summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/macros/latex/contrib/maple/MTNarticle.tex
blob: 0f28aee0f81db4020f09fe279006a4c88db868ae (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
\documentclass[11pt,dvips]{mtn}
\usepackage{palatino}
\begin{document}
%
\title{The D Operator and Algorithmic \\ Differentiation}
\author{Michael Monagan
\thanks{Informatik E.T.H., Z\"{u}rich, Switzerland. monagan@inf.ethz.ch}
\and J. S. Devitt\thanks{Faculty  of Mathematics, University of Waterloo, 
Canada, jsdevitt@daisy.uwaterloo.ca}
}
\shorttitle{D Operator}
\maketitle

\section{Introduction}
In this article we would like to inform our readers and users about
the development of the \mexpr{D} operator in Maple.
As with many major tasks in system development, getting something like
this nicely integrated into a system, and working correctly,
notationally correct, and making it easy to use, requires the design
of new facilities and changes to many parts of the system.

Although ``differentiation'' is often regarded as a
relatively simple task for a computer algebra system, it turns
out that this is not actually the case.
A paper by Stanly Steinberg and Michael Wester {\cite {MUC84}} presented
at the 1984 Macsyma Users Conference pointed out problems with
the differentiation facility in the computer algebra systems available
at that time.  In particular, Maple and other systems could not distinguish
correctly between total and partial derivatives.

Operators were first introduced into Maple in version 4.2
by Gaston Gonnet {\cite {OPERATORS}}.  The addition of the \mexpr{D} operator
addressed the distinction of total and partial derivatives, and also
a representation of the derivative of a function evaluated at a
point (for example, $y'(0)$ by \mexpr{D(y)(0)}).  
Partial derivatives and the ability to
apply the chain rule to an unknown function were added in Maple V.
Presently the \mexpr{D} operator is being extended to address the
problem of algorithmic differentiation, that is, to differentiate
Maple procedures.

In this article we follow the development of the \mexpr{D} operator
by way of examples discussing some of details and system design
issues as we go.

\section{Functions -- Expressions or Mappings?}

Users will find two facilities for differentiation in Maple,
the \mexpr{diff} procedure, and the \mexpr{D} procedure.

The \mexpr{diff} procedure takes as input what Maple calls
an {\em expression} or a {\em formula} which is a function of
zero of more variables ($x_1, x_2, \ldots x_n$) which appear explicitly
in the expression.
It computes the partial derivative of the formula with respect to
a given variable.

The \mexpr{D} procedure in Maple (often called the
\mexpr{D} operator) takes as input a function which is
a mapping from $R^N \rightarrow R$.  In Maple this is called an
{\em operator} or a {\em mapping}.
For example, $sin(x)$ is an expression in $x$ but $sin$ by itself is a
mapping from $R \rightarrow R$.
Another mapping in Maple is $sin+cos^2$.
A {\em mapping} can always be applied to an argument.
For example, given the mapping

\begin{mapleinput}
F := sin+cos^2;
\end{mapleinput}
\begin{maplelatex}
\[
{F} := {\rm sin} + {\rm cos}^{2}
\]
\end{maplelatex}
if we apply it to a number we get a number and if we apply
it to a formula we get a formula, e.g.

\begin{mapleinput}
F(1.0);
\end{mapleinput}
\begin{maplelatex}
\[
1.133397567
\]
\end{maplelatex}
\begin{mapleinput}
F(Pi/3);
\end{mapleinput}
\begin{maplelatex}
\[
{\displaystyle \frac {1}{2}}\,\sqrt {3} + {\displaystyle \frac {1
}{4}}
\]
\end{maplelatex}
\begin{mapleinput}
F(x);
\end{mapleinput}
\begin{maplelatex}
\[
{\rm sin}(\,{x}\,) + {\rm cos}(\,{x}\,)^{2}
\]
\end{maplelatex}

