summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-chicago/biblatex-chicago15.tex
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-chicago/biblatex-chicago15.tex')
-rw-r--r--Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-chicago/biblatex-chicago15.tex49
1 files changed, 30 insertions, 19 deletions
diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-chicago/biblatex-chicago15.tex b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-chicago/biblatex-chicago15.tex
index 44ebde49325..285958d58dc 100644
--- a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-chicago/biblatex-chicago15.tex
+++ b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-chicago/biblatex-chicago15.tex
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@
15th-edition style files for biblatex
\vspace{.3\baselineskip}
-\sffamily\normalsize\bfseries David Fussner\qquad Version 0.9.9c (beta) \\
+\sffamily\normalsize\bfseries David Fussner\qquad Version 0.9.9d (beta) \\
\href{mailto:djf027@googlemail.com}{djf027@googlemail.com}\\ \today
\end{center}
@@ -76,13 +76,14 @@
\textsf{biblatex-chicago.pdf}. There may still be some users,
however, who wish to continue using the 15th-edition styles, so I am
continuing to provide them, though I am now marking them as
- \enquote{deprecated.} They have received no backported fixes in
- this release cycle, though my test files do still compile correctly.
- The main reason to continue using these files is perhaps a desire
- not to interrupt a work-in-progress. Given how little attention
- they are currently receiving, however, I encourage all users of both
- the \textsf{authordate15} and \textsf{notes15} styles to upgrade to
- the current release of the 16th-edition styles as soon as may be
+ \enquote{strongly deprecated,} and will soon mark them as
+ \enquote{obsolete.} I have included very few fixes in this release
+ cycle, enough so that my test files do still compile correctly. The
+ main reason to continue using these files is perhaps a desire not to
+ interrupt a work-in-progress. Given how little attention they are
+ currently receiving, however, I encourage all users of both the
+ \textsf{authordate15} and \textsf{notes15} styles to upgrade to the
+ current release of the 16th-edition styles as soon as may be
practicable. If the changes to the author-date style's treatment of
titles has thus far discouraged you from upgrading, please be aware
that the new \mycolor{\textsf{authordate-trad}} style retains the
@@ -142,11 +143,11 @@ release.
\begin{itemize}{}{}
\item Philipp Lehman's \textsf{biblatex} package, of course! You
- should use the latest version(s) --- 1.7 or 2.5 --- as those
+ should use the latest version(s) --- 1.7 or 2.8 --- as those
versions have been tested more thoroughly than any other, meaning
- that these style files may well not function properly with some
- earlier iterations of \textsf{biblatex}. Lehman's tools require
- several packages, and he strongly recommends several more:
+ that these style files may well not function properly with earlier
+ iterations of \textsf{biblatex}. Lehman's tools require several
+ packages, and he strongly recommends several more:
\begin{itemize}{}{}
\item e-\TeX\ (required)
\item \textsf{etoolbox} --- available from CTAN (required)
@@ -166,12 +167,11 @@ release.
from version 1.5 onwards. For that style you must use the
following:
\item \textsf{Biber} --- the next-generation \textsc{Bib}\TeX\
- replacement, called \textsf{Biber}, which is available from
- SourceForge. You should use the latest version, 1.5, to work with
- \textsf{biblatex} 2.5, or 0.9.9 with \textsf{biblatex} 1.7, and it
- is required for users who are either using the author-date style
- or processing a .bib file in Unicode. See
- \textsf{cms-dates-sample.pdf} for more details.
+ replacement, which is available from SourceForge. You should use
+ the latest version, 1.8, to work with \textsf{biblatex} 2.8, and
+ it is required for users who are either using the author-date
+ style or processing a .bib file in Unicode. See
+ \textsf{cms15-dates-sample.pdf} for more details.
\end{itemize}
\item The line:
\begin{quote}
@@ -8565,7 +8565,18 @@ code for it, let me know, and I'll look into it.
\section{Revision History}
\label{sec:history}
-\textbf{0.9.9c: Released \today}
+\textbf{0.9.9d: Released \today}
+\begin{itemize}
+\item I have made just enough changes to the styles to ensure they
+ compile the test files correctly, but I am marking them as
+ \enquote{strongly deprecated,} and encourage all users to upgrade as
+ soon as is practicable to the 16th-edition styles. In the next
+ release, I shall mark them as \enquote{obsolete,} and they will
+ receive no further updates.
+
+\end{itemize}
+
+\textbf{0.9.9c: Released March 15, 2013}
\begin{itemize}
\item No changes to either style, but I am marking them as
\enquote{deprecated,} and encourage all users to upgrade as soon as