summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/usergrps/uktug/baskervi/5_2/taylor2.tex
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'usergrps/uktug/baskervi/5_2/taylor2.tex')
-rw-r--r--usergrps/uktug/baskervi/5_2/taylor2.tex21
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/usergrps/uktug/baskervi/5_2/taylor2.tex b/usergrps/uktug/baskervi/5_2/taylor2.tex
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..bff037ce7e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/usergrps/uktug/baskervi/5_2/taylor2.tex
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+\title{Letters to the editor 3: \textsc{Dante}}
+\author[Philip Taylor]{Philip Taylor\\RHBNC;\\
+Technical Director, NTS project}
+\begin{Article}
+At the end of the first paragraph of ``Malcolm's Gleanings'',
+the author urges readers to `Expunge \ldots from your minds [the
+malicious and/or mischievous gossip that ``\textsc{Dante} was reluctant to
+support Haralambous' and Plaice's Omega project since it was
+thought to compete with NTS'']'. Despite having a close and
+mutually beneficial relationship with \textsc{Dante}, such allegations
+were completely new to me, as I suspect they were to the majority
+if not all of your readers: one must therefore ask at whose door
+these allegations of malice or mischief should properly be laid?
+
+I would further add that I know of no-one, either within \textsc{Dante}
+or within the NTS team, who would wish John and Yannis anything less than
+complete success with their project; the world will be enriched,
+not diminished, by the availability of alternative derivatives of \TeX.
+
+Yours etc.
+\end{Article}