Strictly speaking,
Maple would call both the formula $sin(x) + cos(x)^2$ and
the mapping $sin + cos^2$ expressions.
Any distinction between the two comes from how we use them.
Mappings are mappings because our intention is
to {\em apply} them to arguments, while formulae are the
result of applying mappings to their arguments.
Throughout this article we will call the former
mappings and the latter formulae.
Thus the \mexpr{diff} procedure differentiates a formula and returns
a formula.  The \mexpr{D} operator differentiates a mapping
and returns a mapping.  Compare

\begin{mapleinput}
diff( sin(x)^2, x );
\end{mapleinput}
\begin{maplelatex}
\[
2\,{\rm sin}(\,{x}\,)\,{\rm cos}(\,{x}\,)
\]
\end{maplelatex}
\begin{mapleinput}
D(sin^2);
\end{mapleinput}
\begin{maplelatex}
\[
2\,{\rm cos}\,{\rm sin}
\]
\end{maplelatex}

Note, for mappings, functional composition is represented
explicitly by use of the \mexpr{@} operator, and repeated composition
is represented by the \mexpr{@@} operator.  Compare

\begin{mapleinput}
diff( sin(cos(x)), x );
\end{mapleinput}
\begin{maplelatex}
\[
 - {\rm cos}(\,{\rm cos}(\,{x}\,)\,)\,{\rm sin}(\,{x}\,)
\]
\end{maplelatex}
\begin{mapleinput}
D( sin@cos );
\end{mapleinput}
\begin{maplelatex}
\[
 - {\rm cos}^{(\,2\,)}\,{\rm sin}
\]
\end{maplelatex}

\section{Derivatives of Unknown Functions}

As well as being able to compute with known functions, like
$\sin, \cos, \exp, \ln$, etc., Maple has always supported the ability to
compute with unknown functions.  In the following examples
of partial and repeated partial differentiation of an unknown function $f$, the
notation \mexpr{D[i](f)} means the partial derivative of $f$ with
respect to the $i^{th}$ argument.

\begin{mapleinput}
diff(f(x,y),y);
\end{mapleinput}
\begin{maplelatex}
\[
{\frac {{ \partial}}{{ \partial}{y}}}\,{\rm f}(\,{x}, {y}\,)
\]
\end{maplelatex}
\begin{mapleinput}
D[2](f);
\end{mapleinput}
\begin{maplettyout}
\end{maplettyout}
\begin{maplelatex}
\[
{{D}_{2}}(\,{f}\,)
\]
\end{maplelatex}
\begin{mapleinput}
diff(f(x,y),x,y,x) = diff(diff(diff(f(x,y),x),y),x);
\end{mapleinput}
\begin{maplelatex}
\[
{\frac {{ \partial}^{3}}{{ \partial}{y}\,{ \partial}{x}^{2}}}\,
{\rm f}(\,{x}, {y}\,)={\frac {{ \partial}^{3}}{{ \partial}{y}\,{ 
\partial}{x}^{2}}}\,{\rm f}(\,{x}, {y}\,)
\]
\end{maplelatex}
\begin{mapleinput}
D[1,2,1](f) = D[1](D[2](D[1](f)));
\end{mapleinput}
\begin{maplettyout}
\end{maplettyout}
\begin{maplelatex}
\[
{{D}_{1, 1, 2}}(\,{f}\,)={{D}_{1, 1, 2}}(\,{f}\,)
\]
\end{maplelatex}

In Maple, the \mexpr{D} operator is an ordinary Maple procedure.
When we input \mexpr{D[1,2,1](f)}, what happens?
If \mexpr{D} was an array or table then the entry \mexpr{D[1,2,1]}
would be applied to $f$.  In the case of a procedure, what happens
is that it is called with the given arguments and inside
the procedure the $procname$ variable's value will be the subscript.
In our example, \mexpr{D} is called with $f$ as an argument
and the value of $procname$ will be \mexpr{D[1,2,1]}.
The \mexpr{D} code sorts the indices (assumes partial derivatives commute)
and returns \mexpr{D[1,1,2](f)} unevaluated.
This subscripted function calling facility is new in Maple V.
It is also used for the log function for different bases.
For example, \mexpr{log[b](x)} means $\log _b x$ i.e. logarithm base $b$ of $x$.

