summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-dw/biblatex-dw.tex
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-dw/biblatex-dw.tex')
-rw-r--r--Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-dw/biblatex-dw.tex25
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-dw/biblatex-dw.tex b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-dw/biblatex-dw.tex
index ade5c3dc970..4d376a853a2 100644
--- a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-dw/biblatex-dw.tex
+++ b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-dw/biblatex-dw.tex
@@ -297,7 +297,8 @@ Besides some changes in punctuation, there are the following differences:
\item If both \option{annotation} and \option{library} are set to
\wert{true}, the contents of the \texttt{annotation} field is placed
before the contents of the \texttt{library} field.
- \item In normal \bl{}, the entry type \texttt{@inreference} is an alias for
+ \item In\beschreibung{inreference}
+ normal \bl{}, the entry type \texttt{@inreference} is an alias for
\texttt{@incollection} entries. In \bldw{}, this entry type can be used
for articles in encyclopedias or dictionaries. The output is similar to
that of an \texttt{@incollection}, but there are some differences:
@@ -313,6 +314,21 @@ Besides some changes in punctuation, there are the following differences:
The \texttt{@reference} entry type still is an alias to \texttt{@collection}.
Thus, you can use either \texttt{@collection} or \texttt{@reference} for
a work of reference.
+ \item In\beschreibung{review}
+ normal \bl{}, the entry type \texttt{@review} is an alias for
+ \texttt{@article} entries. In \bldw{}, this entry type can be used
+ for reviews. The output is similar to \texttt{@article}, with the
+ following differences:
+ \begin{itemize}
+ \item The title is enclosed in quotes.
+ \item The bibliography string \enquote{review} (standard:
+ \enquote{Review of}) is put in front of the title.
+ \item Instead of manually entering the data for the reviewed work in the \texttt{title}
+ field of the \texttt{@review} entry, it is also possible to add a reference in the field
+ \texttt{xref}. The entry with the \BibTeX\ key given in the \texttt{xref} field
+ will be cited. Using this approach, options like \option{namefont} or
+ \option{firstfull} are considered also for the reviewed work.
+ \end{itemize}
\end{itemize}
\subsection{Appearance in citations}
@@ -1069,7 +1085,7 @@ clear to the English reader as well.
\end{lstlisting}
\fullcite{Fingiert:1939h}
-\section{Commands and bibliography strings}
+\section{Commands, bibliography strings, entry types, field formats}
\subsection{Additional commands}
The following list shows additional commands introduced by \bldw{}, along with their standard definitions. These commands can be customized with \cmd{renewcommand}.
@@ -1172,6 +1188,11 @@ It depends on the \bl{} option \option{abbreviate} which version is used.
\biblstring{thiscite}{here}{here}
\end{labeling}
+\subsection{Entry types}
+The following entry types are used in a different way than in \bl.
+ \eintragstyp{inreference}{Article in an encyclopedia or dictionary}{incollection}
+ \eintragstyp{review}{Review~-- the reviewed work can be referenced with \texttt{xref}}{article}
+
\subsection{Additional field formats}
The following list shows additional field formats defined by \bldw{}.