diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Master/texmf-dist/doc')
| -rw-r--r-- | Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/PDP.tex | 55 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/README | 21 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/appAeng.tex | 134 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/appendix.tex | 3 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/conclusion.tex | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/example.pdf | bin | 0 -> 288311 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/example.tex | 279 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/exp1.tex | 23 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/exp2.tex | 4 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/exp3.tex | 74 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/felty.bib | 2495 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/intro.tex | 46 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/mybibstyle.bst | 1468 |
13 files changed, 4604 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/PDP.tex b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/PDP.tex new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e90eed16d6a --- /dev/null +++ b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/PDP.tex @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ +\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=.8,cap=round] +% Styles +\tikzstyle{information text}=[text badly centered]%, rounded corners,fill=red!10,inner sep=1ex] +% The graphic +\begin{scope} +\pgfsetarrowsend{stealth'} +\pgfsetlinewidth{1pt} +\draw (1,.9) -- (1,1.8) + node[below=.9cm,text width=3cm,style=information text] + {\small Phonological representation of root form }; +\draw (5,-.2) -- (5,.8) + node[below=.9cm,text width=3cm, style=information text] + { \small Wickelfeature representation of root form }; +\draw (11,-.2) -- (11,.8) + node[below=.9cm,text width=3cm, style=information text] + { \small Wickelfeature representation of past tense }; +\draw (16,0.9) -- (16,1.8) + node[below=.9cm,text width=3cm, style=information text] + { \small Phonological representation of past tense }; +\end{scope} +\draw (3,6) + node[text width=3cm, style=information text] + { \small Fixed Encoding Network }; +\draw (8,6) + node[text width=4cm, style=information text] + { \small Pattern Associator Modifiable Connections }; +\draw (13.5,6) + node[text width=3cm, style=information text] + { \small Decoding/Binding Network }; +% draw the nodes +\foreach \x in {1,16} + \foreach \y in {2,3,4} { + \draw (\x,\y) circle (0.1cm); + } +\foreach \x in {5,11} + \foreach \y in {1,2,3,4,5} { + \draw (\x,\y) circle (0.1cm); + } +% we add the lines for the nodes starting in y 2,3, and 4 +\foreach \xa / \xb in {1.1 / 4.9, 5.1 / 10.9 , 10.9 / 5.1 , 15.9 / 11.1} + \foreach \ya / \yb / \yc / \yd / \ye in {2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 1, 3 / 4 / 5 / 1 / + 2, 4 / 5 / 1 / 2 / 3} { + \draw (\xa,\ya) -- (\xb,\ya); + \draw (\xa,\ya) -- (\xb,\yb); + \draw (\xa,\ya) -- (\xb,\yc); + \draw (\xa,\ya) -- (\xb,\yd); + \draw (\xa,\ya) -- (\xb,\ye); + } +% add remaining lines from y1 to y5 +\foreach \xa / \xb in {5.1 / 10.9 , 10.9 / 5.1} + \foreach \ya / \yb in {1 / 5, 5 / 1} { + \draw (\xa,\ya) -- (\xb,\ya); + \draw (\xa,\ya) -- (\xb,\yb); + } +\end{tikzpicture} diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/README b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/README new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b4aec82ba83 --- /dev/null +++ b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/README @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +LaTeX class file in conformance with the specifications set by the +University of Michigan for dissertations +This class loads the standard book class and then modifies it as little as %% possible. Many of the modifications were taken from the beavtex class and +the umdiss.cls + +Before using, please read the introductory comments in the umthesis.cls file +and look at the example.tex file, which is also highly commented. A compiled +example.pdf is also provided, which illustrates many of the features of the +class. + +INSTALLATION +You can simply keep the class file in the same directory as your dissertation, +or if you prefer, you can put it somewhere tex will find it (under texmf) +and then run +texhash +to tell tex you added something + +This software is released under the Latex Project Public License. + +Please direct any questions or comments to Robert Felty +<robfelty AE gmail DOT com> diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/appAeng.tex b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/appAeng.tex new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8d1ab06b394 --- /dev/null +++ b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/appAeng.tex @@ -0,0 +1,134 @@ + +\setlength{\extrarowheight}{-7pt} +\section{English Nonwords} +\label{S:engNon} +\begin{footnotesize} + \begin{longtable}[c]{|*{2}{l|} *{14}{r|}} + \caption{English nonword stimuli used \label{T:engNonwordStimuli}}\\ + \hline\hline + \hspace{3em}\rotth{7em}{spell} & + \hspace{2.6em}\rotth{7em}{IPA} & + \rotth{7em}{posfreq}& + \rotth{7em}{biphone freq} & + \rotth{7em}{Neighbors}& + \rotth{7em}{Freq Neighbors} & + \rotth{7em}{\raggedright Lemma Freq Neighbors}& + \rotth{7em}{syl1 Neighbors}& + \rotth{7em}{syl1 Freq Neighbors}& + \rotth{7em}{syl1 lemma Freq Neighbors}& + \rotth{7em}{syl2 Neighbors} & + \rotth{7em}{syl2 Freq Neighbors} & + \rotth{7em}{syl2 lemma Freq Neighbors}& + \rotth{7em}{edit2 neighbors} & + \rotth{7em}{edit2 Freq Neighbors} & + \rotth{7em}{edit2 lemma Freq Neighbors}\\ + \hline + & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & {\vspace*{-.1em}}\\ + \endfirsthead + \caption[]{English nonword stimuli used (continued)}\\ + \hline\hline + \hspace{3em}\rotth{7em}{spell} & + \hspace{2.6em}\rotth{7em}{IPA} & + \rotth{7em}{posfreq}& + \rotth{7em}{biphone freq} & + \rotth{7em}{Neighbors}& + \rotth{7em}{Freq Neighbors} & + \rotth{7em}{\raggedright Lemma Freq Neighbors}& + \rotth{7em}{syl1 Neighbors}& + \rotth{7em}{syl1 Freq Neighbors}& + \rotth{7em}{syl1 lemma Freq Neighbors}& + \rotth{7em}{syl2 Neighbors} & + \rotth{7em}{syl2 Freq Neighbors} & + \rotth{7em}{syl2 lemma Freq Neighbors}& + \rotth{7em}{edit2 neighbors} & + \rotth{7em}{edit2 Freq Neighbors} & + \rotth{7em}{edit2 lemma Freq Neighbors}\\ + \hline + & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & {\vspace*{-.1em}}\\ + \endhead + \hline\hline + \endfoot + \input{table/engNonwordStimuliStats} + \end{longtable} +\end{footnotesize} + +\begin{landscape} +\section{English Words} +\label{S:engStimList} +\begin{footnotesize} + \begin{longtable}[c]{|*{3}{l|} *{16}{r|}} + \caption{English word stimuli used \label{T:engWordStimuli}}\\ + \hline\hline + \hspace{3em}\rotth{7em}{spell} & + \hspace{2.6em}\rotth{7em}{IPA} & + \hspace{1.4em}\rotth{7em}{morph} & + \rotth{7em}{logFreq}& + \rotth{7em}{lemmaLogFreq}& + \rotth{7em}{posfreq}& + \rotth{7em}{biphone freq} & + \rotth{7em}{Neighbors}& + \rotth{7em}{Freq Neighbors} & + \rotth{7em}{\raggedright Lemma Freq Neighbors}& + \rotth{7em}{syl1 Neighbors}& + \rotth{7em}{syl1 Freq Neighbors}& + \rotth{7em}{syl1 lemma Freq Neighbors}& + \rotth{7em}{syl2 Neighbors} & + \rotth{7em}{syl2 Freq Neighbors} & + \rotth{7em}{syl2 lemma Freq Neighbors}& + \rotth{7em}{edit2 neighbors} & + \rotth{7em}{edit2 Freq Neighbors} & + \rotth{7em}{edit2 lemma Freq Neighbors}\\ + \hline + & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & {\vspace*{-.1em}}\\ + \endfirsthead + \caption[]{English word stimuli used (continued)}\\ + \hline\hline + \hspace{3em}\rotth{7em}{spell} & + \hspace{2.6em}\rotth{7em}{IPA} & + \hspace{1.4em}\rotth{7em}{morph} & + \rotth{7em}{logFreq}& + \rotth{7em}{lemmaLogFreq}& + \rotth{7em}{posfreq}& + \rotth{7em}{biphone freq} & + \rotth{7em}{Neighbors}& + \rotth{7em}{Freq Neighbors} & + \rotth{7em}{\raggedright Lemma Freq Neighbors}& + \rotth{7em}{syl1 Neighbors}& + \rotth{7em}{syl1 Freq Neighbors}& + \rotth{7em}{syl1 lemma Freq Neighbors}& + \rotth{7em}{syl2 Neighbors} & + \rotth{7em}{syl2 Freq Neighbors} & + \rotth{7em}{syl2 lemma Freq Neighbors}& + \rotth{7em}{edit2 neighbors} & + \rotth{7em}{edit2 Freq Neighbors} & + \rotth{7em}{edit2 lemma Freq Neighbors}\\ + \hline + & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & {\vspace*{-.1em}}\\ + \endhead + \hline\hline + \endfoot + \input{table/engWordStimuliStats} + \end{longtable} +\end{footnotesize} +\end{landscape} + + \clearpage + +\setlength{\extrarowheight}{0pt} + \begin{table}[htbp] + \caption{Distribution of Phonemes for English stimuli} + \label{T:engDist} + \centering + \begin{tabular}{*{21}{r}} + \hline\hline + \rule{0pt}{1.1em} phon & C1& V1& C2& C3& V2& C4 & & C1& V1& C2& C3& V2& + C4& & C1& V1& C2& C3& V2& C4\\[.3em] + \hline + \rule{0pt}{1.1em} & \multicolumn{6}{c}{monomorphemes} & & + \multicolumn{6}{c}{bimorphemes} && \multicolumn{6}{c}{nonwords}\\[.3em] + \cline{2-7}\cline{9-14}\cline{16-21} + \input{table/engDist} + \hline\hline + \end{tabular} + \end{table} + \clearpage diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/appendix.tex b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/appendix.tex new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..82f6d15fe2a --- /dev/null +++ b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/appendix.tex @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +\chapter{The first appendix} + +\chapter{The second appendix} diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/conclusion.tex b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/conclusion.tex new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9999fa48f5a --- /dev/null +++ b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/conclusion.tex @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +\chapter{The conclusion} + diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/example.pdf b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/example.pdf Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 00000000000..573701a386a --- /dev/null +++ b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/example.pdf diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/example.tex b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/example.tex new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..29c37847312 --- /dev/null +++ b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/example.tex @@ -0,0 +1,279 @@ +\documentclass[12pt, letterpaper]{umthesis} + +%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% +%%% optional packages %%% +%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% +%% these packages are all optional. I include them here +%% because I use them, and I know they work with this class + +\usepackage{sidecap} %put captions beside a figure +\usepackage{ifpdf} % check to see if compiling as dvi or pdf +\usepackage{rotating} % rotate some text +\usepackage{graphicx} % include graphics files +\usepackage[all]{xy} %for making simple graphs +\usepackage{index} %this is newer and more fully featured than makeidx +\usepackage{hhline} %fancy rules +\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb} %extra math commands and symbols +\usepackage{mathptmx} %use times for normal text and math +\usepackage{helvet} %use helvetica font for sans-serif +\usepackage{courier} % use courier font for typewriter and fixed width +\usepackage{colortbl} %allows for color in tables +\usepackage{subfigure} % groups figures into one large one +\usepackage{longtable} % multi-page tables +\usepackage{pdflscape} %better handling of landscape features +\usepackage{tabularx} %advanced tabular environment +\usepackage{multicol} % to use multiple columns +\usepackage{tikz} % package for making cool graphics - compatible with + % dvi, postscript, and pdf +\usetikzlibrary{arrows} % fancy arrows for tikz package +\usepackage{natbib} %more advanced handling of bibliographies +\bibpunct{(}{)}{;}{a}{,}{,} %settings for natbib, if using it +\usepackage[font=small,labelfont=bf,labelsep=quad]{caption} %more caption +\ifpdf %use these packages if we are compiling with pdf + \usepackage{epstopdf} %automatically converts .eps files to .pdf + \usepackage[final,expansion=true,protrusion=true]{microtype} + %advanced typesetting +\fi +%\usepackage[T1]{tipa} %phonetic fonts +%\usepackage{placeins} %prevent floats from floating past section +%\usepackage{flafter} %don't allow floats to appear before their definition + %formatting +%\usepackage{chngpage}%this allows resetting margins within the document +%\usepackage[color]{showkeys} % prints the names of labels that you use + % handy for proofreading purposes +%\usepackage[dvips]{geometry} %tells dvips about paper size options +%\usepackage{svn} % to keep track of revisions +%\SVN $Author: robfelty $ +%\SVN $Revision: 17 $ +%\SVN $Date: 2007-03-06 10:58:33 -0500 (Tue, 06 Mar 2007) $ +%\SVN $Id: example.tex 17 2007-03-06 15:58:33Z robfelty $ +%\usepackage{timestamp} % to give me a timestamp + +%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% +%% sectsty allows to do some fancier formatting +%% of chapter and section titles - it is not clear +%% to me whether Rackham allows this or not +%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% + +%\usepackage{sectsty} +%\makeatletter +%\chapternumberfont{% +% \if@mainmatter% +% \rule{\textwidth}{2pt}\\% +% \vspace{-1em}\rule{\textwidth}{1pt}\\% +% \fi% +% \centering \huge \bf% +%} +%\chaptertitlefont{% +% \if@mainmatter% +% \vspace{-1em} \rule{\textwidth}{1pt}\\[.2em]% +% \fi% +% \centering \huge \bf% +%} +%\makeatother +%\usepackage[pdftex]{graphicx} + +%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% +%%% fancy headers are not allowed by Rackham - however +%%% this does not mean that you can't use them for all other +%%% copies that you do not give to Rackham +%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% + +%\usepackage{fancyhdr} +% \pagestyle{fancy} +% % with this we ensure that the chapter and section +% % headings are in lowercase. +% \renewcommand{\chaptermark}[1]{\markboth{#1}{}} +% \renewcommand{\sectionmark}[1]{\markright{\thesection\ #1}} +% \fancyhf{} % delete current setting for header and footer +% \fancyhead[LE,RO]{\thepage} +% \fancyhead[LO]{\rightmark} +% \fancyhead[RE]{\leftmark} +% %\fancyhead[RE,RO]{\bfseries\rightmark} +% %\fancyhead[LE,LO]{\bfseries\leftmark} +% %\fancyfoot[C]{\thepage} +% \renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0.5pt} +% \renewcommand{\footrulewidth}{0pt} +% \addtolength{\headheight}{0.5pt} % make space for the rule +% \fancypagestyle{plain}{% +% \fancyhead{} % get rid of headers on plain pages +% %\fancyfoot[C]{\thepage} +% \fancyfoot{} +% \renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt} % and the line +% } +\hfuzz2pt % Don't bother to report overfull hboxes if over-edge is < 2pt +\vfuzz2pt % Same for overfull vboxes (maybe just works for hfuzz?) + +%this command can be used for table headers that need to be rotated, thus the +%name rotth, for rotated table header -- it takes two arguments, the width of +%the parbox to create (which since it is rotated is more like height), and the +%text to put in it +\newcommand\rotth[2]{% + \begin{sideways}% + \parbox[b]{#1}{\raggedright #2}% + \end{sideways}% +} +%this sets up a new command \dash, which makes nice dashes +\DeclareRobustCommand\dash{% +\unskip\nobreak\thinspace\textemdash\thinspace\ignorespaces} + %in bookmarks, use regular dash instead of emdash + \pdfstringdefDisableCommands{\renewcommand{\dash}{ - }} + +%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% +%% additional options for the hyperref package (it is already loaded) +%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% +% \hypersetup{ +% colorlinks, +% bookmarksnumbered, +% bookmarkstype={toc}, +% bookmarksopen={true}, +% bookmarksopenlevel={1}, +% pdfstartview={FitH}, +% citecolor={blue}, +% %linkcolor={black}, +% %urlcolor={black}, +% pdfpagemode={UseOutlines}, +% breaklinks=true +% } + +%the next two lines will prevent hyphenation in phonetic transcriptions +%\usepackage{hyphenat} +%\newcommand{\ipa}[1]{\nohyphens{\textipa{#1}}} + +%% redefine some rules for nice table formatting +\setlength{\arrayrulewidth}{.6pt} +\setlength{\doublerulesep}{0pt} + +%% allow more floats on a page, and change the float separation from text +\setlength{\floatsep}{5pt} +\setlength{\intextsep}{5pt} +\renewcommand\floatpagefraction{.70} +\renewcommand\topfraction{.95} +\renewcommand\bottomfraction{.95} +\renewcommand\textfraction{.1} + +%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% +%% line spacing %%% +%% Rackham requires onehalf or double spacing +%% The default for the class is onehalf +%% To change it for non-final copies, use one of the following options +%\singlespacing +%\doublespacing +%% The class file automatically singles spaces stuff which should +%% be single spaced according to rackham, like the bibliography, +%% titles and such +%% However, if you want to, you can also change spacing for +%% a portion of text like so: +%%\begin{singlespacing} ... \end{singlespacing} +%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% + +%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% +%%% title and author info %%%% +%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% +\author{\LaTeX} +\program{Professional Typesetting} +\degree{Doctor of Philosophy} +\cochaircommitteemember{John Smith}{Professor} +\cochaircommitteemember{Mary Johnson}{Assistant Professor} +\committeemember{Emily Dickens}{Assistant Professor} +\committeemember{Robert Hughes}{Professor} +\title{The most Rackham-standards compliant dissertation ever} + +\makeindex %if you are including an index +%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% +%% IMPORTANT - learn to use includeonly - it is very helpful +%% 1. put each chapter in a separate file +%% 2. type \include{file} where you want it to go +%% 3. First you have to compile once with everything included, +%% then you can include only certain parts +%% +%% and the table of contents will still list all parts, +%% the chapter numbers will still all be correct +%% and you can easily print out (or e-mail or whatever) just one chapter +%% if you like, you can even leave out all the frontmatter stuff by putting +%% it in a separate file as well +%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% +\includeonly{% +intro,% +exp1,% +exp2,% +exp3,% +conclusion,% +appendix +} +\begin{document} +%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% +%% IMPORTANT -- must issue frontmatter, mainmatter, and backmatter +%% commands in right place. These commands handle page numbering and +%% formatting of various parts +%% \frontmatter - right after begin document +%% \mainmatter - right before first chapter +%% \backmatter - right before bibliography +%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% +\frontmatter + +%%%% these command change latex's default hyphenation a bit. +% Setting tolerance low will encourage hyphenation. +% Setting tolerance high will discourage hyphenation +\pretolerance=-1 +\tolerance=1000 +\adjdemerits=6400 +\doublehyphendemerits=90000 +\finalhyphendemerits=14400 + +\maketitle +%%%%% the finalabstract environment typesets the abstract as it should be +% for the copies that go to Rackham separate of the actual dissertation. +\begin{finalabstract} + your abstract here +\end{finalabstract} +\makecopyright + +\begin{frontispiece} + If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research\\ + \dash Albert Einstein +\end{frontispiece} + +\begin{dedication} + to Delores +\end{dedication} + +\begin{acknowledgments} + these people helped me +\end{acknowledgments} + +\begin{preface} + before reading this, you should know\dots +\end{preface} + +\tableofcontents +\listoftables +\listoffigures +\listofappendices + +% the normal abstract is formatted the same as preface and acknowledgements, +% and is listed in the table of contents +\begin{abstract} + your abstract here +\end{abstract} +\mainmatter +\include{intro} +\include{exp1} +\include{exp2} +\include{exp3} +\include{conclusion} +\appendix +\include{appendix} + +\backmatter +\bibliographystyle{mybibstyle} %my personal bibliography style +%\bibliographystyle{plain} %default bib style +\bibliography{felty} +%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% +%% if using an index, make sure to add it to the table of contents +%% and use phantomsection so hyperref links to the right page +%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% +%\phantomsection %makes sure it points to the right page +%\addtocontents{toc}{chapter}{Index} +%\printindex +\end{document} diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/exp1.tex b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/exp1.tex new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c76fdbe8606 --- /dev/null +++ b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/exp1.tex @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +\chapter{My first experiment} + +This is my first experiment. I will try to prove the following things: +(Note that lists are single spaced, as Rackham wants, and that lists should +start a new paragraph, otherwise the single spacing will also apply to the +preceding paragraph). + +\begin{itemize} + \item lists are easy to use + \item \LaTeX\ rocks +\end{itemize} + +The following figure was drawn using the excellent pgf/tikz graphics package. +If you do not have this package, you should comment it out. + +\begin{figure*}[htbp] +\centering +\input{PDP} +\caption[Model structure from \cite{Rumelhart1986}]{Model structure from +\cite{Rumelhart1986}} +\label{F:PDP} +\end{figure*} + diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/exp2.tex b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/exp2.tex new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..113120801b1 --- /dev/null +++ b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/exp2.tex @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ +\chapter{My second experiment \dash which has a really long name, to +illustrate line breaking within the document as well as in the table of +contents} + diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/exp3.tex b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/exp3.tex new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..321fdbf1d3b --- /dev/null +++ b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/exp3.tex @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@ +\chapter{My third experiment} +"Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod +tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, +quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo +consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse +cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non +proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum." + +\section{Section 1.10.32 of "de Finibus Bonorum et Malorum", written by +Cicero in 45 BC} + + +"Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium +doloremque laudantium, totam rem aperiam, eaque ipsa quae ab illo inventore +veritatis et quasi architecto beatae vitae dicta sunt explicabo. Nemo enim +ipsam voluptatem quia voluptas sit aspernatur aut odit aut fugit, sed quia +consequuntur magni dolores eos qui ratione voluptatem sequi nesciunt. Neque +porro quisquam est, qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, +adipisci velit, sed quia non numquam eius modi tempora incidunt ut labore et +dolore magnam aliquam quaerat voluptatem. Ut enim ad minima veniam, quis +nostrum exercitationem ullam corporis suscipit laboriosam, nisi ut aliquid ex +ea commodi consequatur? Quis autem vel eum iure reprehenderit qui in ea +voluptate velit esse quam nihil molestiae consequatur, vel illum qui dolorem +eum fugiat quo voluptas nulla pariatur?" + +1914 translation by H. Rackham + +"But I must explain to you how all this mistaken idea of denouncing pleasure +and praising pain was born and I will give you a complete account of the +system, and expound the actual teachings of the great explorer of the truth, +the master-builder of human happiness. No one rejects, dislikes, or avoids +pleasure itself, because it is pleasure, but because those who do not know how +to pursue pleasure rationally encounter consequences that are extremely +painful. Nor again is there anyone who loves or pursues or desires to obtain +pain of itself, because it is pain, but because occasionally circumstances +occur in which toil and pain can procure him some great pleasure. To take a +trivial example, which of us ever undertakes laborious physical exercise, +except to obtain some advantage from it? But who has any right to find fault +with a man who chooses to enjoy a pleasure that has no annoying consequences, +or one who avoids a pain that produces no resultant pleasure?" + +\section{Section 1.10.33 of "de Finibus Bonorum et Malorum", written by Cicero +in 45 BC} + +"At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis +praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias +excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui +officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum +quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum +soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime +placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor +repellendus. Temporibus autem quibusdam et aut officiis debitis aut rerum +necessitatibus saepe eveniet ut et voluptates repudiandae sint et molestiae +non recusandae. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut +reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus +asperiores repellat." + +1914 translation by H. Rackham + +"On the other hand, we denounce with righteous indignation and dislike men who +are so beguiled and demoralized by the charms of pleasure of the moment, so +blinded by desire, that they cannot foresee the pain and trouble that are +bound to ensue; and equal blame belongs to those who fail in their duty +through weakness of will, which is the same as saying through shrinking from +toil and pain. These cases are perfectly simple and easy to distinguish. In a +free hour, when our power of choice is untrammelled and when nothing prevents +our being able to do what we like best, every pleasure is to be welcomed and +every pain avoided. But in certain circumstances and owing to the claims of +duty or the obligations of business it will frequently occur that pleasures +have to be repudiated and annoyances accepted. The wise man therefore always +holds in these matters to this principle of selection: he rejects pleasures to +secure other greater pleasures, or else he endures pains to avoid worse +pains." + diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/felty.bib b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/felty.bib new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f3402702106 --- /dev/null +++ b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/felty.bib @@ -0,0 +1,2495 @@ +This file was created with JabRef 2.2b2. +Encoding: UTF8 + +@PREAMBLE{"\hyphenation{Vite-vitch +Cole-man +Rud-nicky +Pierre-hum-bert +Sonnen-stuhl +Eisen-beiss +Brad-low +Ble-vins +Bier-wisch +Booth-royd +Broadbent +Nitt-rouer +Zwitser-lood +Wunder-lich +Van-nest}"} + +@STRING{JASA = {Journal of the Acoustical Society of America}} + +@STRING{JML = {Journal of Memory and Language}} + +@ARTICLE{Albright2002, + author = {Albright, A.}, + title = {Islands of reliability for regular morphology: Evidence from Italian}, + journal = {Language}, + year = {2002}, + volume = {78}, + pages = {684--709}, + number = {4}, + month = dec, + abstract = {The representation of regular morphological processes has been the + subject of much controversy, particularly in the debate between single + and dual route models of morphology. I present a model of morphological + learning that posits rules and seeks to infer their productivity + by comparing their reliability in different phonological environments. + The result of this procedure is a grammar in which general rules + exist alongside more specific, but more reliable, generalizations + describing subregularities for the same process. I present results + from a nonce-probe (WUG) experiment in Italian, in which speakers + rated the acceptability of novel infinitives in various conjugation + classes. These results indicate that such subregularities are in + fact internalized by speakers, even for a regular morphological process.}, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/Albright2002.pdf}, + sn = {0097-8507}, + timestamp = {2007.02.10}, + ut = {ISI:000180204900006} +} + +@ARTICLE{Albright2003, + author = {Albright, Adam and Hayes, Bruce}, + title = {Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: a computational/experimental + study}, + journal = {Cognition}, + year = {2003}, + volume = {90}, + pages = {119--161}, + number = {2}, + month = dec, + abstract = {Are morphological patterns learned in the form of rules? Some models + deny this, attributing all morphology to analogical mechanisms. The + dual mechanism model (Pinker, S., & Prince, A. (1998). On language + and connectionism: analysis of a parallel distributed processing + model of language acquisition. Cognition, 28, 73-193) posits that + speakers do internalize rules, but that these rules are few and cover + only regular processes; the remaining patterns are attributed to + analogy. This article advocates a third approach, which uses multiple + stochastic rules and no analogy. We propose a model that employs + inductive learning to discover multiple rules, and assigns them confidence + scores based on their performance in the lexicon. Our model is supported + over the two alternatives by new "wug test" data on English past + tenses, which show that participant ratings of novel pasts depend + on the phonological shape of the stem, both for irregulars and, surprisingly, + also for regulars. The latter observation cannot be explained under + the dual mechanism approach, which derives all regulars with a single + rule. To evaluate the alternative hypothesis that all morphology + is analogical, we implemented a purely analogical model, which evaluates + novel pasts based solely on their similarity to existing verbs. Tested + against experimental data, this analogical model also failed in key + respects: it could not locate patterns that require abstract structural + characterizations, and it favored implausible responses based on + single, highly similar exemplars. We conclude that speakers extend + morphological patterns based on abstract structural properties, of + a kind appropriately described with rules.}, + keywords = {Rules, Analogy, Similarity, Past tenses, Dual mechanism model}, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/AlbrightHayes2003.pdf}, + timestamp = {2007.02.12} +} + +@ARTICLE{Allen1994, + author = {Allen, Jont}, + title = {How do humans process and recognize speech?}, + journal = {IEEE Transactions of Speech and Audio Processing}, + year = {1994}, + volume = {2}, + pages = {567-577}, + number = {4}, + keywords = {Allen, Jont} +} + +@ARTICLE{Allen2002, + author = {Allen, Mark and Badecker, William}, + title = {Inflectional Regularity: Probing the Nature of Lexical Representation + in a Cross-Modal Priming Task}, + journal = {Journal of Memory and Language}, + year = {2002}, + volume = {46}, + pages = {705--722}, + number = {4}, + month = may, + abstract = {Two cross-modal priming experiments address issues concerning the + representation and processing of regular and irregular morphology + in English as well as methodological issues concerning the use of + the cross-modal technique in lexical processing studies. Cross-modal + inflectional priming facilitates regular verbs (e.g., walked priming + walk) but not irregular verbs (e.g., gave priming give). We found + that similar but morphologically unrelated words (e.g., slam priming + slim) inhibit each other when presented cross-modally. Based on this + effect for form-based inhibition, we interpret the regular/irregular + verb priming asymmetry as a reflection of competition between orthographically + similar verb forms (e.g., gave-give) which results in target inhibition. + In support of this proposal, we found that orthographically dissimilar + irregular verbs (e.g., taught-teach) show strong priming facilitation. + We account for this result in terms of a two-level lexicon in which + irregular verb alternates have distinct form-level entries, but engage + a common entry at an abstract morphological level of representation. + In addition to serving as evidence concerning the representation + of English verbal inflection, the findings from these experiments + also set important limits on the claim that the cross-modal priming + paradigm automatically circumvents form-related processing effects + that are not morphological in character.}, + keywords = {inflectional morphology, regularity, two-level model of lexical processing, + cross-modal priming, form-based inhibition.}, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/AllenBadecker2002JML.pdf}, + timestamp = {2006.12.13}, + url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6WK4-45WGJ0Y-3/2/4e23b8078a19e6a7eb4f0a516cdb8583} +} + +@MISC{Baayen1993, + author = {Baayen, H, R. and H. Rijn}, + title = {The {CELEX} lexical database (CD-ROM)}, + howpublished = {Philadelphia: Linguistics Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania}, + year = {1993}, + journal = {Philadelphia: Linguistics Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania}, + keywords = {Baayen, H, R. and H. Rijn} +} + +@ARTICLE{Baayen1997JML, + author = {Baayen, R. H. and Dijkstra, T. and Schreuder, R.}, + title = {Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route + modes}, + journal = {Journal Of Memory And Language}, + year = {1997}, + volume = {37}, + pages = {94--117}, + number = {1}, + month = jul, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/BaayenDijkstraSchreuder1997.pdf}, + sn = {0749-596X}, + timestamp = {2007.02.09}, + ut = {ISI:A1997XG92100005} +} + +@ARTICLE{Baayen2006, + author = {Baayen, R. H. and Feldman, L. B. and Schreuder, R.}, + title = {Morphological influences on the recognition of monosyllabic monomorphemic + words}, + journal = {Journal Of Memory And Language}, + year = {2006}, + volume = {55}, + pages = {290--313}, + number = {2}, + month = aug, + af = {Baayen, R. H.EOLEOLFeldman, L. B.EOLEOLSchreuder, R.}, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/BaayenFeldmanSchreuder2006.pdf}, + sn = {0749-596X}, + timestamp = {2007.02.09}, + ut = {ISI:000239352800009} +} + +@ARTICLE{Baayen1997, + author = {Baayen, R. H. and Lieber, R. and Schreuder, R.}, + title = {The morphological complexity of simplex nouns}, + journal = {Linguistics}, + year = {1997}, + volume = {35}, + pages = {861--877}, + number = {5}, + owner = {robfelty}, + sn = {0024-3949}, + timestamp = {2007.02.09}, + ut = {ISI:A1997YE39500003} +} + +@ARTICLE{Baayen2005, + author = {Baayen, R. H. and Martin, F. M. D.}, + title = {Semantic density and past-tense formation in three germanic languages}, + journal = {Language}, + year = {2005}, + volume = {81}, + pages = {666--698}, + number = {3}, + month = sep, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/Baayen2005.pdf}, + sn = {0097-8507}, + timestamp = {2007.02.06}, + ut = {ISI:000232076300006} +} + +@ARTICLE{Bailey2001, + author = {Bailey, Todd M. and Hahn, Ulrike}, + title = {Determinants of Wordlikeness: Phonotactics or Lexical Neighborhoods?}, + journal = {Journal of Memory and Language}, + year = {2001}, + volume = {44}, + pages = {568--591}, + number = {4}, + month = may, + abstract = {Wordlikeness, the extent to which a sound sequence is typical of words + in a language, affects language acquisition, language processing, + and verbal short-term memory. Wordlikeness has generally been equated + with phonotactic knowledge of the possible or probable sequences + of sounds within a language. Alternatively, wordlikeness might be + derived directly from the mental lexicon, depending only on similarity + to known words. This paper tests these two cognitively different + possibilities by comparing measures of phonotactic probability and + lexical influence, including a new model of lexical neighborhoods, + in their ability to explain empirical wordlikeness judgments. Our + data show independent contributions of both phonotactic probability + and the lexicon, with relatively greater influence from the lexicon. + The influence of a lexical neighbor is found to be an inverted-U-shaped + function of its token frequency. However, our results also indicate + that current measures are limited in their ability to account for + sequence typicality.}, + keywords = {wordlikeness, phonotactics, token frequency, lexical neighborhood, + sequence typicality.}, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/BaileyHahn2001.pdf}, + timestamp = {2007.01.02}, + url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6WK4-457VF34-14/2/9cd7bc170454fcfc79324ba8f7ad57a7} +} + +@ARTICLE{Balota1984, + author = {Balota, David A. and James I. Chumbley}, + title = {Are Lexical Decisions a Good Measure of Lexical Access? The Role + of Word Frequency in the Neglected Decision Stage}, + journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology}, + year = {1984}, + volume = {10}, + pages = {340-357}, + number = {3}, + keywords = {Balota, David A. James I.}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/Classes/Linguistics/Ling812-Perception/Balota1984.pdf} +} + +@ARTICLE{Balota2001, + author = {Balota, D. A. and Pilotti, M. and Cortese, M. J.}, + title = {Subjective frequency estimates for 2,938 monosyllabic words}, + journal = {Memory and Cognition}, + year = {2001}, + volume = {29}, + pages = {639--647}, + owner = {robfelty}, + timestamp = {2007.02.09} +} + +@ARTICLE{BenkiJASA, + author = {Benk\'i, Jos\'e}, + title = {Quantitative evaluation of lexical status, word frequency and neighborhood + density as context effects in spoken word recognition}, + journal = JASA, + year = {2003}, + volume = {113}, + pages = {1689-1705}, + number = {3}, + keywords = {Benkk, Jose} +} + +@ARTICLE{BenkiPhonetica, + author = {Benk\'i, Jos\'e}, + title = {Analysis of {E}nglish Nonsense Syllable Recognition in Noise}, + journal = {Phonetica}, + year = {2003}, + volume = {60}, + pages = {129-157}, + keywords = {BenkÌ, JosÈ}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/LSA2003/Phonetics in Phono/BenkiPhonetica.pdf} +} + +@ARTICLE{Benki2005, + author = {Jos\'e Benk\'i and Robert Felty}, + title = {Recognition of English phonemes in noise}, + journal = JASA, + year = {2005}, + volume = {117}, + pages = {2568}, + owner = {robfelty}, + timestamp = {2006.10.09} +} + +@UNPUBLISHED{BenkiMandarin, + author = {Benk\'i, Jos\'e and J. Myers and Terrance Nearey}, + title = {Lexical Frequency Effects in {M}andarin}, + year = {in preparation}, + keywords = {Benki, Jose, J. and Terence Nearey, mandarin} +} + +@ARTICLE{Berent2004, + author = {Berent, I. and Vaknin, V. and Shimron, J.