blob: b6c61782721c0196a2299e538eb2fdebda3c4c46 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
|
\documentclass[a4paper,twoside]{article}
\usepackage{html}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\renewcommand{\d}{\partial}\providecommand{\bm}[1]{\mathbf{#1}}
\providecommand{\Range}{\mathcal{R}}\providecommand{\Ker}{\mathcal{N}}
\providecommand{\Quat}{\vec{\mathbf{Q}}}
\newcommand{\StAndrews}{\url{http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history}}%
\newcommand{\Pythagorians}{\htmladdnormallink
{Pythagorians}{\StAndrews/Mathematicians/Pythagoras.html}}
\newcommand{\Fermat}{\htmladdnormallink
{Fermat, c.1637}{\StAndrews/HistTopics/Fermat's_last_theorem.html}}
\newcommand{\Wiles}{\htmladdnormallink
{Wiles, 1995}{http://www.pbs.org:80/wgbh/nova/proof}}
\begin{document}
\htmlhead[center]{section}{Math examples}
\begin{flushright}
\begin{makeimage}
\begin{eqnarray}
\phi(\lambda) & = & \frac{1} {2 \pi i}\int^{c+i\infty}_{c-i\infty}
\exp \left( u \ln u + \lambda u \right ) du \hspace{1cm}\mbox{for } c \geq 0 \\
\lambda & = & \frac{\epsilon -\bar{\epsilon} }{\xi}
- \gamma' - \beta^2 - \ln \frac{\xi} {E_{\rm max}} \\
\gamma & = & 0.577215\dots \mathrm{\hspace{5mm}(Euler's\ constant)} \\
\gamma' & = & 0.422784\dots = 1 - \gamma \\
\epsilon , \bar{\epsilon} & = & \mbox{actual/average energy loss}
\end{eqnarray}
\end{makeimage}
\end{flushright}
Since~\eqref{eqn:stress-sr} or~\eqref{gdef} should hold for arbitrary $\delta\bm{c}$%
-vectors, it is clear that $\Ker(A) = \Range(B)$ and that when $y=B(x)$ one has...\\
...the \Pythagorians{} knew infinitely many solutions in integers to $a^2+b^2=c^2$.
That no non-trivial integer solutions exist for $a^n+b^n=c^n$ with integers $n>2$ has long
been suspected (\Fermat). Only during the current decade has this been proved (\Wiles).
\begin{flushright}
\begin{eqnarray}\htmlimage{thumbnail=.4}
\label{eqn:stress-sr}
V \bm{\pi}^{sr} & = & \left< \sum_i M_i \bm{V}_i \bm{V}_i
+ \sum_i \sum_{j>i} \bm{R}_{ij} \bm{F}_{ij}\right> \\ \nonumber
& = & \left< \sum_i M_i \bm{V}_i \bm{V}_i
+ \sum_{i}\sum_{j>i}\sum_\alpha\sum_\beta \bm{r}_{i\alpha j\beta}\bm{f}_{i\alpha j\beta}
- \sum_i \sum_\alpha \bm{p}_{i\alpha} \bm{f}_{i\alpha} \right>
\end{eqnarray}
\end{flushright}
\begin{flushright}
\begin{subequations}\htmlimage{thumbnail=.3}
\label{bgdefs}
\begin{align} B_{ij}^\alpha & =
\left(B_{ij}^\alpha\right)_0 + \left(B_{ij}^\alpha\right)_a \label{bdef} \\
\left(B_{ij}^\alpha\right)_0 & = \frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\d N_i^\alpha}{\d X_j}
+ \frac{\d N_j^\alpha} {\d X_i} \right) \label{b0def} \\
\left(B_{ij}^\alpha\right)_a & = H_{ij}^{\alpha \beta} a^\beta \label{budef} \\
H_{ij}^{\alpha \beta} & =
\frac{1}{2}\left( \frac{\d N_k^\alpha}{\d X_i} \frac{\d N_k^\beta}{\d X_j}
+ \frac{\d N_k^\beta}{\d X_i} \frac{\d N_k^\alpha}{\d X_j} \right) \label{gdef}
\end{align}
\end{subequations}
\end{flushright}
\end{document}
|
