summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/macros/latex/contrib/biblatex-contrib/biblatex-chicago/doc/cms-trad-sample.tex
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'macros/latex/contrib/biblatex-contrib/biblatex-chicago/doc/cms-trad-sample.tex')
-rw-r--r--macros/latex/contrib/biblatex-contrib/biblatex-chicago/doc/cms-trad-sample.tex528
1 files changed, 528 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/macros/latex/contrib/biblatex-contrib/biblatex-chicago/doc/cms-trad-sample.tex b/macros/latex/contrib/biblatex-contrib/biblatex-chicago/doc/cms-trad-sample.tex
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..f6a1a88e03
--- /dev/null
+++ b/macros/latex/contrib/biblatex-contrib/biblatex-chicago/doc/cms-trad-sample.tex
@@ -0,0 +1,528 @@
+\documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{report}
+\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
+\usepackage{textcomp}
+%\usepackage{endnotes}
+\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
+\usepackage[german,french,american]{babel}
+\usepackage[autostyle]{csquotes}
+%\usepackage[document]{ragged2e}
+\usepackage[authordate-trad,backend=biber,autolang=none,booklongxref=false,%
+bibencoding=latin1,postnotepunct,compresspages,strict]{biblatex-chicago}
+% \usepackage[style=chicago-authordate,backend=biber,usecompiler=true,%
+% babel=hyphen,bibencoding=auto,sorting=nyt,cmslos,autocite=inline]{biblatex}
+\usepackage{lmodern}
+\usepackage{gentium}
+%\renewcommand*{\rmdefault}{fgn}% The font (gentium) used for pdf
+\usepackage{ifthen}
+\usepackage{setspace}
+\usepackage{vmargin} \setpapersize{A4}
+\setmarginsrb{1in}{20pt}{1in}{.5in}{1pt}{2pt}{0pt}{2mm}
+\usepackage{url}
+\urlstyle{rm}
+\appto\bibsetup{\sloppy}
+\providecommand{\cmslink}[1]{#1}% In case someone prints the annotations.
+\hyphenation{evans-ton clem-ens mc-hugh ho-ro-witz}
+\setlength{\dimen\footins}{9.5in}
+\setlength{\parindent}{0pt}
+\setlength{\parskip}{5pt}
+\protected\def\onethird{\mbox{\scriptsize\raisebox{.7ex}{1}%
+ \hspace{-0.1em}\raisebox{.2ex}{/}\hspace{-0.03em}3}}
+\newcommand{\cmd}[1]{\texttt{\textbackslash #1}}
+\usepackage[colorlinks,urlcolor=blue,citecolor=black,
+plainpages=false,breaklinks=true]{hyperref}
+\bibliography{dates-test}
+%%\onehalfspacing
+\begin{document}
+
+\section*{The Chicago authordate-trad Specification:%
+ \ Testing Only}
+\label{sec:spec}
+
+\subsection*{Please don't read on. See cms-dates-intro.pdf first}
+\label{bibernote}
+
+\subsection*{Editions}
+\label{editions}
+
+This file documents the \textsf{authordate-trad} specification which,
+as envisaged by the \emph{Manual} \autocite*[15.45]{chicago:manual},
+grafts the traditional Chicago author-date title formatting onto the
+current, 16th-edition recommendations for the remainder of the
+reference apparatus. This newest edition implemented significant
+changes to what the author-date specification has, historically,
+recommended, and there are certain to be users who prefer the older
+format with titles capitalized sentence-style and not, in the case of
+most un-book-like entries, enclosed in quotation marks. I have
+implemented the \textsf{authordate-trad} style for such users. To
+compare it with the standard style, please see
+\textsf{cms-dates-sample.pdf}. You can also still use the
+15th-edition styles from \textsf{biblatex-chicago}, which have been
+updated with some improvements borrowed from the 16th edition, but
+which are now strongly deprecated. (See
+\textsf{biblatex-chicago15.pdf} and \textsf{cms15-dates-sample.pdf}.)
+I would encourage all users to switch to one of the 16th-edition
+styles as soon as possible, as I am concentrating all of my
+development time there.