}, + title = {Does a theory of language need a grammar? Evidence from Hebrew root + structure}, + journal = {Brain And Language}, + year = {2004}, + volume = {90}, + pages = {170--182}, + number = {1-3}, + month = jul, + abstract = {Hebrew constrains the occurrence of identical consonants in its roots: + Identical consonants are acceptable root finally (e.g., skk), but + not root initially (e.g., kks). Speakers' ability to freely generalize + this constraint to novel phonemes (Berent, Marcus, Shimron, & Gafos, + 2002) suggests that they represent segment identity-a relation among + mental variables. An alternative account attributes the restriction + on identical phonemes to their feature similarity, captured by either + the number of shared features or their statistical frequency-The + similarity account predicts that roots with partially similar consonants + (e.g., sgk) should be at least as acceptable as roots with fully + identical consonants (e.g., skk), and each of these roots should + be less acceptable than dissimilar controls (e.g., gdn). Contrary + to these predictions, three lexical decision experiments demonstrate + that full identity is more acceptable than partial similarity and + (in some cases) controls. Speakers' sensitivity to consonant identity + suggests that linguistic competence, in general, and phonology, in + particular, encompass a computational mechanism that operates over + variables. This conclusion is consistent with linguistic accounts + that postulate a symbolic grammatical component that is irreducible + to the statistical properties of the lexicon}, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/BerentVaknin2003.pdf}, + sn = {0093-934X}, + timestamp = {2007.02.10}, + ut = {ISI:000222062500018} +} + +@ARTICLE{Bertram2000, + author = {Bertram, Raymond and Laine, Matti and Harald Baayen, R. and Schreuder, + Robert and Hyona, Jukka}, + title = {Affixal Homonymy triggers full-form storage, even with inflected + words, even in a morphologically rich language}, + journal = {Cognition}, + year = {2000}, + volume = {74}, + pages = {B13--B25}, + number = {2}, + month = feb, + abstract = {This paper investigates whether affixal homonymy, the phenomenon that + one affix form serves two or more semantic/syntactic functions, affects + lexical processing of inflected words in a similar way for a morphologically + rich language such as Finnish as for morphologically restricted languages + such as Dutch and English. For the latter two languages, there is + evidence that affixal homonymy triggers full-form storage for inflected + words (Bertram, R., Schreuder, R., and Baayen, R. H. (in press). + The balance of storage and computation in morphological processing: + the role of word formation type, affixal homonymy, and productivity. + Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition; + . Processing of English inflectional morphology. Memory and Cognition, + 25, 425-437). Two visual lexical decision experiments show the same + pattern for Finnish. Apparently, the substantially richer morphology + in Finnish does not prevent full-form storage for inflected words + when the affix is homonymic.}, + keywords = {Affixal Homonymy, Full-form storage, Morphologically rich languages}, + owner = {robfelty}, + timestamp = {2007.02.09}, + url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6T24-3Y6RF0B-4/2/04bb420f58933395ba981a099b02d02c} +} + +@INCOLLECTION{Bierwisch1967, + author = {Bierwisch, Manfred}, + title = {Syntactic features in morphology: General problems of so-called pronominal + inflection in {G}erman}, + booktitle = {To Honor Roman Jakobson}, + publisher = {Mouton}, + year = {1967}, + pages = {239-270}, + address = {The Hague}, + keywords = {Bierwisch, Manfred. 1967} +} + +@INCOLLECTION{Blevins2000, + author = {Blevins, James P}, + title = { Markedness and blocking in {G}erman declensional paradigms}, + booktitle = { Lexicon in focus}, + publisher = {Akademie-Verlag}, + year = {2000}, + editor = {Barbara Stiebels and Dieter Wunderlich}, + pages = {83-103}, + address = {Berlin}, + keywords = {Blevins, James P} +} + +@ARTICLE{Blevins1995, + author = {Blevins, James P}, + title = { Syncretism and paradigmatic opposition}, + journal = {Linguistics and Philosophy}, + year = {1995}, + volume = {18}, + pages = {113-152}, + keywords = {Blevins, James P} +} + +@MISC{Praat, + author = {Boersma, Paul and Weenink, David}, + title = {Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 4.4.12) [Computer program]}, + year = {2006}, + keywords = {Praat}, + url = {http://www.praat.org/} +} + +@ARTICLE{Boothroyd1988, + author = {Boothroyd, Arthur and Nittrouer, Susan}, + title = {Mathematical treatment of context effects in phoneme and word recognition}, + journal = JASA, + year = {1988}, + volume = {84}, + pages = {101-114}, + keywords = {Boothroyd, A and Nittrouer S.}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/BoothroydNittrouer1988.pdf} +} + +@INPROCEEDINGS{Boudelaa2000, + author = {Boudelaa, S. and Marslen-Wilson, W. D.}, + title = {Non-concatenative morphemes in language processing: Evidence from + Modern Standard Arabic}, + booktitle = {Proceedings of the Workshop on Spoken Word Access Processes}, + year = {2000}, + editor = {A. Cutler and J.M. McQueen and R. Zondervan}, + pages = {23–-26}, + address = {Nijmegen, The Netherlands}, + publisher = {Max-Planck Institute for Psychol inguistics.}, + owner = {robfelty}, + timestamp = {2007.02.13} +} + +@ARTICLE{Bradlow1999, + author = {Bradlow, Ann and David Pisoni}, + title = {Recognition of spoken words by native and non-native listeners: Talker-, + listener- and item-related factors}, + journal = JASA, + year = {1999}, + volume = {106}, + pages = {2074-2085}, + number = {4}, + keywords = {Bradlow, Ann and David Pisoni}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/BradlowPisoni1999.pdf} +} + +@ARTICLE{Bradlow1994, + author = {Bradlow, Ann and David Pisoni}, + title = {Using a multi-talker database to identify sentence- and talker-dependent + correlates of speech intelligibility: Preliminary results}, + journal = JASA, + year = {1994}, + volume = {95}, + pages = {3010}, + number = {5}, + keywords = {Bradlow, Ann and David Pisoni} +} + +@ARTICLE{Broadbent1967, + author = {Broadbent, D.}, + title = {Word-Frequency Effect and Response Bias}, + journal = {Psychological Review}, + year = {1967}, + volume = {74}, + pages = {1-15}, + keywords = {Broadbent, D.}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/Classes/Linguistics/Ling812-Perception/Broadbent1967.pdf} +} + +@BOOK{Bybee2001, + title = {Phonology and Language Use}, + publisher = {Cambridge University Press}, + year = {2001}, + author = {Joan Bybee}, + owner = {robfelty}, + timestamp = {2007.01.25} +} + +@ARTICLE{Bybee1995, + author = {Bybee, Joan L.}, + title = {Regular morphology and the lexicon}, + journal = {Language and Cognitive Processes}, + year = {1995}, + volume = {10}, + pages = {425-455}, + keywords = {Bybee}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/Bybee1995.pdf} +} + +@ARTICLE{Caramazza1988, + author = {Caramazza, Alfonso and Laudanna, Alessandro and Romani, Cristina}, + title = {Lexical access and inflectional morphology}, + journal = {Cognition}, + year = {1988}, + volume = {28}, + pages = {297--332}, + number = {3}, + month = apr, + abstract = {This study investigated the hypothesis that lexical representations + are stored in morphologically decomposed form. Three lexical decision + experiments in which the morphological structure of nonword stimuli + was varied are reported. Systematic effects of morphological structure + on reaction time and error performance were obtained. In particular, + it was found that: (1) morphologically nondecomposable nonwords were + easiest to process; (2) nonwords with partial morphological structure + were processed with greater difficulty than this latter set of stimuli; + and, (3) morphologically legal nonwords (i.e., nonwords that are + exhaustively decomposable into morphemes) were processed with the + greatest difficulty. Furthermore, it was found that within the class + of morphologically legal nonwords performance was affected by the + type of relationship that obtained between the morphemes that comprised + a stimulus item. These results, which are interpreted as evidence + in favor of the hypothesis that lexical representations are morphologically + decomposed, are discussed in the context of the Augmented Addressed + Morphology Model.}, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/CaramazzaLaudannaRomani1988.pdf}, + timestamp = {2007.02.13}, + url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6T24-45WHV6D-4D/2/2d9f0769a3f41e5937870a6958c1ebe6} +} + +@INCOLLECTION{Chang2001, + author = {Steve Chang and Madelaine Plauch\'e and John Ohala}, + title = {Markedness and consonant confusion asymmetries}, + booktitle = {The role of speech perception in phonology}, + publisher = {Academic Press}, + year = {2001}, + editor = {Elizabeth Hume and Keith Johnson }, + address = {San Diego}, + keywords = {ohala plauche chang confusion asymmetry} +} + +@ARTICLE{Clahsen1999, + author = {Harald Clahsen}, + title = {Lexical entries and rules of language: + + A multidisciplinary study + + of German inflection}, + journal = {Behavioral and Brian Sciences}, + year = {1999}, + volume = {22}, + pages = {991--1060}, + abstract = {Following much work in linguistic theory, it is hypothesized that + the language faculty has a modular structure and consists of two + basic components, a lexicon of (structured) entries and a computational + system of combinatorial operations to form larger linguistic expressions + from lexical entries. This target article provides evidence for the + dual nature of the language faculty by describing recent results + of a multidisciplinary investigation of German inflection. We have + examined: (1) its linguistic representation, focussing on noun plurals + and verb inflection (participles), (2) processes involved in the + way adults produce and comprehend inflected words, (3) brain potentials + generated during the processing of inflected words, and (4) the way + children acquire and use inflection. It will be shown that the evidence + from all these sources converges and supports the distinction between + lexical entries and combinatorial operations. Our experimental results + indicate that adults have access to two distinct processing routes, + one accessing (irregularly) inflected entries from the mental lexicon + and another involving morphological decomposition of (regularly) + inflected words into stem + routes correspond to the dual structure of the linguistic system. + Results from event-related potentials confirm this linguistic distinction + at the level of brain structures. In children’s language, we have + also found these two processes to be clearly dissociated; regular + and irregular inflection are used under different circumstances, + and the constraints under which children apply them are identical + to those of the adult linguistic system. + + + Our findings will be explained in terms of a linguistic model that + maintains the distinction between the lexicon and the computational + system but replaces the traditional view of the lexicon as a simple + list of idiosyncrasies with the notion of internally structured lexical + representations.}, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/Clahsen1999.pdf}, + timestamp = {2007.02.13} +} + +@ARTICLE{Clahsen2004, + author = {Clahsen, H. and Hadler, M. and Weyerts, H.}, + title = {Speeded production of inflected words in children and adults}, + journal = {Journal Of Child Language}, + year = {2004}, + volume = {31}, + pages = {683--712}, + number = {3}, + month = aug, + abstract = {This study examines the production of regular and irregular participle + forms of German with high and low frequencies using a speeded production + task. 40 children in two age groups (five- to seven-year olds, eleven- + to twelve-year olds) and 35 adult native speakers of German listened + to stem forms of verbs presented in a sentential context and were + asked to produce corresponding participle forms as quickly and accurately + as possible. Dependent variables were the subjects' participle-production + latencies and error rates. We found contrasts between the production + of regular and irregular forms in both children and adults, with + respect to the production latencies and types of morphological error. + Children overapplied the regular patterns to forms that are irregular + in the adult language, but not vice versa. High-frequency irregular + participles were produced faster (and amongst the children more accurately) + than low-frequency ones, whereas regular participles yielded a reverse + frequency effect, i.e. longer production latencies for high-frequency + forms than for low-frequency ones, in the two groups of children + as well as in one subgroup of adults. We explain these findings from + the perspective of dual-mechanism models of inflection arguing that + the mental mechanisms and representations for processing morphologically + complex words ('words' and 'rules') are the same in children and + adults, and that the observed child/adult differences in participle + production are due to slower and less accurate lexical access in + children than in adults.}, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/ClahsenHadlerWeyerts2004.pdf}, + sn = {0305-0009}, + timestamp = {2007.02.10}, + ut = {ISI:000225903800008} +} + +@ARTICLE{Clahsen2001, + author = {Clahsen, Harald and Sonja Isenbeiss and Meike Hadler and Ingrid Sonnenstuhl}, + title = {The mental representations of inflected words: an experimental study + of adjectives and verbs in {G}erman}, + journal = {Language}, + year = {2001}, + volume = {77}, + pages = {510-543}, + number = {3}, + keywords = {Clahsen, Harald, Sonja Isenbeiss, Meike Hadler and Ingrid Sonnenstuhl}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/ClahsenEtAl2001.pdf} +} + +@ARTICLE{ColeRudnicky1983, + author = {Ronald A. Cole and Alexander I. Rudnicky}, + title = {What's new in speech perception? The research and ideas of {W}illiam + {C}handler {B}agley, 1874-1946}, + journal = {Psychological Review}, + year = {1983}, + volume = {90}, + pages = {94-101}, + number = {1}, + keywords = {Cole Rudnicky William Chandler Bagley} +} + +@INPROCEEDINGS{Coleman1997, + author = {John Coleman and Janet Pierrehumbert}, + title = {Stochastic phonological grammars and acceptability}, + booktitle = {Computational phonology: Third meeting of the ACL special interest + group in computational phonology}, + year = {1997}, + editor = {John Coleman}, + pages = {49-56}, + address = {Somerset, NJ}, + organization = {Association for Computational Linguistics}, + publisher = {Association for Computational Linguistics}, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/randomArticles/Coleman1997.pdf}, + timestamp = {2006.10.24} +} + +@ARTICLE{Coltheart1993, + author = {Coltheart, Max and Curtis, Brent and Atkins, Paul and Haller, Michael}, + title = {Models of Reading Aloud: Dual-Route and Parallel-Distributed-Processing + Approaches,}, + journal = {Psychological Review}, + year = {1993}, + volume = {100}, + pages = {589--608}, + number = {4}, + month = oct, + abstract = {It has often been argued that various facts about skilled reading + aloud cannot be explained by any model unless that model possesses + a dual-route architecture (lexical and nonlexical routes from print + to speech). This broad claim has been challenged by Seidenberg and + McClelland (1989, 1990). Their model has but a single route from + print to speech, yet, they contend, it can account form major facts + about reading that have hitherto been claimed to require a dual-route + architecture. The authors identify 6 of these major facts about reading. + The 1-route model proposed by Seidenberg and McClelland can account + for the first of these but not the remaining 5. Because models with + dual-route architectures can explain all 6 of these basic facts about + reading, the authors suggest that this remains the viable architecture + for any tenable model of skilled reading and learning to read. The + dual-route cascaded model, a computational version of the dual-route + model, is described.}, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/Coltheart1993.pdf}, + timestamp = {2007.02.12}, + url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6X04-46T966N-S/2/69edd4c17b69e04b5f29ecea4d05f1d6} +} + +@ARTICLE{Connine1994, + author = {Connine, Cynthia M. and Dawn G. Glasko and Jian Wang}, + title = {Vertical similarity in spoken word recognition: Multiple lexical + activation, individual differences, and the role of sentence context}, + journal = {Perception and Psychophysics}, + year = {1994}, + volume = {56}, + pages = {624-636}, + number = {6}, + keywords = {Connine bilingual } +} + +@ARTICLE{Conrad2004, + author = {Conrad, M. and Jacobs, A.}, + title = {Replicating syllable frequency effects in Spanish in German: One + more challenge to computational models of visual word recognition}, + journal = {Language and Cognitive Processes}, + year = {2004}, + volume = {19}, + pages = {369--390}, + number = {3}, + month = jun, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/Conrad2004.pdf}, + timestamp = {2006.12.11} +} + +@INCOLLECTION{Cutler1979, + author = {Cutler, Anne and Dennis Norris}, + title = {Monitoring sentence comprehension}, + booktitle = {Sentence processing: Psycholinguistics studies presented to Merrill + Garrett}, + publisher = {Erlbaum}, + year = {1979}, + editor = {W. E. Cooper and E. C. T. Walker}, + keywords = {Cutler, Anne, } +} + +@ARTICLE{Cutler2004, + author = {Cutler, Anne and Andreas Weber and Roel Smits and Nicole Cooper}, + title = {Patterns of {E}nglish phoneme confusions by native and non-native + listeners}, + journal = JASA, + year = {2004}, + volume = {116}, + pages = {3668-3678}, + number = {6}, + keywords = {Cutler, Anne and Andreas Weber and Roel Smits and Nicole Cooper} +} + +@PHDTHESIS{Dailey1997, + author = {Dailey-O'Cain, Jennifer L.}, + title = {Geographic and Socio-political Influences on Language Ideology and + Attitudes Toward Language Variation in Post-unification Germany}, + school = {University of Michigan}, + year = {1997}, + keywords = {Dailey O'Cain, language variation, German} +} + +@BOOK{vanDam1940, + title = {Handbuch der {D}eutschen {S}prache. {Z}weiter {B}and: {W}ortlehre}, + publisher = {J. B. Wolter's Uitgevers-Maatschappij N.V.}, + year = {1940}, + author = {van Dam, J.}, + address = {Groningen}, + owner = {robfelty}, + timestamp = {2007.02.14} +} + +@ARTICLE{Drews1995, + author = {Drews, Etta and Piene Zwitser\-lood}, + title = {Morphological and Orthographic Similarity in Visual Word Recognition}, + journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology}, + year = {1995}, + volume = {21}, + pages = {1098- 1116}, + number = {5}, + keywords = {Drews, Etta and Piene Zwitserlood} +} + +@ARTICLE{Eddington2000, + author = {Eddington, D.