diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-chicago/notes-test.bib')
| -rw-r--r-- | Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-chicago/notes-test.bib | 733 |
1 files changed, 447 insertions, 286 deletions
diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-chicago/notes-test.bib b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-chicago/notes-test.bib index 0025e7aa68a..a08c5150931 100644 --- a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-chicago/notes-test.bib +++ b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-chicago/notes-test.bib @@ -24,19 +24,20 @@ date = {2008-06-30}, author = {AC}, eventdate = {2008-07-01}, + url = {http://wardsix.blogspot.com/2008/06/sqatters-rights.html}, nameaddon = {(10:18 a.m.)}, crossref = {ellis:blog}, title = {comment on Rhian Ellis, \mkbibquote{Squatters' Rights}}, annote = {The 16th edition suggests a format such as this for presenting comments on blogs or other online material. With only a generic title, it takes a - Review entry instead of an Article one, and the - crossref field points to the blog to which the - comment is attached. The eventdate gives the date - of the comment, and if additional temporal - specificity is required then you can use the - nameaddon field to give a timestamp, inside - parentheses.} + \textsf{Review} entry instead of an \textsf{Article} + one, and the \textsf{crossref} field points to the + blog to which the comment is attached. The + \textsf{eventdate} gives the date of the comment, + and if additional temporal specificity is required + then you can use the \textsf{nameaddon} field to + give a timestamp, inside parentheses.} } @Book{adorno:benj, @@ -123,9 +124,10 @@ chapter = 7, location = {Cleveland, OH}, shorttitle = {The Frontal Lobes}, - annote = {A typical InBook entry, identified by title and - also, in this case, by chapter number rather than - page range.} + annote = {A typical \textsf{InBook} entry, identified both by + a \textsf{title} and also, in this case, by a + \textsf{chapter} number rather than a \textsf{pages} + range.} } @CustomC{ashe:creasey, @@ -413,13 +415,21 @@ author = {Bundy, McGeorge}, title = {interview by Robert MacNeil}, shorttitle = {interview}, - annote = {A television interview presented in a Review entry, - with "magazine" entrysubtype. Note that the - interviewee is presented as the author, and that the - broadcast network is given in the usera field. Note - also the use of lowercase letters to start both - title and shorttitle, allowing automatic contextual - capitalization of a generic title in a Review entry.} + annote = {A television interview, with a generic title, + presented in a \textsf{Review} entry, with + \texttt{magazine} \textsf{entrysubtype}. The + \emph{CMS} often treats such sources, including + online ones, as \textsf{journaltitles} in + \textsf{Article} or \textsf{Review} entries, the + \textsf{entrysubtype} indicating the distance from + traditional scholarly journals. Note here that the + interviewee is presented as the \textsf{author}, and + that the broadcast network is given in the + \textsf{usera} field. Note also the use of + lowercase letters to start both \textsf{title} and + \textsf{shorttitle}, allowing automatic contextual + capitalization of a generic title in a + \textsf{Review} entry.} } @InCollection{centinel:letters, @@ -443,8 +453,7 @@ @Book{chaucer:alt, title = {Chaucer Life-Records}, - options = {useauthor=false,useeditor=false,usetranslator=false, - usecompiler=false}, + options = {useeditor=false,usenamec=false}, year = 1966, editor = {Crow, Martin~M. and Olson, Clair~C.}, namec = {Manly, John~M. and Richert, Edith}, @@ -492,12 +501,14 @@ title = {The Chicago Manual of Style}, year = 2010, author = {{University of Chicago Press}}, + shorthand = {\mkbibemph{CMS}}, publisher = uchp, edition = 16, location = {Chicago}, - annote = {A manual presented in a Book entry. Note curly - brackets around corporate author, which is printed - twice, both as author and publisher.} + annote = {A manual presented in a \textsf{Book} entry. Note + curly braces around corporate \textsf{author}, which + is printed twice, both as \textsf{author} and + \textsf{publisher}.} } @Book{chicago:manual:15, @@ -519,11 +530,11 @@ howpublished = {End of the Commons General Store}, year = {\mkbibbrackets{1957?}}, location = {Mesopotamia, OH}, - annote = {A standard Booklet entry, though the same - information could be presented in a Book entry, - using publisher instead of howpublished. Note - brackets around year, as this is obviously a best - guess.} + annote = {A standard \textsf{Booklet} entry, though the same + information could be presented in a \textsf{Book} + entry, using \textsf{publisher} instead of + \textsf{howpublished}. Note the brackets around the + \textsf{year}, indicating that this is a guess.} } @Video{cleese:holygrail, @@ -598,7 +609,9 @@ year = {forthcoming}, editor = {Editor, Ellen}, location = {Place}, - annote = {A forthcoming essay in an InCollection entry.} + annote = {A fabricated \textsf{InCollection} entry, showing + how to present a \texttt{forthcoming} essay using + the \textsf{year} field.} } @Book{cook:sotweed, @@ -624,18 +637,25 @@ "plain" in the type field.} } -@Misc{coolidge:speech, +@Online{coolidge:speech, author = {Coolidge, Calvin}, - title = {\mkbibquote{Equal Rights} (speech)}, + title = {Equal Rights}, + titleaddon = {(speech)}, + related = {loc:leaders}, note = {copy of an undated 78 rpm disc}, - addendum = {from \fullcite{loc:leaders}}, - year = {[1920?]