One of the main reasons why Maple has a \mexpr{D} operator as well
as a \mexpr{diff} procedure is because it is not possible to specify $y'(0)$ using
\mexpr{diff}.  Maple users reading this article might think of
using the Maple \mexpr{subs} procedure e.g. \mexpr{subs(x=0,diff(sin(x),x))}.
This works if Maple can actually differentiate the function
but it will not work for an unknown function $y$.
Being able to represent $y'(0)$ simply as $D(y)(0)$ motivated the
introduction of operators, in particular the \mexpr{D} operator in Maple.
This notation is used to specify the initial conditions for the
\mexpr{dsolve} procedure, which solves systems of ODE's,
replacing an earlier defunct notation $yp(0), ypp(0), \ldots$
It is also used in series; for example, here is the
Taylor series for an unknown function $f$ to order $O(x^6)$

\begin{mapleinput}
taylor(f(x),x);
\end{mapleinput}
\begin{maplettyout}
\end{maplettyout}
\begin{maplelatex}
\begin{eqnarray*}
\lefteqn{{\rm f}(\,0\,) + {\rm D}(\,{f}\,)(\,0\,)\,{x} + 
{\displaystyle \frac {1}{2}}\,{D}^{(\,2\,)}(\,{f}\,)(\,0\,)\,{x}
^{2} + {\displaystyle \frac {1}{6}}\,{D}^{(\,3\,)}(\,{f}\,)(\,0\,
)\,{x}^{3} + {\displaystyle \frac {1}{24}}\,{D}^{(\,4\,)}(\,{f}\,
)(\,0\,)\,{x}^{4} + } \\
 & & {\displaystyle \frac {1}{120}}\,{D}^{(\,5\,)}(\,{f}\,)(\,0\,
)\,{x}^{5} + {\rm O}(\,{x}^{6}\,)\mbox{\hspace{200pt}}
\end{eqnarray*}
\end{maplelatex}
And here is a multivariate Taylor series to third order.

\begin{mapleinput}
readlib(mtaylor); # load the multivariate series package
\end{mapleinput}
\begin{maplelatex}
\end{maplelatex}
\begin{maplettyout}
proc() ... end

\end{maplettyout}
\begin{mapleinput}
mtaylor(f(x,y),[x,y],3);
\end{mapleinput}
\begin{maplettyout}
\end{maplettyout}
\begin{maplelatex}
\begin{eqnarray*}
\lefteqn{{\rm f}(\,0, 0\,) + {{D}_{1}}(\,{f}\,)(\,0, 0\,)\,{x} + 
{{D}_{2}}(\,{f}\,)(\,0, 0\,)\,{y} + {\displaystyle \frac {1}{2}}
\,{{D}_{1, 1}}(\,{f}\,)(\,0, 0\,)\,{x}^{2} + {x}\,{{D}_{1, 2}}(\,
{f}\,)(\,0, 0\,)\,{y}} \\
 & & \mbox{} + {\displaystyle \frac {1}{2}}\,{{D}_{2, 2}}(\,{f}\,
)(\,0, 0\,)\,{y}^{2}\mbox{\hspace{250pt}}
\end{eqnarray*}
\end{maplelatex}

