diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Master/texmf-dist/tex/latex/bidi/multicol-xetex-bidi.def')
| -rw-r--r-- | Master/texmf-dist/tex/latex/bidi/multicol-xetex-bidi.def | 65 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 63 deletions
diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/tex/latex/bidi/multicol-xetex-bidi.def b/Master/texmf-dist/tex/latex/bidi/multicol-xetex-bidi.def index c67f9439e74..6c65aa23e9a 100644 --- a/Master/texmf-dist/tex/latex/bidi/multicol-xetex-bidi.def +++ b/Master/texmf-dist/tex/latex/bidi/multicol-xetex-bidi.def @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ %% bidi.dtx (with options: `multicol-xetex-bidi.def') %% %% ______________________________________ -%% Copyright © 2009–2010 Vafa Khalighi +%% Copyright © 2009–2011 Vafa Khalighi %% %% License information appended. %% @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ \rule\z@\footnotesep\ignorespaces\if@RTL@footnote#1\else\rmfamily#1\fi\@finalstrut\strutbox}% \color@endgroup}} %% -%% Copyright © 2009–2010 Vafa Khalighi <vafakhlgh@gmail.com> +%% Copyright © 2009–2011 Vafa Khalighi <vafakhlgh@gmail.com> %% %% It may be distributed and/or modified under the LaTeX Project Public License, %% version 1.3c or higher (your choice). The latest version of @@ -168,67 +168,6 @@ %% This work is “author-maintained” (as per LPPL maintenance status) %% by Vafa Khalighi. %% -%% In addition to the terms of LPPL any distributed version -%% (unchanged or modified) of bidi has to keep the statement -%% about the moral obligation for using bidi. In case of major -%% changes where this would not be appropriate the author of the -%% changed version should contact the copyright holder. -%% -%% -%% -%% Moral obligation for using bidi: -%% ____________________________________ -%% -%% Users of bidi who wish to include or use bidi or a modified -%% version in a proprietary and commercially market product are asked -%% under certain conditions (see below) for the payment of a license -%% fee. The size of this fee is to be determined, in each instance, -%% by the commercial user, depending on his/her judgment of the value of -%% bidi for his/her product. -%% -%% -%% The conditions for this are as follows: -%% -%% The producer of a proprietary and commercially market product -%% that involves typesetting using bidi is asked to determine -%% the value of a license fee for using bidi if -%% -%% - the product is a document and the producer has decided to -%% include bidi to typeset (parts of) the document or has -%% directed the author of the document to include bidi (for -%% example, by providing a class file to be used by the author) -%% -%% - the product is a LaTeX class or package that includes bidi -%% -%% -%% There is no moral obligation in case -%% -%% - the product is a document but producer has not directed -%% the author to include bidi (in that case the moral obligation -%% lies with the author of the document) -%% -%% - the product does not involve typesetting, e.g., consists, for -%% example, of distributing bidi and its documentation. -%% -%% - the product is not proprietary, i.e., is made available as free -%% software itself (which doesn't prohibit its commercial marketing) -%% -%% - bidi is used for non-commercial purposes -%% -%% -%% Determinating a license fee might result in a license fee of zero -%% (i.e., no payment) in case a producer has determined that the use -%% of bidi has no enhancing effect on the product. This is a -%% plausible scenario, i.e., in the above two cases the producer is -%% only asked to evaluate the value of bidi for the product -%% not for the payment of a license fee per se (which might or might -%% not follow from this evaluation). -%% -%% The license fee, if any, can be payed to the author of -%% the program who can be contacted at -%% -%% vafakhlgh@gmail.com -%% %% %% %% |