diff options
author | Norbert Preining <norbert@preining.info> | 2019-09-02 13:46:59 +0900 |
---|---|---|
committer | Norbert Preining <norbert@preining.info> | 2019-09-02 13:46:59 +0900 |
commit | e0c6872cf40896c7be36b11dcc744620f10adf1d (patch) | |
tree | 60335e10d2f4354b0674ec22d7b53f0f8abee672 /info/digests/nts-l/9501 |
Initial commit
Diffstat (limited to 'info/digests/nts-l/9501')
-rw-r--r-- | info/digests/nts-l/9501 | 32 |
1 files changed, 32 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/info/digests/nts-l/9501 b/info/digests/nts-l/9501 new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..331f8bd6b5 --- /dev/null +++ b/info/digests/nts-l/9501 @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ +======================================================================== +Date: Fri, 13 Jan 1995 11:03:08 -0500 +Reply-To: NTS-L Distribution list <NTS-L%DHDURZ1.BITNET@vm.gmd.de> +From: Michael Downes <MJD@MATH.AMS.ORG> +Subject: \eqno, \leqno should not be math mode + +A suggestion for e-TeX: + +The contents of \eqno, \leqno should be typeset in text mode, not math +mode. In particular, they should not call \everymath. Equation numbers +are inherently textual in nature, like all the other structural +numbering in a document, even though we sometimes embellish them with +bits of math or want to use centered math * instead of raised text *. + +Michael Downes +mjd@math.ams.org + +======================================================================== +Date: Fri, 13 Jan 1995 16:25:15 GMT +Reply-To: NTS-L Distribution list <NTS-L%DHDURZ1.BITNET@vm.gmd.de> +From: Philip Taylor <CHAA006@VMS.RHBNC.AC.UK> +Subject: Re: \eqno, \leqno should not be math mode + +>> The contents of \eqno, \leqno should be typeset in text mode, not math +>> mode. In particular, they should not call \everymath. Equation numbers +>> are inherently textual in nature, like all the other structural +>> numbering in a document, even though we sometimes embellish them with +>> bits of math or want to use centered math * instead of raised text *. + +Many thanks for your suggestion, Michael: I will ensure that it +is discussed. ** Phil. + |