diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Master/texmf-doc/doc/english/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-capbibtex.html')
-rw-r--r-- | Master/texmf-doc/doc/english/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-capbibtex.html | 14 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/Master/texmf-doc/doc/english/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-capbibtex.html b/Master/texmf-doc/doc/english/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-capbibtex.html index 614b55f97a2..e02940bd381 100644 --- a/Master/texmf-doc/doc/english/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-capbibtex.html +++ b/Master/texmf-doc/doc/english/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-capbibtex.html @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ <h3>Capitalisation in BibTeX</h3> <p>The standard BibTeX bibliography styles impose fixed ideas about the capitalisation of titles of things in the bibliography. While -this is not unreasonable by BibTeX's lights (the rules come from +this is not unreasonable by BibTeX’s lights (the rules come from the <em>Chicago Manual of Style</em>) it can be troublesome, since BibTeX fails to recognise special uses (such as acronyms, chemical formulae, etc.). @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ BibTeX should not touch, in braces, as: <pre> title = {The {THE} operating system}, </pre> -</blockquote> +</blockquote><p> Sometimes you find BibTeX changing the case of a single letter inappropriately. No matter: the technique can be applied to single letters, as in: @@ -22,21 +22,21 @@ letters, as in: <pre> title = {Te{X}niques and tips}, </pre> -</blockquote> +</blockquote><p> If your document design specification requires a different style of -capitalisation, you should acquire a bibliography style that doesn't -enforce BibTeX's default rules. It is definitely <em>not</em> a good +capitalisation, you should acquire a bibliography style that doesn’t +enforce BibTeX’s default rules. It is definitely <em>not</em> a good idea to enclose an entire title in braces, as in <blockquote> <pre> title = {{TeXniques and tips}}, </pre> -</blockquote> +</blockquote><p> though that does ensure that the capitalisation is not changed. Your BibTeX database should be a general-purpose thing, not something tuned to the requirements of a particular document, or to the way you are thinking today. -<p>There's more on the subject in the +<p>There’s more on the subject in the <a href="FAQ-BibTeXing.html">BibTeX documentation</a>. <p><p>This question on the Web: <a href="http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=capbibtex">http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=capbibtex</a> |