\newpage
Without use of the \mexpr{D} operator it would be difficult to apply
the chain rule to unknown functions.  For example, we have

\begin{mapleinput}
diff(f(x^2),x);
\end{mapleinput}
\begin{maplettyout}
\end{maplettyout}
\begin{maplelatex}
\[
2\,{\rm D}(\,{f}\,)(\,{x}^{2}\,)\,{x}
\]
\end{maplelatex}
\begin{mapleinput}
diff(f(x^2,x*y),x);
\end{mapleinput}
\begin{maplettyout}
\end{maplettyout}
\begin{maplelatex}
\[
2\,{{D}_{1}}(\,{f}\,)(\,{x}^{2}, {y}\,{x}\,)\,{x} + {{D}_{2}}(\,{
f}\,)(\,{x}^{2}, {y}\,{x}\,)\,{y}
\]
\end{maplelatex}
\begin{mapleinput}
D(f@g);
\end{mapleinput}
\begin{maplettyout}
\end{maplettyout}
\begin{maplelatex}
\[
{\rm D}(\,{f}\,){\rm @}{g}\,{\rm D}(\,{g}\,)
\]
\end{maplelatex}
There are distinct advantages to manipulating mappings as if
they were expressions.  The following example illustrates implicit
differentiation of $y$ as a function of $x$.
Given the equation

\begin{mapleinput}
eq := y^2*x + y^3*x^2 + y + 3*x = 0;
\end{mapleinput}
\begin{maplelatex}
\[
{\it eq} := {y}^{2}\,{x} + {y}^{3}\,{x}^{2} + {y} + 3\,{x}=0
\]
\end{maplelatex}
we can regard $x$ and $y$ as arbitrary mappings.  Then applying
\mexpr{D} to both sides of the equation we have

\begin{mapleinput}
map(D,eq);
\end{mapleinput}
\begin{maplettyout}
\end{maplettyout}
\begin{maplelatex}
\[
2\,{\rm D}(\,{y}\,)\,{y}\,{x} + {y}^{2}\,{\rm D}(\,{x}\,) + 3\,
{\rm D}(\,{y}\,)\,{y}^{2}\,{x}^{2} + 2\,{y}^{3}\,{\rm D}(\,{x}\,)
\,{x} + {\rm D}(\,{y}\,) + 3\,{\rm D}(\,{x}\,)=0
\]
\end{maplelatex}
This equation can be interpreted in many different ways.  For example,
it can be solved to obtain a formula for $D(y)$
\begin{mapleinput}
D(y) = solve(",D(y));
\end{mapleinput}
\begin{maplettyout}
\end{maplettyout}
\begin{maplelatex}
\[
{\rm D}(\,{y}\,)= - \,{\displaystyle \frac {{y}^{2}\,{\rm D}(\,{x
}\,) + 2\,{y}^{3}\,{\rm D}(\,{x}\,)\,{x} + 3\,{\rm D}(\,{x}\,)}{2
\,{y}\,{x} + 3\,{y}^{2}\,{x}^{2} + 1}}
\]
\end{maplelatex}
while the interpretation that $x$ is an independent variable can
be indicated by the substitution
\begin{mapleinput}
subs(D(x)=1,");
\end{mapleinput}
\begin{maplettyout}
\end{maplettyout}
\begin{maplelatex}
\[
{\rm D}(\,{y}\,)= - \,{\displaystyle \frac {{y}^{2} + 2\,{y}^{3}
\,{x} + 3}{2\,{y}\,{x} + 3\,{y}^{2}\,{x}^{2} + 1}}
\]
\end{maplelatex}

Earlier we mentioned that application of a mapping to a symbolic
variable yields a formula.  And hence the identity
\mexpr{D(f)(x) = diff(f(x),x)}.  For example

\begin{mapleinput}
F := sin+cos^2;
\end{mapleinput}
\begin{maplelatex}
\[
{F} := {\rm sin} + {\rm cos}^{2}
\]
\end{maplelatex}
\begin{mapleinput}
F(x);
\end{mapleinput}
\begin{maplelatex}
\[
{\rm sin}(\,{x}\,) + {\rm cos}(\,{x}\,)^{2}
\]
\end{maplelatex}
\begin{mapleinput}
diff(F(x),x) - D(F)(x);
\end{mapleinput}
\begin{maplelatex}
\[
0
\]
\end{maplelatex}