}, + title = {Analogy and the dual-route model of morphology}, + journal = {Lingua}, + year = {2000}, + volume = {110}, + pages = {281--298}, + number = {4}, + month = apr, + abstract = {Prasada and Pinker's (1993) subjects provided past tense forms of + nonce verbs. The subject's willingness to provide irregular past + tense forms correlated with the verb's phonological similarity to + existing irregular English verbs. However, there:was no correlation + between the number of nonce verbs assigned regular inflection, and + the verb's similarity to existing regular verbs. According to the + dual-route model, this is expected since irregular items are stored + in associative memory, while regular items take an allomorph of -ed + by rule. A single-route connectionist simulation failed to duplicate + the subject's behavior on regular verbs. + + + Two instance-based models were applied to the data: Analogical Modeling + of Language and the Tilburg Memory Based Learner. Each model employed + a-similarity algorithm to determine the behavior of all regular and + irregular items. Both models successfully mirrored the subject's + responses. Therefore, the data are consistent with an, instance-based + single-route model of morphology.}, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/Eddington2000.pdf}, + sn = {0024-3841}, + timestamp = {2007.02.10}, + ut = {ISI:000085868800003} +} + +@ARTICLE{Elman2004, + author = {Elman, Jeffrey L.}, + title = {An alternative view of the mental lexicon}, + journal = {Trends in Cognitive Sciences}, + year = {2004}, + volume = {8}, + pages = {301--306}, + number = {7}, + month = jul, + abstract = {An essential aspect of knowing language is knowing the words of that + language. This knowledge is usually thought to reside in the mental + lexicon, a kind of dictionary that contains information regarding + a word's meaning, pronunciation, syntactic characteristics, and so + on. In this article, a very different view is presented. In this + view, words are understood as stimuli that operate directly on mental + states. The phonological, syntactic and semantic properties of a + word are revealed by the effects it has on those states.}, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/Elman2004.pdf}, + timestamp = {2007.02.12} +} + +@BOOK{Fletcher1953, + title = {Speech and Hearing in Communication}, + publisher = {Krieger}, + year = {1953}, + author = {Fletcher, Harvey}, + address = {New York}, + keywords = {Fletcher, Harvey} +} + +@ARTICLE{Forster2000, + author = {Forster, Kenneth I. and Azuma, Tamiko}, + title = {Masked priming for prefixed words with bound stems: Does <i>submit</i> + prime <i>permit</i>?}, + journal = {Language and Cognitive Processes}, + year = {2000}, + volume = {15}, + pages = {539--561}, + number = {4 - 5}, + month = aug, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/Forster2000.pdf}, + timestamp = {2006.12.13}, + url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690960050119698} +} + +@ARTICLE{Plaut2000, + author = {Frost, Ram and Grainger, Jonathan}, + title = {Cross-linguistic perspectives on morphological processing: An introduction}, + journal = {Language and Cognitive Processes}, + year = {2000}, + volume = {15}, + pages = {321--328}, + number = {4 - 5}, + month = aug, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/Frost2000.pdf}, + timestamp = {2006.12.13}, + url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690960050119616} +} + +@ARTICLE{Ganong1980, + author = {Ganong, William F. III}, + title = {Phonetic Categorization in Auditory Word Perception}, + journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance}, + year = {1980}, + volume = {6}, + pages = {110-125}, + number = {1}, + keywords = {Ganong, Lexical Index Shift} +} + +@ARTICLE{Goldinger1998, + author = {Gol\-dinger, Stephen D}, + title = {Signal detection comparisons of phonemic and phonetic priming: The + flexible-bias problem}, + journal = {Perception and Psychophysics}, + year = {1998}, + volume = {60}, + pages = {952-965}, + number = {6}, + keywords = {Goldinger, Stephen D} +} + +@PHDTHESIS{Gordon1997, + author = {Gordon, Matthew}, + title = {Urban sound change beyond city limits: the spread of the Northern + Cities Shift in Michigan}, + school = {University of Michigan dissertation}, + year = {1997}, + keywords = {Gordon northern cities shift} +} + +@ARTICLE{Graf2005, + author = {Graf, R. and Nagler, M. and Jacobs, A. M.}, + title = {Factor analysis of 57 variables in visual word recognition}, + journal = {ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PSYCHOLOGIE}, + year = {2005}, + volume = {116}, + pages = {205--218}, + number = {4}, + owner = {robfelty}, + timestamp = {2006.12.11} +} + +@ARTICLE{Hahn2000, + author = {Hahn, U. and Nakisa, R. C.}, + title = {German inflection: Single route or dual route?}, + journal = {Cognitive Psychology}, + year = {2000}, + volume = {41}, + pages = {313--360}, + number = {4}, + month = dec, + keywords = {single dual route}, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/HahnNakisa2000.pdf}, + sn = {0010-0285}, + timestamp = {2007.02.06}, + ut = {ISI:000165767000001} +} + +@ARTICLE{Hahne2006, + author = {Hahne, A. and Mueller, J. L. and Clahsen, H.}, + title = {Morphological processing in a second language: Behavioral and event-related + brain potential evidence for storage and decomposition}, + journal = {Journal Of Cognitive Neuroscience}, + year = {2006}, + volume = {18}, + pages = {121--134}, + number = {1}, + month = jan, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/HahneMuellerClahsen2006.pdf}, + sn = {0898-929X}, + timestamp = {2007.02.10}, + ut = {ISI:000235368200011} +} + +@ARTICLE{Hillenbrand1995, + author = {Hillenbrand, J.M. and Getty, L.A. and Clark, M.J. and Wheeler, K.}, + journal = JASA, + year = {1995}, + volume = {97}, + pages = {3099-3111}, + number = {5}, + keywords = {Hillendbrand english vowels Peterson and Barney} +} + +@ARTICLE{Hirsh1954, + author = {Hirsh, I., Elizabeth g. and Maurice Joseph}, + title = {Intelligibility of Different Speech Materials}, + journal = JASA, + year = {1954}, + volume = {26}, + pages = {530-538}, + number = {4}, + keywords = {Hirsh, I., Elizabeth g. and Maurice Joseph} +} + +@ARTICLE{Imai2005, + author = {Satomi Imai and Amanda C. Walley and James E. Flege}, + title = {Lexical frequency and neighborhood density effects on the recognition + of native and Spanish-accented words by native English and Spanish + listeners}, + journal = JASA, + year = {2005}, + volume = {117}, + pages = {896--907}, + abstract = {This study examined the effect of presumed mismatches between speech + input and the phonological representations of English words by native + speakers of English + which were produced by a NE speaker and a NS speaker, varied orthogonally + in lexical frequency and neighborhood density and were presented + to NE listeners and to NS listeners who differed in English pronunciation + proficiency. It was hypothesized that mismatches between phonological + representations and speech input would impair word recognition, especially + for items from dense lexical neighborhoods which are phonologically + similar to many other words and require finer sound discrimination. + Further, it was assumed that L2 phonological representations would + change with L2 proficiency. The results showed the expected mismatch + effect only for words from dense neighborhoods. For Spanish-accented + stimuli, the NS groups recognized more words from dense neighborhoods + than the NE group did. For native-produced stimuli, the low-proficiency + NS group recognized fewer words than the other two groups. The-high + proficiency NS participants’ performance was as good as the NE group’s + for words from sparse neighborhoods, but not for words from dense + neighborhoods. These results are discussed in relation to the development + of phonological representations of L2 words.}, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/ImaiWalleyFlege2005.pdf}, + timestamp = {2007.02.15} +} + +@BOOK{IPA, + title = {Handbook of the International Phonetic Association}, + publisher = {Cambridge University Press}, + year = {1999}, + author = {{International Phonetic Association}}, + owner = {robfelty}, + timestamp = {2007.02.08} +} + +@ARTICLE{Isel2003, + author = {Isel, Fr\'ederic and Thomas C. Gunter and Angela D. Friederici}, + title = {Prosody-Assisted Head-Driven Access to Spoken {G}erman Compounds}, + journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition}, + year = {2003}, + volume = {29}, + pages = {277-288}, + number = {2}, + keywords = {Isel, Frederic, Thomas C. and Angela D.} +} + +@ARTICLE{Jacobs1991, + author = {Jacobs, Robert A. and Jordan, Michael I. and Barto, Andrew G.}, + title = {Task decomposition through competition in a modular connectionist + architecture: The what and where vision tasks}, + journal = {Cognitive Science}, + year = {1991}, + volume = {15}, + pages = {219--250}, + number = {2}, + abstract = {A novel modular connectionist architecture is presented in which the + networks composing the architecture compete to learn the training + patterns. An outcome of the competition is that different networks + learn different training patterns and, thus, learn to compute different + functions. The architecture performs task decomposition in the sense + that it learns to partition a task into two or more functionally + independent tasks and allocates distinct networks to learn each task. + In addition, the architecture tends to allocate to each task the + network whose topology is most appropriate to that task. The architecture's + performance on "what" and "where" vision tasks is presented and compared + with the performance of two multilayer networks. Finally, it is noted + that function decomposition is an underconstrained problem, and, + thus, different modular architectures may decompose a function in + different ways. A desirable decomposition can be achieved if the + architecture is suitably restricted in the types of functions that + it can compute. Finding appropriate restrictions is possible through + the application of domain knowledge. A strength of the modular architecture + is that its structure is well suited for incorporating domain knowledge.}, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/JacobsJordanBarto1991.pdf}, + timestamp = {2007.02.14} +} + +@INCOLLECTION{Johnson1997, + author = {Keith Johnson}, + title = {Speech perception without speaker normalization: An exemplar model}, + booktitle = {Talker Variability in Speech Processing}, + publisher = {Academic Press}, + year = {1997}, + editor = {Keith Johnson and J.W. Mullennix}, + address = {San Diego}, + keywords = {Johnson, exemplar} +} + +@ARTICLE{deJong2000, + author = {Nivja H. de Jong and Robert Schreuder and R. Harald Baayen}, + title = {The morphological family size effect and morphology}, + journal = {Language and Cognitive Processes}, + year = {2000}, + volume = {V15}, + pages = {329--365}, + number = {4}, + month = aug, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/deJongSchreuderBaayen2000.pdf}, + timestamp = {2007.02.09}, + url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690960050119625} +} + +@ARTICLE{Krott2006, + author = {Krott, A. and Baayen, R. H. and Hagoort, P.}, + title = {The nature of anterior negativities caused by misapplications of + morphological rules}, + journal = {Journal Of Cognitive Neuroscience}, + year = {2006}, + volume = {18}, + pages = {1616--1630}, + number = {10}, + month = oct, + af = {Krott, AndreaEOLEOLBaayen, R. HaraldEOLEOLHagoort, Peter}, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/KrottBaayenHagoort2006.pdf}, + sn = {0898-929X}, + timestamp = {2007.02.06}, + ut = {ISI:000241278500002} +} + +@BOOK{Kucera1967, + title = {Computational Analysis of Present Day American {E}nglish}, + publisher = {Brown University Press}, + year = {1967}, + author = {Ku{\v c}era, F. and Francis, W.}, + address = {Providence}, + keywords = {Kucera, F., and Francis, W. } +} + +@INCOLLECTION{Lahiri2002, + author = {Aditi Lahiri and Henning Reetz}, + title = {Underspecified Recognition}, + booktitle = {Papers in Laboratory Phonology 7}, + publisher = {Mouton de Gruyter}, + year = {2002}, + editor = {Carlos Gussenhoven, Natasha Warner and Toni Rietveld}, + address = {New York}, + keywords = {Lahiri Reetz FUL} +} + +@ARTICLE{Laine1999, + author = {Laine, M and S. Vainio and J. Hy\"on\"a}, + title = {Lexical access routes to nouns in a morphologically rich language}, + journal = {Journal of Memory and Language}, + year = {1999}, + volume = {40}, + pages = {109-135}, + keywords = {Laine, M, S. and J. Hyona} +} + +@MISC{Lenzo1998, + author = {Lenzo, K.}, + title = {Text-to-phoneme converter builder software}, + year = {1998}, + owner = {robfelty}, + timestamp = {2007.02.19}, + url = {http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~lenzo/t2p/} +} + +@ARTICLE{Lorch1990, + author = {Lorch, Robert F. and Myers, Jerome L.}, + title = {Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research.}, + journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition}, + year = {1990}, + volume = {16}, + pages = {149--157}, + number = {1}, + month = jan, + abstract = {Repeated measures designs involving nonorthogonal variables are being + used with increasing frequency in cognitive psychology. Researchers + usually analyze the data from such designs inappropriately, probably + because the designs are not discussed in standard textbooks on regression. + Two commonly used approaches to analyzing repeated measures designs + are considered in this article. It is argued that both approaches + use inappropriate error terms for testing the effects of independent + variables. A more appropriate analysis is presented, and two alternative + computational procedures for the analysis are illustrated. (PsycINFO + Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved)}, + comment = {Accession Number: xlm-16-1-149. First Author & Affiliation: Lorch, + Robert F.; U Kentucky, Lexington, US. Release Date: 19900401. Publication + Type: Journal, Peer Reviewed Journal. Language: English. Major Descriptor(s): + Cognitive Psychology; Experimentation; Repeated Measures; Statistical + Regression. Minor Descriptor(s): Methodology. Classification: Cognitive + Processes (2340); Population: Human (10); . References Available: + Y.}, + issn = {0278-7393}, + keywords = {regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive psychology + research, Cognitive Psychology, Experimentation, Repeated Measures, + Statistical Regression, Methodology}, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/LorchMyers1990.pdf}, + publisher = {American Psychological Assn}, + timestamp = {2007.01.02}, + url = {http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pdh&AN=xlm-16-1-149&site=ehost-live} +} + +@PHDTHESIS{Luce1986, + author = {Paul Luce}, + title = {Neighborhoods of words in the mental lexicon}, + school = {Indiana University}, + year = {1986}, + owner = {robfelty}, + timestamp = {2006.10.09} +} + +@ARTICLE{Luce1998, + author = {Luce, Paul and David Pisoni}, + title = {Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model}, + journal = {Ear and Hearing}, + year = {1998}, + volume = {19}, + pages = {1-36}, + keywords = { NAM Luce Pisoni}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/Classes/Linguistics/Ling812-Perception/LucePisoni1998.pdf} +} + +@ARTICLE{Munte1999, + author = {M\"unte, Thomas F and Tessa Say and Harald Clahsen and Kolja Schiltz + and Marta Kutas}, + title = {Decomposition of morphologically complex words in {E}nglish: evidence + from event-related brain potentials}, + journal = {Cognitive Brain Research}, + year = {1999}, + volume = {7}, + pages = {241 - 253}, + keywords = {Munte, Thomas F and Tessa Say, Harald Clahsen, Kolja Schiltz and Marta + Kutas}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/MunteEtAl1999.pdf} +} + +@ARTICLE{MacWhinney1991, + author = {MacWhinney, Brian and Leinbach, Jared}, + title = {Implementations are not conceptualizations: Revising the verb learning + model}, + journal = {Cognition}, + year = {1991}, + volume = {40}, + pages = {121--157}, + number = {1-2}, + month = aug, + abstract = {In a recent issue of this journal, Pinker and Prince (1988) and Lachter + and Bever (1988) presented detailed critiques of Rumelhart and McClelland's + (1986) connectionist model of the child's learning of the phonological + form of the English past tense. In order to address these criticisms, + a new connectionist model was constructed using the back-propagation + algorithm, a larger input corpus, a fuller paradigm, and a new phonological + representation. This new implementation successfully addressed the + criticisms of the phonological representation used by Rumelhart and + McClelland. It did a much better job of learning the past tense using + a fuller input set with realistic frequencies of occurrence. Ancillary + simulations using the same network were able to deal with the homonymy + problem and the generation of forms like "ated" from "ate". The one + feature not provided by the new model was a way of modeling early + correct production of irregular forms. The success of the new model + can be used to help clarify the extent to which the published critiques + apply to a particular connectionist implementation as opposed to + fundamental principles underlying the broader connectionist conceptualization.}, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/MacWhinneyLeinbach1991.pdf}, + timestamp = {2007.02.13} +} + +@ARTICLE{Marcus1995, + author = {Marcus, G. F. and Brinkman, U. and Clahsen, H. and Wiese, R. and + Pinker, S.}, + title = {German inflection: The exception that proves the rule}, + journal = {Cognitive Psychology}, + year = {1995}, + volume = {29}, + pages = {189--256}, + number = {3}, + month = dec, + abstract = {Language is often explained as the product of generative rules and + a memorized lexicon. For example, most English verbs take a regular + past tense suffix (ask-asked), which is applied to new verbs (faxed, + wugged), suggesting the mental rule ''add-ed to a Verb.'' Irregular + verbs (break-broke, go-went) would be listed in memory. Alternatively, + a pattern associator memory (such as a connectionist network) might + record all past tense forms and generalize to new ones by similarity; + irregular and regular patterns would differ only because of their + different numbers of verbs. We present evidence that mental rules + are indispensible. A rule concatenates a suffix to a symbol for verbs, + so it does not require access to memorized verbs or their sound patterns, + but applies as the ''default,'' whenever memory access fails. We + find 21 such circumstances for regular past tense formation, including + novel, unusual-sounding, and rootless and headless derived words; + in every case, people inflect them regularly (explaining quirks like + flied out, sabre-tooths, walkmans). Contrary to the connectionist + account, these effects are not due to regular words constituting + a large majority of vocabulary. The German participle -t applies + to a much smaller percentage of verbs than its English counterpart, + and the German plural -s applies to a small minority of nouns. Bur + the affixes behave in the language like their English counterparts, + as defaults. We corroborate this effect in two experiments eliciting + ratings of participle and plural forms of novel German words. Thus + default suffixation is not due to numerous regular words reinforcing + a pattern in associative memory. Because default cases do not occupy + a cohesive similarity space, but do correspond to the range of a + symbol, they are evidence for a memory-independent, symbol-concatenating + mental operation}, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/MarcusBrinkmannClahsenWiesePinker1995.pdf}, + sn = {0010-0285}, + timestamp = {2007.02.11}, + ut = {ISI:A1995TM28500001} +} + +@INPROCEEDINGS{Marian1999, + author = {Marian, V. and Spivey, M.