+
+\subsection*{Usage}
+\label{usage}
+
+As a general rule, you'll probably want to use the \cmd{autocite}
+command for most citations. For most sources, the result will be
+exactly as you expect it to be. A few examples:
+\autocite{adorno:benj}; \autocite{ashbrook:brain};
+\autocite{babb:peru}; \autocite{barcott:review:15}. Any page
+references should also appear as you expect: \autocite[338]{batson};
+\autocite[79]{beattie:crime}; \autocite[36]{boxer:china}.
+
+\subsection*{Repeated citations}
+\label{sec:ibidem}
+
+Repeated citations are somewhat complicated. The Chicago author-date
+style doesn't use \enquote{\emph{Ibid},} but in general a repeated
+citation on the same page will print only the page reference:
+\autocite{browning:aurora}; \autocite[45]{browning:aurora}.
+Technically, this should only occur when a source is cited
+\enquote{more than once in one paragraph}
+\autocite[15.26]{chicago:manual}, so you can use the \cmd{citereset}
+command from \textsf{biblatex} to achieve the greatest compliance, as
+the package only offers automatic resetting on part, chapter, section,
+and subsection boundaries, while \textsf{biblatex-chicago}
+automatically resets the tracker at page breaks:
+
+\citereset\cmd{citereset}\ \autocite[15.27]{chicago:manual}. If you
+are going to repeat a source, make sure that the cite command provides
+a postnote --- when using \textsf{biblatex-chicago} you'll no longer
+get any annoying empty parentheses, but you will get another standard
+citation, which may add too much clutter: \autocite{chicago:manual}.
+If you don't need to cite a specific page, then it may be better, or
+at least more concise, only to use one citation command rather than
+two.
+
+\subsection*{Other citation commands}
+\label{sec:other}
+
+The other citation commands from \textsf{biblatex} also work fine:
+
+\cmd{textcite}: \textcite{conley:fifthgrade}; \cmd{autocite*}:
+\autocite*{connell:chronic}; \cmd{cite}: \cite{conway:evolution};
+\cmd{cite*}: \cite*{davenport:attention}; \cmd{foot\-note} with
+\cmd{autocite};\footnote{\autocite{donne:var:15}.}\ \cmd{footcite}
+(=\cmd{cite} inside a \cmd{footnote}). \footcite{dunn:revolutions}
+
+Multicites should work as you expect, too:
+
+\cmd{autocites}: \autocites{dyna:browser}{eliot:pound};
+\cmd{autocites} by the same author:
+\autocites{pirumova}{pirumova:russian}; \cmd{autocites} by the same
+author with postnotes: \autocites{pirumova}[14]{pirumova:russian};
+\cmd{textcites} by the same author with postnotes:
+\textcites[37]{pirumova}{pirumova:russian}.
+
+\subsection*{Shorthands}
+\label{sec:shorthands}
+
+Chicago's author-date style only seems to recommend the use of
+shorthands as abbreviations for long authors' names, particularly
+institutional names \autocite[15.36]{chicago:manual}. By default, I
+have followed this recommendation: \cmd{autocites}:
+\autocites{bsi:abbreviation}{iso:electrodoc}; \cmd{textcites}:
+\textcites{bsi:abbreviation}{iso:electrodoc}. This \textsf{shorthand}
+will by default appear at the head of the entry in the list of
+references, followed by the parenthesized expansion of the shorthand,
+taken from the \textsf{author} field. (This is a change from the 15th
+edition.) You will usually also need a \textsf{sortkey} field to make
+sure that the entry is alphabetized by the \textsf{shorthand} rather
+than by the \textsf{title}. If you use a \cmd{printshorthands}
+command, the list of shorthands will still be printed, so you now have
+a variety of options available for presenting the expansions depending
+on your specific requirements. Please note, also, that you can get
+back something approaching the \enquote{standard} behavior of
+shorthands if you give the \texttt{cmslos=false} option to
+\textsf{biblatex-chicago} in your document preamble.
