diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-chicago/cms-dates-sample.tex')
-rw-r--r-- | Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-chicago/cms-dates-sample.tex | 168 |
1 files changed, 90 insertions, 78 deletions
diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-chicago/cms-dates-sample.tex b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-chicago/cms-dates-sample.tex index b0d74ad50e0..1ca60d94f03 100644 --- a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-chicago/cms-dates-sample.tex +++ b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-chicago/cms-dates-sample.tex @@ -6,13 +6,10 @@ \usepackage[german,french,american]{babel} \usepackage[autostyle]{csquotes} %\usepackage[document]{ragged2e} -\usepackage[authordate,backend=biber,babel=hyphen,% +\usepackage[authordate,backend=biber,autolang=hyphen,booklongxref=false,% bibencoding=latin1,strict]{biblatex-chicago} % \usepackage[style=chicago-authordate,backend=biber,usecompiler=true,% % babel=hyphen,bibencoding=auto,sorting=nyt,cmslos,autocite=inline]{biblatex} -%\DeclareLanguageMapping{german}{cms-german} -%\DeclareLanguageMapping{american}{cms-american} -%\DeclareLanguageMapping{french}{cms-french} %\renewcommand*{\rmdefault}{fgn}% The font (gentium) used for pdf \usepackage{ifthen} \usepackage{setspace} @@ -41,7 +38,7 @@ bibencoding=latin1,strict]{biblatex-chicago} \usepackage{url} \urlstyle{rm} \appto\bibsetup{\sloppy} -\hyphenation{evans-ton clem-ens} +\hyphenation{evans-ton clem-ens mc-hugh} \setlength{\dimen\footins}{9.5in} \setlength{\parindent}{0pt} \setlength{\parskip}{5pt} @@ -66,17 +63,16 @@ plainpages=false,breaklinks=true]{hyperref} Starting with \textsf{biblatex} version 1.5, in order to adhere to the author-date specification you will need to use \textsf{Biber} to process your .bib files, as \textsc{Bib}\TeX\ (and its more recent -variants) will no longer provide all the features you need. I highly -recommend, therefore, that you upgrade either to \textsf{Biber} 0.9.9 -and to \textsf{biblatex} 1.7, which are designed to work together, or -to \textsf{Biber} 1.5 and \textsf{biblatex} 2.5, which latter two are -the newest releases and are likewise designed to work as a matched -pair. The advice that follows in this document assumes that you are -using \textsf{Biber}; if you wish to continue using \textsc{Bib}\TeX\ -then you need \textsf{biblatex} version 1.4c and -\textsf{biblatex-chicago} 0.9.7a. (Please contact me at the email -address in \textsf{biblatex-chicago.pdf} if you have any difficulty -obtaining a copy of this earlier release.) +variants) will no longer provide all the features the style requires. +For this release, you really need the latest versions of +\textsf{Biber} (1.8) and \textsf{biblatex} (2.8), which contain +features and bug-fixes on which my own code relies. The advice that +follows in this document assumes that you are using \textsf{Biber}; if +you wish to continue using \textsc{Bib}\TeX\ then you need +\textsf{biblatex} version 1.4c and \textsf{biblatex-chicago} 0.9.7a. +(Please contact me at the email address in +\textsf{biblatex-chicago.pdf} if you have any difficulty obtaining a +copy of this earlier release.) \subsection*{Editions} \label{editions} @@ -92,13 +88,13 @@ envisaged by the \emph{Manual} \autocite*[15.45]{chicago:manual}, grafts the traditional Chicago author-date title formatting onto the current recommendations for the remainder of the reference apparatus. Please consult \textsf{cms-trad-sample.pdf} to see how this looks in -practice. You can also still use the 15th-edition style files from +practice. You can also still use the 15th-edition styles from \textsf{biblatex-chicago}, which have been updated with some improvements borrowed from the 16th edition, but which are now -deprecated. (See \textsf{biblatex-chicago15.pdf} and +strongly deprecated. (See \textsf{biblatex-chicago15.pdf} and \textsf{cms15-dates-sample.pdf}.) I would encourage all users to switch to one of the 16th-edition styles as soon as possible, as I am -concentrating nearly all of my development time there. +concentrating all of my development time there. \subsection*{Usage} \label{usage} @@ -190,22 +186,34 @@ known or can be guessed: \autocite{horsley:prosodies}; edition is less than enthusiastic about the use of \enquote{\texttt{Anon.