diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'macros/plain/contrib/lextex/example1.tex')
-rw-r--r-- | macros/plain/contrib/lextex/example1.tex | 215 |
1 files changed, 215 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/macros/plain/contrib/lextex/example1.tex b/macros/plain/contrib/lextex/example1.tex new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..4f673d6aec --- /dev/null +++ b/macros/plain/contrib/lextex/example1.tex @@ -0,0 +1,215 @@ +% This is a demonstration file, intended to show what LeXTeX does. +% The method of processing it depends upon whether you have turned +% LeXTeX into a format file or not. If you have not you should type +% +% TEX &PLAIN EXAMPLE1 +% +% If LeXTeX has been converted into a format file the command is +% TEX &LEXTEX EXAMPLE1 +% +% In the latter case the line further down which reads +% "\input lextex" can be deleted although leaving it alone will +% not cause any problem. +% +% In TeX everything that follows a percent sign (%) is a comment. +% As a result, these lines will not show up in the final +% printed document. +% You can, of course, amend the file in whatever way you choose +% (although some amnedments are likely to have odd effects) +% +% The next few lines provide some information used in processing +% the file. The command \bstitle need only be used when formatting +% an Opinion or a draft in a non-litigious matter. It sets the +% title to be used on the backsheet. +% +% \solsref is the Solicitors' internal refererence. +% +% \colsref is the ACE case reference, omitting Counsel's initials. +% +% (These will be set by the command \col{XYZ} in the rhlocal.tex +% file which accompanies LeXTeX. The signature at the end is +% produced by the command \counsel{JOHN SMITH} in the same file.) +% +% The remaining commands provide information to the Clerks for +% charging purposes. +% +% It may be found useful to keep a copy of these commands in a +% separate file or in a macro. +% +% Note that in the clauses which follow various commands are +% surrounded by vertical bar characters (|). Do not type +% these bars. They are there simply to enable the command name +% to be printed in the file instead of being interpeted +% by LeXTeX. + + +\input lextex +\bstitle{} +\solsref{} +\colsref{SUEGRA/2} % Omit Counsel's initials +\timetaken{} % hours \casetype{} +\value{} % omit pound sign +\difficulty{} % out of 10 +\proposedfee{} % omit pound sign +\legalaidno{} +\comment{} + +% The next command tells LeXTeX that the case is in the Chancery +% Division. It can be altered to \qb or \family. It can also be +% given the full (or partial) case reference, eg \ch{1991 X 1234} +% or \qb{1989}. + +\ch + +\plaintiff{ANTHONY ARCHER} + +\plaintiff{JOSEPH GRUNDY} + +\defendant{BRIAN ALDRIDGE} + +\defendant{JENNIFER ALDRIDGE} +\defendant{FRED BLOGS} + +\writ + +\cl This file is intended to demonstrate various things, +such as the way in which the names and addresses of the +parties are formatted. If the command |\writ| immediately +above this clause is changed to |\os| the file will be +formatted as an Originating Summons. + +\cl The addresses of the parties will be left blank in the +writ or originating summons. If they are know they can be +inserted by using the command |\of{Brookfield Farm, +Ambridge}|. Two parties having the same address can be linked +by the word |\and|; this will, as might be expected, insert +``and'' between their names. If there are, say, three +parties having the same address the first two can be linked +by |\nand| and the second and third by |\and|. (The macros +which achieve this are not yet perfect, however.) If one +address is given, then an address must be given for all +parties, even if it takes the form |\of{\noaddr}|. + + +\cl \TeX\ can produce various accents, although there are +not, of course, many accented English words. Here are a few +accents. Pr\^et \`a na\"\i ve. + +\cl The Plaintiffs were induced to enter into an agreement +by the representation of the Defendants that the Defendants +had an account at the Borchester Branch of B.C.C.I. from +which a certain sum would be paid. The representation was +implied by the drawing of a cheque by the Defendants. The +representation was untrue in that the Defendants had no such +account. The representation was made falsely and +fraudulently by the Defendants in order to induce the +Plaintiffs to deliver a motor car to the Defendants. This +paragraph has been adapted from Volume~39 of \bo Atkin's +Court Forms\ok and is as such is no doubt copyright +(\copyright) Butterworths. + +\cl Note that one of the items set out at the top of the +file and referred to above is |\colsref{SUEGRA/2}|. This is +the case reference as it appears in the ACE accounting +system. \LeXTeX\ extracts Sue Grabbit \& Runne's name and +address from a file and inserts it into the proper place in +this document. Note that |SUEGRA| must be in capitals and +that the initials of the Counsel concerned are set in the +|RHLOCAL| file which accompanies \LeXTeX. + +\cl If this is an Originating Summons then of course the +next command should be removed. + +\claim + +\cl An Order that the Defendants should do something or +other + +\cl Liberty to apply + +\cl Costs + +\amended\soc + +\cl The command |\soc| produceds a Statement of Claim. If it +is changed to, for example, |\defence| the format of the +document will change. (Note that if a Writ and a Defence are +inclided in the same file \LeXTeX\ may become slightly confused +as to which party you are acting.) The command |\amended| +produces an amended Statement of Claim or other document. + +\cl The \forwhom\ \wants\ that the statements of the +\notforwhom\ are a load of piffle. (It is not, of course, +normal to use {\tt\string\forwhom}, {\tt\string\notforwhom} +and {\tt\string\wants} in this way; you are expected to +know for whom you act.) + +\cl How about an accent or two? Pr\^et \`a na\"\i ve. + +\cl The Plaintiffs were induced to enter into an agreement +by the representation of the Defendants that the Defendants +had an account at the Borchester Branch of B.C.C.I. from +which a certain sum would be paid. {\xo The representation +was implied by the drawing of a cheque by the Defendants.} +{\ul The representation was contained in a letter from the +Defendants to the Plaintiffs dated the 20th July 1991.} The +representation was untrue in that the Defendants had no such +account. The representation was made falsely and +fraudulently by the Defendants in order to induce the +Plaintiffs to deliver a motor car to the Defendants. This +paragraph has been adapted from Volume~39 of \bo Atkin's +Court Forms\ok and is as such no doubt copyright +(\copyright) Butterworths. + +{\ul\acl This is an additional clause + +\acl This is another} + +\claim + +\cl An Order that the Defendants should do something or +other + +\cl Liberty to apply + +\cl Costs + +\deponent{JACK WOOLEY} + \of{Gray Gables, Ambridge, Borchester} + \occupation{Hotel Proprietor} + +\affidavit + +\cl The command |\deponent| must precede the command +|\affidavit|. The commands |\of{[address]}| and +|\occupation{[Occupation]}| are optional; if they are +omitted a suitable comment will be added. + +\cl I am the owner of the above-mentioned hotel. + +\cl There is now \exhibited the Conveyance of it to me dated +the 1st April 1955. Note that the exhibits are automatically +numbered by the cfommand |\exhibited| and the similar +command |\bundled|. + +\cl The accounts for the last five years are now \bundled. + +\cl If an affidavit is the only document in the file \LeXTeX\ +will assume that it is to be filed on behalf of the +Defendant(s). If this is not the case it should be preceded +by the command |\clientpltrue|. + +\cl This paragraph is included simply to bulk things out a +little bit so that the affidavit extends over onto the next +page. + +\opinion +I have settled the appropriate documents for the +consideration of my Instructing Solicitors. I have no +comments to make on them. + +To change this Opinion into an Advice, simply change |\opinion| +at the top of the file to |\advice|. + +\bye + |