}, - entrysubtype = {speech}, - annote = {This is a recording from an online archive, using a - Misc entry with an entrysubtype. The addendum cites - the archive itself using an Online entry. - Cp. weed:flatiron and loc:city, which cite a film - from an online archive, both using a Video entry.} + options = {related=true,ptitleaddon=space,ctitleaddon=space}, + year = {ca.\,1920}, + annote = {This is a recording from an online archive, using an + \textsf{Online} entry. The two \texttt{titleaddon} + options allow the parenthesized \textsf{titleaddon} + to appear with only a space intervening, both in + notes and bibliography. The \textsf{related} field + cites the archive itself, another \textsf{Online} + entry, and the \texttt{related=true} option causes + the archive reference to be printed both in notes + and bibliography. Cp.\ \texttt{weed:flatiron} and + \texttt{loc:city}, which cite a film from an online + archive, both using a \textsf{Video} entry.} } @Book{cotton:manufacture, @@ -727,20 +747,26 @@ note = {Edward~M. House Papers}, organization = {Yale University Library}, annote = {An unpublished letter from an archive, presented in - a Misc entry with an entrysubtype. You can avoid - the awkward repetition of the author's name in notes - by using \headlessfullcite and/or \headlesscite - instead of the usual citation commands. The - manuscript collection is found in the note and - organization fields -- depending on the entry, you - can use note, organization, institution, and/or - location, in ascending order of generality, though - you should consistently put the most specific - collection name in the note field. The date of the - letter goes in origdate, and in the short note form - you can use the macro \letterdatelong in the - postnote field to identify the letter by this date, - if it helps disambiguate.} + a \textsf{Misc} entry with an \textsf{entrysubtype}. + You can avoid the awkward repetition of the author's + name in notes by using \cmd{headlessfullcite} or + \cmd{headlesscite} instead of the usual citation + commands. The manuscript collection + \vadjust{\eject}is found in the \textsf{note} and + \textsf{organization} fields --- depending on the + entry, you can use \textsf{note}, + \textsf{organization}, \textsf{institution}, and/or + \textsf{location}, in ascending order of generality, + though you should consistently put the most specific + collection name in the \textsf{note} field. As in + \textsf{Letter} entries the date of the letter goes + in \textsf{origdate}, and in the short note form you + can use the macro \cmd{letterdatelong} in the + \textsf{postnote} field to identify the letter by + this date, if it helps disambiguate. (In other + non-letter-like \textsf{Misc} entries, you would use + the \textsf{date} field instead of + \textsf{origdate}.)} } @Book{davenport:attention, @@ -812,12 +838,14 @@ address = {Providence, RI}, year = 1991, shorttitle = {Dynatext}, - annote = {A technical manual presented in a Manual entry. In - absence of named author the organization is printed - twice, as author and as publisher. If you are using - Biber, you no longer need a sortkey to help with - alphabetization, though with BibTeX it would still - be necessary.} + annote = {A technical manual presented in a \textsf{Manual} + entry. In the absence of a named author the + \textsf{organization} is printed twice, as + \textsf{author} and as \textsf{publisher}. If you + are using \textsf{Biber}, you don't need a + \textsf{sortkey} to help with alphabetization, + though with \textsc{Bib}\TeX\ it would still be + necessary.} } @Book{eliot:pound, @@ -843,19 +871,22 @@ title = {By Rail and Stage to Galena}, crossref = {prairie:state}, pages = {271--279}, - annote = {First of three InCollection entries - cross-referencing the same Collection. Since it is - cited first in my example file, its long note + annote = {First of two \textsf{InCollection} entries + cross-referencing the same \textsf{Collection}. + Since it is cited first in this file, its long note reference contains the full bibliographical data for - the Collection entry, whereas the subsequent two - long notes contain abbreviated references to the - Collection. Cf. keating:dearborn and - lippincott:chicago. All three have an abbreviated + the \textsf{Collection} entry, whereas the + subsequent long note --- \cmslink{keating:dearborn} + --- contains an abbreviated reference to the + \textsf{Collection}. Both parts have an abbreviated reference in the bibliography. If you don't want this space-saving measure, then you can, for - example, set longcrossref=true in the options field. - With Biber, an empty subtitle field is no longer - necessary to prevent inheritance from parent entry.} + example, set \texttt{longcrossref=true} in the + \textsf{options} field. With \textsf{Biber}, an + empty \textsf{subtitle} field is no longer necessary + to prevent inheritance from the parent entry, and + the \textsf{title} of a \textsf{Collection} will + become a \textsf{booktitle} in its children.} } @Article{ellis:blog, @@ -866,13 +897,14 @@ date = {2008-06-30}, url = {http://wardsix.blogspot.com/2008/06/sqatters-rights.html}, entrysubtype = {magazine}, - annote = {The 16th edition specifies an Article-like - presentation for blogs, the main peculiarity being - the identification of the material as a blog using - the location field, which is usually reserved for - identifying the place of publication of obscure - journals. See ac:comment, a Review entry, for how - to reference comments on such online material.