blob: 8093fdc8fc96ca8f5479cdc7a9ccd23369ddb0e0 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
|
# Collection of possible todos
These are an unsorted collection of thoughts by others or myself and may or may not get done depending ...
## Comparing
- When comparing, I suggest writing the log file with the
the list of glyphs found only in the comparison font. That way, people
developing a font who want to have equal coverage can easily see what
glyphs they are missing. Since you are already discovering the
information, why not log it ...
- Also, if there are first-font-only symbols (maybe not in
this case -- is there a way to get a textual list of the differing code
points?), I'd suggest trying an open box (cf. the shaded box for
second-font-only).
- KB suggests to use a special default title when comparing showing both font names
## Standalone
- implement the question "Mathfont? (default no)" and make it
automatically set the range-end to a large value
|