summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/kluwer/sampkluw.tex
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/kluwer/sampkluw.tex')
-rw-r--r--Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/kluwer/sampkluw.tex581
1 files changed, 581 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/kluwer/sampkluw.tex b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/kluwer/sampkluw.tex
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..e12b203efce
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/kluwer/sampkluw.tex
@@ -0,0 +1,581 @@
+\documentclass{kluwer} % Specifies the document style.
+
+\newdisplay{guess}{Conjecture}
+
+\begin{document}
+\begin{article}
+\begin{opening}
+\title{A Sample Document\thanks{Footnote
+ to the title with the `thanks' command.}}
+\author{Leslie \surname{Lamport}}
+\runningauthor{Leslie Lamport}
+\runningtitle{A Sample Document}
+\institute{Author's Affiliation}
+\date{April 15, 1993}
+
+\begin{abstract}
+This is a sample input file. Comparing it with the output it
+generates can show you how to produce a simple document of
+your own.
+\end{abstract}
+\keywords{sample, \LaTeX}
+
+
+\end{opening}
+
+\section{Ordinary Text}
+ % Produces section heading. Lower-level
+ % sections are begun with similar
+ % \subsection and \subsubsection commands.
+
+The ends of words and sentences are marked
+ by spaces. It doesn't matter how many
+spaces you type; one is as good as 100. The
+end of a line counts as a space.
+
+One or more blank lines denote the end
+of a paragraph.
+
+Since any number of consecutive spaces are treated like a single
+one, the formatting of the input file makes no difference to
+ \TeX, % The \TeX command generates the TeX logo.
+but it makes a difference to you.
+When you use
+ \LaTeX, % The \LaTeX command generates the LaTeX logo.
+making your input file as easy to read as possible
+will be a great help as you write your document and when you
+change it. This sample file shows how you can add comments to
+your own input file.
+
+Because printing is different from typewriting, there are a
+number of things that you have to do differently when preparing
+an input file than if you were just typing the document directly.
+Quotation marks like
+ ``this''
+have to be handled specially, as do quotes within quotes:
+ ``\,`this' % \, separates the double and single quote.
+ is what I just
+ wrote, not `that'\,''.
+
+Dashes come in three sizes: an
+ intra-word
+dash, a medium dash for number ranges like
+ 1--2,
+and a punctuation
+ dash---like
+this.
+
+A sentence-ending space should be larger than the space between words
+within a sentence. You sometimes have to type special commands in
+conjunction with punctuation characters to get this right, as in the
+following sentence.
+ Gnats, gnus, etc.\ % `\ ' makes an inter-word space.
+ all begin with G\@. % \@ marks end-of-sentence punctuation.
+You should check the spaces after periods when reading your output to
+make sure you haven't forgotten any special cases.
+Generating an ellipsis
+ \ldots\ % `\ ' needed because TeX ignores spaces after
+ % command names like \ldots made from \ + letters.
+ %
+ % Note how a `%' character causes TeX to ignore the
+ % end of the input line, so these blank lines do not
+ % start a new paragraph.
+with the right spacing around the periods
+requires a special command.
+
+\TeX\ interprets some common characters as commands, so you must type
+special commands to generate them. These characters include the
+following:
+ \$ \& \% \# \{ and~\}.
+
+In printing, text is emphasized by using an
+ {\em italic\/} % The \/ command produces the tiny extra space that
+ % should be added between a slanted and a following
+ % unslanted letter.
+type style.
+
+\begin{em}
+ A long segment of text can also be emphasized in this way. Text within
+ such a segment given additional emphasis
+ with\/ {\em Roman}
+ type. Italic type loses its ability to emphasize and become simply
+ distracting when used excessively.
+\end{em}
+
+It is sometimes necessary to prevent \TeX\ from breaking a line where
+it might otherwise do so. This may be at a space, as between the
+``Mr.'' and ``Jones'' in
+ ``Mr.~Jones'', % ~ produces an unbreakable interword space.
+or within a word---especially when the word is a symbol like
+ \mbox{\em itemnum\/}
+that makes little sense when hyphenated across
+ lines.
+
+
+
+
+
+\TeX\ is good at typesetting mathematical formulas like
+ \( x-3y = 7 \)
+or
+ \( a_{1} > x^{2n} / y^{2n} > x' \).
