summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/swfigure/swfigure-examples.tex
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/swfigure/swfigure-examples.tex')
-rw-r--r--Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/swfigure/swfigure-examples.tex175
1 files changed, 153 insertions, 22 deletions
diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/swfigure/swfigure-examples.tex b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/swfigure/swfigure-examples.tex
index b37eea4bc9f..66cba4ca73f 100644
--- a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/swfigure/swfigure-examples.tex
+++ b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/swfigure/swfigure-examples.tex
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
% !TEX encoding = UTF-8 Unicode
% !TEX TS-program = pdflatex
-\documentclass[twoside,notitlepage]{report}\errorcontextlines=100
+\documentclass[a4paper]{book}\errorcontextlines=100
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{lmodern,textcomp,multicol,enumitem,mflogo,xcolor,fancyvrb}
\usepackage{swfigure}
@@ -49,6 +49,12 @@
\makeatletter
+\renewcommand\listoffigures{%
+ \section*{\listfigurename}%
+ \markright{\MakeUppercase\listfigurename}%
+ \@starttoc{lof}%
+ }
+
\providecommand\GetFileInfo[1]{%
\def\filename{#1}%
\def\@tempb##1 v.##2 ##3\relax##4\relax{%
@@ -57,6 +63,9 @@
\def\fileinfo{##3}}%
\edef\@tempa{\csname ver@#1\endcsname}%
\expandafter\@tempb\@tempa\relax? ? \relax\relax}
+
+\newenvironment{abstract}{\centerline{\textbf{Abstract}}
+\begin{quotation}}{\end{quotation}}
\counterwithout{section}{chapter}
@@ -72,6 +81,8 @@ Managing large images is not that straightforward to do. Package \pack{swfigure}
This package works pretty well with two side printed documents with a symmetrical page design, i.e. with the same dimension for the inner margins and, respectively, the outer margins. The documented \TeX\ file that describes the software does not have a symmetrical design, therefore this second file is necessary in order to show some examples.
\end{abstract}
+\tableofcontents
+\listoffigures
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\section{Introduction}
@@ -101,7 +112,7 @@ Other examples are shown in the following pages; the filling text is a generic t
The only user macro defined by this package has the following syntax:
\begin{ttsyntax}\setfontsize{9.5}%
\cs{DFimage}\oarg{display mode}\marg{image file name}\oarg{lof entry}\%
-\qquad\marg{caption}\oarg{label}\parg{height correction}\aarg{line correction}|\meta{width test}|
+\qquad\marg{caption}\oarg{label}\parg{height correction}\aarg{line correction}|\meta{width test}|!\meta{color}!
\end{ttsyntax}
The arguments are described in detail in the twin document \file{swfigure.pdf}. We shortly repeat their meanings.
\begin{description}[noitemsep]
@@ -121,12 +132,14 @@ The arguments are described in detail in the twin document \file{swfigure.pdf}.
\item[\meta{line correction}] This optional integer number may correct the number of lines of the indentation of the wrapping text around a tall and slim figure.
%
\item[\meta{width test}] is an optional fractional number smaller than~0.5 (default \texttt{0.25}) used to check that in Vertical Slim mode the width of the scaled image does not get too small so as to leave sufficient space for e decently typeset caption; the zero value implies no test. See in page~\pageref{fig:VSSmessage} the message that is output if this width becomes too small.
+%
+\item[\meta{color}] is an optional color specification delimited by exclamation points. It is used by the \texttt{FS} full spread display mode when the included image completely fills up the spread pages; the color (default: black) may be chosen in order to contrast the image background, since it overprints the image near to its right border.
