diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'macros/latex/contrib/biblatex-ms/doc/examples/91-sorting-schemes-ms.tex')
-rw-r--r-- | macros/latex/contrib/biblatex-ms/doc/examples/91-sorting-schemes-ms.tex | 18 |
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/macros/latex/contrib/biblatex-ms/doc/examples/91-sorting-schemes-ms.tex b/macros/latex/contrib/biblatex-ms/doc/examples/91-sorting-schemes-ms.tex new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..39498d475a --- /dev/null +++ b/macros/latex/contrib/biblatex-ms/doc/examples/91-sorting-schemes-ms.tex @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +\documentclass[a4paper]{article} +\usepackage{fontspec} +\usepackage[american]{babel} +\usepackage{csquotes} +\usepackage[style=authoryear,sortcites,sorting=ynt,backend=biber]{biblatex-ms} +\usepackage{hyperref} +\addbibresource{biblatex-examples.bib} +\begin{document} +% This demonstrates that the sorting of citations can be difference to the +% bibliography. However, this is not always advisable in case of multiple +% citations in the same year for the same author list. This is because +% extradate (the "a", "b" etc. in "Smith 2010a" and "Smith 2010b" etc.) +% depends on the sorting order and if the sorting order is different +% between citations and bibliography, this can cause confusion. +Filler text \parencite{wassenberg,cicero,companion,angenendt}. +\newrefcontext[sorting=nyt] +\printbibliography +\end{document} |