+Remember that a letter like
+ $x$ % $ ... $ and \( ... \) are equivalent
+is a formula when it denotes a mathematical symbol, and should
+be treated as one.
+
+
+\section{Notes}
+Footnotes\footnote{This is an example of a footnote.}
+pose no problem\footnote{And another one}.
+Endnotes\endnote{This is an example of an endnote.} pose no
+problem either\endnote{And another one.}.
+
+When using the {\sc kluwer} style file, you can produce endnotes
+analogous to footnotes. Instead of the \LaTeX\ command \verb+\footnote{}+,
+you can use \verb+\endnote{}+. The command \verb+\theendnotes+ can be used
+to place the endnotes in the text. They will be put in a separate section in
+the \verb+\footnotesize+ font.
+
+
+
+\section{Displayed Text}
+
+Text is displayed by indenting it from the left margin.
+Quotations are commonly displayed. There are short quotations
+\begin{quote}
+ This is a short a quotation. It consists of a
+ single paragraph of text. There is no paragraph
+ indentation.
+\end{quote}
+and longer ones.
+\begin{quotation}
+ This is a longer quotation. It consists of two paragraphs
+ of text. The beginning of each paragraph is indicated
+ by an extra indentation.
+
+ This is the second paragraph of the quotation. It is just
+ as dull as the first paragraph.
+\end{quotation}
+Another frequently-displayed structure is a list.
+The following is an example of an {\em itemized} list, four levels deep.
+\begin{itemize}
+\item This is the first item of an itemized list. Each item
+ in the list is marked with a ``tick''. The document
+ style determines what kind of tick mark is used.
+\item This is the second item of the list. It contains another
+ list nested inside it. The three inner lists are an {\em itemized}
+ list.
+ \begin{itemize}
+ \item This is the first item of an enumerated list that
+ is nested within the itemized list.
+ \item This is the second item of the inner list. \LaTeX\
+ allows you to nest lists deeper than you really should.
+ \end{itemize}
+ This is the rest of the second item of the outer list. It
+ is no more interesting than any other part of the item.
+ \item This is the third item of the list.
+\end{itemize}
+
+
+The following is an example of an {\em enumerated} list, four levels deep.
+\begin{enumerate}
+\item This is the first item of an enumerated list. Each item
+ in the list is marked with a ``tick''. The document
+ style determines what kind of tick mark is used.
+\item This is the second item of the list. It contains another
+ list nested inside it. The three inner lists are an {\em enumerated}
+ list.
+ \begin{enumerate}
+ \item This is the first item of an enumerated list that
+ is nested within the enumerated list.
+ \item This is the second item of the inner list. \LaTeX\
+ allows you to nest lists deeper than you really should.
+ \end{enumerate}
+ This is the rest of the second item of the outer list. It
+ is no more interesting than any other part of the item.
+ \item This is the third item of the list.
+\end{enumerate}
+
+
+The following is an example of a {\em description} list.
+\begin{description}
+\item[Cow] Highly intelligent animal that can produce milk out of grass.
+\item[Horse] Less intelligent animal renowned for its legs.
+\item[Human being] Not so intelligent animal that thinks that it can think.
+\end{description}
+
+You can even display poetry.
+\begin{verse}
+ There is an environment for verse \\ % The \\ command separates lines
+ Whose features some poets will curse. % within a stanza.
+
+ % One or more blank lines separate stanzas.
+
+ For instead of making\\
+ Them do {\em all\/} line breaking, \\
+ It allows them to put too many words on a line when they'd
+ rather be forced to be terse.
+\end{verse}
+
+Mathematical formulas may also be displayed. A displayed formula is
+one-line long; multiline formulas require special formatting
+instructions.
+ \[ x' + y^{2} = z_{i}^{2}\]
+Don't start a paragraph with a displayed equation, nor make
+one a paragraph by itself.
+
+Example of a theorem:
+
+
+\begin{guess}
+All conjectures are interesting, but some conjectures are more
+interesting than others.
+\end{guess}
+
+
+\section{Tables and Figures}
+Cross reference to labelled table: As you can see in Table~\ref{sphericcase} on
+page~\pageref{sphericcase} and also in Table~\ref{parset} on page~\pageref{parset}.