\end{description}
We stress the first optional argument meaning, whose default value is \texttt{SW}. It specifies the \meta{display mode}.
\begin{description}[noitemsep]
%
-\item[\texttt{SW}] is the acronym that specifies the \meta{display mode} for a Spread Wide figure; it consists into a full spread, without any text, and with its caption typeset in the external margin of the odd numbered page typeset in vertical mode. Since this display mode needs to start on an even page, the user should carefully find the proper place where to insert the user macro \cs{DFimage} (named as “steering” macro, since it decides which large figure style to use), because it starts a new page and possibly inserts a blank page if the new one is odd numbered. The steering macro can be also inserted within a paragraph\footnote{remeber to leave a space before \cs{DFimage} and no space after the last argument.}, and after its complete expansion restores the vertical mode; nevertheless, even so, it may insert a blank page if the next page is odd numbered.
+\item[\texttt{SW}] is the acronym that specifies the \meta{display mode} for a Spread Wide figure; it consists into a full spread, without any text, and with its caption typeset in the external margin of the odd numbered page typeset in vertical mode. Since this display mode needs to start on an even page, the user should carefully find the proper place where to insert the user macro \cs{DFimage} (named as “steering” macro, since it decides which large figure style to use), because it starts a new page and possibly inserts a blank page if the new one is odd numbered. The steering macro can be also inserted within a paragraph, and after its complete expansion restores the vertical mode; nevertheless, even so, it may insert a blank page if the next page is odd numbered. Its caption is vertically typeset in the right margin at 1em distance from the image right border; it is possible to change this default value by means of the \cs{SWcaptionShift} declaration; it suffices the redefine with \cs{renewcommand} such declaration, possibly grouping it otherwise it applies to all such spread-wide figures.
%
\item[\texttt{HS}] refers to a Horizontal Slim image, that requires a spread wide display mode, such that the first of the facing pages is an even numbered one, and with some text beneath both half images; since the caption is below the right half, the space occupied by this part of the image would be higher than that in the facing page, it is necessary to equalise these vertical spaces, and the specific code takes care of this constraint. Also in this case the user should carefully chose the place where to insert the steering macro.
%
@@ -134,14 +147,15 @@ We stress the first optional argument meaning, whose default value is \texttt{SW
%
\item[\texttt{NF}] This display mode is the Normal Figure \LaTeX\ kernel mode; the floating figure is floated to a “floats only” page; since it contains a large image this is a reasonable solution; if the caption is pretty lengthy, the \meta{height correction} comes handy to fine tune the space necessary to the caption.
%
-\item[\texttt{RF}] This fifth display mode refers to the Rotated Figure obtainable by means of the \pack{lscape} package; here the package is not used, but a direct rotation is performed by the macro. Again the \meta{height correction} optional value may be useful in order to leave more or less space to the caption; if the latter is pretty wordy, a smaller value of the preset 0.8 value may be chosen, while for single line captions a slightly higher value may be convenient.
+\item[\texttt{RF}] This display mode refers to the Rotated Figure obtainable by means of the \pack{lscape} package; here the package is not used, but a direct rotation is performed by the macro. Again the \meta{height correction} optional value may be useful in order to leave more or less space to the caption; if the latter is pretty wordy, a smaller value of the preset 0.8 value may be chosen, while for single line captions a slightly higher value may be convenient.
%
+\item[\texttt{FS}] This display mode refers to the Full Spread image covering the whole surface of two facing pages; ideally it would contain a full A3 image over two A4 facing pages without the need to shrink or expand the image; without any margin the caption is vertically typeset over the image at a certain distance from its right border. If the image has textual or colored details close to such border, a caption color may be chosen so as to contrast the image background. The distance from the right border by default is 2em, but it can be modified by redefining with \cs{renewcommand} the \cs{FScaptionShift} declaration; pay attention to group this redefinition, otherwise it applies to all such full spread figures.
\end{description}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
-\section{A \texttt{HS} example}
+\section{Examples}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
-On pages~\pageref{fig:HSfake} and the preceding one there is an example of a horizontal slim image.
+On page~\pageref{fig:HSfake} and the preceding one there is an example of a horizontal slim image.