}, + title = {Activation of {R}ussian and {E}nglish cohorts during bilingual spoken + word recognition }, + booktitle = {Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science + Society}, + year = {1999}, + pages = {349-354}, + address = {Mahwah, NJ}, + publisher = {Erlbaum}, + keywords = {marian spivey} +} + +@ARTICLE{Marslen-Wilson2001, + author = {Marslen-Wilson, William}, + title = {Access to lexical representations: Cross-linguistic issues}, + journal = {Language and Cognitive Processes}, + year = {2001}, + volume = {16}, + pages = {699-708}, + number = {5/6}, + keywords = {Marslen-Wilson, William}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/Marslen-Wilson2001.pdf} +} + +@ARTICLE{Marslen-Wilson1994, + author = {Marslen-Wilson, William and Lorraine K. Tyler and Rachelle Waksler + and Lianne Older}, + title = {Morphology and meaning in the {E}nglish mental lexicon}, + journal = {Psychological Review}, + year = {1994}, + volume = {101}, + pages = {3-33}, + keywords = {Marslen-Wilson} +} + +@ARTICLE{Marslen-Wilson1989, + author = {Marslen-Wilson, William and Pienie Zwitser\-lood}, + title = {Accessing Spoken Words: The Importance of Word Onsets}, + journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology}, + year = {1989}, + volume = {15}, + pages = {576-585}, + number = {3}, + keywords = {Marslen-Wilson, William and Pienie Zwitserlood} +} + +@ARTICLE{Martin2004, + author = {Martin, Fermin Moscoso del Prado and Kostic, Aleksandar and Baayen, + R. Harald}, + title = {Putting the bits together: an information theoretical perspective + on morphological processing}, + journal = {Cognition}, + year = {2004}, + volume = {94}, + pages = {1--18}, + number = {1}, + month = nov, + abstract = {In this study we introduce an information-theoretical formulation + of the emergence of type- and token-based effects in morphological + processing. We describe a probabilistic measure of the informational + complexity of a word, its information residual, which encompasses + the combined influences of the amount of information contained by + the target word and the amount of information carried by its nested + morphological paradigms. By means of re-analyses of previously published + data on Dutch words we show that the information residual outperforms + the combination of traditional token- and type-based counts in predicting + response latencies in visual lexical decision, and at the same time + provides a parsimonious account of inflectional, derivational, and + compounding processes.}, + keywords = {Inflection, Derivation, Compound, Morphology, Information theory, + Lexical decision}, + owner = {robfelty}, + timestamp = {2007.02.09}, + url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6T24-4C4X2C5-1/2/d88949c7cd3de31445656da63c1d1cbb} +} + +@ARTICLE{McClelland1988, + author = {McClelland, James L.}, + title = {Connectionist models and psychological evidence}, + journal = {Journal of Memory and Language}, + year = {1988}, + volume = {27}, + pages = {107--123}, + number = {2}, + month = apr, + abstract = {In this article I review the connectionist framework for modeling + psychological processes, and I examine the role of connectionist + models in empirical psychology. I illustrate how modeling can reveal + the empirical implications of general principles, and I point out + that the connectionist framework is particularly apt for formalizing + certain proposed processing principles. The framework has led to + the discovery of new classes of explanations for basic findings; + it has led to unified accounts of disparate or contradictory phenomena; + and it has shed light on the relevance of certain types of evidence + for basic questions about the nature of the processing system.}, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/McClelland1988.pdf}, + timestamp = {2007.02.14}, + url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6WK4-4D62K31-5M/2/c289e7eb53f8187ca46ec4d12f403260} +} + +@ARTICLE{McClellandElman, + author = {McClelland, J. L. and J. L. Elman}, + title = {The TRACE model of spoken word recognition}, + journal = {Cognitive Psychology}, + year = {1986}, + volume = {18}, + pages = {1-86}, + keywords = {McClelland, J. and J.} +} + +@ARTICLE{McClelland2002, + author = {McClelland, James L. and Patterson, Karalyn}, + title = {Rules or connections in past-tense inflections: what does the evidence + rule out?}, + journal = {Trends in Cognitive Sciences}, + year = {2002}, + volume = {6}, + pages = {465--472}, + number = {11}, + month = nov, + abstract = {Pinker and colleagues propose two mechanisms - a rule system and a + lexical memory - to form past tenses and other inflections. They + predict that children's acquisition of the regular inflection is + sudden; that the regular inflection applies uniformly regardless + of phonological, semantic or other factors; and that the rule system + is separably vulnerable to disruption. A connectionist account makes + the opposite predictions. Pinker has taken existing evidence as support + for his theory, but the review of the evidence presented here contradicts + this assessment. Instead, it supports all three connectionist predictions: + gradual acquisition of the past tense inflection; graded sensitivity + to phonological and semantic content; and a single, integrated mechanism + for regular and irregular forms, dependent jointly on phonology and + semantics.}, + keywords = {Rules, Connectionist Models, Parallel-Distributed Processing, Langauge + Processing, Past Tense, Inflectional Morphology}, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/McClelland2002.pdf}, + timestamp = {2007.02.11}, + url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6VH9-4777Y0F-D/2/698e13cee7eec7f957060cc0ef95d656} +} + +@ARTICLE{Meador2000, + author = {Diane Meador and James E. Flege and Ian R. A. Mackay}, + title = {Factors affecting the recognition of words in a second language}, + journal = {Bilingualism: Language and Cognition}, + year = {2000}, + volume = {3}, + pages = {55-67}, + abstract = {This study examined the recognition of English words by groups of + native speakers of Italian who differed in age of arrival in Canada + and amount of continued native language use. The dependent variable + was the number of words correctly repeated in English sentences presented + in noise. Significantly higher word recognition scores were obtained + for early than late bilinguals, and for early bilinguals who used + Italian seldom than for early bilinguals who used Italian relatively + often. A hierarchical regression analysis showed that the native + Italian participants' ability to perceive English vowels and consonants + accounted for a significant amount of variance in the word-recognition + scores independently of age of arrival, amount of L1 use, and length + of residence in Canada. The native language use effect was interpreted + to have arisen from differences in the extent to which the early + bilinguals' Italian phonetic system influenced the representations + they developed for English vowels and consonants}, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/MeadorFlegeMackay2000.pdf}, + timestamp = {2007.02.15} +} + +@ARTICLE{Moon1994, + author = {Seung-Jae Moon and Bjorn Lindblom}, + title = {Interaction between duration, context, and speaking style in English + stressed vowels}, + journal = {The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America}, + year = {1994}, + volume = {96}, + pages = {40-55}, + number = {1}, + keywords = {VOWELS; SPEECH; TIMING PROPERTIES}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/MoonLindblom1997.pdf}, + publisher = {ASA} +} + +@ARTICLE{Murphy2004, + author = {Murphy, V. A.}, + title = {Dissociable systems in second language inflectional morphology}, + journal = {Studies In Second Language Acquisition}, + year = {2004}, + volume = {26}, + pages = {433--459}, + number = {3}, + month = sep, + abstract = {Pinker and Prince (1988) argued that two dissociable systems underlie + the development of linguistic representations: one rule governed + and the other associative. These two dissociable systems of representation + and processing are claimed to be a linguistic universal (Pinker, + 1999). Therefore, one should expect that nonnative speakers of a + language also manifest the same kinds of dissociations in performance + between rule-based and associative features of language as native + speakers. The study reported here extends the work of Prasada and + Pinker (1993) into the second language (L2) domain to test whether + nonnative speakers (a) perform similarly to native speakers and (b) + dissociate rule-based from associative features of language. In Prasada + and Pinker, the degree of similarity between a nonce verb and a real + English verb influenced past-tense generalizations on nonce irregular + verbs but did not influence generalizations on nonce regular verbs. + In the experiment reported here, first language (L1) and L2 participants + of different ages and language groups were compared or the same task + as that used by Prasada and Pinker. Participants overall produced + more verbs with a past-tense suffix for nonce regular items than + for the nonce irregular items. Significant group effects indicate + that participants' varying levels of experience with English play + an important role in their past-tense productions of nonce verbs. + Furthermore, similarity influenced both the regular and irregular + verbs on a production task. These results are discussed in terms + of whether there are two dissociable systems underlying L2 linguistic + knowledge and whether an alternative single associative learning + mechanism could be responsible for the development of the system + of regular and irregular inflectional morphology in both L1 and L2 + learning.}, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/Murphy2004.pdf}, + sn = {0272-2631}, + timestamp = {2007.02.10}, + ut = {ISI:000224743300003} +} + +@INCOLLECTION{Nakisa2001, + author = {Nakisa, R. C. and Plunkett, K. and Hahn, U.}, + title = { A cross-linguistic comparison of single and dual-route models of + inflectional morphology}, + booktitle = {Models of language acquisition: inductive and deductive approaches}, + publisher = {MIT Press}, + year = {2001}, + editor = {P. Broeder and J. Murre}, + address = {Cambridge, MA}, + owner = {robfelty}, + timestamp = {2007.02.13} +} + +@INCOLLECTION{Nearey2004, + author = {Nearey, Terrance}, + title = {On the Factorability of Phonological Units in Speech Perception}, + booktitle = {Laboratory Phonology 6}, + publisher = {Cambridge University Press}, + year = {2004}, + editor = {John Local and Richard Ogden and Rosalind Temple}, + address = {Cambridge}, + keywords = {Nearey, Terrance} +} + +@UNPUBLISHED{NeareySimulate, + author = {Nearey, Terrance}, + title = {The factorability of phonological units in speech perception: Simulating + results on speech reception in noise}, + note = {In R. Smyth (ed.) A festschrift for Bruce Derwing}, + year = {in press}, + keywords = {Nearey, Terrance} +} + +@ARTICLE{Newman1997, + author = {Newman, Rochelle S. and James R. Sawusch and Paul A. Luce}, + title = {Lexical Neighborhood Effects in Phonetic Processing}, + journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology}, + year = {1997}, + volume = {23}, + pages = {873- 889}, + number = {1}, + keywords = {Newman, Rochelle S, James R. and Paul A.}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/Classes/Linguistics/Ling812-Perception/Newman1997.pdf} +} + +@ARTICLE{Nittrouer1990, + author = {Nittrouer, S. and Boothroyd, A.}, + title = {Context effects in phoneme and word recognition by young children + and older adults}, + journal = JASA, + year = {1990}, + volume = {87}, + pages = {2705-2715}, + keywords = {boothroyd, nittrouer, age} +} + +@ARTICLE{Norris2000, + author = {Norris, Dennis and James M. McQueen and Anne Cutler}, + title = {Merging information in speech: Feedback is never necessary}, + journal = {Behavioral and Brain Sciences}, + year = {2000}, + volume = {23}, + pages = {299-370}, + keywords = {Norris, Dennis, James M. McQueen and Anne Cutler} +} + +@TECHREPORT{Nusbaum1984, + author = {Nusbaum, H. C. and Pisoni, D. B. and Davis, C. K. }, + title = {Sizing up the Hoosier mental lexicon: Measuring the familiarity of + 20 000 words}, + institution = {Speech Research Laboratory, Psychology Department, Indiana University, + Bloomington}, + year = {1984}, + type = {Research on Speech Perception Progress Report No. 10 }, + number = {10}, + keywords = {hoosier mental lexicon} +} + +@ARTICLE{Nygaard1998, + author = {Nygaard, L. C. and Pisoni, D. B.}, + title = {Talker-specific learning in speech perception}, + journal = {Perception and Psychophysics}, + year = {1998}, + volume = {60}, + pages = {335--376}, + owner = {robfelty}, + timestamp = {2007.02.15} +} + +@ARTICLE{Nygaard1994, + author = {Nygaard, L. C. and Sommers, M. C. and Pisoni, David. B.}, + title = {Speech perception as a talker-contingent process}, + journal = {Psychological Science}, + year = {1994}, + volume = {5}, + pages = {42--46}, + owner = {robfelty}, + timestamp = {2007.02.15} +} + +@ARTICLE{Olsen1997, + author = {Olsen, Wayne and Dianne Van Tasell and Charles Speaks}, + title = {Phoneme and word recognition for words in isolation and sentences}, + journal = {Ear and Hearing}, + year = {1997}, + volume = {18}, + pages = {175-188}, + number = {3}, + keywords = {Olsen, Wayne, Dianne Van Tasell and Charles Speaks}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/OlsenEtAl1997.pdf} +} + +@ARTICLE{Pallier2001, + author = {Pallier,Christophe and Colome,Angels and Sebastian-Galles,Nuria}, + title = {The Influence of Native-language Phonology on Lexical Access: Exemplar-Based + Versus Abstract Lexical Entries}, + journal = {Psychological Science}, + year = {2001}, + volume = {12}, + pages = {445-449}, + number = {6}, + abstract = {This study used medium-term auditory repetition priming to investigate + word-recognition processes. Highly fluent Catalan-Spanish bilinguals + whose first language was either Catalan or Spanish were tested in + a lexical decision task involving Catalan words and nonwords. Spanish-dominant + individuals, but not Catalan-dominant individuals, exhibited repetition + priming for minimal pairs differing in only one feature that is nondistinctive + in Spanish (e.g., /net@/ vs. /nEt@/), thereby indicating that they + processed these words as homophones. This finding provides direct + evidence both that word recognition uses a language-specific phonological + representation and that lexical entries are stored in the mental + lexicon as abstract forms.}, + doi = {10.1111/1467-9280.00383}, + eprint = {http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1467-9280.00383}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/PallierColomeSebastian-Galles2001.pdf} +} + +@ARTICLE{Penke2002, + author = {Penke, M. and Krause, M.}, + title = {German noun plurals: A challenge to the Dual-Mechanism Model}, + journal = {Brain And Language}, + year = {2002}, + volume = {81}, + pages = {303--311}, + number = {1-3}, + month = apr, + abstract = {In this article, the authors test one of the central claims of the + Dual-Mechanism Model (Pinker & Prince, 1994), that is, that regular + inflection equals default inflection. Based on results from an elicitation + task with eight agrammatic Broca's aphasics and a lexical decision + task with unimpaired subjects, the authors show that this assumption + is not borne out. Their data on German plural inflection rather indicate + that regular inflection is not necessarily identical to default inflection. + To capture the German data. they have to assume regular but input-restricted + inflection besides regular default inflection.}, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/PenkeKrause2002.pdf}, + sn = {0093-934X}, + timestamp = {2007.02.11}, + ut = {ISI:000175771500026} +} + +@ARTICLE{Perea1998, + author = {Perea, Manuel and Carreiras, Manuel}, + title = {Effects of syllable frequency and syllable neighborhood frequency + in visual word recognition.}, + journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance}, + year = {1998}, + volume = {24}, + pages = {134--144}, + number = {1}, + month = feb, + abstract = {Three experiments were carried out to analyze the role of syllable + frequency in lexical decision and naming. The results show inhibitory + effects of syllable frequency in the lexical decision task for both + high- and low-frequency words. In contrast, the effect of syllable + frequency is facilitatory in the naming task. A post hoc analysis + revealed the important role played by the number of higher frequency + syllabic neighbors (words that share a syllable with the target) + in the lexical decision task and the role of the frequency of the + first syllable in the naming task. Experiment 3 manipulated the neighborhood + syllable frequency directly by comparing words with few higher frequency + syllabic neighbors and words with many higher frequency syllabic + neighbors in the lexical decision task; an inhibitory neighborhood + syllable frequency effect was found. The results are interpreted + in terms of current models of visual word recognition and word naming. + (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved) (from + the journal abstract)}, + comment = {Accession Number: xhp-24-1-134. First Author & Affiliation: Perea, + Manuel; U de València, Facultat de Psicologia, Area de Metodologia, + València, Spain. Release Date: 19980401. Publication Type: Journal, + Peer Reviewed Journal. Language: English. Major Descriptor(s): Lexical + Decision; Orthography; Syllables; Word Frequency; Word Recognition. + Minor Descriptor(s): Naming; Words (Phonetic Units). Classification: + Cognitive Processes (2340); Population: Human (10); Location: Spain. + Age Group: Adulthood (18 yrs & older) (300); Young Adulthood (18-29 + yrs) (320); . Methodology: Empirical Study. References Available: + Y.