summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Master/texmf-dist/tex/latex/bidi/pdfpages-xetex-bidi.def
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKarl Berry <karl@freefriends.org>2010-10-11 00:15:03 +0000
committerKarl Berry <karl@freefriends.org>2010-10-11 00:15:03 +0000
commitea0ac2d1bc725a9e159c3709bc8e775d77dc65bd (patch)
tree3a5d0fc88ff32f76f3c6e0bba488d0251b4213bd /Master/texmf-dist/tex/latex/bidi/pdfpages-xetex-bidi.def
parente8dde3fdf371b3f9c7443830b0613ad123cc735b (diff)
bidi update (10oct10)
git-svn-id: svn://tug.org/texlive/trunk@20046 c570f23f-e606-0410-a88d-b1316a301751
Diffstat (limited to 'Master/texmf-dist/tex/latex/bidi/pdfpages-xetex-bidi.def')
-rw-r--r--Master/texmf-dist/tex/latex/bidi/pdfpages-xetex-bidi.def76
1 files changed, 70 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/tex/latex/bidi/pdfpages-xetex-bidi.def b/Master/texmf-dist/tex/latex/bidi/pdfpages-xetex-bidi.def
index 8e20d5f71ae..c110b5bcf75 100644
--- a/Master/texmf-dist/tex/latex/bidi/pdfpages-xetex-bidi.def
+++ b/Master/texmf-dist/tex/latex/bidi/pdfpages-xetex-bidi.def
@@ -1,9 +1,13 @@
%%
%% This is file `pdfpages-xetex-bidi.def',
-
+%% generated with the docstrip utility.
+%%
+%% The original source files were:
+%%
+%% bidi.dtx (with options: `pdfpages-xetex-bidi.def')
%%
-%% __________________________________
-%% Copyright © 2009-2010 Vafa Khalighi
+%% ______________________________________
+%% Copyright © 2009–2010 Vafa Khalighi
%%
%% License information appended.
%%
@@ -57,15 +61,75 @@
\AM@ClearShipoutPicture
}
%%
-%% Copyright © 2009-2010 by Vafa Khalighi <vafakh84@gmail.com>
+%% Copyright © 2009–2010 Vafa Khalighi <vafakhlgh@gmail.com>
%%
-%% Distributable under the LaTeX Project Public License,
+%% It may be distributed and/or modified under the LaTeX Project Public License,
%% version 1.3c or higher (your choice). The latest version of
%% this license is at: http://www.latex-project.org/lppl.txt
%%
-%% This work is "maintained" (as per LPPL maintenance status)
+%% This work is “author-maintained” (as per LPPL maintenance status)
%% by Vafa Khalighi.
%%
+%% In addition to the terms of LPPL any distributed version
+%% (unchanged or modified) of bidi has to keep the statement
+%% about the moral obligation for using bidi. In case of major
+%% changes where this would not be appropriate the author of the
+%% changed version should contact the copyright holder.
+%%
+%%
+%%
+%% Moral obligation for using bidi:
+%% ____________________________________
+%%
+%% Users of bidi who wish to include or use bidi or a modified
+%% version in a proprietary and commercially market product are asked
+%% under certain conditions (see below) for the payment of a license
+%% fee. The size of this fee is to be determined, in each instance,
+%% by the commercial user, depending on his/her judgment of the value of
+%% bidi for his/her product.
+%%
+%%
+%% The conditions for this are as follows:
+%%
+%% The producer of a proprietary and commercially market product
+%% that involves typesetting using bidi is asked to determine
+%% the value of a license fee for using bidi if
+%%
+%% - the product is a document and the producer has decided to
+%% include bidi to typeset (parts of) the document or has
+%% directed the author of the document to include bidi (for
+%% example, by providing a class file to be used by the author)
+%%
+%% - the product is a LaTeX class or package that includes bidi
+%%
+%%
+%% There is no moral obligation in case
+%%
+%% - the product is a document but producer has not directed
+%% the author to include bidi (in that case the moral obligation
+%% lies with the author of the document)
+%%
+%% - the product does not involve typesetting, e.g., consists, for
+%% example, of distributing bidi and its documentation.
+%%
+%% - the product is not proprietary, i.e., is made available as free
+%% software itself (which doesn't prohibit its commercial marketing)
+%%
+%% - bidi is used for non-commercial purposes
+%%
+%%
+%% Determinating a license fee might result in a license fee of zero
+%% (i.e., no payment) in case a producer has determined that the use
+%% of bidi has no enhancing effect on the product. This is a
+%% plausible scenario, i.e., in the above two cases the producer is
+%% only asked to evaluate the value of bidi for the product
+%% not for the payment of a license fee per se (which might or might
+%% not follow from this evaluation).
+%%
+%% The license fee, if any, can be payed to the author of
+%% the program who can be contacted at
+%%
+%% vafakhlgh@gmail.com
%%
%%
%%