} + annote = {The 16th edition of the \emph{CMS} specifies an + \textsf{Article}-like presentation for blogs, the + main peculiarity being the identification of the + material as a blog using the \textsf{location} + field, which is usually reserved for identifying the + place of publication of obscure journals. See + ac:comment, a \textsf{Review} entry, for how to + reference comments on such online material.} } @Book{emerson:nature, @@ -941,13 +973,16 @@ pages = {185--288}, location = {Chicago}, annote = {A work from antiquity, cited by pages in a modern - edition, hence not needing "classical" in - entrysubtype. Since the titles of such works are - uniformly italicized, we need to use a BookInBook - entry with a title and a booktitle ("book within a - book") and in this case also a maintitle. Note the - editors of the maintitle (editor field), and the - translator of the title (nameb field).} + edition, hence not needing \texttt{classical} in the + \textsf{entrysubtype} field. Since the titles of + such works are uniformly italicized, we need to use + a \textsf{BookInBook} entry with a \textsf{title} + and a \textsf{booktitle} (\enquote{book within a + book}) and in this case also a \textsf{maintitle}, a + multi-volume collection of \textsf{booktitles}. + Note also the editors of the \textsf{maintitle} + (\textsf{editor} field), and the translator of the + \textsf{title} (\textsf{nameb} field).} } @Online{evanston:library, @@ -990,7 +1025,7 @@ number = {CDP 7 46381 2}, publisher = {Capitol}, type = {compact disc}, - annote = {_16th edition only_. An example of a re-released + annote = {16th edition only. An example of a re-released album, using the pubstate field to print a notice at the end of the entry clarifying that it is indeed a re-release. If you don't use the pubstate field in @@ -1009,14 +1044,17 @@ title = {\mkbibemph{Nicomachean Ethics} VII. 11--12}, subtitle = {Pleasure}, booktitle = {Aristotle}, - booksubtitle = {\mkbibemph{Nicomachean Ethics}, Book VII}, + booksubtitle = {\mkbibquote{Nicomachean Ethics,} Book VII}, series = {Symposium Aristotelicum}, editor = {Carlo Natali}, publisher = {Oxford University Press}, address = {Oxford}, year = {2009}, pages = {183--207}, - annote = {A standard inproceedings entry.} + annote = {A fairly standard \textsf{InProceedings} entry, + showing some of the complications of formatting + titles within titles in both the \textsf{title} and + the \textsf{booksubtitle} fields.} } @Article{friedman:learning, @@ -1046,12 +1084,24 @@ publisher = {Warner Home Video}, type = {DVD}, address = {Burbank, CA}, - annote = {_16th edition only_. This is a template for citing - television shows in the 16th edition. The eventdate - is the original broadcast date, while the date - applies to the medium you are citing. Note that - information about the season and episode numbers - goes in booktitleaddon.} + annote = {This is a template for citing an episode of a + television series using a \textsf{Video} entry. The + name of the episode goes in the \textsf{title} field + while the name of the series goes in + \textsf{booktitle}. (Were you to cite an entire + series rather than a single episode, you wouldn't + need the \textsf{booktitle} for it, but only a + \textsf{title}.) The writers of the episode go in + \textsf{author}, while the director goes in + \textsf{editor}, using an \textsf{editortype} field + to specify her role, something of frequent + occurrence in the audio-visual types. The + \textsf{eventdate} is the original broadcast date, + while the \textsf{date} applies to the medium you + are citing. That medium itself goes in the + \textsf{type} field. Note that information about + the season and episode numbers goes in + \textsf{booktitleaddon}.} } @Book{furet:passing:eng, @@ -1062,12 +1112,24 @@ translator = {Furet, Deborah}, publisher = uchp, location = {Chicago}, - annote = {A translation, with the userf field referring to the - original. In notes, this has no effect, but in the - bibliography the translation and original are - presented in the same entry, connected (in the - absence of an origlanguage field) by the string - "Originally published as".} + annote = {A translation, serving as the target of the + \textsf{related} field of \cmslink{furet:related}. + If it isn't cited independently, it will appear only + after that entry in the bibliography, connected to + it using the format defined by the + \textsf{relatedtype} \texttt{bytranslator}. You + could also give this entry a \textsf{userf} field + referring to the original text, + \texttt{furet:passing:fr}, or indeed a + \textsf{related} field referring to the same .bib + entry, along with a \textsf{relatedtype} + \texttt{origpubas}. In notes, by default, neither + of these mechanisms would have any effect, but in + the bibliography the translation and the original + would be presented in the same entry, connected (in + the absence of an \textsf{origlanguage} or + \textsf{relatedstring} field, respectively) by the + string \enquote{Originally published as.}} } @Book{furet:passing:fr, @@ -1082,6 +1144,23 @@ bibliography.} } +@Book{furet:related, + title = {Le passé d'une illusion}, + year = 1995, + related = {furet:passing:eng}, + relatedtype = {bytranslator}, + author = {Furet, François}, + publisher = {Éditions Robert Laffont}, + location = {Paris}, + annote = {This entry presents the same \textsf{Book} as + \texttt{furet:passing:fr}, but does so using the + \textsf{relatedtype} \texttt{bytranslator} + functionality. This is the alternate Chicago form + for presenting a text and its translation together + in a single bibliography entry. Cp.\ + furet:passing:eng.