Given the formula, how can we get back the mapping $F$?
This is called {\em lambda abstraction} in the language of lambda calculus.
In Maple it is called \mexpr{unapply} because it
is the inverse of application, that is, it takes a formula and returns
a mapping. For example

\begin{mapleinput}
G := unapply(F(x),x);
\end{mapleinput}
\begin{maplelatex}
\[
{G} := {x} \rightarrow {\rm sin}(\,{x}\,) + {\rm cos}(\,{x}\,)^{2
}
\]
\end{maplelatex}
is a mapping in the form of a Maple procedure equivalent to 
\mexpr{proc(x) sin(x)+cos(x)^2 end:} except it has been
displayed using a more succinct format, 
known as arrow operators.  The arrow notation above is used often in algebra.
This new notation is essentially equivalent to Maple's
older angle bracket notation

\begin{mapleinput}
<sin(x)+cos(x)^2|x>;
\end{mapleinput}
\begin{maplelatex}
\[
 \langle {\rm sin}(\,{x}\,) + {\rm cos}(\,{x}\,)^{2}\,{ \mid}\,{x
} \rangle 
\]
\end{maplelatex}
differing only in how the procedure is entered and displayed.

Another notation for functions that is used often in applied mathematics
is the $F(x)=sin(x)+cos(x)^2$ notation.  In Maple one might use
\mexpr{F(x):=sin(x)+cos(x)^2}, but this already has a meaning in Maple (which
unfortunately is different) and this does lead to confusion.
The meaning of \mexpr{F(x):=y} is to enter the entry $(x,y)$ in $F$'s remember
table so that when $F$ is called with the literal symbol
$x$, $y$ is returned.  It is rather like making $F$ work like a table
of values.

\section{Equivalence of Mappings}

Notice though, that \mexpr{unapply} did not return the mapping
in the same {\em form} $F$ that we started with.
This raises another question, namely, given two mappings, how could one
test if they are the same?  Users are familiar with the problem of testing
whether two formulae are the same.  For example, suppose we are
given the two formulae

\begin{mapleinput}
f1 := sin(x)+cos(x)^2:
f2 := sin(x)+cos(2*x)/2+1/2:
\end{mapleinput}

How would we test whether $f_1 = f_2$?  This is the problem of
simplification, or zero recognition.
In Maple, one would use the expand (or simplify) function as follows

\begin{mapleinput}
expand(f1-f2);
\end{mapleinput}
\begin{maplelatex}
\[
0
\]
\end{maplelatex}

In this case, expand applies the transformation $cos(2 x) = 2 cos(x)^2 - 1$
hence recognizing that $f_1 = f_2$.
But what about mappings?

\begin{mapleinput}
expand(eval(G));
\end{mapleinput}
\begin{maplelatex}
\[
{\rm sin} + {\rm cos}^{2}
\]
\end{maplelatex}

Expand tries to write an arrow (or angle bracket)
operator as an algebraic combination of other mappings, in this case
allowing us to recognize that $F$ and $G$ are effectively
the same mapping.

\begin{mapleinput}
expand(F-eval(G));
\end{mapleinput}
\begin{maplelatex}
\[
0
\]
\end{maplelatex}

Maple can differentiate those arrow operators too, even
in their unexpanded form.

\begin{mapleinput}
D(G);
\end{mapleinput}
\begin{maplettyout}
\end{maplettyout}
\begin{maplelatex}
\[
{x} \rightarrow {\rm cos}(\,{x}\,) - 2\,{\rm cos}(\,{x}\,)\,{\rm 
sin}(\,{x}\,)
\]
\end{maplelatex}