+
+\subsection*{Mildly problematic entries}
+\label{sec:problematic}
+
+In most entries, the absence of an author can be supplied by, e.g., an
+editor or a translator: \autocite{chaucer:alt};
+\autocite{silver:gawain}. Sometimes an anonymous work's author is
+known or can be guessed: \autocite{horsley:prosodies};
+\autocite{cook:sotweed}. Alternatively, in some cases the
+\textsf{title} may appear in place of the \textsf{author}:
+\autocite{anon:stanze}; \autocite{virginia:plantation}. The 16th
+edition is less than enthusiastic about the use of
+\enquote{\texttt{Anon.}}\ as author.
+
+By default, in most entry types, an absent \textsf{date} will
+automatically provoke \textsf{Biber} into searching for other sorts of
+dates in the entry, in the order \textsf{year, eventyear, origyear,
+ urlyear}: e.g., \autocite{evanston:library}, which only has a
+\textsf{urlyear}. In three entry types --- \textsf{Music},
+\textsf{Review}, and \textsf{Video} --- this search order is
+\textsf{eventyear, origyear, year, urlyear}, as in these types the
+earliest year should take precedence (cf.\
+page~\pageref{sec:audiovisual}, below). Beginning with this release,
+you can change the default search order, for all but the three types
+just mentioned, by using the \texttt{cmsdate} option in the preamble
+of your document, instead of (or in addition to) using it in the
+\textsf{options} field of individual entries. Setting that option in
+the preamble either to \enquote{\texttt{both}} or
+\enquote{\texttt{on}} makes the document-wide search order:
+\textsf{origyear, year, eventyear, urlyear}. This may be useful for
+documents that contain many entries with multiple dates, and where you
+want \emph{always} to present the earlier (i.e., \textsf{orig}) dates
+at the head of reference list entries and in citations. You can
+eliminate some of these dates from the running, or change the search
+order, using the \cmd{DeclareLabeldate} command in your preamble, but
+please be aware that I have hard-coded the possibilities above into
+the author-date style in order to cope with some tricky corners of the
+specification. If you reorder these dates, and your references enter
+these tricky corners, the results might be surprising. (Cf.\
+section~4.5.8 in \textsf{biblatex.pdf} and especially section~5.2,
+s.v.\ \enquote{\textsf{date}} in \textsf{biblatex-chicago.pdf} for the
+gory details.)
+
+In most entry types, the absence of all four possible dates will
+automatically produce \mbox{\enquote{\texttt{n.d.}\hspace{-2pt}}}
+instead: \autocite{bernstein:shostakovich}. You can also give it
+yourself in the form \cmd{bibstring\{nodate\}}:
+\autocite{ross:thesis}. A date that can be guessed should appear
+within square brackets: \autocite{clark:mesopot}. Forthcoming works
+are straightforward, assuming you remember to use the \cmd{autocap}
+macro and the \textsf{year} (instead of the \textsf{date}) field, so
+that the word appears correctly in both citations and the list of
+references: \autocite{author:forthcoming}; \autocite{contrib:contrib}.
+
+The 16th edition of the \emph{Manual} has changed the rules for
+entries with more than one date \autocite[15.38]{chicago:manual}.
+First, \textsf{Music}, \textsf{Review}, and \textsf{Video} entries
+have their own rules, which are applied automatically. (Once again,
+see page~\pageref{sec:audiovisual}, below.) For other entry types,
+there are two options, corresponding to two different states of the
+\texttt{cmsdate} entry (or preamble) option. The default is
+\texttt{cmsdate=off}: \autocite{maitland:equity}. Here, setting the
+\textsf{pubstate} field to \texttt{reprint} ensures that a notice of
+the original publication date will be printed at the end of the
+reference list entry. Alternatively, you can use
+\texttt{cmsdate=both}: \autocite{emerson:nature};
+\autocite{maitland:canon}. \texttt{cmsdate=new} and
+\texttt{cmsdate=old} are both now synonyms of \texttt{both}, while
+\texttt{cmsdate=on} is still available even though it falls outside
+the specification: \autocite{james:ambassadors}. These options, in
+combination with others available in your .bib files, can cover a wide
+range of difficult cases. Please see the next section below, the
+documentation in \textsf{biblatex-chicago.pdf}, particularly in
+section~5.2, s.v.\ \enquote{\textsf{date},} and also the following
+entries in \textsf{dates-test.bib}:
+\autocites{schweitzer:bach}{white:russ}{white:ross:memo}.
