summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/macros/latex/required/tools/array.dtx
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'macros/latex/required/tools/array.dtx')
-rw-r--r--macros/latex/required/tools/array.dtx31
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 16 deletions
diff --git a/macros/latex/required/tools/array.dtx b/macros/latex/required/tools/array.dtx
index 5590b0a136..acfa560937 100644
--- a/macros/latex/required/tools/array.dtx
+++ b/macros/latex/required/tools/array.dtx
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
% \iffalse meta-comment
%
-% Copyright (C) 1993-2019
+% Copyright (C) 1993-2020
%
% The LaTeX3 Project and any individual authors listed elsewhere
% in this file.
@@ -284,7 +284,7 @@
% \hline\hline
% w\{align\}\{width\} & Sets the cell content in a box of the
% specified \texttt{width} aligned according to
-% the \texttt{align} parameter which could be
+% the \texttt{align} parameter which could be
% either \texttt{l}, \texttt{c} or
% \texttt{r}. Works essentially like
% =\makebox[=width=][=align=]{=cell=}= so
@@ -633,10 +633,10 @@
% \texttt{m}. As a result that cell was vertically centered with that
% space inside, resulting in a strange offset. Since 2.4f, this space
% is now added after centering the cell.
-%
+%
% A similar problem happened when "\extrarowheight" was used. For that
% reason m-cells now manually position the cell content which
-% allows to ignore this extra space request during the vertical aligment.
+% allows to ignore this extra space request during the vertical aligment.
%
%
% \subsection{Bugs and Features}
@@ -1323,7 +1323,7 @@
% \changes{v2.4f}{2017/11/04}{Managing m-cells without \cs{vcenter}}
% \begin{macrocode}
% \let\do@row@strut\relax
-% \let\ar@align@mcell\relax
+% \let\ar@align@mcell\relax
% \end{macrocode}
% Now we remove possible $*$-forms in the user preamble with the
% command =\@xexpast=. As we already know, this command saves
@@ -1551,7 +1551,7 @@
\hfil
% \end{macrocode}
% We also add a space of 1sp just in case the first thing in the
-% cell is a command doing an =\unskip=.
+% cell is a command doing an =\unskip=.
% \changes{v2.4k}{2018/12/30}{Add extra \cs{hskip} to guard against an
% \cs{unskip} at the start of a c-column cell (gh/102)}
% \begin{macrocode}
@@ -1604,7 +1604,7 @@
% mode. Therefore we start with a~=$=.
% \changes{v2.4f}{2017/11/04}{Managing m-cells without \cs{vcenter}}
% \begin{macrocode}
- \setbox\ar@mcellbox\vbox
+ \setbox\ar@mcellbox\vbox
% \end{macrocode}
% The part of the templates which is the same in all three cases
% (\texttt{p}, \texttt{m} and \texttt{b})
@@ -1618,7 +1618,7 @@
% \changes{v2.4e}{2016/10/07}{Fixing SX68732}
% \changes{v2.4f}{2017/11/04}{Managing m-cells without \cs{vcenter}}
% \begin{macrocode}
- \@startpbox{\@nextchar}\insert@column \@endpbox
+ \@startpbox{\@nextchar}\insert@column \@endpbox
\ar@align@mcell
\do@row@strut \or
% \end{macrocode}
@@ -2296,7 +2296,7 @@
% environments (via =\multicolumn=) are impossible.
% For 25 years or so =\@halignto= was set globally (to save space on the
% save stack, but that was a mistake: if there is a tabular in the
-% output routine (e.g., in the running header) then that tabular is
+% output routine (e.g., in the running header) then that tabular is
% able overwrite the =\@halignto=
% setting of a tabular in the main text resulting in a very weird error.
% \changes{v2.4d}{2016/10/06}{\cs{@halignto} set locally (pr/4488)}
@@ -2613,7 +2613,7 @@
% it is the equivalent of the primitive "\show" command for macro
% definitions. All we need to do is locally redefine "\NC@do" to take
% its argument (say `C') and then "\show" the (slightly modified)
-% definition of "\NC@rewrite@C". Actually as the the list always
+% definition of "\NC@rewrite@C". Actually as the list always
% starts off with "\NC@do *" and we do not want to print the
% definition of the $*$-form, define "\NC@do" to throw away the first
% item in the list, and then redefine itself to print the rest of the
@@ -2729,9 +2729,9 @@
% \changes{v2.4f}{2017/11/04}{Managing m-cells without \cs{vcenter}}
% \begin{macrocode}
\def\@mkpream#1{\gdef\@preamble{}\@lastchclass 4 \@firstamptrue
- \let\@sharp\relax
+ \let\@sharp\relax
% \end{macrocode}
-%
+%
% \changes{v2.4j}{2018/11/13}{Do not expand argument of
% \cs{@startpbox} while building the tabular preamble (sx/459285)}
% The "\@startpbox" (which is called for "p", "m" or "b" columns)
@@ -2747,7 +2747,7 @@
\def\@startpbox##1{\unexpanded\expandafter{\expandafter
\@startpbox\expandafter{##1}}}\let\@endpbox\relax
\let\do@row@strut\relax
- \let\ar@align@mcell\relax
+ \let\ar@align@mcell\relax
% \end{macrocode}
% Now we remove possible $*$-forms and user-defined column
% specifiers in the user preamble by repeatedly executing the list
@@ -2953,7 +2953,7 @@
%
% The problem in this case is that if the optional argument "[b]"
% is used we do want the reference point of the tabular be at the
-% baseline of the last row but at the same time do want the the
+% baseline of the last row but at the same time do want the
% depth of this last line increased by "\extratabsurround" without
% changing the placement "\hline".
%
@@ -3076,7 +3076,7 @@
<{\end{lrbox}%
\let\hss\hfil
\makebox[#2][#1]{\unhbox\ar@cellbox}}}
-% \end{macrocode}
+% \end{macrocode}
% This is a bit sneaky, as it temporarily disables "\hss", but
% given that we know what goes into that box it should be
% sufficient.
@@ -3089,4 +3089,3 @@
% \Finale
%
\endinput
-