1 files changed, 18 insertions, 17 deletions
diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-chicago/cms-trad-sample.tex b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-chicago/cms-trad-sample.tex
index e63610c0f46..73a880674e1 100644
--- a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-chicago/cms-trad-sample.tex
+++ b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-chicago/cms-trad-sample.tex
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ process your .bib files, as \textsc{Bib}\TeX\ (and its more recent
 variants) will no longer provide all the features you need.  I highly
 recommend, therefore, that you upgrade either to \textsf{Biber} 0.9.9
 and to \textsf{biblatex} 1.7, which are designed to work together, or
-to \textsf{Biber} 1.4 and \textsf{biblatex} 2.4, which latter two are
+to \textsf{Biber} 1.5 and \textsf{biblatex} 2.5, which latter two are
 the newest releases and are likewise designed to work as a matched
 pair.  The advice that follows in this document assumes that you are
 using \textsf{Biber}; if you wish to continue using \textsc{Bib}\TeX\
@@ -94,12 +94,11 @@ implemented the \textsf{authordate-trad} style for such users.  To
 compare it with the standard style, please see
 \textsf{cms-dates-sample.pdf}.  You can also still use the
 15th-edition style files from \textsf{biblatex-chicago}, which have
-been updated with some improvements borrowed from the 16th edition.
-(See \textsf{biblatex-chicago15.pdf} and
-\textsf{cms15-dates-sample.pdf}.)  I would encourage all users,
-however, to switch to one of the 16th-edition styles as soon as
-possible, as I am concentrating nearly all of my development time
-there.
+been updated with some improvements borrowed from the 16th edition,
+but which are now deprecated.  (See \textsf{biblatex-chicago15.pdf}
+and \textsf{cms15-dates-sample.pdf}.)  I would encourage all users to
+switch to one of the 16th-edition styles as soon as possible, as I am
+concentrating nearly all of my development time there.
 
 \subsection*{Usage}
 \label{usage}
@@ -129,12 +128,12 @@ automatically resets the tracker at page breaks:
 
 \citereset\cmd{citereset}\ \autocite[15.27]{chicago:manual}.  If you
 are going to repeat a source, make sure that the cite command provides
-a postnote --- from this release of \textsf{biblatex-chicago} you'll
-no longer get any annoying empty parentheses, but you will get another
-standard citation, which may add too much clutter:
-\autocite{chicago:manual}.  If you don't need to cite a specific page,
-then it may be better, or at least more concise, only to use one
-citation command rather than two.
+a postnote --- when using \textsf{biblatex-chicago} you'll no longer
+get any annoying empty parentheses, but you will get another standard
+citation, which may add too much clutter: \autocite{chicago:manual}.
+If you don't need to cite a specific page, then it may be better, or
+at least more concise, only to use one citation command rather than
+two.
 
 \subsection*{Other citation commands}
 \label{sec:other}
@@ -269,10 +268,12 @@ In \textsf{Article} and \textsf{Review} entries with the
 \texttt{magazine} entrysubtype, the absence of an author automatically
 places the \textsf{journaltitle} of the periodical in citations and at
 the head of the entry in the list of references:
-\autocite{gourmet:052006}.  You can cite newspaper and magazine
-articles entirely within the text, i.e., without them appearing in the
-reference list \autocite[15.47]{chicago:manual}, if you set the
-\texttt{cmsdate=full} entry option: \autocite{lakeforester:pushcarts};
+\autocite{gourmet:052006}.  (Without the entrysubtype, you'll get the
+\textsf{title} at the head rather than the \textsf{journaltitle}.)
+You can cite newspaper and magazine articles entirely within the text,
+i.e., without them appearing in the reference list
+\autocite[15.47]{chicago:manual}, if you set the \texttt{cmsdate=full}
+entry option: \autocite{lakeforester:pushcarts};
 \autocite{nyt:trevorobit}.  In \textsf{Manual} entries, the
 \textsf{organization} field does the same: \autocite{dyna:browser}.
 If you wish to present an abbreviated form of the journal (or