+
+\subsection*{Corners of the specification}
+\label{sec:corners}
+
+In some cases, the \emph{Manual} isn't altogether clear about how to
+present entries in the author-date style. I'm pretty certain about
+most of what follows, but if you interpret the specification
+differently please let me know.
+
+\subsubsection*{InReference entries}
+\label{sec:inref}
+
+These present several peculiarities: the title of the work should
+always take the place of any author, no
+\enquote{\texttt{n.d.}\hspace{-2pt}} will automatically be provided,
+and any postnote field will be enclosed in quotation marks preceded by
+\enquote{\texttt{s.v.}\hspace{-2pt}} for \enquote{\emph{sub verbo}.}
+This allows you to refer to alphabetized articles in well-known
+reference works: \autocite[Hume, David]{ency:britannica};
+\autocite[Sibelius, Jean]{grove:sibelius};
+\autocite[BibTeX]{wikiped:bibtex}.
+
+\subsubsection*{Author-less Article, Review, and Manual entries}
+\label{sec:authless:art}
+
+In \textsf{Article} and \textsf{Review} entries with the
+\texttt{magazine} entrysubtype, the absence of an author automatically
+places the \textsf{journaltitle} of the periodical in citations and at
+the head of the entry in the list of references:
+\autocite{gourmet:052006}. (Without the entrysubtype, you'll get the
+\textsf{title} at the head rather than the \textsf{journaltitle}.)
+You can cite newspaper and magazine articles entirely within the text,
+i.e., without them appearing in the reference list
+\autocite[15.47]{chicago:manual}, if you set the \texttt{cmsdate=full}
+entry option: \autocite{lakeforester:pushcarts};
+\autocite{nyt:trevorobit}. In \textsf{Manual} entries, the
+\textsf{organization} field does the same: \autocite{dyna:browser}.
+If you wish to present an abbreviated form of the journal (or
+organization) name only in citations, then the \textsf{shortauthor}
+field --- or in other cases the \textsf{shorthand} field --- is the
+place for it, making sure to include formatting:
+\autocite{unsigned:ranke}; \autocite{bsi:abbreviation}.
+
+\subsubsection*{Misc entries with an entrysubtype}
+\label{sec:misc}
+
+When citing individual letter-like pieces from an unpublished archive
+where only an \textsf{origdate} is present, you no longer need to set
+the \texttt{cmsdate} option in your .bib entry, as \textsf{Biber} and
+\textsf{biblatex-chicago} now handle this automatically:
+\autocite{creel:house}. Non-letters, e.g., interviews, use the
+\textsf{date} field, so you don't need \texttt{cmsdate} there, either:
+\autocite{spock:interview}. For undated pieces you can put
+\cmd{bibstring\{nodate\}} in the \textsf{year} field:
+\autocite{dinkel:agassiz}. For citing whole collections, see the next
+section.
+
+\subsubsection*{entrysubtype = \{classical\}}
+\label{sec:classical}
+
+This option's name derives from its use for citing texts from
+classical antiquity, though in the author-date style especially it can
+be put to use in several other contexts. In a nutshell, any entry
+with such an \textsf{entrysubtype} will be treated, in citations only,
+not as author-date but as author-title. (Entries in the list of
+references, e.g., a particular edition of Aristotle, will still appear
+in standard author-date format.) A \cmd{cite*} or \cmd{autocite*}
+command will, in such a case, produce the title rather than the year.
