diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'usergrps/uktug/baskervi/6_2/bv62ed.tex')
-rw-r--r-- | usergrps/uktug/baskervi/6_2/bv62ed.tex | 61 |
1 files changed, 61 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/usergrps/uktug/baskervi/6_2/bv62ed.tex b/usergrps/uktug/baskervi/6_2/bv62ed.tex new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..aa0b4f6fd9 --- /dev/null +++ b/usergrps/uktug/baskervi/6_2/bv62ed.tex @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ + +\title{Editorial} +%\author[\mbox{}]{Malcolm Clark} +\begin{article} +As you will have gathered from the last edition +of \BV, the editorship of this august organ +now rotates around the luckless committee. Whoever +fails to avoid our esteemed chair's eye (Robin Fairbairns +in Ancient Mariner mode) is deemed (or doomed) to serve. +It is a demanding , but fascinating experience. +With the resource of the rest of the committee to call on, +nothing is insuperable. In the longer term it will build up +a pool of expertise which can only be to the good. +You begin to appreciate the Rahtz' triplets even more. + +Sourcing material has not been difficult +for this edition, since we are currently +in the throes of two series -- David Carlisle's +tour of \LaTeX, and Sebastian Rahtz' \textsf{PSTricks} +exposition. In +addition I had an abundance of riches +and ended up having to pass on material. This +does not imply that we do not continue to crave +articles. Looking back over recent issues, +the same faces\slash names pop up over and over +again, although one or two contributors have +sadly fallen by the wayside -- perhaps exhausted +by the strain of composition. + +I was pleased with David Carlisle's +other article, neatly solving +a problem raised and discussed at last year's +Bridewell meeting on Portable Documents -- typesetting +from HTML documents. Robin Fairbairns' article on +\CTAN\ is a welcome review and state of the art, together +with some aspirations for the future. These two papers derive from the recent +\textsl{\TeX\ and the Internet} meeting. It is unlikely +that the group's meetings will generate enough +material to fill these pages, so let me paraphrase what I said +earlier: ``we need your contributions''. +The observant will also note that committee +members continue to generate many of the articles, but +by way of contradiction, I'm pleased to welcome +Mark Wooding to the pantheon of stars. +In my darker moods, I wonder whether \BV\ is merely +an ego trip for its writers (i.e.\ mainly the committee) and +is unread by its intended readership -- yourselves. +Is it wise to ask such questions? + +As a partial answer, let me note that +a pleasing feature of this edition (for me) is that +I open it (with the editorial), and close it +(with the \textsl{Gleanings}, whose final year you may be +relieved to know this is). + +I am indebted, as ever, but in particular for assistance +with this edition to Robin Fairbairns (whose tele-presence +was invaluable), David Carlisle and +Sebastian Rahtz. Theirs is the glory, mine are the errors and +misunderstandings. +\end{article} |