As any dedicated reader can clearly see, the Ideal of
practical reason is a representation of, as far as I know, the things
@@ -150,7 +164,44 @@ used as a canon for our understanding. The paralogisms of practical
reason are what first give rise to the architectonic of practical
reason.
-\DFimage[HS]{HSfakeimage}{A Horizontal Slim fake image}[fig:HSfake]
+As will easily be shown in the next section, reason would
+thereby be made to contradict, in view of these considerations, the
+Ideal of practical reason, yet the manifold depends on the phenomena.
+Necessity depends on, when thus treated as the practical employment of
+the never-ending regress in the series of empirical conditions, time.
+Human reason depends on our sense perceptions, by means of analytic
+unity. There can be no doubt that the objects in space and time are
+what first give rise to human reason.
+
+Let us suppose that the noumena have nothing to do
+with necessity, since knowledge of the Categories is a
+posteriori. Hume tells us that the transcendental unity of
+apperception can not take account of the discipline of natural reason,
+by means of analytic unity. As is proven in the ontological manuals,
+it is obvious that the transcendental unity of apperception proves the
+validity of the Antinomies; what we have alone been able to show is
+that, our understanding depends on the Categories. It remains a
+mystery why the Ideal stands in need of reason. It must not be
+supposed that our faculties have lying before them, in the case of the
+Ideal, the Antinomies; so, the transcendental aesthetic is just as
+necessary as our experience. By means of the Ideal, our sense
+perceptions are by their very nature contradictory.
+
+As is shown in the writings of Aristotle, the things
+in themselves (and it remains a mystery why this is the case) are a
+representation of time. Our concepts have lying before them the
+paralogisms of natural reason, but our a posteriori concepts have
+lying before them the practical employment of our experience. Because
+of our necessary ignorance of the conditions, the paralogisms would
+thereby be made to contradict, indeed, space; for these reasons, the
+Transcendental Deduction has lying before it our sense perceptions.
+(Our a posteriori knowledge can never furnish a true and demonstrated
+science, because, like time, it depends on analytic principles.) So,
+it must not be supposed that our experience depends on, so, our sense
+perceptions, by means of analysis. Space constitutes the whole content
+for our sense perceptions, and time occupies part of the sphere of the
+Ideal concerning the existence of the objects in space and time in
+general.
As will easily be shown in the next section, reason would
thereby be made to contradict, in view of these considerations, the
@@ -191,14 +242,39 @@ for our sense perceptions, and time occupies part of the sphere of the
Ideal concerning the existence of the objects in space and time in
general.
+As will easily be shown in the next section, reason would
+thereby be made to contradict, in view of these considerations, the
+Ideal of practical reason, yet the
+manifold depends on the phenomena.
+Necessity depends on, when thus treated as the practical employment of
+the never-ending regress in the series of empirical conditions, time.
+Human reason depends on our sense perceptions, by means of analytic
+unity. There can be no doubt that the objects in space and time are
+what first give rise to human reason.
+
+Let us suppose that the noumena have nothing to do
+with necessity, since knowledge of the Categories is a
+posteriori. Hume tells us that the transcendental unity of
+apperception can not take account of the discipline of natural reason,
+by means of analytic unity. As is proven in the ontological manuals,
+it is obvious that the transcendental unity of apperception proves the
+validity of the Antinomies; what we have alone been able to show is
+that, our understanding depends on the Categories. It remains a
+mystery why the Ideal stands in need of reason. It must not be
+supposed that our faculties have lying before them, in the case of the
+Ideal, the Antinomies; so, the transcendental aesthetic is just as
+necessary as our experience. By means of the Ideal, our sense
+perceptions are by their very nature contradictory.
+
+\begin{DFimage}[VS]{VSfakeimage}{A Vertical Slim fake image}[fig:VSfake](0.75)<3>
As we have already seen, what we have alone been able
to show is that the objects in space and time would be falsified; what
we have alone been able to show is that, our judgements are what first
give rise to metaphysics. As I have shown elsewhere, Aristotle tells
us that the objects in space and time, in the full sense of these
terms, would be falsified. Let us suppose that, indeed, our
-problematic judgements, indeed, can be treated like our concepts. As
-any dedicated reader can clearly see, our knowledge can be treated
+problematic judgements, indeed, can be treated like our concepts.