}, + issn = {0096-1523}, + keywords = {syllable frequency & number & frequency of orthographic neighbors + of high- vs low-frequency words, lexical decision & word naming, + college students, Spain, Lexical Decision, Orthography, Syllables, + Word Frequency, Word Recognition, Naming, Words (Phonetic Units)}, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/pereaCarreiras1998.pdf}, + publisher = {American Psychological Assn}, + timestamp = {2007.01.09} +} + +@ARTICLE{PetersonBarney, + author = {G. E. Peter\-son and H. L. Barney}, + title = {Control methods used in a study of the vowels}, + journal = JASA, + year = {1952}, + volume = {24}, + pages = {175-184}, + keywords = {Peterson and Barney} +} + +@ARTICLE{Pinker1988, + author = {Pinker, Steven and Prince, Alan}, + title = {On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed + processing model of language acquisition}, + journal = {Cognition}, + year = {1988}, + volume = {28}, + pages = {73--193}, + number = {1-2}, + month = mar, + abstract = {Does knowledge of language consist of mentally-represented rules? + Rumelhart and McClelland have described a connectionist (parallel + distributed processing) model of the acquisition of the past tense + in English which successfully maps many stems onto their past tense + forms, both regular (walk/walked) and irregular (go/went), and which + mimics some of the errors and sequences of development of children. + Yet the model contains no explicit rules, only a set of neuronstyle + units which stand for trigrams of phonetic features of the stem, + a set of units which stand for trigrams of phonetic features of the + past form, and an array of connections between the two sets of units + whose strengths are modified during learning. Rumelhart and McClelland + conclude that linguistic rules may be merely convenient approximate + fictions and that the real causal processes in language use and acquisition + must be characterized as the transfer of activation levels among + units and the modification of the weights of their connections. We + analyze both the linguistic and the developmental assumptions of + the model in detail and discover that (1) it cannot represent certain + words, (2) it cannot learn many rules, (3) it can learn rules found + in no human language, (4) it cannot explain morphological and phonological + regularities, (5) it cannot explain the differences between irregular + and regular forms, (6) it fails at its assigned task of mastering + the past tense of English, (7) it gives an incorrect explanation + for two developmental phenomena: stages of overregularization of + irregular forms such as bringed, and the appearance of doubly-marked + forms such as ated and (8) it gives accounts of two others (infrequent + overregularization of verbs ending in t/d, and the order of acquisition + of different irregular subclasses) that are indistinguishable from + those of rule-based theories. In addition, we show how many failures + of the model can be attributed to its connectionist architecture. + We conclude that connectionists' claims about the dispensability + of rules in explanations in the psychology of language must be rejected, + and that, on the contrary, the linguistic and developmental facts + provide good evidence for such rules.}, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/PinkerPrince1988.pdf}, + timestamp = {2007.02.11} +} + +@ARTICLE{Pinker2002reply, + author = {Pinker, S. and Ullman, M.}, + title = {Combination and structure, not gradedness, is the issue - Reply to + McClelland and Patterson}, + journal = {Trends In Cognitive Sciences}, + year = {2002}, + volume = {6}, + pages = {472--474}, + number = {11}, + month = nov, + abstract = {We defend the theory that irregular past-tense forms are stored in + the lexicon, a division of declarative memory, whereas regular inflection + is rule-driven and based in grammatical processing. This dual-mechanism + approach differs from single-system connectionist approaches, which + fail to capture all the data.}, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/PinkerUllman2002reply.pdf}, + sn = {1364-6613}, + timestamp = {2007.02.11}, + ut = {ISI:000179170000011} +} + +@ARTICLE{Pinker2002, + author = {Pinker, S. and Ullman, M. T.}, + title = {The past and future of the past tense}, + journal = {Trends In Cognitive Sciences}, + year = {2002}, + volume = {6}, + pages = {456--463}, + number = {11}, + month = nov, + abstract = {What is the interaction between storage and computation in language + processing? What is the psychological status of grammatical rules? + What are the relative strengths of connectionist and symbolic models + of cognition? How are the components of language implemented in the + brain? The English past tense has served as an arena for debates + on these issues. We defend the theory that irregular past-tense forms + are stored in the lexicon, a division of declarative memory, whereas + regular forms can be computed by a concatenation rule, which requires + the procedural system. Irregulars have the psychological, linguistic + and neuropsychological signatures of lexical memory, whereas regulars + often have the signatures of grammatical processing. Furthermore, + because regular inflection is rule-driven, speakers can apply it + whenever memory fails.}, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/PinkerUllman2002.pdf}, + sn = {1364-6613}, + timestamp = {2007.02.11}, + ut = {ISI:000179170000008} +} + +@ARTICLE{Plaut2000a, + author = {Plaut, David C. and Gonnerman, Laura M.}, + title = {Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed + connectionist approach to lexical processing?}, + journal = {Language and Cognitive Processes}, + year = {2000}, + volume = {15}, + pages = {445--485}, + number = {4 - 5}, + month = aug, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/Plaut2000.pdf}, + timestamp = {2006.12.13}, + url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690960050119661} +} + +@ARTICLE{Plunkett1991, + author = {Plunkett, Kim and Marchman, Virginia}, + title = {U-shaped learning and frequency effects in a multi-layered perception: + Implications for child language acquisition}, + journal = {Cognition}, + year = {1991}, + volume = {38}, + pages = {43--102}, + number = {1}, + month = jan, + abstract = {A three-layer back-propagation network is used to implement a pattern + association task in which four types of mapping are learned. These + mappings, which are considered analogous to those which characterize + the relationship between the stem and past tense forms of English + verbs, include arbitrary mappings, identity mappings, vowel changes, + and additions of a suffix. The degree of correspondence between parallel + distributed processing (PDP) models which learn mappings of this + sort (e.g., Rumelhart & McClelland, 1986, 1987) and children's acquisition + of inflectional morphology has recently been at issue in discussions + of the applicability of PDP models to the study of human cognition + and language (Pinker & Mehler, 1989; Bever, in press). In this paper, + we explore the capacity of a network to learn these types of mappings, + focusing on three major issues. First, we compare the performance + of a single-layered perceptron similar to the one used by Rumerlhart + and McClelland with a multi-layered perceptron. The results suggest + that it is unlikely that a single-layered perceptron is capable of + finding an adequate solution to the problem of mapping stems and + past tense forms in input configurations that are sufficiently analogous + to English. Second, we explore the input conditions which determine + learning in these networks. Several factors that characterize linguistic + input are investigated: (a) the nature of the mapping performed by + the network (arbitrary, suffixation, identity, and vowel change); + (b) the competition effects that arise when the task demands simultaneous + learning of distinct mapping types; (c) the role of the type and + token frequency of verb stems; and (d) the influence of phonological + subregularities in the irregular verbs. Each of these factors is + shown to have selective consequences on both successful and erroneous + performance in the network. Third, we outline several types of systems + which could result in U-shaped acquisition, and discuss the ways + in which learning in multi-layered networks can be seen to capture + several characteristics of U-shaped learning in children. In general, + these models provide information about the role of input in determining + the kinds of errors that a network will produce, including the conditions + under which rule-like behavior and U-shaped learning will and will + not emerge. The results from all simulations are discussed in light + of behavioral data on children's acquisition of the past tense and + the validity of drawing conclusions about the acquisition of language + from models of this sort.}, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/PlunkettMarchman1991.pdf}, + timestamp = {2007.02.14} +} + +@ARTICLE{Pothos2005, + author = {Pothos, E. M.}, + title = {The rules versus similarity distinction}, + journal = {Behavioral And Brain Sciences}, + year = {2005}, + volume = {28}, + pages = {1--+}, + number = {1}, + month = feb, + abstract = {The distinction between rules and similarity is central to our understanding + of much of cognitive psychology. Two aspects of existing research + have motivated the present work. First, in different cognitive psychology + areas we typically see different conceptions of rules and similarity; + for example, rules in language appear to be of a different kind compared + to rules in categorization. Second, rules processes are typically + modeled as separate from similarity ones; for example, in a learning + experiment, rules and similarity influences would be described on + the basis of separate models. in the present article, I assume that + the rules versus similarity distinction can be understood in the + same way in learning, reasoning, categorization, and language, and + that a unified model for rules and similarity is appropriate. A rules + process is considered to be a similarity one where only a single + or a small subset of an object's properties are involved. Hence, + rules and overall similarity operations are extremes in a single + continuum of similarity operations. It is argued that this viewpoint + allows adequate coverage of theory and empirical findings in learning, + reasoning, categorization, and language, and also a reassessment + of the objectives in research on rules versus similarity.}, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/Pothos2005.pdf}, + sn = {0140-525X}, + timestamp = {2007.02.06}, + ut = {ISI:000229944100001} +} + +@ARTICLE{Prasada1993, + author = {Prasada, S. and Pinker, S}, + title = {Generalization of regular and irregular morphological patterns}, + journal = {Language and Cognitive Processes}, + year = {1993}, + volume = {8}, + pages = {1--56}, + owner = {robfelty}, + timestamp = {2007.02.13} +} + +@ARTICLE{Prince1988, + author = {Prince, Alan and Pinker, Steven}, + title = {Rules and connections in human language}, + journal = {Trends in Neurosciences}, + year = {1988}, + volume = {11}, + pages = {195--202}, + number = {5}, + abstract = {Recently `connectionist' or `parallel distributed processing' (PDP) + approaches to brain modelling have attracted an enormous amount of + attention. These models are said to be faithful to neurophysiological + and to behavioral data in a way that previous approaches based on + symbolic computation were not. A PDP simulation by Rumelhart and + McClelland of children's acquisition of the past tense in English + has been one of the most famous demonstrations of the advantages + of the connectionist approach. In a recent special issue of the journal + Cognition devoted to Connectionism and Symbol Systems, Steven Pinker + and Alan Prince examine this model and the relevant data in great + detail, finding severe limitations in the ability of current PDP + models to explain human language and cognition. The key points of + their analysis are summarised in the following article.}, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/PrasadaPinker1993.pdf}, + timestamp = {2007.02.11}, + url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6T0V-482YFJR-2J/2/2f7474e120061a838a5d449ec45fcb28} +} + +@ARTICLE{Prince1988wickel, + author = {Prince, Alan and Pinker, Steven}, + title = {Wickelphone ambiguity}, + journal = {Cognition}, + year = {1988}, + volume = {30}, + pages = {189--190}, + number = {2}, + month = nov, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/PrincePinker1988wickelphone.pdf}, + timestamp = {2007.02.11}, + url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6T24-45Y1213-16/2/8ee5c0c5f3f54e7d2c3bdc49c4660d91} +} + +@ARTICLE{Ramscar2002, + author = {Ramscar, M.}, + title = {The role of meaning in inflection: Why the past tense does not require + a rule}, + journal = {Cognitive Psychology}, + year = {2002}, + volume = {45}, + pages = {45--94}, + number = {1}, + month = aug, + abstract = {How do we produce the past tenses of verbs? For the last 20 years + this question has been the focal domain for conflicting theories + of language, knowledge representation, and cognitive processing. + On one side of the debate have been similarity-based or single-route + approaches that propose that all past tenses are formed simply through + phonological analogies to existing past tenses stored in memory. + On the other side of the debate are rule-based or dual-route approaches + which agree that phonological analogy is important for producing + irregular past tenses (e.g., think 7 thought), but argue that regular + past tenses (e.g., walk --> walked) are generated via a +ed rule + and that a principled account of regular inflection can only be given + by recourse to explicit rules. This debate has become a crucial battleground + for arguments concerning the necessity and importance of abstract + mental rules, embracing not only language processing, but also the + of nature cognition itself. However, in centering on the roles of + phonological similarity and rules, the past tense debate has largely + ignored the possible role of semantics in determining inflection. + This paper presents five studies that demonstrate a striking and + decisive role of semantic similarity in inflection. In fact, semantic + factors appear to be more important in inflection than the grammatical + considerations put forward by the dual-route account. Further, these + new findings provide a new way of discriminating between the claims + of single-route (similarity-based) and dual-route (rule-based) approaches. + It appears that inflection is carried out through analogical reminding + based on semantic and phonological similarity and that a rule-based + route is not necessary to account for past tense inflection.}, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/Ramscar2002.pdf}, + sn = {0010-0285}, + timestamp = {2007.02.10}, + ut = {ISI:000177350700002} +} + +@ARTICLE{Redford1999, + author = {Redford, Melissa A and Randy L.}, + title = {The relative perceptual distinctiveness of initial and final consonants + in CVC syllables}, + journal = JASA, + year = {1999}, + volume = {106}, + pages = {1555-1565}, + number = {3}, + keywords = {Redford, Melissa A and Randy L.} +} + +@PHDTHESIS{Reid2001, + author = {Reid, A.}, + title = {The combinatorial lexicon: Psycholinguistic studies of Polish morphology.}, + school = {Birkbeck College, University of London.}, + year = {2001}, + owner = {robfelty}, + timestamp = {2007.02.13} +} + +@INCOLLECTION{Rumelhart1986, + author = {David E. Rumelhart and James L. McClelland}, + title = {On learning the past tenses of English verbs}, + booktitle = {Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure + of Cognition}, + publisher = {MIT Press}, + year = {1986}, + editor = {James L. McLelland and David E. Rumelhart}, + volume = {2}, + chapter = {18}, + pages = {216--271}, + owner = {robfelty}, + timestamp = {2007.02.12} +} + +@ARTICLE{Samuel1981, + author = {Samuel, Arthur G}, + title = {Phonemic Restoration: Insights From a New Methodology}, + journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology}, + year = {1981}, + volume = {110}, + pages = {474-494}, + number = {4}, + keywords = {Samuel, Arthur G} +} + +@ARTICLE{Schreuder1997, + author = {Schreuder, R. and Baayen, R. H.}, + title = {How complex simplex words can be}, + journal = {Journal Of Memory And Language}, + year = {1997}, + volume = {37}, + pages = {118--139}, + number = {1}, + month = jul, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/SchreuderBaayen1997.pdf}, + sn = {0749-596X}, + timestamp = {2007.02.09}, + ut = {ISI:A1997XG92100006} +} + +@ARTICLE{Schreuder1994, + author = {Schreuder, R. and Baayen, R. Harald.}, + title = {Prefix Stripping Re-Revisited}, + journal = {Journal Of Memory And Language}, + year = {1994}, + volume = {33}, + pages = {357--375}, + number = {1}, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/SchreuderBaayen1994.pdf}, + timestamp = {2007.02.09} +} + +@ARTICLE{Schroeder1968, + author = {Schroeder, M.}, + title = {Reference signal for signal quality studies}, + journal = JASA, + year = {1968}, + volume = {44}, + pages = {1735--1736}, + keywords = {Schroeder, M.} +} + +@ARTICLE{Seidenberg1989, + author = {Seidenberg, Mark S. and McClelland, James L.}, + title = {A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.}, + journal = {Psychological Review}, + year = {1989}, + volume = {96}, + pages = {523--568}, + number = {4}, + month = oct, + abstract = {The model described consists of sets of orthographic and phonological + units and an interlevel of hidden units. Weights on connections between + units were modified during a training phase using the back-propagation + learning algorithm. The model simulates many aspects of human performance, + including (a) differences between words in terms of processing difficulty, + (b) pronunciation of novel items, (c) differences between readers + in terms of word recognition skill, (d) transitions from beginning + to skilled reading, and (e) differences in performance on lexical + decisions and naming tasks. The model's behavior early in the learning + phase corresponds to that of children acquiring word recognition + skills. Training with a smaller number of hidden units produces output + characteristic of many dyslexic readers. Naming is simulated without + pronunciation rules, and lexical decisions are simulated without + assessing word-level representations. The performance of the model + is largely determined by three factors: the nature of the input, + a significant fragment of written English; the learning rule, which + encodes the implicit structure of the orthography in the weights + on connections; and the architecture of the system, which influences + the scope of what can be learned. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 + APA, all rights reserved)}, + comment = {Accession Number: rev-96-4-523. First Author & Affiliation: Seidenberg, + Mark S.; McGill U, Montreal, PQ, Canada. Release Date: 19900201. + Publication Type: Journal, Peer Reviewed Journal. Language: English. + Major Descriptor(s): Language Development; Models; Naming; Word Recognition. + Minor Descriptor(s): Reading. Classification: Cognitive Processes + (2340); Population: Human (10); . References Available: Y.}, + issn = {0033-295X}, + keywords = {model of word recognition & naming, language development & reading, + Language Development, Models, Naming, Word Recognition, Reading}, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/SeidenbergMcClelland1989.pdf}, + publisher = {American Psychological Assn}, + timestamp = {2007.02.14} +} + +@ARTICLE{Sereno1997, + author = {Sereno, J. and Jongman, A.}, + title = {Processing of {E}nglish inflectional morphology}, + journal = {Memory and Cognition}, + year = {1997}, + volume = {25}, + pages = {425-437}, + keywords = {Sereno, J. and Jongman A.} +} + +@ARTICLE{Shannon1999, + author = {Shannon, R.V. and Jensvold, A. and Padilla, M. and Robert, M.E. and + Wang, X.}, + title = {Consonant recordings for speech testing}, + journal = JASA, + year = {1999}, + volume = {106}, + pages = {L71-L74}, + number = {6}, + keywords = {Shannon} +} + +@ARTICLE{Stemberger2004, + author = {Stemberger, J. P.