} +} + @Article{garaud:gatine, author = {Garaud, Marcel}, title = {Recherches sur les défrichements dans la Gâtine @@ -1092,9 +1171,11 @@ series = 4, pages = {11--27}, shorttitle = {Recherches sur les défrichements}, - annote = {An Article in a journaltitle which is into its 4th - series. Note preservation of French - capitalization.} + annote = {An \textsf{Article} entry with \textsf{author}, + \textsf{title}, \textsf{journaltitle}, + \textsf{year}, \textsf{volume}, \textsf{series}, and + \textsf{pages} fields. Note also the preservation + of French capitalization in the two titles.} } @Article{garrett, @@ -1217,7 +1298,7 @@ author = {Handel, George Frederic}, publisher = {Video Artists International}, address = {Ansonia Station, NY}, - annote = {_16th edition only_. This is a videotape of an + annote = {16th edition only. This is a videotape of an oratorio, presented therefore as a Video entry rather than as Music. The composer goes in author, the performers and conductor in editor and editora. @@ -1235,12 +1316,14 @@ crossref = {harley:hoc}, date = {1987}, volume = 1, - annote = {A Collection entry, with the maintitle coming from - the MVCollection entry cited in the crossref field. - With the booklongxref option set properly, and not - by default, this and the next entry will now produce - abbreviated references in the bibliography and in - long notes (after the first). Cf. lach:asia.}, + annote = {A \textsf{Collection} entry, with the + \textsf{maintitle} coming from the + \textsf{MVCollection} entry cited in the + \textsf{crossref} field. With the + \texttt{booklongxref} option set properly, and not + by default, this and \cmslink{harley:cartography} + will produce abbreviated references in the + bibliography and in long notes (after the first).} } @Collection{harley:cartography, @@ -1251,15 +1334,16 @@ volume = {2}, part = {2}, shorttitle = {Cartography in East and Southeast Asia}, - annote = {A Collection entry, with its maintitle's logical - volumes published in separate physical parts, hence - a volume and a part number. The maintitle itself - comes from the MVCollection entry cited in the - crossref field. With the booklongxref option set - properly, and not by default, this and the previous - entry will now produce abbreviated references in the + annote = {A second \textsf{Collection} entry cross-referencing + the same \textsf{MVCollection}. With the + \texttt{booklongxref} option set to \texttt{false} + in the preamble, this and the previous entry will + now produce abbreviated references in the bibliography and in long notes (after the first). - Cf. lach:asia.} + Since its \textsf{maintitle's} logical volumes are + sometimes published in separate physical parts, it + has both a \textsf{volume} and a \textsf{part} + number.} } @MVCollection{harley:hoc, @@ -1269,20 +1353,17 @@ volumes = {3}, publisher = uchp, location = {Chicago}, - annote = {This entry shows the new MVCollection type used as - the parent to two child Collection entries -- - harley:ancient:cart and harley:cartography. It will - be presented in the bibliography when more than one - of its children are cited, and those children's - entries will be abbreviated in the bibliography and - in long notes (after the first), assuming the option - booklongxref is set properly (it won't be by - default). Please note that this treatment isn't - explicitly allowed in the Chicago specification, and - also that this style of cross-referencing, where the - title of the MVCollection automatically becomes the - maintitle of the Collection, is only available with - Biber as your backend.} + annote = {This entry shows the \textsf{MVCollection} type used + as the parent to two child \textsf{Collection} + entries --- \cmslink{harley:ancient:cart} and + \cmslink{harley:cartography}. It will be presented + in the bibliography when more than one of its + children are cited, even if it isn't itself + independently cited. Please note that this style of + cross-referencing, where the \textsf{title} of the + \textsf{MVCollection} automatically becomes the + \textsf{maintitle} of the \textsf{Collection}, is + only available with \textsf{Biber} as your backend.} } @Online{harwood:biden, @@ -1303,9 +1384,11 @@ institution = {CERN DD internal note}, year = 1988, month = 11, - annote = {A Report entry, the type already set by using the - TechReport alias instead of Report. The institution - field identifies the issuer of the report.} + annote = {A \textsf{Report} entry, with the \textsf{type} + field automatically set by using the + \textsf{TechReport} alias instead of + \textsf{Report}. The \textsf{institution} field + identifies the issuer of the report.} } @Video{hitchcock:nbynw, @@ -1365,20 +1448,23 @@ type = {33\onethird\ rpm}, note = {with Ray Ellis}, options = {useauthor=false}, - annote = {_16th edition only_ This entry illustrates some of - the changes made to Music entries for the 16th - edition. It cites a song (title) from an album - (booktitle). The writers of the song go in author, - while the options field prevents these writers from - appearing at the head of notes or of the entry in - the bibliography. The performer goes in editor, - with the editortype ensuring that no identifying - string appears. So far, then, this isn't different - from the 15th edition. The eventdate gives the - recording date of a song -- you would use origdate - if the recording date applied to the album as a - whole. The date gives the release date of the - album.