summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Master/texmf-doc/doc/english/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-capbibtex.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'Master/texmf-doc/doc/english/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-capbibtex.html')
-rw-r--r--Master/texmf-doc/doc/english/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-capbibtex.html14
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/Master/texmf-doc/doc/english/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-capbibtex.html b/Master/texmf-doc/doc/english/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-capbibtex.html
index 614b55f97a2..e02940bd381 100644
--- a/Master/texmf-doc/doc/english/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-capbibtex.html
+++ b/Master/texmf-doc/doc/english/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-capbibtex.html
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
<h3>Capitalisation in BibTeX</h3>
<p>The standard BibTeX bibliography styles impose fixed ideas about
the capitalisation of titles of things in the bibliography. While
-this is not unreasonable by BibTeX's lights (the rules come from
+this is not unreasonable by BibTeX&rsquo;s lights (the rules come from
the <em>Chicago Manual of Style</em>) it can be troublesome, since
BibTeX fails to recognise special uses (such as acronyms, chemical
formulae, etc.).
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ BibTeX should not touch, in braces, as:
<pre>
title = {The {THE} operating system},
</pre>
-</blockquote>
+</blockquote><p>
Sometimes you find BibTeX changing the case of a single letter
inappropriately. No matter: the technique can be applied to single
letters, as in:
@@ -22,21 +22,21 @@ letters, as in:
<pre>
title = {Te{X}niques and tips},
</pre>
-</blockquote>
+</blockquote><p>
If your document design specification requires a different style of
-capitalisation, you should acquire a bibliography style that doesn't
-enforce BibTeX's default rules. It is definitely <em>not</em> a good
+capitalisation, you should acquire a bibliography style that doesn&rsquo;t
+enforce BibTeX&rsquo;s default rules. It is definitely <em>not</em> a good
idea to enclose an entire title in braces, as in
<blockquote>
<pre>
title = {{TeXniques and tips}},
</pre>
-</blockquote>
+</blockquote><p>
though that does ensure that the capitalisation is not changed. Your
BibTeX database should be a general-purpose thing, not something
tuned to the requirements of a particular document, or to the way you
are thinking today.
-<p>There's more on the subject in the
+<p>There&rsquo;s more on the subject in the
<a href="FAQ-BibTeXing.html">BibTeX documentation</a>.
<p><p>This question on the Web: <a href="http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=capbibtex">http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=capbibtex</a>