\section{Notational Equivalence and Conversions}

Two important identities relating \mexpr{D} and
\mexpr{diff} are \mexpr{D(f)(x)} = \mexpr{diff(f(x),x)} (and its
multiviate counterpart), and \mexpr{D(f)} = \mexpr{unapply(diff(f(x),x))}.
When two notations are involved for essentially the same
expression, it is essential to be able to convert from
one notation to the other.  For example

\begin{mapleinput}
diff(f(x),x);
\end{mapleinput}
\begin{maplelatex}
\[
{\frac {{ \partial}}{{ \partial}{x}}}\,{\rm f}(\,{x}\,)
\]
\end{maplelatex}
\begin{mapleinput}
convert(",D);
\end{mapleinput}
\begin{maplettyout}
\end{maplettyout}
\begin{maplelatex}
\[
{\rm D}(\,{f}\,)(\,{x}\,)
\]
\end{maplelatex}
\begin{mapleinput}
unapply(",x);
\end{mapleinput}
\begin{maplettyout}
\end{maplettyout}
\begin{maplelatex}
\[
{\rm D}(\,{f}\,)
\]
\end{maplelatex}

\section{Algorithmic Differentiation}

The use of arrow operators, or more generally, arbitrary procedures
leads us to the interesting problem of program differentiation.
Consider the function $f$ defined by the following Maple procedure

\begin{mapleinput}
f := proc(x) local s,t; s := sin(x); t := x^2; s*t+2*t end:
\end{mapleinput}

\vspace{1mm}
What is its derivative?
We could compute its value as a formula and differentiate
the formula.

\begin{mapleinput}
f(x);
\end{mapleinput}
\begin{maplelatex}
\[
{\rm sin}(\,{x}\,)\,{x}^{2} + 2\,{x}^{2}
\]
\end{maplelatex}
\begin{mapleinput}
diff(",x);
\end{mapleinput}
\begin{maplelatex}
\[
{\rm cos}(\,{x}\,)\,{x}^{2} + 2\,{\rm sin}(\,{x}\,)\,{x} + 4\,{x}
\]
\end{maplelatex}

The Maple V Release 2 Share Library%
\footnote{Information about the Share Library
is included in the {\em News and Announcements} section.}
introduced a facility for differentiating programs.  This has
since been incoporated into Release 3 and is accessible directly
as
\begin{mapleinput}
PD := readlib('`PD/PD`'):
\end{mapleinput}
The \mexpr{PD} procedure takes as input a Maple procedure $f$ which
is a function of $n$ parameters, and a positive integer $i$, and it returns
a Maple procedure which computes the partial derivative of $f$ with
respect to the $i^{th}$ parameter.
For example

\begin{mapleinput}
g := PD(f,1);
\end{mapleinput}
\begin{maplelatex}
\end{maplelatex}
\begin{maplettyout}
g := proc(x)
     local s,t,sx,tx;
         sx := cos(x); s := sin(x); tx := 2*x; t := x^2; sx*t+s*tx+2*tx
     end

\end{maplettyout}
Does the procedure $g$ really compute $f'$?
In this case we can \emph{prove} that it does by executing the procedure
on symbolic parameters, in effect converting the function represented
by the procedure into a formula.

\begin{mapleinput}
diff(f(x),x) - g(x);
\end{mapleinput}
\begin{maplelatex}
\[
0
\]
\end{maplelatex}

Clearly one couldn't do this if a procedure had a conditional
statement involving the formal parameter $x$ and one called the procedure
with a symbolic parameter,  but
under what conditions could one differentiate a 
procedure involving more than just an expression?
For example, can this be done
if the procedure had loops or subroutine calls?
It turns out that the answer to this question is, surprisingly, yes.
And moreover, there exists a very simple algorithm for computing the
derivative of a procedure or a program.