} + annote = {This entry illustrates some of the peculiarities of + \textsf{Music} entries. It cites a song + (\textsf{title}) from an album (\textsf{booktitle}). + (Were you to cite a whole album, then you wouldn't + need the \textsf{booktitle}, only the album title in + \textsf{title}.) The writers of the song go in + \textsf{author}, while the \textsf{options} field + prevents these writers from appearing at the head of + notes or of the entry in the bibliography. The + performer goes in \textsf{editor}, with the + \textsf{editortype} ensuring that no identifying + string appears. The \textsf{eventdate} gives the + recording date of a song --- you would use + \textsf{origdate} if the recording date applied to + the album as a whole. The \textsf{date} gives the + release date of the album, while the \textsf{type} + field gives the medium of the release.} } @Online{horowitz:youtube, @@ -1446,27 +1532,25 @@ pages = {\bibstring{number} 42}, location = {Oxford}, annote = {An individual letter from a published collection, - hence the Letter entry, designed specifically for - this sort of reference. The title field should - always look like this, and the author won't be - printed in notes, as this field already specifies - it. The shorttitle is specific to this entry form, - eventually printing the author's surname followed by - the contents of this field, which again is specified - for this type of reference. The origdate field - holds the date of the original letter, while the - year (or date) holds the date of the publication of - the collection as a whole. The pages field in this - example holds not the page, but the number in the - collection -- notice the bibstring -- while the - booktitle is the title of that published collection. - If you refer to more than one letter from such a - collection, then only the name of the collection - appears in the bibliography, and you could use the - keywords field to suppress the printing of each - individual letter there. Cf. white:ross:memo, - white:russ, and white:total to see how this might - look.} + hence the \textsf{Letter} entry, designed + specifically for this sort of reference. The + \textsf{title} field should always look like this, + and the \textsf{author} won't be printed in notes, + as this field already specifies it. The + \textsf{shorttitle's} form is specific to this entry + type, eventually printing the \textsf{author's} + surname followed by the contents of this field, + which again is specified for this type of reference. + The \textsf{origdate} field holds the date of the + original letter, while the \textsf{year} (or + \textsf{date}) holds the date of the publication of + the collection as a whole. The \textsf{pages} field + in this example holds not the page, but the number + in the collection -- notice the \cmd{bibstring} -- + while the \textsf{booktitle} is the title of that + published collection. If you refer to more than one + letter from such a collection, then only the name of + the collection need appear in the bibliography.} } @Book{james:ambassadors, @@ -1476,10 +1560,11 @@ author = {James, Henry}, publisher = {Project Gutenberg}, url = {ftp://ibiblio.org/pub/docs/books/gutenberg/etext96/ambas10.txt}, - annote = {Presents an online edition of a book which, not - being inherently an online text, still uses a Book - entry. The origdate field is the date of the print - publication of the text that is now online.} + annote = {This cites an online edition of a book which, not + being inherently an online text, uses a + \textsf{Book} entry. The \textsf{origdate} field is + the date of the print publication of the text that + is now online.} } @InCollection{keating:dearborn, @@ -1487,11 +1572,13 @@ title = {Fort Dearborn and Chicago}, crossref = {prairie:state}, pages = {84--87}, - annote = {Second of three InCollection pieces from the same - Collection, using the crossref field. Even in the + annote = {Second of the \textsf{InCollection} pieces from the + same \textsf{Collection}, the latter identified + using the \textsf{crossref} field. Even in the first, long note, the data for the whole collection will be presented in abbreviated form, since - ellet:galena (which see) has already been cited.} + \cmslink{ellet:galena} (which see) has already been + cited.} } @Article{kern, @@ -1567,18 +1654,23 @@ entrysubtype = {magazine}, title = {Pushcarts Evolve to Trendy Kiosks}, location = {Lake Forest, IL}, - sortkey = {Lake Forester}, shorttitle = {Pushcarts Evolve}, - annote = {An Article entry from a newspaper, using "magazine" - in entrysubtype. The article doesn't have an - author, hence the journaltitle will be used at the - head of the entry in notes, short notes, and - bibliography. The newspaper might not be well - known, so the location field helps your readers out - in this case. If you are using Biber with the 16th - edition style, a sortkey field is no longer - necessary to alphabetize by journaltitle rather than - by title.} + annote = {An \textsf{Article} entry from a newspaper. As the + source isn't a traditional scholarly one, the entry + requires \texttt{magazine} in the + \textsf{entrysubtype} field. The article doesn't + have an \textsf{author}, so the \textsf{title} will + be used at the head of the entry in notes and short + notes, while the \textsf{journaltitle} appears there + in the bibliography. (The \emph{CMS} suggests + that such sources needn't appear in the bibliography + at all, assuming that the note contains a full + enough reference.) The newspaper might not be well + known, so the \textsf{location} field helps your + readers out in this case. If you are using + \textsf{Biber}, a \textsf{sortkey} field isn't + necessary to alphabetize by \textsf{journaltitle} + rather than by \textsf{title}.} } @CustomC{lecarre:cornwell, @@ -1619,10 +1711,12 @@ year = {1480s}, note = {78 x 48.5 in\adddot}, location = {Paris}, - annote = {A typical Artwork entry. Note the type field and - the fact that it begins with a lowercase letter, - allowing biblatex to capitalize it contextually when - needed.} + annote = {This is a typical \textsf{Artwork} entry, with the + artist presented in the \textsf{author} field. Note + the \textsf{type} field for the medium of the work, + and also the fact that it begins with a lowercase + letter, allowing \textsf{biblatex} to capitalize it + contextually when needed.} } @Book{levistrauss:savage, @@ -1675,16 +1769,15 @@ title = {The Life of a City}, subtitle = {Early Films of New York, 1898--1906}, author = {{Library of Congress}}, - options = {skipbib}, type = {MPEG}, url = {http://lcweb2.loc.gov/ammem/papr/nychome.html}, urldate = {2001-08-14}, annote = {This Video entry provides the online location of the weed:flatiron film, providing it as an MPEG file for - download. Here, the options field prevents this - from printing independently of the other entry, - which contains a manual citation of this entry in - its addendum field.} + download. It is referenced in the other entry by a + related field, so you don't need a skipbib option + here, as entries referenced only in such fields are + by default never presented separately.} } @Online{loc:leaders, @@ -1694,13 +1787,23 @@ 1918--1920}, url = {http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/nfhtml/nforSpeakers01.html}, note = {RealAudio and WAV formats}, - options = {skipbib}, annote = {This Online entry provides the online archive - location of the coolidge:speech entry. Here, the - options field prevents this from printing - independently of the other entry, which contains a - manual citation of this entry in its addendum field. - Cp. loc:city and weed:flatiron.} + location of the coolidge:speech entry, which + references it using a related field. You no longer + need skipbib in the options field, as by default + entries cited only by the related system won't + appear on their own. Cp. loc:city and + weed:flatiron.}, + annote = {It's worth noting that the annotations to this + \textsf{related} entry appear \emph{before} those of + the parent entry. Here, an \textsf{Online} entry + provides the online archive location of the + \cmslink{coolidge:speech} entry, which references it + using a \textsf{related} field. You no longer need + \texttt{skipbib} in the \textsf{options} field, as + by default entries cited only by the + \textsf{related} system won't appear on their own. + Cp.\ \texttt{loc:city} and \texttt{weed:flatiron}.} } @Article{loften:hamlet, @@ -1734,10 +1837,10 @@ author = {McHugh, Roland}, publisher = {Johns Hopkins University Press}, location = {Baltimore}, - annote = {A Book with a quoted title inside an italicized one. - If you use \mkbibquote, the package will - automatically do the right thing with punctuation - inside the quotation marks.} + annote = {A \textsf{Book} with a quoted \textsf{title} inside + an italicized one. If you use \cmd{mkbibquote} the + package will automatically do the right thing, + moving punctuation inside the quotation marks.} } @Article{mcmillen:antebellum, @@ -1881,13 +1984,13 @@ Science Editors}, location = {San Antonio, TX}, date = {2000-05-06/2000-05-09}, - annote = {A typical Unpublished entry, presenting an + annote = {An \textsf{Unpublished} entry, presenting an unpublished piece that isn't part of a formal - archive, which would usually require a Misc - entry. The note field provides the details of what - sort of piece it is, and whence it came, and begins - with a lowercase letter. Note the date range in the - date field.} + archive. The \textsf{note} field provides the + details of what sort of piece it is, and whence it + came, and it begins with a lowercase letter, so that + \textsf{biblatex-chicago} can automatically + capitalize it when the context demands.} } @Book{natrecoff:camera, @@ -1964,7 +2067,7 @@ userd = {recorded at the Madeira Festival,}, sortkey = {New York Trumpet}, type = {compact disc}, - annote = {_16th edition only_ This entry is a good example of + annote = {16th edition only This entry is a good example of the changes between the 15th and 16th editions of the Manual in Music entries. The title, date, author, shortauthor, number, series, sortkey, and @@ -2131,11 +2234,12 @@ pages = {327--621}, location = {Oxford}, annote = {A work from antiquity, which will be cited by the - traditional divisions, and which therefore requires - the "classical" entrysubtype. The title of such a - work being italicized, it needs a BookInBook entry, - and it has all three sorts of title, plus a series - to boot.} + traditional divisions of Stephanus' edition, and + which therefore requires the \texttt{classical} + \textsf{entrysubtype}. The \textsf{title} of such a + work being italicized, it needs a + \textsf{BookInBook} entry, and it has all three + sorts of title, plus a \textsf{series} to boot.} } @SuppBook{polakow:afterw, @@ -2148,27 +2252,41 @@ year = 1993, publisher = uchp, location = {Chicago}, - annote = {A standard example of a SuppBook entry, specifically - citing an afterword written by the main author of - the book. Note that you need only put something in - the afterword field (and not define a foreword or - introduction field) to make the reference work. The - 16th edition requires, for the entry in the list of - references, a page range for the part being cited.} + annote = {The \textsf{SuppBook} entry type is rather like the + \textsf{Review} type, in that it covers texts with + generic titles instead of specific ones, only the + text, as here, is contained not in a journal but in + a \textsf{Book}. In its current state, the + \textsf{SuppBook} type in \textsf{biblatex-chicago} + is a little anomolous with respect to general + \textsf{biblatex} usage. This will evolve in future + releases, but for now, in order to cite, for + example, an afterword written by the main author of + the book, you need only put something in the + \textsf{afterword} field (and not define a + \textsf{foreword} or \textsf{introduction} field) to + make the otherwise \textsf{Book}-like reference + work. The 16th edition of the \emph{CMS} + requires, for the entry in the bibliography, a + \textsf{pages} range for the part being cited.} } @Online{pollan:plant, author = {Pollan, Michael}, title = {Michael Pollan Gives a Plant's-Eye View}, organization = {TED video, 17:31}, + titleaddon = {filmed March 2007}, url = {http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/michael_pollan_gives_a_plant_s_eye_view.html}, urldate = {2008-02}, - date = {2007-03}, userd = {posted}, - annote = {Another online video, presented in an Online entry. - Note the userd field to modify the string printed - before the urldate. Cf. harwood:biden, - horowitz:youtube.} + annote = {An online video, presented in an \textsf{Online} + entry. Note the \textsf{userd} field to modify the + string printed before the \textsf{urldate}, and also + the \textsf{titleaddon} in place of a \textsf{date} + field, in case you want that information in closer + association with the \textsf{title}. + Cf. \texttt{harwood:biden}, + \texttt{horowitz:youtube}.} } @Online{powell:email, @@ -2177,13 +2295,17 @@ titleaddon = {e-mail to Grapevine mailing list}, url = {http://www.electriceditors.net/grapevine/issues/83.txt}, shorttitle = {\autocap{e}-mail to Grapevine mailing list}, - annote = {An Online entry without a specific title, hence with - no title field, only a titleaddon. Note the initial - lowercase letter in the titleaddon, and the - \autocap macro in shorttitle, because the Online - type doesn't automate this for you in title or - shorttitle. Note also the absence of any - organization or owner of the site as whole.} + annote = {An \textsf{Online} entry without a specific title, + hence with no \textsf{title} field, only a + \textsf{titleaddon}. Note the initial lowercase + letter in the \textsf{titleaddon}, and the + \cmd{autocap} macro in the \textsf{shorttitle}, + because the \textsf{Online} type doesn't automate + capitalization in \textsf{title} or + \textsf{shorttitle}, while it does in + \textsf{titleaddon}. Note also the absence of any + \textsf{organization} or owner of the site as + whole.} } @Collection{prairie:state, @@ -2197,14 +2319,17 @@ editor = {Angle, Paul~M.}, publisher = uchp, location = {Chicago}, - annote = {A Collection entry, the one that has been - cross-referenced by three other entries in this - bibliography. Note the usual duplication of title - and booktitle in a parent entry when the children - use crossref, and note the editor instead of an - author. If more than one child cross-references the - parent, the parent will be printed in the - bibliography even if not independently cited.} + annote = {A \textsf{Collection} entry, the one that has been + cross-referenced by two other entries in this + bibliography. Note the \textsf{editor} instead of + an \textsf{author} in this entry type. If more than + one child cross-references the parent, the parent + will be printed in the bibliography even if not + independently cited, though I have cited it here to + illustrate that, as far as \textsf{biblatex-chicago} + is concerned, this work has already been cited (by + the two previous notes), thus producing a short + note.} } @SuppBook{prose:intro, @@ -2245,15 +2370,24 @@ pages = {B13--B14}, shorttitle = {\bibstring{reviewof} \mkbibemph{The Mystery of Samba}}, - annote = {A Review entry, this time from a scholarly - journaltitle, hence no entrysubtype needed. Note - the bibstrings in title and shorttitle -- you could - also start them with lowercase letters -- and the - formatting in both fields of the title of the book - reviewed. Most especially note the use of - \parteditandtrans, which allows the editor and - translator of the reviewed book to be identified by - the correct strings in notes and bibliography.} + annote = {The \textsf{Review} entry type functions much like + the \textsf{Article} type, but is designed to + present articles which have only a generic title + rather than a specific one, like the book review + cited by this entry. Note, first, the + \cmd{bibstrings} in the \textsf{title} and + \textsf{shorttitle} --- using them isn't strictly + necessary, and you could also just write them out, + taking care to start each field with a lowercase + letter to allow for contextual capitalization. (The + \cmd{bibstrings} make the entry portable + \vadjust{\eject}across languages.) Note, second, + the formatting in both fields of the title of the + book reviewed. Most especially note the use of + \cmd{parteditandtrans}, which is necessary here to + allow the editor and translator of the reviewed book + to be identified by the correct (different) strings + in notes and bibliography.} } @Article{reaves:rosen, @@ -2295,8 +2429,12 @@ url = {http://libx.bsu.edu/cdm4/item_viewer.php?CISOROOT=/ElRoos&CISOPTR=0&CISOBOX=1&REC=2}, date = {1959-05-06}, annote = {Another speech from an online archive, presented in - a Misc entry with an entrysubtype. Note the - formatting of the title. Cp. coolidge:speech.} + a Misc entry with an entrysubtype, as it's somewhat + like an unpublished letter. Note the formatting of + the title. Cp. coolidge:speech, which uses the + Online entry type -- it's primarily a question of + the placement of the date, either before or after + the note field.