diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Master/texmf-doc/doc/english/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-fuzzy-gs.html')
-rw-r--r-- | Master/texmf-doc/doc/english/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-fuzzy-gs.html | 26 |
1 files changed, 26 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Master/texmf-doc/doc/english/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-fuzzy-gs.html b/Master/texmf-doc/doc/english/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-fuzzy-gs.html new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..bd4275cf4e5 --- /dev/null +++ b/Master/texmf-doc/doc/english/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-fuzzy-gs.html @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ +<head> +<title>UK TeX FAQ -- question label fuzzy-gs</title> +</head><body> +<h3>Fuzzy fonts because <i>Ghostscript</i> too old</h3> +<!-- crippled blurry --> +<p>So you've done everything the FAQ has told you that you need, +correct fonts properly installed and appearing in the <i>dvips</i> +output, but <em>still</em> you get fuzzy character output after +distilling with <i>ghostscript</i>. +<p>The problem could arise from too old a version of +<i>ghostscript</i>, which you may be using directly, or via a +script such as <i>ps2pdf</i> (distributed with +<i>ghostscript</i> itself), <i>dvipdf</i>, or similar. +Though <i>ghostscript</i> was capable of distillation from +version 5.50, that version could only produce bitmap Type 3 output of +any font other than the fundamental 35 fonts (<i>Times</i>, +<i>Helvetica</i>, etc.). Later versions added 'complete' +distillation, but it wasn't until version 6.50 that one could rely on +it for everyday work. +<p>So, if your PDF output still looks fuzzy in <i>Acrobat</i> +<i>Reader</i>, upgrade <i>ghostscript</i>. The new version +should be at least version 6.50, of course, but it's usually good +policy to go to the most recent version (version 8.12 at the time of +writing - 2003). +<p><p>This question on the Web: <a href="http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=fuzzy-gs">http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=fuzzy-gs</a> +</body> |