+
+
+
+
+
+\begin{table} %
+\begin{tabular}{lrl}
+\hline
+$Q_{s,\max}$ & [g/g DM h] & 0.18\\
+$K_{s}$ & [g/L] & 1.0\\
+$Y_{x/s}$ & [g DM/g] & 0.5\\
+$Y_{p/s}$ & [g/g] & 0.854\\
+$Q_{p,\max}$ & [g/g DM h] & 0.0045\\
+$\mu_{\rm crit}$ & [h$^{-1}$] & 0.01\\
+$k_{h}$ & [h$^{-1}$] & 0.002\\
+$m_{s}$ & [g/g DM h] & 0.025\\
+\hline
+\end{tabular}
+\caption[]{Parameter set used in the model of \shortcite{Bunt}}\label{parset}
+\end{table}
+
+\begin{table*}
+\caption[]{The spherical case ($I_1=0$, $I_2=0$).}
+\label{sphericcase}
+\begin{tabular}{crrrrc}
+\hline
+Equil. \\
+Points & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$x$} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$y$} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$z$} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$C$} &
+S \\
+\hline
+$~~L_1$ & $-$2.485252241 & 0.000000000 & 0.017100631 & 8.230711648 & U \\
+$~~L_2$ & 0.000000000 & 0.000000000 & 3.068883732 & 0.000000000 & S \\
+$~~L_3$ & 0.009869059 & 0.000000000 & 4.756386544 & $-$0.000057922 & U \\
+$~~L_4$ & 0.210589855 & 0.000000000 & $-$0.007021459 & 9.440510897 & U \\
+$~~L_5$ & 0.455926604 & 0.000000000 & $-$0.212446624 & 7.586126667 & U \\
+$~~L_6$ & 0.667031314 & 0.000000000 & 0.529879957 & 3.497660052 & U \\
+$~~L_7$ & 2.164386674 & 0.000000000 & $-$0.169308438 & 6.866562449 & U \\
+$~~L_8$ & 0.560414471 & 0.421735658 & $-$0.093667445 & 9.241525367 & U \\
+$~~L_9$ & 0.560414471 & $-$0.421735658 & $-$0.093667445 & 9.241525367 & U
+\\
+$~~L_{10}$ & 1.472523232 & 1.393484549 & $-$0.083801333 & 6.733436505 & U \\
+$~~L_{11}$ & 1.472523232 & $-$1.393484549 & $-$0.083801333 & 6.733436505 & U
+\\ \hline
+\end{tabular}
+\end{table*}
+
+
+A major
+point of difference lies in the value of the specific production rate $\pi$ for
+large values of the specific growth rate $\mu$.
+Already in the early publications \cite{Falzon87}
+it appeared that high glucose
+concentrations in the production phase are well correlated with a
+low penicillin yield (the
+`glucose effect'). It has been confirmed recently
+\cite{Bunt,Cahour-thesis,BrownAndBurton,Carr-Goldstein}
+that
+high glucose concentrations inhibit the synthesis of the enzymes of the
+penicillin pathway, but not the actual penicillin biosynthesis.
+In other words, glucose represses (and not inhibits) the penicillin
+biosynthesis.
+
+These findings do not contradict the results of
+\citeauthor{Chin88-book} (on which \shortcite{Bunt} based their
+production kinetics) and of \citeyear{ChinThesis} which were obtained for
+continuous culture fermentations.
+Because for high values of the specific
+growth rate $\mu$ it is most likely (as shall be discussed below) that
+maintenance metabolism occurs, it can be shown that
+in steady state continuous culture conditions, and with $\mu$ described by a Monod kinetics
+\begin{equation}
+ C_{s} = K_{M} \frac{\mu/\mu_{x}}{1-\mu/\mu_{x}} \label{cs}
+\end{equation}
+Pirt \& Rhigelato determined $\pi$ for $\mu$ between
+$0.023$ and $0.086$ h$^{-1}$.
+They also reported a value $\mu_{x} \approx 0.095$
+h$^{-1}$, so that for their experiments $\mu/\mu_{x}$ is in the range
+of $0.24$ to $0.9$.