}}\ as author. -With \textsf{Biber}, in most entry types, an absent \textsf{date} will -automatically provoke it into searching for other sorts of dates in -the entry, in the order \textsf{year, eventyear, origyear, urlyear}: -e.g., \autocite{evanston:library}, which only has a \textsf{urlyear}. -In three entry types --- \textsf{Music}, \textsf{Review}, and -\textsf{Video} --- this search order is \textsf{eventyear, origyear, - year, urlyear}, as in these types the earliest year should take -precedence (cf.\ page~\pageref{sec:audiovisual}, below). You can +By default, in most entry types, an absent \textsf{date} will +automatically provoke \textsf{Biber} into searching for other sorts of +dates in the entry, in the order \textsf{year, eventyear, origyear, + urlyear}: e.g., \autocite{evanston:library}, which only has a +\textsf{urlyear}. In three entry types --- \textsf{Music}, +\textsf{Review}, and \textsf{Video} --- this search order is +\textsf{eventyear, origyear, year, urlyear}, as in these types the +earliest year should take precedence (cf.\ +page~\pageref{sec:audiovisual}, below). Beginning with this release, +you can change the default search order, for all but the three types +just mentioned, by using the \texttt{cmsdate} option in the preamble +of your document, instead of (or in addition to) using it in the +\textsf{options} field of individual entries. Setting that option in +the preamble either to \enquote{\texttt{both}} or +\enquote{\texttt{on}} makes the document-wide search order: +\textsf{origyear, year, eventyear, urlyear}. This may be useful for +documents that contain many entries with multiple dates, and where you +want \emph{always} to present the earlier (i.e., \textsf{orig}) dates +at the head of reference list entries and in citations. You can eliminate some of these dates from the running, or change the search -order, using the \cmd{DeclareLabelyear} command in your preamble, but -please be aware that I have hard-coded this order into the author-date -style in order to cope with some tricky corners of the specification. -If you reorder these dates, and your references enter these tricky -corners, the results might be surprising. (Cf.\ section~4.5.2 in -\textsf{biblatex.pdf} and section~5.2, s.v.\ \enquote{date} in -\textsf{biblatex-chicago.pdf} for the details.) +order, using the \cmd{DeclareLabeldate} command in your preamble, but +please be aware that I have hard-coded the possibilities above into +the author-date style in order to cope with some tricky corners of the +specification. If you reorder these dates, and your references enter +these tricky corners, the results might be surprising. (Cf.\ +section~4.5.8 in \textsf{biblatex.pdf} and especially section~5.2, +s.v.\ \enquote{\textsf{date}} in \textsf{biblatex-chicago.pdf} for the +gory details.) In most entry types, the absence of all four possible dates will automatically produce \mbox{\enquote{\texttt{n.d.}\hspace{-2pt}}} @@ -214,30 +222,31 @@ yourself in the form \cmd{bibstring\{nodate\}}: \autocite{ross:thesis}. A date that can be guessed should appear within square brackets: \autocite{clark:mesopot}. Forthcoming works are straightforward, assuming you remember to use the \cmd{autocap} -macro so that the word appears correctly in both citations and the -list of references: \autocite{author:forthcoming}; -\autocite{contrib:contrib}. +macro and the \textsf{year} (instead of the \textsf{date}) field, so +that the word appears correctly in both citations and the list of +references: \autocite{author:forthcoming}; \autocite{contrib:contrib}. The 16th edition of the \emph{Manual} has changed the rules for entries with more than one date \autocite[15.38]{chicago:manual}. -First, \textsf{Music} and \textsf{Video} entries have their own rules, -which are applied automatically. (Once again, see -page~\pageref{sec:audiovisual}, below.) For other entry types, there -are two options, corresponding to two different states of the -\texttt{cmsdate} entry option. The default is \texttt{cmsdate=off}: -\autocite{maitland:equity}. Here, setting the \textsf{pubstate} field -to \texttt{reprint} ensures that a notice of the original publication -date will be printed at the end of the reference list entry. -Alternatively, you can use \texttt{cmsdate=both}: -\autocite{emerson:nature}; \autocite{maitland:canon}. -\texttt{cmsdate=new} and \texttt{cmsdate=old} are both now synonyms of -\texttt{both}, while \texttt{cmsdate=on} is still available even -though it falls outside the specification: -\autocite{james:ambassadors}. These options, in combination with -others available in your .bib files, can cover a wide range of -difficult