summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Master/texmf-doc/doc/english/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-limits.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'Master/texmf-doc/doc/english/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-limits.html')
-rw-r--r--Master/texmf-doc/doc/english/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-limits.html18
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/Master/texmf-doc/doc/english/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-limits.html b/Master/texmf-doc/doc/english/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-limits.html
index 895e067b068..c09918b890b 100644
--- a/Master/texmf-doc/doc/english/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-limits.html
+++ b/Master/texmf-doc/doc/english/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-limits.html
@@ -2,18 +2,18 @@
<title>UK TeX FAQ -- question label limits</title>
</head><body>
<h3>Sub- and superscript positioning for operators</h3>
-<p>The commonest hand-written style for expressions is to place the limit
+<p/>The commonest hand-written style for expressions is to place the limit
expressions on operators such as <code>\</code><code>sum</code> and <code>\</code><code>int</code> physically
above and below the operator. In (La)TeX, we write these limit
expressions using sub- and superscripts applied to the operator, but
they don&rsquo;t always appear in the &ldquo;handwritten&rdquo; way in TeX&rsquo;s
output.
-<p>The reason is, that when an expression appears in non-display maths,
+<p/>The reason is, that when an expression appears in non-display maths,
in running text (and is therefore in TeX <code>\</code><code>textstyle</code>), placing
the limits thus could lead to ragged line spacing (and hence
difficult-to-read text). It is therefore common (in <code>\</code><code>textstyle</code>)
to place the limits as one would sub- and superscripts of variables.
-<p>This is not universally satisfactory, so the primitive <code>\</code><code>limits</code> is
+<p/>This is not universally satisfactory, so the primitive <code>\</code><code>limits</code> is
provided:
<blockquote>
<pre>
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ $\sum\limits_{n=1}^{m} ...$
</blockquote><p>
which will place the limits right above and below the symbol (and be
blowed to the typography...).
-<p>Contrariwise, you may wish to change the arrangement of the limits
+<p/>Contrariwise, you may wish to change the arrangement of the limits
when in <code>\</code><code>displaystyle</code>. For this purpose, there&rsquo;s a corresponding
<code>\</code><code>nolimits</code>:
<blockquote>
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ when in <code>\</code><code>displaystyle</code>. For this purpose, there&rsquo;
</pre>
</blockquote><p>
which will place the limits as they would be in <code>\</code><code>textstyle</code>.
-<p>Alternatively, one can manipulate the
+<p/>Alternatively, one can manipulate the
<code>\</code><code>textstyle</code>/<code>\</code><code>displaystyle</code> state of the mathematics. To get
&ldquo;<code>\</code><code>limits</code> placement&rdquo; in inline maths,
<blockquote>
@@ -49,8 +49,12 @@ and for &ldquo;<code>\</code><code>nolimits</code> placement&rdquo; in display m
will serve. Either of these forms may have effects other than on the
operator you&rsquo;re considering, but there are still those who prefer this
formulation.
-<p>(Note that the macro <code>\</code><code>int</code> normally has <code>\</code><code>nolimits</code> built in to
+<p/>Remember, if you&rsquo;re
+<a href="FAQ-newfunction.html">declaring a special operator of your own</a>, the
+AMSLaTeX functions (that you ought to be using) allow you to choose
+how limits are displayed, at definition time.
+<p/>(Note that the macro <code>\</code><code>int</code> normally has <code>\</code><code>nolimits</code> built in to
its definition. There is an example in the TeXbook to show how odd
<code>\</code><code>int</code><code>\</code><code>limits</code> looks when typeset.)
-<p><p>This question on the Web: <a href="http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=limits">http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=limits</a>
+<p/><p>This question on the Web: <a href="http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=limits">http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=limits</a>
</body>