}, + title = {Phonological priming and irregular past}, + journal = {Journal Of Memory And Language}, + year = {2004}, + volume = {50}, + pages = {82--95}, + number = {1}, + month = jan, + abstract = {It has been shown that the processing of irregular past-tense forms + is affected by phonological factors that are inherent in the relationship + of the past-tense forms to other words in the lexicon (rhyming families + of irregulars) or to their base forms (vowel dominance effects). + This paper addresses more ephemeral phonological effects. In a sentence-production + task, the vowel of the base form or past-tense form of an irregular + verb (e.g., /i/ of freeze or /oupsilon/ of froze) is primed by an + identical vowel in the subject noun (e.g., base vowel cream, past-tense + vowel chrome, unrelated vowel slot). For verbs with different vowels + in the base form and past-tense form, phonological priming of the + base vowel or of the past-tense vowel increases the rate of overregularization + errors such as *freezed as compared to an unrelated vowel prime. + For verbs with the same vowel in the base and past-tense forms (e.g., + hit/hit), phonological printing has no effect on the rate of overregularization + errors. It is argued that irregular forms are not produced in a specialized + subnetwork for (irregular) past-tense forms, but are produced in + the general lexical system simultaneous with general phonological + processing. Implications for theories of inflectional morphology + are discussed}, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/Stemberger2004.pdf}, + sn = {0749-596X}, + timestamp = {2007.02.10}, + ut = {ISI:000187570800005} +} + +@ARTICLE{Stevens1989, + author = {Kenneth N. Stevens}, + title = {On the quantal nature of speech}, + journal = {Journal of Phonetics}, + year = {1989}, + volume = {17}, + pages = {3-45}, + keywords = {Stevens, quantal } +} + +@INCOLLECTION{Stevens1981, + author = {Kenneth N. Stevens and S. E. Blum\-stein}, + title = {The search for invariant acoustic correlates of phonetic features}, + booktitle = {Perspectives on the Study of Speech}, + publisher = {Erlbaum}, + year = {1981}, + editor = {Elmas Miller}, + address = {Hillsdale}, + keywords = {Stevens, Blumstein invariant} +} + +@ARTICLE{Taft1988, + author = {Taft, Marcus}, + title = {A morphological decomposition model of lexical representation}, + journal = {Linguistics}, + year = {1988 }, + volume = {26}, + pages = {657-667}, + keywords = {Taft, Marcus} +} + +@ARTICLE{Taft1979, + author = {Taft, M.}, + title = {Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect}, + journal = {Memory \& Cognition}, + year = {1979}, + volume = {7}, + pages = {263--272}, + owner = {robfelty}, + timestamp = {2007.02.09} +} + +@ARTICLE{Taft1975, + author = {Taft, Marcus and Kenneth Forster}, + title = {Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words}, + journal = {Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior}, + year = {1975}, + volume = {14}, + pages = {638-647}, + keywords = {Taft, Marcus and Kenneth Forster} +} + +@ARTICLE{Vannest2002, + author = {Vannest, Jennifer and Raymond Bertram and Juhani J\"arvikivi and + Jussi Niemi}, + title = {Counterintuitive Cross-Linguistic Differences: More Morphological + Computation in {E}nglish than in {F}innish}, + journal = {Journal of Psycholinguistic Research}, + year = {2002}, + volume = {31}, + pages = {83-106}, + keywords = {Vannest, Jennifer, Raymond Bertram, Juhani Jarvikivi and Jussi Niemi} +} + +@MISC{Vannest2006, + author = {Jennifer Vannest and Elissa L. Newport and Daphne Bavelier}, + title = {How Frequent is a Word? Reexamining base and surface frequencies}, + howpublished = {poster presented at the Fifth International Conference on the Mental + Lexicon}, + month = {October}, + year = {2006}, + booktitle = {poster presented at the Fifth International Conference on the Mental + Lexicon}, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/randomArticles/Vannest_ML_2006.pdf}, + timestamp = {2006.11.26} +} + +@ARTICLE{Vitevitch2005, + author = {Michael S. Vitevitch and Paul A. Luce}, + title = {Increases in phonotactic probability facilitate spoken nonword repetition}, + journal = JML, + year = {2005}, + volume = {52}, + pages = {193-204}, + keywords = {vitevitch, luce, phonotactic probability}, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/randomArticles/VitevitchLuceJML2005.pdf}, + timestamp = {2006.10.24} +} + +@ARTICLE{Vitevitch2004, + author = {Michael S. Vitevitch and Paul A. Luce}, + title = {A Web-based interface to calculate phonotactic probability for words + and nonwords in English}, + journal = {Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, \& Computers}, + year = {2004}, + volume = {36}, + pages = {481-487}, + number = {3}, + keywords = {phonotactic probability, positional frequency, vitevitch, luce, lexical + access}, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/VitevitchLuce2004phonoProb.pdf}, + timestamp = {2006.09.28} +} + +@ARTICLE{Vitevitch1999, + author = {Michael S. Vitevitch and Paul A. Luce}, + title = {Probabilistic Phonotactics and Neighborhood Activation in Spoken + Word Recognition}, + journal = JML, + year = {1999}, + volume = {40}, + pages = {374-406}, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {file://localhost/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/VitevitchAndLuce1999.pdf}, + timestamp = {2006.10.24} +} + +@ARTICLE{Vitevitch1998, + author = {Michael S. Vitevitch and Paul A. Luce}, + title = {WHEN WORDS COMPETE: Levels of Processing in Perception of Spoken + Words}, + journal = {Psychological Science}, + year = {1998}, + volume = {9}, + pages = {325-329}, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {file://localhost/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/VitevitchAndLuce1998.pdf}, + timestamp = {2006.10.24} +} + +@ARTICLE{Weber2004, + author = {Weber, Andrea and Anne Cutler}, + title = {Lexical competition in non- native spoken-word recognition}, + journal = {Journal of Memory and Language}, + year = {2004}, + volume = {50}, + pages = {1- 25}, + keywords = {Weber, Andrea and Anne Cutler} +} + +@ARTICLE{Wickelgren1969, + author = {W. A. Wickelgren}, + title = {Context-sensitive coding, associative memory, and serial order in + (speech) behavior}, + journal = {Psychological Review}, + year = {1969}, + volume = {76}, + pages = {1-15}, + owner = {robfelty}, + timestamp = {2007.02.12} +} + +@ARTICLE{Wiese1986, + author = {Richard Wiese}, + title = {Schwa and the structure of words in German}, + journal = {Linguistics}, + year = {1986}, + volume = {24}, + pages = {695-724}, + owner = {robfelty}, + timestamp = {2007.02.14} +} + +@ARTICLE{Wijngaarden2002, + author = {van Wijngaarden, S. J. and Steeneken, H. J. M. and Houtgast, T.}, + title = {Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for non-native + listeners}, + journal = {Journal Of The Acoustical Society Of America}, + year = {2002}, + volume = {111}, + pages = {1906--1916}, + number = {4}, + month = apr, + owner = {robfelty}, + sn = {0001-4966}, + timestamp = {2007.02.03}, + ut = {ISI:000175000900039} +} + +@INCOLLECTION{Wunderlich1997, + author = {Wunderlich, Dieter}, + title = {Der unterspezifizierte {A}rtikel}, + booktitle = {Sprache im Fokus}, + publisher = {Niemeyer}, + year = {1997}, + editor = {Christa D\"urscheid and Karl-Heinz Ramers and Monika Schwarz}, + pages = {47-55}, + address = {T\"ubingen}, + keywords = {Wunderlich, underspecification} +} + +@ARTICLE{Zhou2000, + author = {Zhou, X. and Marslen-Wilson, W.D.}, + title = {Lexical representation of compound words: Cross-linguistic evidence}, + journal = {Psychologia}, + year = {2000}, + volume = {43}, + pages = {47--66}, + owner = {robfelty}, + timestamp = {2007.02.13} +} + +@ARTICLE{Zhou1995, + author = {Zhou, X. and Marslen-Wilson, W.D.}, + title = {Morphological structure in the Chinese mental lexicon}, + journal = {Language and Cognitive Processes}, + year = {1995}, + volume = {10}, + pages = {545--601}, + owner = {robfelty}, + timestamp = {2007.02.13} +} + +@BOOK{Zipf1935, + title = {The psycho-biology of language: An introduction to dynamic philology}, + publisher = {Houghton Mifflin}, + year = {1935}, + author = {Zipf, G.K.}, + address = {Cambridge, MA}, + owner = {robfelty}, + timestamp = {2007.02.09} +} + +@ARTICLE{Zwicky1986, + author = {Zwicky, Arnold M.}, + title = {The general case: Basic form versus default form}, + journal = {Berkeley Linguistics Society}, + year = {1986}, + volume = {12}, + pages = {305-315}, + keywords = {Zwicky, basic , default} +} + +@ARTICLE{Zwitserlood2000, + author = {Zwitserlood, Pienie and B\"olte, Jens and Dohmes, Petra}, + title = {Morphological effects on speech production: Evidence from picture + naming}, + journal = {Language and Cognitive Processes}, + year = {2000}, + volume = {15}, + pages = {563--591}, + number = {4 - 5}, + month = aug, + owner = {robfelty}, + pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/Zwitserlood2000.pdf}, + timestamp = {2006.12.13}, + url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690960050119706} +} + +@PROCEEDINGS{Strange1995, + title = {Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Theoretical and Methodological + Issues}, + year = {1995}, + editor = {Winifred Strange}, + address = {Timonium, MD}, + publisher = {York Press}, + keywords = {strange cross-linguistics} +} + diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/intro.tex b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/intro.tex new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f0e2ebd284c --- /dev/null +++ b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/intro.tex @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ +\chapter{The introduction} +Modern research on lexical access began in the 1950's (though +\cite{ColeRudnicky1983} note very similar research performed in the 1890's by +William Chandler Bagley). Several statistical properties of the mental +lexicon have consistently been found to influence how humans process speech. +One of the earliest and most robust findings was that lexical frequency has a +strong influence on lexical access. Repeated research has shown that high +frequency words elicit quicker and more accurate responses than low +frequency words in a large variety of experimental conditions +(e.g.\ \cite{Broadbent1967, Taft1979, BenkiJASA}). Another factor which has +been reliably shown to affect lexical access is neighborhood density. +Neighborhood density is a metric of similarity, roughly defined as the degree +to which a word is similar to others (both phonological and orthographical +measures have been used). Words which have many similar words are said to be +in dense neighborhoods, whereas words which have few similar words are said to +be in sparse neighborhoods. In contrast to lexical frequency, which +facilitates the activation of a word in the brain, neighborhood density has +been found to inhibit activation (e.g.\ \cite{Luce1986, Luce1998, BenkiJASA, +Imai2005}). Of course these are not the only factors which affect language +processing, but they are the most frequently cited, and will be referred to +again in the following sections. +\begin{table*}[!htb] + \centering + \caption[Basic Predictions]{Basic Predictions: Predicted results are marked + with a checkmark, and a relative effect size is also given.} + \label{T:predictions} + \begin{tabularx}{\textwidth}{% + >{\setlength{\hsize}{1.5\hsize}\raggedright\arraybackslash}X% + *{2}{>{\setlength{\hsize}{.7\hsize}\raggedright\arraybackslash}X}% + *{2}{>{\setlength{\hsize}{1.05\hsize}\raggedright\arraybackslash}X}} + \hline\hline + \rule{0em}{1.1em}& English native listeners& German native listeners & + English non-native listeners & German non-native listeners\\[.3em] + \cline{2-5} + \rule{0em}{1.1em}lexical status & \checkmark robust& \checkmark + robust& \checkmark less than native listeners& \checkmark less than native + listeners\\ + morphology & marginal & more than English & less than L1& less than L1\\ + lexical frequency & \checkmark robust& \checkmark + robust& \checkmark less than native listeners& \checkmark less than native + listeners\\ + neighborhood density & \checkmark robust & \checkmark robust & \checkmark less + than L1& \checkmark less than L1\\[.3em] + \hline\hline + \end{tabularx} +\end{table*} diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/mybibstyle.bst b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/mybibstyle.bst new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..95867d0e26b --- /dev/null +++ b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/umthesis/mybibstyle.bst @@ -0,0 +1,1468 @@ +%% +%% This is file `felty3.bst', +%% generated with the docstrip utility. +%% +%% The original source files were: +%% +%% merlin.mbs (with options: `ay,nat,nm-revv1,jnrlst,keyxyr,dt-beg,yr-per,yrp-per,note-yr,volp-com,num-xser,bkpg-x,add-pub,pre-pub,edparc,bkedcap,blk-com,blknt,ppx,ed,abr,xedn,url,url-blk') +%% ---------------------------------------- +%% *** updated stylesheet for prospectus *** +%% +%% Copyright 1994-2002 Patrick W Daly + % =============================================================== + % IMPORTANT NOTICE: + % This bibliographic style (bst) file has been generated from one or + % more master bibliographic style (mbs) files, listed above. + % + % This generated file can be redistributed and/or modified under the terms + % of the LaTeX Project Public License Distributed from CTAN + % archives in directory macros/latex/base/lppl.txt; either + % version 1 of the License, or any later version. + % =============================================================== + % Name and version information of the main mbs file: + % \ProvidesFile{merlin.mbs}[2002/10/21 4.05 (PWD, AO, DPC)] + % For use with BibTeX version 0.99a or later + %------------------------------------------------------------------- + % This bibliography style file is intended for texts in ENGLISH + % This is an author-year citation style bibliography. As such, it is + % non-standard LaTeX, and requires a special package file to function properly. + % Such a package is natbib.sty by Patrick W. Daly + % The form of the \bibitem entries is + % \bibitem[Jones et al.(1990)]{key}... + % \bibitem[Jones et al.(1990)Jones, Baker, and Smith]{key}... + % The essential feature is that the label (the part in brackets) consists + % of the author names, as they should appear in the citation, with the year + % in parentheses following. There must be no space before the opening + % parenthesis! + % With natbib v5.3, a full list of authors may also follow the year. + % In natbib.sty, it is possible to define the type of enclosures that is + % really wanted (brackets or parentheses), but in either case, there must + % be parentheses in the label. + % The \cite command functions as follows: + % \citet{key} ==>> Jones et al. (1990) + % \citet*{key} ==>> Jones, Baker, and Smith (1990) + % \citep{key} ==>> (Jones et al., 1990) + % \citep*{key} ==>> (Jones, Baker, and Smith, 1990) + % \citep[chap. 2]{key} ==>> (Jones et al., 1990, chap. 2) + % \citep[e.g.][]{key} ==>> (e.g. Jones et al., 1990) + % \citep[e.g.][p. 32]{key} ==>> (e.g. Jones et al., p. 32) + % \citeauthor{key} ==>> Jones et al. + % \citeauthor*{key} ==>> Jones, Baker, and Smith + % \citeyear{key} ==>> 1990 + %--------------------------------------------------------------------- + +ENTRY + { address + author + booktitle + chapter + edition + editor + howpublished + institution + journal + key + month + note + number + organization + pages + publisher + school + series + title + type + url + volume + year + } + {} + { label extra.label sort.label short.list } +INTEGERS { output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block } +FUNCTION {init.state.consts} +{ #0 'before.all := + #1 'mid.sentence := + #2 'after.sentence := + #3 'after.block := +} +STRINGS { s t} +FUNCTION {output.nonnull} +{ 's := + output.state mid.sentence = + { ", " * write$ } + { output.state after.block = + { add.period$ write$ + newline$ + "\newblock " write$ + } + { output.state before.all = + 'write$ + { add.period$ " " * write$ } + if$ + } + if$ + mid.sentence 'output.state := + } + if$ + s +} +FUNCTION {output} +{ duplicate$ empty$ + 'pop$ + 'output.nonnull + if$ +} +FUNCTION {output.check} +{ 't := + duplicate$ empty$ + { pop$ "empty " t * " in " * cite$ * warning$ } + 'output.nonnull + if$ +} +FUNCTION {fin.entry} +{ add.period$ + write$ + newline$ +} + +FUNCTION {new.block} +{ output.state before.all = + 'skip$ + { after.block 'output.state := } + if$ +} +FUNCTION {new.sentence} +{ output.state after.block = + 'skip$ + { output.state before.all = + 'skip$ + { after.sentence 'output.state := } + if$ + } + if$ +} +FUNCTION {add.blank} +{ " " * before.all 'output.state := +} + +FUNCTION {date.block} +{ + new.sentence +} + +FUNCTION {not} +{ { #0 } + { #1 } + if$ +} +FUNCTION {and} +{ 'skip$ + { pop$ #0 } + if$ +} +FUNCTION {or} +{ { pop$ #1 } + 'skip$ + if$ +} +FUNCTION {new.block.checkb} +{ empty$ + swap$ empty$ + and + 'skip$ + 'new.block + if$ +} +FUNCTION {field.or.null} +{ duplicate$ empty$ + { pop$ "" } + 'skip$ + if$ +} +FUNCTION {emphasize} +{ duplicate$ empty$ + { pop$ "" } + { "{\em " swap$ * "\/}" * } + if$ +} +FUNCTION {tie.or.space.prefix} +{ duplicate$ text.length$ #3 < + { "~" } + { " " } + if$ + swap$ +} + +FUNCTION {capitalize} +{ "u" change.case$ "t" change.case$ } + +FUNCTION {space.word} +{ " " swap$ * " " * } + % Here are the language-specific definitions for explicit words. + % Each function has a name bbl.xxx where xxx is the English word. + % The language selected here is ENGLISH +FUNCTION {bbl.and} +{ "and"} + +FUNCTION {bbl.etal} +{ "et~al." } + +FUNCTION {bbl.editors} +{ "eds." } + +FUNCTION {bbl.editor} +{ "ed." } + +FUNCTION {bbl.edby} +{ "edited by" } + +FUNCTION {bbl.edition} +{ "edn." } + +FUNCTION {bbl.volume} +{ "vol." } + +FUNCTION {bbl.of} +{ "of" } + +FUNCTION {bbl.number} +{ "no." } + +FUNCTION {bbl.nr} +{ "no." } + +FUNCTION {bbl.in} +{ "in" } + +FUNCTION {bbl.pages} +{ "" } + +FUNCTION {bbl.page} +{ "" } + +FUNCTION {bbl.chapter} +{ "chap." } + +FUNCTION {bbl.techrep} +{ "Tech. Rep." } + +FUNCTION {bbl.mthesis} +{ "Master's thesis" } + +FUNCTION {bbl.phdthesis} +{ "Ph.D. thesis" } + +MACRO {jan} {"Jan."} + +MACRO {feb} {"Feb."} + +MACRO {mar} {"Mar."} + +MACRO {apr} {"Apr."} + +MACRO {may} {"May"} + +MACRO {jun} {"Jun."} + +MACRO {jul} {"Jul."} + +MACRO {aug} {"Aug."} + +MACRO {sep} {"Sep."} + +MACRO {oct} {"Oct."} + +MACRO {nov} {"Nov."} + +MACRO {dec} {"Dec."