+Some examples should make this clearer:
+
+%\enlargethispage{-\baselineskip}
+
+Classical works: without abbreviation:
+\autocite{aristotle:metaphy:trans}; with abbreviation:
+\autocite{aristotle:metaphy:gr}; \autocite{plato:republic:gr}; using
+standard pagination: \autocite*[3.2.996b5--8]{aristotle:metaphy:gr};
+\autocite*[420e]{plato:republic:gr}; work cited by page of a modern
+edition, i.e., without \textsf{entrysubtype}:
+\autocite[198]{euripides:orestes}.
+
+Sacred works, e.g., the Bible and the Qur'an:
+\autocite[25:19--36:43]{genesis}.
+
+An unpublished archive, from which more than one work has been cited:
+\autocite[file 12]{house:papers}. (Both this and the previous example
+use a Misc entry with \texttt{classical} \textsf{entrysubtype}.)
+
+\subsubsection*{Comments inside citations}
+\label{sec:comments}
+
+If you wish to include a comment inside the parentheses of a citation,
+it will need to be separated by a semicolon
+\autocite[15.23]{chicago:manual}. If you have a \textsf{postnote},
+then you can manually provide the punctuation and comment in that
+field, e.g., \autocite[4; the unrevised trans.]{stendhal:parma}.
+Without a \textsf{postnote}, you now have two choices. You can enable
+the new \texttt{postnotepunct} package option, which allows you simply
+to type \cmd{autocite[; the unrevised trans.]\{stendhal:\ parma\}}
+\citereset\autocite[; the unrevised trans.]{stendhal:parma}, or you
+can continue to use a separate \textsf{Misc} or \textsf{CustomC} entry
+containing just the text of the comment in the \textsf{title} field,
+\textsf{entrysubtype} \texttt{classical}, and \textsf{options}
+\texttt{skipbib}. An \cmd{autocites} command calling both the main
+text and the comment will then do the trick, e.g.,
+\autocites{chicago:manual}{chicago:comment}.
+
+\subsubsection*{Multiple authors}
+\label{sec:multiple}
+
+The default settings in \textsf{biblatex-chicago} are
+\texttt{maxnames=3,minnames=1} in citations and
+\texttt{max\-bibnames=10,minbibnames=7} in the list of references
+(these latter parameters set in \textsf{biblatex-chicago.sty}). In
+practice, this means that an entry like hlatky:hrt, with 5 authors,
+will present all of them in the list of references but will truncate
+to one in citations, like so: \autocite{hlatky:hrt}. For the vast
+majority of circumstances, these settings are exactly right for the
+Chicago author-date specification. However, if \enquote{a reference
+ list includes another work \emph{of the same date} that would also
+ be abbreviated as [\enquote{Hlatky et al.}] but whose coauthors are
+ different persons or listed in a different order, the text citations
+ must distinguish between them} \autocite[15.28]{chicago:manual}.
+The (\textsf{Biber}-only) \textsf{biblatex} option
+\texttt{uniquelist}, set for you in \textsf{biblatex-chicago.sty},
+will automatically handle many of these situations for you, but it is
+as well to understand that it does so by temporarily suspending the
+limits, listed above, on how many names to print in a citation.
+Without \texttt{uniquelist}, \textsf{biblatex} would present such a
+work as, e.g., (Hlatky et al. 2002b), while hlatky:hrt would be
+(Hlatky et al. 2002a). This does distinguish between them, but
+inaccurately, as it suggests that the two different author lists are
+exactly the same. With \texttt{uniquelist}, the two citations might
+look like (Hlatky, Boothroyd et al.\ 2002) and (Hlatky, Smith et al.\
+2002), which is what the specification requires.
+
+If, however, the distinguishing name occurs further down the author
+list --- in fourth or fifth position in our examples --- then the
+default settings would produce citations with all 4 or 5 names
+printed, which can become awkwardly long. In such a situation, you
+can provide \textsf{shortauthor} fields that look like this:
+\{\{Hlatky et al., Quality of life,\}\} and \{\{Hlatky et al.,
+Depressive symptoms,\}\}, using a shortened title to distinguish the
+references. This would produce (Hlatky et al., Quality of life, 2002)
+and (Hlatky et al., Depressive symptoms, 2002), as the spec
+recommends. There is, unfortunately, no simpler way that I know of to
+deal with this situation.
