summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/support/texlab/src/snapshots/texlab__citation__tests__biblatex_examples_010.snap
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'support/texlab/src/snapshots/texlab__citation__tests__biblatex_examples_010.snap')
-rw-r--r--support/texlab/src/snapshots/texlab__citation__tests__biblatex_examples_010.snap6
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/support/texlab/src/snapshots/texlab__citation__tests__biblatex_examples_010.snap b/support/texlab/src/snapshots/texlab__citation__tests__biblatex_examples_010.snap
deleted file mode 100644
index 09e341c790..0000000000
--- a/support/texlab/src/snapshots/texlab__citation__tests__biblatex_examples_010.snap
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
----
-source: src/citation.rs
-assertion_line: 348
-expression: "render_simple(r#\"\n@string{jchph = {J.~Chem. Phys.}}\n\n@article{kastenholz,\n author = {Kastenholz, M. A. and H{\\\"u}nenberger, Philippe H.},\n title = {Computation of methodology\\hyphen independent ionic solvation\n free energies from molecular simulations},\n journaltitle = jchph,\n date = 2006,\n subtitle = {{I}. {The} electrostatic potential in molecular liquids},\n volume = 124,\n eid = 124106,\n doi = {10.1063/1.2172593},\n langid = {english},\n langidopts = {variant=american},\n indextitle = {Computation of ionic solvation free energies},\n annotation = {An \\texttt{article} entry with an \\texttt{eid} and a\n \\texttt{doi} field. Note that the \\textsc{doi} is transformed\n into a clickable link if \\texttt{hyperref} support has been\n enabled},\n abstract = {The computation of ionic solvation free energies from\n atomistic simulations is a surprisingly difficult problem that\n has found no satisfactory solution for more than 15 years. The\n reason is that the charging free energies evaluated from such\n simulations are affected by very large errors. One of these is\n related to the choice of a specific convention for summing up\n the contributions of solvent charges to the electrostatic\n potential in the ionic cavity, namely, on the basis of point\n charges within entire solvent molecules (M scheme) or on the\n basis of individual point charges (P scheme). The use of an\n inappropriate convention may lead to a charge-independent\n offset in the calculated potential, which depends on the\n details of the summation scheme, on the quadrupole-moment\n trace of the solvent molecule, and on the approximate form\n used to represent electrostatic interactions in the\n system. However, whether the M or P scheme (if any) represents\n the appropriate convention is still a matter of on-going\n debate. The goal of the present article is to settle this\n long-standing controversy by carefully analyzing (both\n analytically and numerically) the properties of the\n electrostatic potential in molecular liquids (and inside\n cavities within them).}, \n}\"#)"
----
-Kastenholz, M. A., & Hünenberger, Philippe H. (n.d.). Computation of methodology\\hyphen independent ionic solvation free energies from molecular simulations: I. The electrostatic potential in molecular liquids. *J. Chem. Phys.*, *124*. [https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2172593](https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2172593)