+Substituting $K _M$ in Eq. (\ref{cs}) by
+the value $K_{M}=1$ g/L as used by \cite{Bunt}, one finds
+with the above equation $0.3 < C_{s} < 9$ g/L. This agrees well with
+the work of \shortcite{Bunt}, who reported that penicillin biosynthesis
+repression only occurs at glucose concentrations from $C_{s}=10$ g/L on.
+The conclusion is that the glucose concentrations in the experiments of
+Pirt \& Rhigelato probably were too low for glucose repression to be
+detected. The experimental data published by Ryu \& Hospodka
+are not detailed sufficiently to permit a similar analysis.
+
+
+
+\begin{table}
+\caption[]{Parameter sets used by Bajpai \& Reu\ss\ }
+\begin{tabular}{lrll}
+\hline
+\multicolumn{2}{l}{\it parameter} & {\it Set 1} & {\it Set 2}\\
+\hline
+$\mu_{x}$ & [h$^{-1}$] & 0.092 & 0.11 \\
+$K_{x}$ & [g/g DM] & 0.15 & 0.006 \\
+$\mu_{p}$ & [g/g DM h] & 0.005 & 0.004 \\
+$K_{p}$ & [g/L] & 0.0002 & 0.0001 \\
+$K_{i}$ & [g/L] & 0.1 & 0.1 \\
+$Y_{x/s}$ & [g DM/g] & 0.45 & 0.47 \\
+$Y_{p/s}$ & [g/g] & 0.9 & 1.2 \\
+$k_{h}$ & [h$^{-1}$] & 0.04 & 0.01 \\
+$m_{s}$ & [g/g DM h] & 0.014 & 0.029 \\
+\hline
+\end{tabular}
+\end{table}
+
+Bajpai \& Reu\ss\ decided to disregard the
+differences between time constants for the two regulation mechanisms
+(glucose repression or inhibition) because of the
+relatively very long fermentation times, and therefore proposed a Haldane
+expression for $\pi$.
+
+It is interesting that simulations with the \cite{Bunt} model for the
+initial conditions given by these authors indicate that, when the
+remaining substrate is fed at a constant rate, a considerable and
+unrealistic amount of penicillin is
+produced when the glucose concentration is still very high \cite{CarberryCL88}
+Simulations with the Bajpai \& Reu\ss\ model correctly predict almost
+no penicillin production in similar conditions.
+
+
+The maintenance coefficient used by \cite{Bunt}
+($m_{s}=0.025$ g/g DM h) corresponds well to
+the value $m_{s}=0.029$ g/g DM h (Set 2 of \cite{BuchananRBES}), to the
+value $m_{s}=0.024$ g/g DM h reported by \citeauthor{MMI2-d3}, and to the
+value used by \shortcite{CawseyIJMMS} ($m_{s}=0.022$ g/g DM h) (1983).
+However, these values differ from the value in Set 1 of
+\cite{BuchananRBES} ($m_{s}=0.014$ g/g DM h).
+It is not clear where this difference originated from.
+Simulations indicated that the dynamic behaviour of the model is rather
+sensitive with respect to the value of $m_{s}$.
+
+In the model van \shortcite{Bunt}, at severe substrate limitation conditions, and thus most probably corresponding
+to endogenous metabolic behaviour, the biomass consumption due to maintenance
+and production requirements may exceed the conversion of substrate into
+biomass and $\mu$ eventually may become negative. This situation may occur at
+the end of the growth phase during a fed-batch fermentation.
+For these conditions $\pi$ is not defined. A
+straightforward extension of the $\pi(\mu)$ kinetics (10)
+could be $\pi(\mu \leq 0)=0$, but there
+are some biochemical indications that
+the penicillin biosynthesis actually does not stop in that case.
+
+\begin{figure} % figuur 1
+\vspace{6pc}
+\caption[]{Pathway of the penicillin G biosynthesis.}
+\label{penG}
+\end{figure}
+
+Sample of cross-reference to figure.
+Figure~\ref{penG} shows that is not easy to get something on paper.
+
+
+
+\section{Headings}
+
+\subsection{Subsection}
+based their model on balancing methods and
+biochemical know\-ledge. The original model (1980) contained an equation for the
+oxygen dynamics which has been omitted in a second paper
+(1981). This simplified model shall be discussed here.
