summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Master/texmf-dist/doc/generic/expex/source/example1.tex
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'Master/texmf-dist/doc/generic/expex/source/example1.tex')
-rw-r--r--Master/texmf-dist/doc/generic/expex/source/example1.tex57
1 files changed, 57 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/generic/expex/source/example1.tex b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/generic/expex/source/example1.tex
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..dd3e8692300
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/generic/expex/source/example1.tex
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+
+\introsec{ Examples and examples with parts}
+
+\codedisplay
+Example (\nextx) is well-known from the literature on parasitic
+gaps. Here we are concerned with example formatting, not with the
+interesting syntax.
+
+\ex
+I wonder which article John filed {\sl t\/} without reading {\sl e}.
+\xe
+It is beyond the scope of this investigation to determine exactly why
+John did not read the article.
+
+Multipart examples are equally straightforward.
+
+\pex Two examples of parasitic gaps.
+\a He is the man that John did not interview {\sl e\/} before
+he gave the job to {\sl e}.
+\a He is someone who John expected {\sl e\/} to be successful
+though believing {\sl e\/} to be incompetent.
+\xe
+Here, we can speculate on why John did not do an interview before
+recommending the person for a job. It is likely that the person
+was a crony of John. In (\lastx b), perhaps John knew that
+the ``someone'' went to prep school with the owner of the
+business.|endcodedisplay
+
+\framedisplay
+\vskip\lingaboveexskip
+Example (\nextx) is well-known from the literature on parasitic
+gaps. Here we are concerned with example formatting, not with the
+interesting syntax.
+
+\ex
+I wonder which article John filed {\sl t\/} without reading {\sl e}.
+\xe
+It is beyond the scope of this investigation to determine exactly why
+John did not read the article.
+
+Multipart examples are equally straightforward.
+
+\pex Two examples of parasitic gaps.
+\a He is the man that John did not interview {\sl e\/} before
+he gave the job to {\sl e}.
+\a He is someone who John expected {\sl e\/} to be successful
+though believing {\sl e\/} to be incompetent.
+\xe
+Here, we can speculate on why John did not do an interview before
+recommending the person for a job. It is likely that the person
+was a crony of John. In (\lastx b), perhaps John knew that
+the ``someone'' went to prep school with the owner of the
+business.
+\vskip\lingbelowexskip
+\endframedisplay
+
+