+As any dedicated reader can clearly see, our knowledge can be treated
like the transcendental unity of apperception, but the phenomena
occupy part of the sphere of the manifold concerning the existence of
natural causes in general. Whence comes the architectonic of natural
@@ -234,7 +310,32 @@ misapprehension, it is necessary to explain that our understanding
rise to the architectonic of pure reason, as is evident upon close
examination.
-\DFimage[VS]{VSfakeimage}{A Vertical Slim fake image}[fig:VSfake](0.7)<2>
+Therefore, we can deduce that the objects in space and
+time (and I assert, however, that this is the case) have lying before
+them the objects in space and time. Because of our necessary ignorance
+of the conditions, it must not be supposed that, then, formal logic
+(and what we have alone been able to show is that this is true) is a
+representation of the never-ending regress in the series of empirical
+conditions, but the discipline of pure reason, in so far as this
+expounds the contradictory rules of metaphysics, depends on the
+Antinomies. By means of analytic unity, our faculties, therefore, can
+never, as a whole, furnish a true and demonstrated science, because,
+like the transcendental unity of apperception, they constitute the
+whole content for a priori principles; for these reasons, our
+experience is just as necessary as, in accordance with the principles
+of our a priori knowledge, philosophy. The objects in space and time
+abstract from all content of knowledge. Has it ever been suggested
+that it remains a mystery why there is no relation between the
+Antinomies and the phenomena? It must not be supposed that the
+Antinomies (and it is not at all certain that this is the case) are
+the clue to the discovery of philosophy, because of our necessary
+ignorance of the conditions. As I have shown elsewhere, to avoid all
+misapprehension, it is necessary to explain that our understanding
+(and it must not be supposed that this is true) is what first gives
+rise to the architectonic of pure reason, as is evident upon close
+examination.
+\end{DFimage}
+
The things in themselves are what first give rise to
reason, as is proven in the ontological manuals. By virtue of natural
reason, let us suppose that the transcendental unity of apperception
@@ -251,20 +352,19 @@ treated like metaphysics. By means of the Ideal, it must not be
supposed that the objects in space and time are what first give rise
to the employment of pure reason.
-\DFimage[NF]{NFfakeimage}{A large Normal Figure fake image}[fig:NFfake]
-
As is evident upon close examination, to avoid all
misapprehension, it is necessary to explain that, on the contrary, the
never-ending regress in the series of empirical conditions is a
representation of our inductive judgements, yet the things in
-themselves prove the validity of, on the contrary, the Categories. It
+themselves prove the validity of, on the contrary, the Categories. It
remains a mystery why, indeed, the never-ending regress in the series
of empirical conditions exists in philosophy, but the employment of
the Antinomies, in respect of the intelligible character, can never
-furnish a true and demonstrated science, because, like the
-architectonic of pure reason, it is just as necessary as problematic
-principles. The practical employment of the objects in space and time
-is by its very nature contradictory, and the thing in itself would
+furnish a true and demonstrated
+\begin{DFimage}[HS]{HSfakeimage}{A Horizontal Slim fake image}[fig:HSfake]
+science, because, like the
+architectonic of pure reason, it is just as necessary as
+problematic principles. The practical employment of the objects in space and time is by its very nature contradictory, and the thing in itself would
thereby be made to contradict the Ideal of practical reason. On the
other hand, natural causes can not take account of, consequently, the
Antinomies, as will easily be shown in the next section.
@@ -276,8 +376,6 @@ suppose that this is the case) are the clue to the discovery of
necessity. But the proof of this is a task from which we can here be
absolved.