cases. Please see the next section below, the documentation -in \textsf{biblatex-chicago.pdf}, and also the following entries in -\textsf{dates-test.bib}: +First, \textsf{Music}, \textsf{Review}, and \textsf{Video} entries +have their own rules, which are applied automatically. (Once again, +see page~\pageref{sec:audiovisual}, below.) For other entry types, +there are two options, corresponding to two different states of the +\texttt{cmsdate} entry (or preamble) option. The default is +\texttt{cmsdate=off}: \autocite{maitland:equity}. Here, setting the +\textsf{pubstate} field to \texttt{reprint} ensures that a notice of +the original publication date will be printed at the end of the +reference list entry. Alternatively, you can use +\texttt{cmsdate=both}: \autocite{emerson:nature}; +\autocite{maitland:canon}. \texttt{cmsdate=new} and +\texttt{cmsdate=old} are both now synonyms of \texttt{both}, while +\texttt{cmsdate=on} is still available even though it falls outside +the specification: \autocite{james:ambassadors}. These options, in +combination with others available in your .bib files, can cover a wide +range of difficult cases. Please see the next section below, the +documentation in \textsf{biblatex-chicago.pdf}, particularly in +section~5.2, s.v.\ \enquote{\textsf{date},} and also the following +entries in \textsf{dates-test.bib}: \autocites{schweitzer:bach}{white:russ}{white:ross:memo}. \subsection*{Corners of the specification} @@ -309,6 +318,8 @@ in standard author-date format.) A \cmd{cite*} or \cmd{autocite*} command will, in such a case, produce the title rather than the year. Some examples should make this clearer: +\enlargethispage{-\baselineskip} + Classical works: without abbreviation: \autocite{aristotle:metaphy:trans}; with abbreviation: \autocite{aristotle:metaphy:gr}; \autocite{plato:republic:gr}; using @@ -433,29 +444,30 @@ Book: \autocite{barrows:reading}; \autocite{churchill:letters}; \autocite{creasey:ashe:blast}; \autocite{creasey:morton:hide}; \autocite{creasey:york:death}; \autocite{davenport:attention}; \autocite{feydeau:farces}; \autocite{furet:passing:eng}; -\autocite{furet:passing:fr}; \autocite{harley:cartography}; -\autocite{hopp:attalid}; \autocite{howell:marriage}; -\autocite{lach:asia}; \autocite{lecarre:quest}; -\autocite{levistrauss:savage}; \autocite{lynch:webstyle}; -\autocite{maisonneuve:relations}; \autocite{mchugh:wake}; -\autocite{menchu:crossing}; \autocite{meredith:letters}; -\autocite{michelangelo:poems}; \autocite{mla:style}; -\autocite{natrecoff:camera}; \autocite{palmatary:pottery}; -\autocite{pelikan:christian}; \autocite{rodman:walk}; -\autocite{schellinger:novel}; \autocite{sechzer:women}; -\autocite{sereny:cries}; \autocite{soltes:georgia}; -\autocite{stendhal:parma}; \autocite{suangtho:tectona}; -\autocite{thompson:making}; \autocite{tillich:system}; -\autocite{times:guide}; \autocite{turabian:manual}; -\autocite{walker:columbia}; \autocite{wauchope:ceramics}; -\autocite{weber:saugetiere}; \autocite{weresz}; -\autocite{white:total}; \autocite{wright:evolution}; -\autocite{wright:theory}. - -BookInBook: \autocite{bernard:boris}. - -Collection: \autocite{brush:ornithology}; \autocite{kamrany:economic}; -\autocite{prairie:state}; \autocite{zukowsky:chicago}. +\autocite{furet:passing:fr}; \autocite{hopp:attalid}; +\autocite{howell:marriage}; \autocite{lach:asia}; +\autocite{lecarre:quest}; \autocite{levistrauss:savage}; +\autocite{lynch:webstyle}; \autocite{maisonneuve:relations}; +\autocite{mchugh:wake}; \autocite{menchu:crossing}; +\autocite{meredith:letters}; \autocite{michelangelo:poems}; +\autocite{mla:style}; \autocite{natrecoff:camera}; +\autocite{palmatary:pottery}; \autocite{pelikan:christian}; +\autocite{rodman:walk}; \autocite{schellinger:novel}; +\autocite{sechzer:women}; \autocite{sereny:cries}; +\autocite{soltes:georgia}; \autocite{stendhal:parma}; +\autocite{suangtho:tectona}; \autocite{thompson:making}; +\autocite{tillich:system}; \autocite{times:guide}; +\autocite{turabian:manual}; \autocite{walker:columbia}; +\autocite{wauchope:ceramics}; \autocite{weber:saugetiere}; +\autocite{weresz}; \autocite{white:total}; +\autocite{wright:evolution}; \autocite{wright:theory}. + +BookInBook: \autocite{bernhard:boris}; \autocite{bernhard:ritter}. + +Collection: \autocite{brush:ornithology}; +\autocite{harley:cartography}; \autocite{harley:ancient:cart}; +\autocite{kamrany:economic}; \autocite{prairie:state}; +\autocite{zukowsky:chicago}. Image: \autocite{bedford:photo}. |