+
+\subsubsection{Subsubsection}
+\cite{Carr-Goldstein,Cohen-Jones88-book}
+based their model on balancing methods and
+biochemical know\-ledge. The original model (1980) contained an equation for the
+oxygen dynamics which has been omitted in a second paper
+(1981). This simplified model shall be discussed here.
+
+\paragraph{Paragraph.}
+\cite{Carr-Goldstein,Cohen-Jones88-book}
+based their model on balancing methods and
+biochemical know\-ledge. The original model (1980) contained an equation for the
+oxygen dynamics which has been omitted in a second paper
+(1981). This simplified model shall be discussed here.
+
+\subparagraph{Subparagraph.}
+\cite{Carr-Goldstein,Cohen-Jones88-book}
+based their model on balancing methods and
+biochemical know\-ledge. The original model (1980) contained an equation for the
+oxygen dynamics which has been omitted in a second paper
+(1981). This simplified model shall be discussed here.
+
+
+
+\section{Equations and the Like}
+
+Two equations:
+\begin{equation}
+ C_{s} = K_{M} \frac{\mu/\mu_{x}}{1-\mu/\mu_{x}} \label{ccs}
+\end{equation}
+
+and
+
+\begin{equation}
+ G = \frac{P_{\rm opt} - P_{\rm ref}}{P_{\rm ref}} \mbox{\ }100 \mbox{\ }(\%)
+\end{equation}
+
+Two equation arrays:
+
+\begin{eqnarray}
+ \frac{dS}{dt} & = & - \sigma X + s_{F} F\\
+ \frac{dX}{dt} & = & \mu X\\
+ \frac{dP}{dt} & = & \pi X - k_{h} P\\
+ \frac{dV}{dt} & = & F
+\end{eqnarray}
+
+and,
+
+\begin{eqnarray}
+ \mu_{\rm substr} & = & \mu_{x} \frac{C_{s}}{K_{x}C_{x}+C_{s}} \\
+ \mu & = & \mu_{\rm substr} - Y_{x/s}(1-H(C_{s}))(m_{s}+\pi /Y_{p/s}) \\
+ \sigma & = & \mu_{\rm substr}/Y_{x/s}+ H(C_{s}) (m_{s}+ \pi /Y_{p/s})
+\end{eqnarray}
+
+
+\section{References in the THEBIBLIOGRAPHY Environment}
+The first reference in the list below has the key \{BrownAndBurton\}.
+Together with the bibitem option $\backslash$citeauthoryear\{Brown and
+Burton\}\{1978\} the follwing cross-references can be used:\\
+$\backslash$cite\{BrownAndBurton\} produces: \cite{BrownAndBurton}\\
+$\backslash$shortcite\{BrownAndBurton\} produces: \shortcite{BrownAndBurton}\\
+$\backslash$citeauthor\{BrownAndBurton\} produces: \citeauthor{BrownAndBurton}\\
+$\backslash$citeyear\{BrownAndBurton\} produces: \citeyear{BrownAndBurton}\\
+
+
+\appendix
+
+And this is my Appendix.
+
+
+\acknowledgements
+And this is an acknowledgements section with a heading that was produced by the
+$\backslash$acknowledgements command. Thank you all for helping me writing this
+\LaTeX\ sample file.
+
+% The endnotes section will be placed here.
+
+\theendnotes
+
+\begin{thebibliography}{}
+
+\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Brown and Burton}{1978}]{BrownAndBurton}
+Brown, J.~S. and R.~R. Burton.
+\newblock {Diagnostic Models for Procedural Bugs in Basic Mathematical Skills}.
+\newblock {\em Cognitive Science}, 2(2):155--192, 1978.
+
+\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Buchanan}{1984}]{BuchananRBES}
+Buchanan, B.~G. and E.~H. Shortliffe.
+\newblock {\em Rule-Based Expert Systems: The MYCIN Experiments of the Stanford
+ Heuristic Programming Project}.
+\newblock Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1984.
+
+\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Bunt}{1990}]{Bunt}
+Bunt, H.~C.
+\newblock {Modular Incremental Modelling of Belief and Intention}.
+\newblock In {\em Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on User
+ Modeling}, 1990.
+
+\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Cahour}{1990}]{Cahour-90-Montreal}
+Cahour, B.
+\newblock {Competence Modelling in Consultation Dialogs}.
+\newblock In L.~Berlinguet and D.~Berthelette, editors, {\em Proceedings of the
+ International Congress, Work With Dispay Units' 89}, Montreal, Canada,
+ September 1990. North Holland, Amsterdam.
+
+\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Cahour}{1988}]{Cahour-thesis}
+Cahour, B.
+\newblock {\em {La Mod\'elisation de l'Interlocuteur: Elaboration du Mod\`ele
+ et Effets au Cours de Dialogues de Consultation}}.
+\newblock PhD thesis, Universit\'e Paris 8, France, 1991.
+\newblock Cognitive psychology PhD.
+
+\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Carberry}{1988}]{CarberryCL88}
+Carberry, S.~M.
+\newblock {Modeling the User's Plans and Goals}.
+\newblock {\em Computational Linguistics}, 14(3):23--37, September 1988.
+
+\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Carbonell}{1970}]{CarbonellScholar}
+Carbonell, J.~R.
+\newblock {AI in CAI: An Artificial Intelligence Approach to Computer-Aided
+ Instruction}.
+\newblock {\em IEEE Transactions on Man-Machine Systems}, 11:190--202, 1970.
+
+\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Carr and Goldstein}{1977}]{Carr-Goldstein}
+Carr, B. and I.~Goldstein.
+\newblock {Overlays: A Theory of Modelling for Computed Aided Instruction}.
+\newblock AI Memo 406, 1977.
+
+\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Cawsey}{(in press)}]{CawseyIJMMS}
+Cawsey, A.
+\newblock {Planning Interactive Explanations}.
+\newblock {\em International Journal of Man-Machine Studies}, in press.
+
+\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Chandrasekaran and Swartout}{1991}]{chandra-swartout}
+Chandrasekaran, B. and William Swartout.
+\newblock {Explanations in Knowledge Systems: The Role of Explicit
+ Representation of Design Knowledge}.
+\newblock {\em IEEE Expert}, 6(3):47--50, June 1991.
+
+\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Chappel and Cahour}{1991}]{MMI2-d3}
+Chappel, H. and B. Cahour.
+\newblock {User Modeling for Multi-Modal Co-Operative Dialogue with KBS}.
+\newblock Deliverable D3, Esprit Project P2474, 1991.
+
+\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Chin}{1987}]{ChinThesis}
+Chin, D.~N.
+\newblock {\em Intelligent Agents as a Basis for Natural Language Interfaces}.
+\newblock PhD thesis, University of California at Berkeley, 1987.
+
+\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Chin}{1989}]{Chin88-book}
+Chin, D.~N.
+\newblock {KNOME}: {M}odeling {W}hat the {U}ser {K}nows in {UC}.
+\newblock In Alfred Kobsa and Wolfgang Wahlster, editors, {\em User Models in
+ Dialog Systems}. Springer-Verlag, Symbolic Computation Series, Berlin
+ Heidelberg New York Tokyo, 1989.
+
+\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Cohen and Jones}{1989}]{Cohen-Jones88-book}
+Cohen, R. and M. Jones.
+\newblock {Incorporating User Models into Expert Systems for Educational
+ Diagnosis}.
+\newblock In Alfred Kobsa and Wolfgang Wahlster, editors, {\em User Models in
+ Dialog Systems}, pages 35 -- 51. Springer-Verlag, Symbolic Computation
+ Series, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, 1989.
+
+\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Falzon}{1987}]{Falzon87}
+Falzon, P.
+\newblock {Les Dialogues de Diagnostic: L'\'evaluation des Connaissances de
+ l'Interlocuteur}.
+\newblock Technical Report 747, INRIA, Rocquencourt, France, 1987.
+
+\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Finin et al.}{1986}]{FininJoshiWebber}
+Finin, T.~W., A.~K. Joshi, and B.~L. Webber.
+\newblock {Natural Language Interactions with Artificial Experts}.
+\newblock {\em Proceedings of the IEEE}, 74(7), July 1986.
+
+\end{thebibliography}
+\end{article}
+\end{document}