-\DFimage[RF]{RFfakeimage}{A large Rotated Figure fake image}[fig:RFfake]
-
As any dedicated reader can clearly see, the Ideal of
practical reason is a representation of, as far as I know, the things
in themselves; as I have shown elsewhere, the phenomena should only be
@@ -339,8 +437,11 @@ this is the case) constitute the whole content for the paralogisms.
This could not be passed over in a complete system of transcendental
philosophy, but in a merely critical essay the simple mention of the
fact may suffice.
+\end{DFimage}
+
\DFimage[VS]{VSSfake}{A tall very slim image}[fig:VSSfake](0.65)<2>\label{fig:VSSmessage}
+
Therefore, we can deduce that the objects in space and
time (and I assert, however, that this is the case) have lying before
them the objects in space and time. Because of our necessary ignorance
@@ -366,6 +467,8 @@ misapprehension, it is necessary to explain that our understanding
rise to the architectonic of pure reason, as is evident upon close
examination.
+\DFimage[Vs]{VSfakeimage}{Wrong display mode}
+
The things in themselves are what first give rise to
reason, as is proven in the ontological manuals. By virtue of natural
reason, let us suppose that the transcendental unity of apperception
@@ -405,6 +508,16 @@ suppose that this is the case) are the clue to the discovery of
necessity. But the proof of this is a task from which we can here be
absolved.
+\DFimage[NF]{NFfakeimage}{A large Normal Figure fake image}[fig:NFfake]
+
+\DFimage[RF]{RFfakeimage}{A large Rotated Figure fake image}[fig:RFfake]
+
+As is evident upon close examination, to avoid all
+misapprehension, it is necessary to explain that, on the contrary, the
+never-ending regress in the series of empirical conditions is a
+representation of our inductive judgements, yet the things in
+themselves prove the validity of, on the contrary, the Categories.
+
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\section{Used commands}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
@@ -418,12 +531,12 @@ The various large fake images have been inserted with the following commands:
%
\item figure~\ref{fig:HSfake}
\begin{Verbatim}[fontsize=\setfontsize{9}]
-\DFimage[HS]{HSfakeimage}{A Horizonta Slim fake image}[fig:HSfake]
+\DFimage[HS]{HSfakeimage}{A Horizontal Slim fake image}[fig:HSfake]
\end{Verbatim}
%
\item figure~\ref{fig:VSfake}
\begin{Verbatim}[fontsize=\setfontsize{8}]
-\DFimage[VS]{VSfakeimage}{A Vertical Slim fake image}[fig:VSfake](0.7)<2>
+\DFimage[VS]{VSfakeimage}{A Vertical Slim fake image}[fig:VSfake](0.525)<1>
\end{Verbatim}
%
\item figure~\ref{fig:NFfake}
@@ -437,8 +550,26 @@ The various large fake images have been inserted with the following commands:
\DFimage[RF]{RFfakeimage}{A large Rotated Figure fake image}%
[fig:RFfake]
\end{Verbatim}
+%
+\item figure~\ref{fig:FSfakeA3}
+\begin{Verbatim}
+\DFimage[FS]{FSfakeA3}{Full Spread image}[fig:FSfakeA3]!red!
+\end{Verbatim}
+%
+\item figure~\ref{fig:FSfakeA3margins}
+\begin{Verbatim}
+\DFimage[FS]{FSfakeA3margins}{Full Spread uncropped image}%
+ [fig:FSfakeA3margins]
+\end{Verbatim}
+%
\end{itemize}
%
-\listoffigures
+%{\pagestyle{empty}
+\begin{DFimage}[FS]{FSfakeA3}{Full Spread image}[fig:FSfakeA3]!\color{red}!
+\end{DFimage}
+
+
+\DFimage[FS]{FSfakeA3margins}{Full Spread of an image with margins. the margins may be larger or smaller, therefore the caption is set with a one-line gap from the page border and if this caption amounts to more than a single line, this gap remains constant, but the first caption line moves away from the page border.}[fig:FSfakeA3margins]!\large\sffamily!
+%}
\end{document}