} + +MACRO {acmcs} {"ACM Computing Surveys"} + +MACRO {acta} {"Acta Informatica"} + +MACRO {cacm} {"Communications of the ACM"} + +MACRO {ibmjrd} {"IBM Journal of Research and Development"} + +MACRO {ibmsj} {"IBM Systems Journal"} + +MACRO {ieeese} {"IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering"} + +MACRO {ieeetc} {"IEEE Transactions on Computers"} + +MACRO {ieeetcad} + {"IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits"} + +MACRO {ipl} {"Information Processing Letters"} + +MACRO {jacm} {"Journal of the ACM"} + +MACRO {jcss} {"Journal of Computer and System Sciences"} + +MACRO {scp} {"Science of Computer Programming"} + +MACRO {sicomp} {"SIAM Journal on Computing"} + +MACRO {tocs} {"ACM Transactions on Computer Systems"} + +MACRO {tods} {"ACM Transactions on Database Systems"} + +MACRO {tog} {"ACM Transactions on Graphics"} + +MACRO {toms} {"ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software"} + +MACRO {toois} {"ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems"} + +MACRO {toplas} {"ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems"} + +MACRO {tcs} {"Theoretical Computer Science"} +FUNCTION {bibinfo.check} +{ swap$ + duplicate$ missing$ + { + pop$ pop$ + "" + } + { duplicate$ empty$ + { + swap$ pop$ + } + { swap$ + pop$ + } + if$ + } + if$ +} +FUNCTION {bibinfo.warn} +{ swap$ + duplicate$ missing$ + { + swap$ "missing " swap$ * " in " * cite$ * warning$ pop$ + "" + } + { duplicate$ empty$ + { + swap$ "empty " swap$ * " in " * cite$ * warning$ + } + { swap$ + pop$ + } + if$ + } + if$ +} +FUNCTION {format.url} +{ url empty$ + { "" } + { "\urlprefix\url{" url * "}" * } + if$ +} + +STRINGS { bibinfo} +INTEGERS { nameptr namesleft numnames } + +FUNCTION {format.names} +{ 'bibinfo := + duplicate$ empty$ 'skip$ { + 's := + "" 't := + #1 'nameptr := + s num.names$ 'numnames := + numnames 'namesleft := + { namesleft #0 > } + { s nameptr + duplicate$ #1 > + { "{ff~}{vv~}{ll}{, jj}" } + { "{vv~}{ll}{, ff}{, jj}" } + if$ + format.name$ + bibinfo bibinfo.check + 't := + nameptr #1 > + { + namesleft #1 > + { ", " * t * } + { + numnames #2 > + { "," * } + 'skip$ + if$ + s nameptr "{ll}" format.name$ duplicate$ "others" = + { 't := } + { pop$ } + if$ + t "others" = + { + " " * bbl.etal * + } + { + bbl.and + space.word * t * + } + if$ + } + if$ + } + 't + if$ + nameptr #1 + 'nameptr := + namesleft #1 - 'namesleft := + } + while$ + } if$ +} +FUNCTION {format.names.ed} +{ + 'bibinfo := + duplicate$ empty$ 'skip$ { + 's := + "" 't := + #1 'nameptr := + s num.names$ 'numnames := + numnames 'namesleft := + { namesleft #0 > } + { s nameptr + "{ff~}{vv~}{ll}{, jj}" + format.name$ + bibinfo bibinfo.check + 't := + nameptr #1 > + { + namesleft #1 > + { ", " * t * } + { + numnames #2 > + { "," * } + 'skip$ + if$ + s nameptr "{ll}" format.name$ duplicate$ "others" = + { 't := } + { pop$ } + if$ + t "others" = + { + + " " * bbl.etal * + } + { + bbl.and + space.word * t * + } + if$ + } + if$ + } + 't + if$ + nameptr #1 + 'nameptr := + namesleft #1 - 'namesleft := + } + while$ + } if$ +} +FUNCTION {format.key} +{ empty$ + { key field.or.null } + { "" } + if$ +} + +FUNCTION {format.authors} +{ author "author" format.names +} +FUNCTION {get.bbl.editor} +{ editor num.names$ #1 > 'bbl.editors 'bbl.editor if$ } + +FUNCTION {format.editors} +{ editor "editor" format.names duplicate$ empty$ 'skip$ + { + "," * + " " * + get.bbl.editor + capitalize + "(" swap$ * ")" * + * + } + if$ +} +FUNCTION {format.note} +{ + note empty$ + { "" } + { note #1 #1 substring$ + duplicate$ "{" = + 'skip$ + { output.state mid.sentence = + { "l" } + { "u" } + if$ + change.case$ + } + if$ + note #2 global.max$ substring$ * "note" bibinfo.check + } + if$ +} + +FUNCTION {format.title} +{ title + duplicate$ empty$ 'skip$ + { "t" change.case$ } + if$ + "title" bibinfo.check +} +FUNCTION {format.full.names} +{'s := + "" 't := + #1 'nameptr := + s num.names$ 'numnames := + numnames 'namesleft := + { namesleft #0 > } + { s nameptr + "{vv~}{ll}" format.name$ + 't := + nameptr #1 > + { + namesleft #1 > + { ", " * t * } + { + s nameptr "{ll}" format.name$ duplicate$ "others" = + { 't := } + { pop$ } + if$ + t "others" = + { + " " * bbl.etal * + } + { + numnames #2 > + { "," * } + 'skip$ + if$ + bbl.and + space.word * t * + } + if$ + } + if$ + } + 't + if$ + nameptr #1 + 'nameptr := + namesleft #1 - 'namesleft := + } + while$ +} + +FUNCTION {author.editor.key.full} +{ author empty$ + { editor empty$ + { key empty$ + { cite$ #1 #3 substring$ } + 'key + if$ + } + { editor format.full.names } + if$ + } + { author format.full.names } + if$ +} + +FUNCTION {author.key.full} +{ author empty$ + { key empty$ + { cite$ #1 #3 substring$ } + 'key + if$ + } + { author format.full.names } + if$ +} + +FUNCTION {editor.key.full} +{ editor empty$ + { key empty$ + { cite$ #1 #3 substring$ } + 'key + if$ + } + { editor format.full.names } + if$ +} + +FUNCTION {make.full.names} +{ type$ "book" = + type$ "inbook" = + or + 'author.editor.key.full + { type$ "proceedings" = + 'editor.key.full + 'author.key.full + if$ + } + if$ +} + +FUNCTION {output.bibitem} +{ newline$ + "\bibitem[{" write$ + label write$ + ")" make.full.names duplicate$ short.list = + { pop$ } + { * } + if$ + "}]{" * write$ + cite$ write$ + "}" write$ + %newline$ + "" + before.all 'output.state := +} + +FUNCTION {n.dashify} +{ + 't := + "" + { t empty$ not } + { t #1 #1 substring$ "-" = + { t #1 #2 substring$ "--" = not + { "--" * + t #2 global.max$ substring$ 't := + } + { { t #1 #1 substring$ "-" = } + { "-" * + t #2 global.max$ substring$ 't := + } + while$ + } + if$ + } + { t #1 #1 substring$ * + t #2 global.max$ substring$ 't := + } + if$ + } + while$ +} + +FUNCTION {word.in} +{ bbl.in + " " * } + +FUNCTION {format.date} +{ year "year" bibinfo.check duplicate$ empty$ + { + "empty year in " cite$ * "; set to ????" * warning$ + pop$ "????" + } + 'skip$ + if$ + extra.label * + before.all 'output.state := + after.sentence 'output.state := +} +FUNCTION {format.btitle} +{ title "title" bibinfo.check + duplicate$ empty$ 'skip$ + { + emphasize + } + if$ +} +FUNCTION {either.or.check} +{ empty$ + 'pop$ + { "can't use both " swap$ * " fields in " * cite$ * warning$ } + if$ +} +FUNCTION {format.bvolume} +{ volume empty$ + { "" } + { bbl.volume volume tie.or.space.prefix + "volume" bibinfo.check * * + series "series" bibinfo.check + duplicate$ empty$ 'pop$ + { swap$ bbl.of space.word * swap$ + emphasize * } + if$ + "volume and number" number either.or.check + } + if$ +} +FUNCTION {format.number.series} +{ volume empty$ + { number empty$ + { series field.or.null } + { series empty$ + { number "number" bibinfo.check } + { output.state mid.sentence = + { bbl.number } + { bbl.number capitalize } + if$ + number tie.or.space.prefix "number" bibinfo.check * * + bbl.in space.word * + series "series" bibinfo.check * + } + if$ + } + if$ + } + { "" } + if$ +} + +FUNCTION {format.edition} +{ edition duplicate$ empty$ 'skip$ + { + output.state mid.sentence = + { "l" } + { "t" } + if$ change.case$ + "edition" bibinfo.check + " " * bbl.edition * + } + if$ +} +INTEGERS { multiresult } +FUNCTION {multi.page.check} +{ 't := + #0 'multiresult := + { multiresult not + t empty$ not + and + } + { t #1 #1 substring$ + duplicate$ "-" = + swap$ duplicate$ "," = + swap$ "+" = + or or + { #1 'multiresult := } + { t #2 global.max$ substring$ 't := } + if$ + } + while$ + multiresult +} +FUNCTION {format.pages} +{ pages duplicate$ empty$ 'skip$ + { duplicate$ multi.page.check + { + n.dashify + } + { + } + if$ + "pages" bibinfo.check + } + if$ +} +FUNCTION {format.journal.pages} +{ pages duplicate$ empty$ 'pop$ + { swap$ duplicate$ empty$ + { pop$ pop$ format.pages } + { + ", " * + swap$ + n.dashify + "pages" bibinfo.check + * + } + if$ + } + if$ +} +FUNCTION {format.vol.num.pages} +{ volume field.or.null + duplicate$ empty$ 'skip$ + { + "volume" bibinfo.check + } + if$ + number "number" bibinfo.check duplicate$ empty$ 'skip$ + { + swap$ duplicate$ empty$ + { "there's a number but no volume in " cite$ * warning$ } + 'skip$ + if$ + swap$ + "(" swap$ * ")" * + } + if$ * + format.journal.pages +} + +FUNCTION {format.chapter.pages} +{ chapter empty$ + 'format.pages + { type empty$ + { bbl.chapter } + { type "l" change.case$ + "type" bibinfo.check + } + if$ + chapter tie.or.space.prefix + "chapter" bibinfo.check + * * + pages empty$ + 'skip$ + { ", " * format.pages * } + if$ + } + if$ +} + +FUNCTION {format.booktitle} +{ + booktitle "booktitle" bibinfo.check + emphasize +} +FUNCTION {format.in.ed.booktitle} +{ format.booktitle duplicate$ empty$ 'skip$ + { + editor "editor" format.names.ed duplicate$ empty$ 'pop$ + { + "," * + " " * + get.bbl.editor + capitalize + "(" swap$ * ") " * + * swap$ + * } + if$ + word.in swap$ * + } + if$ +} +FUNCTION {format.thesis.type} +{ type duplicate$ empty$ + 'pop$ + { swap$ pop$ + "t" change.case$ "type" bibinfo.check + } + if$ +} +FUNCTION {format.tr.number} +{ number "number" bibinfo.check + type duplicate$ empty$ + { pop$ bbl.techrep } + 'skip$ + if$ + "type" bibinfo.check + swap$ duplicate$ empty$ + { pop$ "t" change.case$ } + { tie.or.space.prefix * * } + if$ +} +FUNCTION {format.article.crossref} +{ + word.in + " \cite{" * crossref * "}" * +} +FUNCTION {format.book.crossref} +{ volume duplicate$ empty$ + { "empty volume in " cite$ * "'s crossref of " * crossref * warning$ + pop$ word.in + } + { bbl.volume + swap$ tie.or.space.prefix "volume" bibinfo.check * * bbl.of space.word * + } + if$ + " \cite{" * crossref * "}" * +} +FUNCTION {format.incoll.inproc.crossref} +{ + word.in + " \cite{" * crossref * "}" * +} +FUNCTION {format.org.or.pub} +{ 't := + "" + address empty$ t empty$ and + 'skip$ + { + address "address" bibinfo.check * + t empty$ + 'skip$ + { address empty$ + 'skip$ + { ": " * } + if$ + t * + } + if$ + } + if$ +} +FUNCTION {format.publisher.address} +{ publisher "publisher" bibinfo.warn format.org.or.pub +} + +FUNCTION {format.organization.address} +{ organization "organization" bibinfo.check format.org.or.pub +} + +FUNCTION {article} +{ output.bibitem + format.authors "author" output.check + author format.key output + format.date "year" output.check + date.block + format.title "title" output.check + crossref missing$ + { + journal + "journal" bibinfo.check + emphasize + "journal" output.check + format.vol.num.pages output + } + { format.article.crossref output.nonnull + format.pages output + } + if$ + format.url output + new.sentence + format.note output + fin.entry +} +FUNCTION {book} +{ output.bibitem + author empty$ + { format.editors "author and editor" output.check + editor format.key output + add.blank + } + { format.authors output.nonnull + crossref missing$ + { "author and editor" editor either.or.check } + 'skip$ + if$ + } + if$ + format.date "year" output.check + date.block + format.btitle "title" output.check + crossref missing$ + { format.bvolume output + format.number.series output + format.publisher.address output + } + { + format.book.crossref output.nonnull + } + if$ + format.edition output + format.url output + new.sentence + format.note output + fin.entry +} +FUNCTION {booklet} +{ output.bibitem + format.authors output + author format.key output + format.date "year" output.check + date.block + format.title "title" output.check + howpublished "howpublished" bibinfo.check output + address "address" bibinfo.check output + format.url output + new.sentence + format.note output + fin.entry +} + +FUNCTION {inbook} +{ output.bibitem + author empty$ + { format.editors "author and editor" output.check + editor format.key output + } + { format.authors output.nonnull + crossref missing$ + { "author and editor" editor either.or.check } + 'skip$ + if$ + } + if$ + format.date "year" output.check + date.block + format.btitle "title" output.check + crossref missing$ + { + format.publisher.address output + format.bvolume output + format.chapter.pages "chapter and pages" output.check + format.number.series output + } + { + format.chapter.pages "chapter and pages" output.check + format.book.crossref output.nonnull + } + if$ + format.edition output + format.url output + new.sentence + format.note output + fin.entry +} + +FUNCTION {incollection} +{ output.bibitem + format.authors "author" output.check + author format.key output + format.date "year" output.check + date.block + format.title "title" output.check + crossref missing$ + { format.in.ed.booktitle "booktitle" output.check + format.publisher.address output + format.bvolume output + format.number.series output + format.chapter.pages output + format.edition output + } + { format.incoll.inproc.crossref output.nonnull + format.chapter.pages output + } + if$ + format.url output + new.sentence + format.note output + fin.entry +} +FUNCTION {inproceedings} +{ output.bibitem + format.authors "author" output.check + author format.key output + format.date "year" output.check + date.block + format.title "title" output.check + crossref missing$ + { format.in.ed.booktitle "booktitle" output.check + publisher empty$ + { format.organization.address output } + { organization "organization" bibinfo.check output + format.publisher.address output + } + if$ + format.bvolume output + format.number.series output + format.pages output + } + { format.incoll.inproc.crossref output.nonnull + format.pages output + } + if$ + format.url output + new.sentence + format.note output + fin.entry +} +FUNCTION {conference} { inproceedings } +FUNCTION {manual} +{ output.bibitem + format.authors output + author format.key output + format.date "year" output.check + date.block + format.btitle "title" output.check + organization "organization" bibinfo.check output + address "address" bibinfo.check output + format.edition output + format.url output + new.sentence + format.note output + fin.entry +} + +FUNCTION {mastersthesis} +{ output.bibitem + format.authors "author" output.check + author format.key output + format.date "year" output.check + date.block + format.btitle + "title" output.check + bbl.mthesis format.thesis.type output.nonnull + school "school" bibinfo.warn output + address "address" bibinfo.check output + format.url output + new.sentence + format.note output + fin.entry +} + +FUNCTION {misc} +{ output.bibitem + format.authors output + author format.key output + format.date "year" output.check + date.block + format.title output + howpublished "howpublished" bibinfo.check output + format.url output + new.sentence + format.note output + fin.entry +} +FUNCTION {phdthesis} +{ output.bibitem + format.authors "author" output.check + author format.key output + format.date "year" output.check + date.block + format.btitle + "title" output.check + bbl.phdthesis format.thesis.type output.nonnull + school "school" bibinfo.warn output + address "address" bibinfo.check output + format.url output + new.sentence + format.note output + fin.entry +} + +FUNCTION {proceedings} +{ output.bibitem + format.editors output + editor format.key output + format.date "year" output.check + date.block + format.btitle "title" output.check + format.bvolume output + format.number.series output + publisher empty$ + { format.organization.address output } + { organization "organization" bibinfo.check output + format.publisher.address output + } + if$ + format.url output + new.sentence + format.note output + fin.entry +} + +FUNCTION {techreport} +{ output.bibitem + format.authors "author" output.check + author format.key output + format.date "year" output.check + date.block + format.title + "title" output.check + format.tr.number output.nonnull + institution "institution" bibinfo.warn output + address "address" bibinfo.check output + format.url output + new.sentence + format.note output + fin.entry +} + +FUNCTION {unpublished} +{ output.bibitem + format.authors "author" output.check + author format.key output + format.date "year" output.check + date.block + format.title "title" output.check + format.url output + new.sentence + format.note "note" output.check + fin.entry +} + +FUNCTION {default.type} { misc } +READ +FUNCTION {sortify} +{ purify$ + "l" change.case$ +} +INTEGERS { len } +FUNCTION {chop.word} +{ 's := + 'len := + s #1 len substring$ = + { s len #1 + global.max$ substring$ } + 's + if$ +} +FUNCTION {format.lab.names} +{ 's := + "" 't := + s #1 "{vv~}{ll}" format.name$ + s num.names$ duplicate$ + #2 > + { pop$ + " " * bbl.etal * + } + { #2 < + 'skip$ + { s #2 "{ff }{vv }{ll}{ jj}" format.name$ "others" = + { + " " * bbl.etal * + } + { bbl.and space.word * s #2 "{vv~}{ll}" format.name$ + * } + if$ + } + if$ + } + if$ +} + +FUNCTION {author.key.label} +{ author empty$ + { key empty$ + { cite$ #1 #3 substring$ } + 'key + if$ + } + { author format.lab.names } + if$ +} + +FUNCTION {author.editor.key.label} +{ author empty$ + { editor empty$ + { key empty$ + { cite$ #1 #3 substring$ } + 'key + if$ + } + { editor format.lab.names } + if$ + } + { author format.lab.names } + if$ +} + +FUNCTION {editor.key.label} +{ editor empty$ + { key empty$ + { cite$ #1 #3 substring$ } + 'key + if$ + } + { editor format.lab.names } + if$ +} + +FUNCTION {calc.short.authors} +{ type$ "book" = + type$ "inbook" = + or + 'author.editor.key.label + { type$ "proceedings" = + 'editor.key.label + 'author.key.label + if$ + } + if$ + 'short.list := +} + +FUNCTION {calc.label} +{ calc.short.authors + short.list + "(" + * + year duplicate$ empty$ + short.list key field.or.null = or + { pop$ "" } + 'skip$ + if$ + * + 'label := +} + +FUNCTION {sort.format.names} +{ 's := + #1 'nameptr := + "" + s num.names$ 'numnames := + numnames 'namesleft := + { namesleft #0 > } + { s nameptr + "{vv{ } }{ll{ }}{ ff{ }}{ jj{ }}" + format.name$ 't := + nameptr #1 > + { + " " * + namesleft #1 = t "others" = and + { "zzzzz" * } + { t sortify * } + if$ + } + { t sortify * } + if$ + nameptr #1 + 'nameptr := + namesleft #1 - 'namesleft := + } + while$ +} + +FUNCTION {sort.format.title} +{ 't := + "A " #2 + "An " #3 + "The " #4 t chop.word + chop.word + chop.word + sortify + #1 global.max$ substring$ +} +FUNCTION {author.sort} +{ author empty$ + { key empty$ + { "to sort, need author or key in " cite$ * warning$ + "" + } + { key sortify } + if$ + } + { author sort.format.names } + if$ +} +FUNCTION {author.editor.sort} +{ author empty$ + { editor empty$ + { key empty$ + { "to sort, need author, editor, or key in " cite$ * warning$ + "" + } + { key sortify } + if$ + } + { editor sort.format.names } + if$ + } + { author sort.format.names } + if$ +} +FUNCTION {editor.sort} +{ editor empty$ + { key empty$ + { "to sort, need editor or key in " cite$ * warning$ + "" + } + { key sortify } + if$ + } + { editor sort.format.names } + if$ +} +FUNCTION {presort} +{ calc.label + label sortify + " " + * + type$ "book" = + type$ "inbook" = + or + 'author.editor.sort + { type$ "proceedings" = + 'editor.sort + 'author.sort + if$ + } + if$ + #1 entry.max$ substring$ + 'sort.label := + sort.label + * + " " + * + title field.or.null + sort.format.title + * + #1 entry.max$ substring$ + 'sort.key$ := +} + +ITERATE {presort} +SORT +STRINGS { last.label next.extra } +INTEGERS { last.extra.num number.label } +FUNCTION {initialize.extra.label.stuff} +{ #0 int.to.chr$ 'last.label := + "" 'next.extra := + #0 'last.extra.num := + #0 'number.label := +} +FUNCTION {forward.pass} +{ last.label label = + { last.extra.num #1 + 'last.extra.num := + last.extra.num int.to.chr$ 'extra.label := + } + { "a" chr.to.int$ 'last.extra.num := + "" 'extra.label := + label 'last.label := + } + if$ + number.label #1 + 'number.label := +} +FUNCTION {reverse.pass} +{ next.extra "b" = + { "a" 'extra.label := } + 'skip$ + if$ + extra.label 'next.extra := + extra.label + duplicate$ empty$ + 'skip$ + { "{\natexlab{" swap$ * "}}" * } + if$ + 'extra.label := + label extra.label * 'label := +} +EXECUTE {initialize.extra.label.stuff} +ITERATE {forward.pass} +REVERSE {reverse.pass} +FUNCTION {bib.sort.order} +{ sort.label + " " + * + year field.or.null sortify + * + " " + * + title field.or.null + sort.format.title + * + #1 entry.max$ substring$ + 'sort.key$ := +} +ITERATE {bib.sort.order} +SORT +FUNCTION {begin.bib} +{ preamble$ empty$ + 'skip$ + { preamble$ write$ newline$ } + if$ + "\begin{thebibliography}{" number.label int.to.str$ * "}" * + write$ newline$ + "\expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi" + write$ newline$ + "\expandafter\ifx\csname url\endcsname\relax" + write$ newline$ + " \def\url#1{{\tt #1}}\fi" + write$ newline$ + "\expandafter\ifx\csname urlprefix\endcsname\relax\def\urlprefix{URL }\fi" + write$ newline$ +} +EXECUTE {begin.bib} +EXECUTE {init.state.consts} +ITERATE {call.type$} +FUNCTION {end.bib} +{ newline$ + "\end{thebibliography}" write$ newline$ +} +EXECUTE {end.bib} +%% End of customized bst file +%% +%% End of file `felty3.bst'. |