+
+\subsubsection*{Audiovisual entries}
+\label{sec:audiovisual}
+
+According to the \emph{Manual}, \enquote{Chicago recommends a more
+ comprehensive approach to dating audiovisual materials than in
+ previous editions.} This means, for instance, that, even when
+consulting a digital copy, \enquote{it is generally useful to give
+ information about the original source.} Also, \enquote{the date of
+ the original recording should be privileged in the citation}
+\autocite[15.53]{chicago:manual}. The rather more book-like entries
+are generally unaffected by these changes, so published
+(\textsf{Audio}) and unpublished (\textsf{Misc}) scores are no problem
+at all: \autocite{schubert:muellerin}; \autocite{verdi:corsaro};
+\autocite{shapey:partita:15}. The dating of online materials has been
+enhanced: \autocite{coolidge:speech}; \autocite{horowitz:youtube};
+\autocite{pollan:plant}. The most significant changes, however,
+appear in \textsf{Music} and \textsf{Video} entries, where every
+effort should be made to find date(s) for sources:
+\autocite{auden:reading}; \autocite{friends:leia};
+\autocite{handel:messiah}; \autocite{holiday:fool};
+\autocite{nytrumpet:art}. Others perhaps require further information
+in the entry or genuinely are better suited to presentation in running
+text: \autocite{beethoven:sonata29}. The standard \textsf{biblatex}
+tools for subdividing reference lists are all available if you want to
+follow the \emph{Manual's} recommendations on presenting this kind of
+material separately from other sources.
+
+\subsection*{Further examples (mainly for testing purposes)}
+\label{testing}
+
+Article: \autocite{assocpress:gun}; \autocite{brown:bremer};
+\autocite{chu:panda}; \autocite{conley:fifthgrade};
+\autocite{connell:chronic}; \autocite{ellis:blog};
+\autocite{friedman:learning}; \autocite{garaud:gatine};
+\autocite{garrett:15}; \autocite{gibbard:15}; \autocite{kern};
+\autocite{kimluu:diethyl:15}; \autocite{lewis:15};
+\autocite{loften:hamlet}; \autocite{loomis:structure:15};
+\autocite{morgenson:market}; \autocite{osborne:poison:15};
+\autocite{reaves:rosen}; \autocite{rozner:liberation};
+\autocite{schneider:mittelpleistozaene}; \autocite{sewall:letter};
+\autocite{stenger:privacy}; \autocite{terborgh:preservation};
+\autocite{wall:radio}; \autocite{warr:ellison};
+\autocite{white:callimachus}.
+
+Artwork: \autocite{leo:madonna}.
+
+Audio: \autocite{greek:filmstrip}; \autocite{weed:flatiron}.
+
+Book: \autocite{barrows:reading}; \autocite{churchill:letters};
+\autocite{cohen:schiff}; \autocite{cotton:manufacture};
+\autocite{creasey:ashe:blast}; \autocite{creasey:morton:hide};
+\autocite{creasey:york:death}; \autocite{davenport:attention};
+\autocite{feydeau:farces}; \autocite{furet:passing:eng};
+\autocite{furet:passing:fr}; \autocite{hopp:attalid};
+\autocite{howell:marriage}; \autocite{lach:asia};
+\autocite{lecarre:quest}; \autocite{levistrauss:savage};
+\autocite{lynch:webstyle}; \autocite{maisonneuve:relations};
+\autocite{mchugh:wake:15}; \autocite{menchu:crossing};
+\autocite{meredith:letters}; \autocite{michelangelo:poems};
+\autocite{mla:style}; \autocite{natrecoff:camera};
+\autocite{palmatary:pottery}; \autocite{pelikan:christian};
+\autocite{rodman:walk}; \autocite{schellinger:novel};
+\autocite{sechzer:women}; \autocite{sereny:cries};
+\autocite{soltes:georgia}; \autocite{stendhal:parma};
+\autocite{suangtho:tectona}; \autocite{thompson:making};
+\autocite{tillich:system}; \autocite{times:guide};
+\autocite{turabian:manual}; \autocite{walker:columbia};
+\autocite{wauchope:ceramics}; \autocite{weber:saugetiere};
+\autocite{weresz}; \autocite{white:total};
+\autocite{wright:evolution}; \autocite{wright:theory}.
