path: root/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/urlbst/urlbst.tex.in

\documentclass[a4paper]{article}

\title{The \texttt{urlbst} package}
\author{Norman Gray\\\texttt{<http://nxg.me.uk>}}
\date{Version @PACKAGE_VERSION@, @RELEASEDATE@}

%\usepackage{times}
\usepackage{url}
\usepackage{hyperref}

% Not long enough to make it useful to number sections
\setcounter{secnumdepth}{0}

% Squeeze a bit more on to the page
%\addtolength\textwidth{1cm}
%\addtolength\oddsidemargin{-0.5cm}

\makeatletter
% Easy verbatim mode
\catcode`\|=\active
\def|{\begingroup \let\do\@makeother \dospecials \verbatim@font \doverb}
\def\doverb#1|{#1\endgroup}

\renewcommand{\verbatim@font}{\normalfont\small\ttfamily}
\makeatother

\newcommand{\ub}{\package{urlbst}}
\newcommand{\BibTeX}{Bib\TeX}
\newcommand{\package}[1]{\texttt{#1}}
\newcommand{\btfield}[1]{\textsf{#1}}

\begin{document}
\maketitle

The \ub\ package consists of a Perl script which edits \BibTeX\ style
files (|.bst|) to add a \btfield{webpage} entry type, and which
supports \btfield{url} and corresponding \btfield{lastchecked} fields
on all other entry types.  The distribution includes preconverted
versions of the four standard \BibTeX\ |.bst| style files.

It has a different goal from Patrick Daly's \package{custom-bib}
package~\cite{url:daly} -- that is intended to create a \BibTeX\ style
|.bst| file from scratch, and supports \btfield{url} and
\btfield{eprint} fields.  This package, on the other hand, is intended
for the case where you already have a style file that works (or at
least, which you cannot or will not change), and edits it to add the
new \btfield{webpage} entry type, plus the \btfield{url},
\btfield{lastchecked} and \btfield{eprint} fields.

Usage is simple:
\begin{verbatim}
% urlbst [--eprint] [--doi] [--pubmed]
    [--nohyperlinks] [--inlinelinks] [--hypertex] [--hyperref] 
    [input-file [output-file]]
\end{verbatim}
where the |input-file| is an existing |.bst| file, and
the |output-file| is the name of the new style file to be
created.  If either file name is missing, the default is the
standard input or standard output respectively.
For example:
\begin{verbatim}
% urlbst --eprint bibstyle.bst
\end{verbatim}
would convert the style file \texttt{bibstyle.bst}, including support
for e-prints, and sending the result to the standard output (ie, the
screen, so it would more useful if you were to either redirect this to
a file or supply the output-file argument).

If the option |--eprint| is present, then we switch on support for
\texttt{eprint} fields in the modified .bst file, with a citation
format matching that recommended in
\url{http://arxiv.org/help/faq/references}.  If the option
|--doi| is present, then include support for a |doi| field, referring
to a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) as standardised by
\url{http://www.doi.org/}.  And if |--pubmed| is present, then include
support for a |pubmed| field, referring to a PubMed identifier as
supported at \url{http://www.pubmed.gov}.

If either of the |--hypertex| or |--hyperref| options is present, then
the generated .bst file includes support for hyperlinks in the
generated eprint entries in the bibliography, with the format being
either Hyper\TeX\ (see
\url{http://arxiv.org/hypertex/#implementation}), supported by xdvi,
dvips and others, or using the support available from the
\package{hyperref} package.  These options have no effect unless one
of the |--eprint|, |--doi|, |--pubmed| or |--inlinelinks| options is given:
when URLs are included
in the bibliography, they are written out using the |\url{...}|
command.  The \package{hyperref} support is more generic, and more
generally supported, and so you should choose this unless you have a
particular need for the Hyper\TeX\ support.  The |--nohyperlinks|
option, which is present by default, suppresses all hyperlinking.

By default, any URL field is displayed as part of the bibliography
entry, linked to the corresponding URL via the mechanism managed by
the |--hypertex| and |--hyperref| options.  If the |--inlinelinks|
option is present, however, then the URL is not displayed in the
printed entry, but instead a hyperlink is created, linked to suitable
text within the bibliography entry, such as the citation title.  This
option does not affect the display of eprints, DOI or PubMed fields.  It makes
no sense to specify |--inlinelinks| with |--nohyperlinks|, and the
script warns you if you do that, for example by failing to specify one
of the link-style options.  This option is (primarily) useful if
you're preparing a version of a document which will be read on-screen;
the point of it is that the resulting bibliography is substantially
more compact than it would otherwise be.

The support for all the above behaviours is always included in the
output file.  The options instead control only whether the various
behaviours are enabled or disabled, and if you need to alter these,
you may do so by editing the generated |.bst| file and adjusting
values in the |{init.urlbst.variables}| function, where indicated.

The generated references have URLs inside |\url{...}|.  The best
way to format this this is with the \package{url} package
(see~\cite{texfaq} for pointers), but as a poor alternative, you can
try |\newcommand{\url}[1]{\texttt{#1}}|.  The \package{hyperref}
package automatically processes |\url{...}| in the correct way to
include a hyperlink, and if you have selected \package{hyperref}
output, then nothing more need be done.  If you selected Hyper\TeX\
output, however, then the script encloses the |\url| command in an
appropriate Hyper\TeX\ special.

The \ub\ script works by spotting patterns and characteristic function
names in the input |.bst| file.  It works as-is in the case of the
four standard \BibTeX\ style files |plain.bst|, |unsrt.bst|,
|alpha.bst| and |abbrv.bst|.  It also works straightforwardly for
many other style files -- since many of these are derived from, or at
least closely inspired by, the standard ones -- but it does not
pretend that it can do so for all of them.  In some cases, such as the
style files for the \package{refer} or \package{koma-script} packages,
the style files are not intended to be used for formatting; others are
sufficiently different from the standard files that a meaningful edit
becomes impossible.  For the large remainder, however, the result of
this script should need only relatively minor edits before being
perfectly usable.

\section{New \texttt{.bib} entry and field types}

The new entry type \btfield{webpage} has required fields
\btfield{title} and \btfield{url}, and optional fields
\btfield{author}, \btfield{editor}, \btfield{note}, \btfield{year},
\btfield{month} and \btfield{lastchecked}.  The \btfield{url} and
\btfield{lastchecked} fields are new, and are
valid in other entry types as well: the first, obviously, is the URL
which is being cited, or which is being quoted as an auxiliary source
for an article perhaps; the second is the date when you last checked
that the URL was there, in the state you quoted it; this is necessary
since some people, heedless of the archival importance of preserving
the validity of URLs, indulge in the vicious practice of reorganising
web pages and destroying links.  For the case of the \btfield{webpage} entry
type, the \btfield{editor} field should be used for the `maintainer'
of a web page.

For example, in Figure~\ref{f:ex} we illustrate two potential |.bib|
file entries.  The \texttt{@webpage} entry type is the new type
provided by this package, and provides reference information for a
webpage; it includes the new \texttt{url} and \texttt{lastchecked}
fields.  There is also an example of the standard \texttt{@book} entry
type, which now includes the \texttt{url} and \texttt{lastchecked}
fields as well.  The difference between the two references is that in
the \texttt{@book} case it is the book being cited, so that the
\texttt{url} provides extra information; in the \texttt{@webpage} case
it is the page itself which is of interest.  You use the new |eprint|,
|doi| and |pubmed| fields similarly, if the bibliographic item in
question has an e-print, DOI or PubMed reference.
\begin{figure}
\begin{verbatim}
@Webpage{apastyle,
  url =          {http://www.apastyle.org/elecref.html},
  author =       {{American Psychological Association}},
  title =        {Electronic References},
  year =         2001,
  lastchecked =  {23 October 2002},
  note =         {Excerpted from 5th edition of the APA Publication Manual}
}

@Book{schutz,
  author =      {Bernard Schutz},
  title =       {Gravity from the GroundUp},
  publisher =   {Cambridge University Press},
  year =        {2003},
  url =         {http://www.gravityfromthegroundup.org/},
  lastchecked = {2008 June 16}
}
\end{verbatim}
\caption{\label{f:ex}The new \texttt{@webpage} entry type, and the \texttt{url}
  field in action}
\end{figure}

How do you use this in a document?  To use the the
\texttt{alphaurl.bst} style -- which is a pre-converted version of the
standard \texttt{alpha.bst} style, included in the \texttt{urlbst}
distribution -- you simply make sure that \texttt{alphaurl.bst} is in
your BibTeX search path (use the command \texttt{kpsepath bst} to find
this path and \texttt{kpsewhich alphaurl.bst} to confirm that BibTeX
can find it) and add |\bibliographystyle{alphaurl}| to your \LaTeX\ document.

\section{Sources}

There are various sources which suggest how to format references to
web pages.  I have followed none specifically, but fortunately they do
not appear to materially disagree.

ISO-690~\cite{url:iso690} is a formal standard for this stuff.  Walker
and Taylor's \emph{Columbia Guide to Online Style}~\cite{walker}
provides extensive coverage (but is only available on dead trees).
Emory University's
\emph{Citation Formats}~\cite{emory95} is a compendium of links rather
than a guide itself.  The APA has a couple of style guides, a proposed
one~\cite{url:weapas} and a style included in the published APA style
guide~\cite{apastyle} (I'm not sure of the relationship between these
last two).

\section{Hints}

If you use Emacs' \BibTeX\ mode, you can insert the following in your
|.emacs| file to add knowledge of the new \btfield{webpage} entry:
\begin{verbatim}
(defun my-bibtex-hook ()
  (setq bibtex-mode-user-optional-fields '("location" "issn")) ; e.g.
  (setq bibtex-entry-field-alist
        (cons
         '("Webpage"
           ((("url" "The URL of the page")
             ("title" "The title of the resource"))
            (("author" "The author of the webpage")
             ("editor" "The editor/maintainer of the webpage")
             ("year" "Year of publication of the page")
             ("month" "Month of publication of the page")
             ("lastchecked" "Date when you last verified the page was there")
             ("note" "Remarks to be put at the end of the entry"))))
         bibtex-entry-field-alist)))
(add-hook 'bibtex-mode-hook 'my-bibtex-hook)
\end{verbatim}
After that, you can add a \btfield{webpage} entry by typing |C-c C-b webpage|
(or |M-x bibtex-entry|).

It is a \emph{very} good idea to use the \package{url} package: it deals with
the problem of line-breaking long URLs, and with the problem that
\BibTeX{} creates, of occasionally inserting \%-signs into URLs in
generated bibliographies.

See also the URL entry in the UK \TeX\ FAQ~\cite{texfaq}, and
references therein.

\textbf{Acknowledgements:} Thanks to Jason Eisner for suggesting
the |--inlinelinks| option, to Pawe\l{} Widera for the
suggestion to use |\path| when formatting DOIs and to Michael Giffin
for the suggestion to include PubMed URLs.

\bibliography{urlbst}
\bibliographystyle{plainurl}

\end{document}