summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Master/texmf-doc/doc/english/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-include.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'Master/texmf-doc/doc/english/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-include.html')
-rw-r--r--Master/texmf-doc/doc/english/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-include.html35
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 35 deletions
diff --git a/Master/texmf-doc/doc/english/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-include.html b/Master/texmf-doc/doc/english/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-include.html
deleted file mode 100644
index 7a758f34ee1..00000000000
--- a/Master/texmf-doc/doc/english/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-include.html
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,35 +0,0 @@
-<head>
-<title>UK TeX FAQ -- question label include</title>
-</head><body>
-<h3>What&rsquo;s going on in my <code>\</code><code>include</code> commands?</h3>
-<p/>The original LaTeX provided the <code>\</code><code>include</code> command to address the
-problem of long documents: with the relatively slow computers of the
-time, the companion <code>\</code><code>includeonly</code> facility was a boon. With the
-vast increase in computer speed, <code>\</code><code>includeonly</code> is less valuable
-(though it still has its place in some very large projects).
-Nevertheless, the facility is retained in current LaTeX, and causes
-some confusion to those who misunderstand it.
-<p/>In order for <code>\</code><code>includeonly</code> to work, <code>\</code><code>include</code> makes a separate
-<code>.aux</code> file for each included file, and makes a &lsquo;checkpoint&rsquo; of
-important parameters (such as page, figure, table and footnote
-numbers); as a direct result, it <em>must</em> clear the current page
-both before and after the <code>\</code><code>include</code> command. What&rsquo;s more, this
-mechanism doesn&rsquo;t work if a <code>\</code><code>include</code> command appears in a file
-that was <code>\</code><code>include</code>d itself: LaTeX diagnoses this as an error.
-<p/>So, we can now answer the two commonest questions about <code>\</code><code>include</code>:
-<ul>
-<li> Why does LaTeX throw a page before and after <code>\</code><code>include</code>
- commands?
-<p/> Answer: because it has to. If you don&rsquo;t like it, replace the
- <code>\</code><code>include</code> command with <code>\</code><code>input</code> &mdash; you won&rsquo;t be able to use
- <code>\</code><code>includeonly</code> any more, but you probably don&rsquo;t need it anyway, so
- don&rsquo;t worry.
-<p/><li> Why can&rsquo;t I nest <code>\</code><code>include</code>d files? &mdash; I always used to be
- able to under LaTeX 2.09.
-<p/> Answer: in fact, you couldn&rsquo;t, even under LaTeX 2.09, but the failure
- wasn&rsquo;t diagnosed. However, since you were happy with the behaviour
- under LaTeX 2.09, replace the <code>\</code><code>include</code> commands with <code>\</code><code>input</code>
- commands (with <code>\</code><code>clearpage</code> as appropriate).
-</ul>
-<p/><p/><p>This question on the Web: <a href="http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=include">http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=include</a>
-</body>