+
+BookInBook: \autocite{bernhard:boris}; \autocite{bernhard:ritter}.
+
+Collection: \autocite{brush:ornithology};
+\autocite{harley:cartography}; \autocite{harley:ancient:cart};
+\autocite{kamrany:economic}; \autocite{prairie:state};
+\autocite{zukowsky:chicago}.
+
+Image: \autocite{bedford:photo}.
+
+InBook: \autocite{ashbrook:brain}; \autocite{phibbs:diary};
+\autocite{will:cohere}.
+
+InCollection: \autocite{centinel:letters}; \autocite{ellet:galena};
+\autocite{keating:dearborn}; \autocite{lippincott:chicago};
+\autocite{sirosh:visualcortex}; \autocite{wiens:avian}.
+
+InProceedings: \autocite{frede:inproc:trad}.
+
+InReference: \autocite[absolute]{oed:cdrom}.
+
+Manual: \autocite{dyna:browser}.
+
+Misc: \autocite{roosevelt:speech:trad}.
+
+Music: \autocite{floyd:atom}; \autocite{mozart:figaro};
+\autocite{rubinstein:chopin}.
+
+Online: \autocite{harwood:biden}; \autocite{powell:email}.
+
+Patent: \autocite{petroff:impurity}.
+
+Periodical: \autocite{good:wholeissue}; \autocite{whittington:water}.
+
+Report: \autocite{herwign:office}.
+
+Review: \autocite{ac:comment:trad}; \autocite{bundy:macneil};
+\autocite{Clemens:letter}; \autocite{kozinn:review};
+\autocite{ratliff:review:15}; \autocite{wallraff:word}.
+
+SuppBook: \autocite{friedman:intro}; \autocite{polakow:afterw};
+\autocite{prose:intro}.
+
+Thesis: \autocite{murphy:silent:15}.
+
+Unpublished: \autocite{nass:address}.
+
+Video: \autocite{cleese:holygrail}; \autocite{hitchcock:nbynw}.
+
+\subsubsection*{Additions and changes for the 17th edition}
+\label{ed17}
+
+Article: \autocite{amlen:hoot}; \autocite{black:infectious};
+\autocite{kessler:nyt}; \autocite{saberhagen:beluga};
+\autocite{stoffle:ghost}.
+
+Artwork: \autocite{mccurry:afghangirl}.
+
+Audio: \autocite{danforth:podcast}; \autocite{strayed:audiobook}.
+
+Book: \autocite{angry:birds}; \autocite{gems:ipad};
+\autocite{gems:print}.
+
+Dataset: \autocite{genbank:db}; \autocite{nasa:db}.
+
+Music: \autocite{naraya}; \autocite{rihanna:umbrella}.
+
+Online: \autocite{diaz:surprise}; \autocite{obrien:recycle};
+\autocite{quora:thread}; \autocite{souza:obama}; comments with
+\texttt{commenton}: \autocites{braun:reply}{quora:thread-customc};
+\autocites{licis:diazcomment}{diaz:surprise-customc}.
+
+Performance: \autocite{hamilton:miranda}.
+
+Periodical: \autocite{amlen:wordplay}.
+
+Review: blog comment without \texttt{commenton}:
+\autocite{viv:amlen:15}; blog comment with \texttt{commenton}:
+\autocites{ac:comment}{ellis:blog-customc}.
+
+Standard: \autocite{niso:bibref}; \autocite{w3c:xml}.
+
+Video: \autocite{american:crime}; \autocite{mayberry:brady}.
+
+% \printshorthands % No longer necessary in author-date.
+% \nocite{*}
+\printbibliography[notkeyword=nosample,title=References]
+
+\end{document}
+%%% Local Variables:
+%%% mode: latex
+%%% TeX-master: t
+%%% End: