summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/examdesign/examplec.tex
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/examdesign/examplec.tex')
-rw-r--r--Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/examdesign/examplec.tex112
1 files changed, 112 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/examdesign/examplec.tex b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/examdesign/examplec.tex
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..b7784d298a5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/examdesign/examplec.tex
@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
+\documentclass{exam}
+\Fullpages
+\NumberOfVersions{3}
+
+\begin{document}
+
+\begin{examtop}
+ \noindent Name:\rule{4in}{.4pt}
+ \begin{center}
+ \textbf{Philosophy 29---Critical Reasoning} \\
+ \textbf{Midterm Exam \Alph{version}} \\
+ \textbf{November 5, 1997}
+ \end{center}
+\end{examtop}
+
+\begin{truefalse}[title={True/False (2 pts. each)},suppressprefix]
+Print ``T'' if the statement is true, otherwise print ``F''
+\begin{question}
+ \answer{True} For purposes of evaluating the credibility of a source, a
+ statement is less credible if the statement maker knows that his or her
+ reputation is at risk.
+\end{question}
+
+\begin{question}
+ \answer{True} A deductively valid argument can have true premises and a true
+ conclusion.
+\end{question}
+
+\begin{question}
+ \answer{True} A proposition and its double negation are logically equivalent.
+\end{question}
+
+\begin{question}
+ \answer{False} If an argument is bad, the conclusion must be wrong.
+\end{question}
+
+\begin{question}
+ \answer{True} Observation reports by the observer are generally to be
+ preferred over others' reports of these observation reports.
+\end{question}
+
+\begin{question}
+ \answer{True} A deductively valid argument can have false premises and a true conclusion.
+\end{question}
+
+\begin{question}
+ \answer{False} The word ``because'' usually indicates that the next sentence
+ is the conclusion of an argument.
+\end{question}
+
+\begin{question}
+ \answer{False} Observations and the conclusions inferred from them are
+ usually equally reliable.
+\end{question}
+
+\begin{question}
+ \answer{True} A conclusion can also be a reason for another conclusion.
+\end{question}
+\end{truefalse}
+
+\begin{fillin}[title={Fill in the blanks (3 pts. each)}]
+\begin{question}
+ An argument is deductively invalid if \hrulefill
+\end{question}
+
+\begin{question}
+ What fallacy labels best describe the following?
+ \begin{enumerate}
+ \item You are giving reasons why the referee's decision was a bad one
+ because you are for the Lakers. So I don't accept your conclusion. \hrulefill
+ \item \word{{Carl Sagan} {Albert Einstein}} says, ``\word{{Asics} {Reeboks}}
+ are the best shoes to wear when thinking about \word{{astronomy}
+ {physics}}.'' \hrulefill
+ \end{enumerate}
+\end{question}
+
+\begin{question}
+ If an argument has a conditional proposition as a premise and the affirmation
+ of the antecedent of the conditional as a premise, then it is deductively
+ valid to conclude \hrulefill
+\end{question}
+
+\begin{question}
+ Write whether each of the following is an observation or a conclusion:
+ \begin{enumerate}
+ \item The physicist says, ``This is the particle track of an electron.''
+ \hrulefill
+ \item The physicist says, ``The particle track on this film curves to the
+ right.'' \hrulefill
+ \end{enumerate}
+\end{question}
+
+\begin{question}
+ When examining an argument, there are three things you must do. These are:
+ \begin{enumerate}
+ \item \hrulefill
+ \item \hrulefill
+ \item \hrulefill
+ \end{enumerate}
+\end{question}
+
+\begin{question}
+ The \emph{then} part of a conditional is called the \hrulefill.
+\end{question}
+
+\begin{question}
+ Write the contrapositive of the proposition: If John is tall, then John is
+ qualified for the basketball team. \hrulefill
+\end{question}
+\end{fillin}
+
+\end{document}