diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/examdesign/examplec.tex')
-rw-r--r-- | Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/examdesign/examplec.tex | 112 |
1 files changed, 112 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/examdesign/examplec.tex b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/examdesign/examplec.tex new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b7784d298a5 --- /dev/null +++ b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/examdesign/examplec.tex @@ -0,0 +1,112 @@ +\documentclass{exam} +\Fullpages +\NumberOfVersions{3} + +\begin{document} + +\begin{examtop} + \noindent Name:\rule{4in}{.4pt} + \begin{center} + \textbf{Philosophy 29---Critical Reasoning} \\ + \textbf{Midterm Exam \Alph{version}} \\ + \textbf{November 5, 1997} + \end{center} +\end{examtop} + +\begin{truefalse}[title={True/False (2 pts. each)},suppressprefix] +Print ``T'' if the statement is true, otherwise print ``F'' +\begin{question} + \answer{True} For purposes of evaluating the credibility of a source, a + statement is less credible if the statement maker knows that his or her + reputation is at risk. +\end{question} + +\begin{question} + \answer{True} A deductively valid argument can have true premises and a true + conclusion. +\end{question} + +\begin{question} + \answer{True} A proposition and its double negation are logically equivalent. +\end{question} + +\begin{question} + \answer{False} If an argument is bad, the conclusion must be wrong. +\end{question} + +\begin{question} + \answer{True} Observation reports by the observer are generally to be + preferred over others' reports of these observation reports. +\end{question} + +\begin{question} + \answer{True} A deductively valid argument can have false premises and a true conclusion. +\end{question} + +\begin{question} + \answer{False} The word ``because'' usually indicates that the next sentence + is the conclusion of an argument. +\end{question} + +\begin{question} + \answer{False} Observations and the conclusions inferred from them are + usually equally reliable. +\end{question} + +\begin{question} + \answer{True} A conclusion can also be a reason for another conclusion. +\end{question} +\end{truefalse} + +\begin{fillin}[title={Fill in the blanks (3 pts. each)}] +\begin{question} + An argument is deductively invalid if \hrulefill +\end{question} + +\begin{question} + What fallacy labels best describe the following? + \begin{enumerate} + \item You are giving reasons why the referee's decision was a bad one + because you are for the Lakers. So I don't accept your conclusion. \hrulefill + \item \word{{Carl Sagan} {Albert Einstein}} says, ``\word{{Asics} {Reeboks}} + are the best shoes to wear when thinking about \word{{astronomy} + {physics}}.'' \hrulefill + \end{enumerate} +\end{question} + +\begin{question} + If an argument has a conditional proposition as a premise and the affirmation + of the antecedent of the conditional as a premise, then it is deductively + valid to conclude \hrulefill +\end{question} + +\begin{question} + Write whether each of the following is an observation or a conclusion: + \begin{enumerate} + \item The physicist says, ``This is the particle track of an electron.'' + \hrulefill + \item The physicist says, ``The particle track on this film curves to the + right.'' \hrulefill + \end{enumerate} +\end{question} + +\begin{question} + When examining an argument, there are three things you must do. These are: + \begin{enumerate} + \item \hrulefill + \item \hrulefill + \item \hrulefill + \end{enumerate} +\end{question} + +\begin{question} + The \emph{then} part of a conditional is called the \hrulefill. +\end{question} + +\begin{question} + Write the contrapositive of the proposition: If John is tall, then John is + qualified for the basketball team. \hrulefill +\end{question} +\end{fillin} + +\end{document} |