diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-chicago/dates-test.bib')
-rw-r--r-- | Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-chicago/dates-test.bib | 69 |
1 files changed, 36 insertions, 33 deletions
diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-chicago/dates-test.bib b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-chicago/dates-test.bib index f6f0a1b980f..f5ba90f5a38 100644 --- a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-chicago/dates-test.bib +++ b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-chicago/dates-test.bib @@ -371,28 +371,30 @@ author = {Barcott, Bruce}, date = {2000-04-16}, entrysubtype = {magazine}, - title = {\bibstring{reviewof} \mkbibemph{The last marlin: The - story of a family at sea}, \bibstring{by} {Fred Waitzkin}}, + title = {review of \mkbibemph{The last marlin: The story of a + family at sea}, by {Fred Waitzkin}}, pages = 7, annotation = {Because of the absence of quotation marks around the \textsf{title} in the \texttt{trad} style, the \textsf{Article} and \textsf{Review} entry types are more or less interchangeable. This entry presents a review from a newspaper, with keyword - \texttt{magazine} in \textsf{entrysubtype}, and with - \cmd{bibstring\{reviewof\}} in the \textsf{title} - field. You could just write \enquote{review of} - instead, but the \cmd{bibstring} makes the entry - portable across languages. Note the formatting of - the reviewed book's title using \cmd{mkbibemph}, and - the sentence-style capitalization you have to - provide by hand for the \texttt{trad} style, because - the curly braces of \cmd{mkbibemph} protect the text - from the automatic sentence-style capitalization - provided by the package. \textsf{Biblatex-chicago} - never modifies the capitalization of the - \textsf{journaltitle}, so that field should always - work properly across styles.} + \texttt{magazine} in \textsf{entrysubtype}. A + \cmd{bibstring\{reviewof\}} at the start of the + \textsf{title} field won't work anymore in the + \textsf{trad} style unless you change the setting of + the \texttt{casechanger} option to \texttt{latex2e}. + Instead of that you can just write \enquote{review + of.} Note the formatting of the reviewed book's + title using \cmd{mkbibemph}, and the sentence-style + capitalization you have to provide by hand for the + \texttt{trad} style, because the curly braces of + \cmd{mkbibemph} protect the text from the automatic + sentence-style capitalization provided by the + package. \textsf{Biblatex-chicago} never modifies + the capitalization of the \textsf{journaltitle}, so + that field should always work properly across + styles.} } @Book{barrows:reading, @@ -3223,29 +3225,30 @@ @Article{ratliff:review:15, author = {Ratliff, Ben}, - title = {\bibstring{reviewof} \mkbibemph{The mystery of - samba: Popular music and national identity in - Brazil}, \bibstring{by} {Hermano Vianna}, - \parteditandtrans {John Charles Chasteen}}, + title = {review of \mkbibemph{The mystery of samba: Popular + music and national identity in Brazil}, by {Hermano + Vianna}, \parteditandtrans {John Charles Chasteen}}, journaltitle = {Lingua Franca}, date = {1999-04}, volume = 9, pages = {B13--B14}, annotation = {An Article entry presenting a review from a scholarly journaltitle, hence no entrysubtype - needed. Note the bibstrings in the title of the - review, and the formatting of the title of the book - reviewed there, for the trad style. Also note the - use of parteditandtrans. The author-date system - doesn't absolutely require the use of these - mechanisms, which were invented to cope with the - differences between notes and bibliography in the - other Chicago style. Still, although simply writing - "ed. and trans." yourself will suffice, using these - mechanisms will make your .bib file work across - multiple languages, and will also allow it to work, - with fewer modifications, in the notes \& - bibliography style, should that be needed.} + needed. A bibstring at the start of the title no + longer works in the trad style, unless you set the + casechanger option to "latex2e" in your + preamble. Note the formatting of the title of the + book reviewed, and also the use of + parteditandtrans. The author-date system doesn't + absolutely require the use of this latter mechanism, + which was invented to cope with the differences + between notes and bibliography in the other Chicago + style. Still, although simply writing "ed. and + trans." yourself will suffice, using the mechanism + will make your .bib file work across multiple + languages, and will also allow it to work, with + fewer modifications, in the notes \& bibliography + style, should that be needed.} } @Article{reaves:rosen, |