep/wp-class}\newpage -\input{../strep/wp-temple}\newpage -\end{workplan} -\newpage\input{../strep/risks} - - -%%% Local Variables: -%%% mode: latex -%%% TeX-master: "propB" -%%% End: - -% LocalWords: workplan newpage wplist makeatletter makeatother wpfig -% LocalWords: workpackages wp-dissem wp-class wp-temple |