} } @MastersThesis{ross:thesis, @@ -2305,9 +2443,10 @@ subtitle = {A Study in Social Mobility}, school = {Columbia University}, year = {\bibstring{nodate}}, - annote = {A Thesis entry with its type pre-defined by the - alias MastersThesis. The nodate bibstring (which - gives n.d. in English) may be used in almost any + annote = {A \textsf{Thesis} entry with its type automatically + set by using the alias \textsf{MastersThesis}. The + \texttt{nodate} \cmd{bibstring} (which gives + \enquote{n.d.} in English) may be used in almost any entry type if you can't find a date.} } @@ -2335,7 +2474,7 @@ number = {60822-2-RG}, type = {11 compact discs}, origdate = {1946/1967}, - annote = {_16 edition only_. A Music entry giving the + annote = {16th edition only. A Music entry giving the original recording dates of a later compilation. Cf. floyd:atom.} } @@ -2373,13 +2512,28 @@ date = 1895, shorttitle = {Das Wandern}, booktitle = {Die sch\"one M\"ullerin (The Maid of the Mill)}, - maintitle = {First Vocal Album \mkbibemph{(for high voice)}}, + maintitle = {First Vocal Album}, + maintitleaddon = {(for high voice)}, + options = {ctitleaddon=space}, author = {Schubert, Franz}, publisher = {G.~Schirmer}, address = {New York}, annote = {An Audio entry presenting a published musical score. Note the presence of all three sorts of title, and - the "reverse italics" in the maintitle.} + the "reverse italics" in the maintitle.}, + annote = {The \textsf{Audio} entry type is the most + \enquote{book-like} of the three audio-visual entry + types, but does differ in several ways from an + ordinary \textsf{book}, and therefore requires a + separate type. This is a citation of a published + musical score, with the composer in the + \textsf{author} field. It cites one song + (\textsf{title}) from a cycle (\textsf{booktitle}), + while the \textsf{maintitle} in this instance refers + to the \textsf{publisher's} collection of the + composer's works. The \textsf{options} field + changes the punctuation to \cmd{addspace} before the + parenthesized \textsf{maintitleaddon}.} } @Book{schweitzer:bach, @@ -2529,10 +2683,11 @@ url = {http://www.cnn.com/1999/TECH/ptech/12/20/implant.device/}, shorttitle = {Tiny Human-Borne Monitoring Device}, annote = {This is an intrinsically-online source, but is - structured like a newspaper, so we use the Article - entry type and "magazine" entrysubtype. The Manual - is specific about this, and it limits the range of - things you might put into an Online entry.} + structured like a newspaper, so we use the + \textsf{Article} entry type and \texttt{magazine} + \textsf{entrysubtype}. The \emph{CMS} is specific + about this, limiting the range of things you might + put into an \textsf{Online} entry.} } @Book{tillich:system, @@ -2710,26 +2865,25 @@ series alone goes in series, the rest in number.} } -@Audio{weed:flatiron, +@Video{weed:flatiron, title = {At the Foot of the Flatiron}, date = 1903, - addendum = {from \fullcite{loc:city}}, + related = {loc:city}, + relatedstring = {from}, + options = {related=true}, author = {Weed, A.~E.}, publisher = {American Mutoscope {and} Biograph Company}, type = {35~mm; 2 min., 19 sec.}, - annote = {The Manual, for some reason, has chosen a rather - more book-like presentation for this film, so - instead of a Video entry I have here used Audio. To - be more consistent, I would have chosen Video for - this, but in any case note the creator of the film - in the author field, and the medium w/ running - length in the type field. The addendum cites - another (Video) entry, containing information about - the online location of the MPEG version of the - original 35mm film. These two entries will be - presented together in both notes and bibliography, - as suggested by the Manual, 15th edition 17.270, - 16th edition 14.280.} + annote = {This film from an online archive takes a Video + entry. Note the creator of the film in the author + field, and the medium w/ running length in the type + field. The related field references another (Video) + entry, containing information about the online + location of the MPEG version of the original 35mm + film. The related=true option means that these two + entries will be presented together in both notes and + bibliography, as suggested by the Manual, 14.280. + The relatedstring links the two entries.} } @Book{weresz, @@ -2833,13 +2987,20 @@ url = {http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BibTeX}, urldate = {2011-09-03}, userd = {last modified}, - annote = {An online InReference entry. You must have the - urldate field, as such sources change rather - rapidly, though the 16th edition would prefer that - you use a revision date or the like instead of an - access date. Here, the new, 16th-edition userd - field identifies which sort of date is at stake. - The entry will not be printed in the bibliography.} + annote = {\textsf{InReference} entries are designed to allow + you to cite particular articles in an + alphabetically-arranged reference work. The + \textsf{lista} field holds the name of the article, + and for printed works you can use the standard + \textsf{postnote} field to make a single .bib entry + work for references to several different articles. + For an online work, you must have a \textsf{urldate} + field, as such sources change rather rapidly, while + the \textsf{userd} field allows you to identify + which sort of date is at stake. Ordinarily, such an + entry need not be printed in the bibliography, only + in notes, but here it will appear in both for the + sake of example.} } @InBook{will:cohere, |