To construct the derivative procedure,
for each assignment statement $v := f(v_1, \ldots , v_n)$ that appears
in the procedure, where the $v_i$ are local variables or formal parameters,
precede it by $v_x := g(v_1, \ldots , v_n)$ where
$g(v_1, \ldots , v_n)$ is obtained by differentiating $f(v_1, \ldots , v_n)$
formally.  That is, $v_i$ may depend on $x$, hence its derivative
will be $v_{i_x}$.
Replace the last statement (or any RETURN value) by its derivative.
This very simple algorithm is called ``forward differentiation''.
There is actually quite a lot of literature on this subject. Many different
algorithms, and quite a number of implementations have been
written to differentiate Fortran code.
For a good reference see {\cite {PROCEEDINGS}}, which also contains a
fairly complete bibliography on algorithmic differentiation.

Here is an example which illustrates the power of algorithmic
differentiation.
In this example, the use of a loop allows us to represent
a very large formula in a very compact way.
There is a theoretical gain here.  In general, a function that can
be represented by a formula can be represented by a program
in an exponentially more compact way by using local variables and loops.

\begin{mapleinput}
f := proc(x,n) local i,t;
     t := x;
     for i to n do t := ln(t) od;
     t
end:
g := PD(f,1,2); # compute D(D(f))
\end{mapleinput}
\begin{maplelatex}
\end{maplelatex}
\begin{maplettyout}
g := proc(x,n)
     local tx,i,t,txx;
         txx := 0;
         tx := 1;
         t := x;
         for i to n do  txx := txx/t-tx^2/t^2; tx := tx/t; t := ln(t) od;
         txx
     end

\end{maplettyout}

Another nice theoretical result is that the size of the resulting
program which computes the derivative is linear in the size of the
original program.  In fact, in most cases, it is not much bigger.
What can algorithmic differentiation be used for?
In numerical computation, one often is given a function $f:R^N \rightarrow R$,
where $f$ is given by a program, rather than an analytic formula.
The standard fast methods for computing the zeros
of $f$ or the extrema require the derivatives of $f$.
An example is given in the article \emph{The Billiard Problem}
in this issue, by Walter Gander and Dominik Gruntz, where a Newton
iteration is used to find the zeroes of a function.

Here is another example where we are given a function which
evaluates a polynomial input as an array of coefficients using Horner's
rule and we compute its derivative.

\begin{mapleinput}
f := proc(x,b,n) local i,s;
    # the array b represents the polynomial b = sum( b[i]*x^i, i=0..n )
    s := 0;
    for i from n by -1 to 0 do s := s*x+b[i]; od;
    s
end:
g := PD(f,1);
\end{mapleinput}
\begin{maplelatex}
\end{maplelatex}
\begin{maplettyout}
g := proc(x,b,n)
     local i,s,sx;
         sx := 0;
         s := 0;
         for i from n by -1 to 0 do  sx := sx*x+s; s := s*x+b[i] od;
         sx
     end

\end{maplettyout}

It may not be apparent from these examples, but the difficult
part of algorithmic differentiation is program optimization.
This is because differentiation produces redundant computation.
For example, repeatedly differentiating formulae results in
lots of repeated common subexpressions.  And, when computing partial
derivatives, a lot of zeroes may result.
Thus two of the main focuses of algorithmic differentiation is
to avoid as much of this redundancy as possible and 
do program optimization.
We are presently working on extending Maple's capabilities for
differentiating procedures to compute gradients and jacobians,
and improving the optimization of the resulting procedures.

\begin{thebibliography}{10}

\bibitem{MUC84}
Michael Wester and Stanly Steinberg,
A Survey of Symbolic Differentiation Implementations,
\emph{Proceedings of the 1984 MACSYMA Users' Conference},
Schenectady NY, (1984).

\bibitem{OPERATORS}
Gaston Gonnet,
An Implementation of Operators for Symbolic Algebra Systems,
\emph{Proceedings of the 1986 Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Computations},
Symsac `86, ACM, (1986).

\bibitem{PROCEEDINGS}
Automatic Differentiation of Algorithms: Theory, Implementation
and Application, SIAM, Philadelphia 1991.
\textit{Proceedings of the SIAM Workshop on Automatic Differentiation},
Breckenridge, CO, (1991).

\end{thebibliography}

\end{document}