summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Master/texmf-dist/doc/generic/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-misschar.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'Master/texmf-dist/doc/generic/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-misschar.html')
-rw-r--r--Master/texmf-dist/doc/generic/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-misschar.html18
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/generic/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-misschar.html b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/generic/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-misschar.html
index cef0b600977..9e3817e233d 100644
--- a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/generic/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-misschar.html
+++ b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/generic/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-misschar.html
@@ -2,16 +2,16 @@
<title>UK TeX FAQ -- question label misschar</title>
</head><body>
<h3>Where have my characters gone?</h3>
-<p/>You&rsquo;ve typed some apparently reasonable text and processed it, but the
+<p/>You&#8217;ve typed some apparently reasonable text and processed it, but the
result contains no sign of some of the characters you typed. A likely
-reason is that the font you selected just doesn&rsquo;t have a
+reason is that the font you selected just doesn&#8217;t have a
representation for the character in question.
-<p/>For example, if I type &ldquo;that will be &pound;44.00&rdquo; into an ordinary
+<p/>For example, if I type &#8220;that will be &#163;44.00&#8221; into an ordinary
(La)TeX document, or if I select the font <code>rsfs10</code> (which contains
-uppercase letters only) and type pretty much anything, the &pound;
+uppercase letters only) and type pretty much anything, the &#163;
sign, or any lowercase letters or digits will not appear in the
-output. There&rsquo;s no actual error message, either: you have to read the
-log file, where you&rsquo;ll find cryptic little messages like
+output. There&#8217;s no actual error message, either: you have to read the
+log file, where you&#8217;ll find cryptic little messages like
<blockquote>
<pre>
Missing character: There is no ^^a3 in font cmr10!
@@ -19,9 +19,9 @@ Missing character: There is no 3 in font rsfs10!
</pre>
</blockquote><p>
-(the former demonstrating my TeX&rsquo;s unwillingness to deal in characters
+(the former demonstrating my TeX&#8217;s unwillingness to deal in characters
which have the eighth bit set, while the <code>rsfs10</code> example shows that
-TeX will log the actual character in error, if it thinks it&rsquo;s
+TeX will log the actual character in error, if it thinks it&#8217;s
possible).
<p/>Somewhat more understandable are the diagnostics you may get from
<i>dvips</i> when using the OT1 and T1 versions of
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ dvips: Warning: missing glyph `Delta'
The process that generates the metrics for using the fonts generates
an instruction to <i>dvips</i> to produce these diagnostics, so
that their non-appearance in the printed output is less surprising
-than it might be. Quite a few glyphs provided in Knuth&rsquo;s text
+than it might be. Quite a few glyphs provided in Knuth&#8217;s text
encodings and in the Cork encoding are not available in the Adobe
fonts. In these cases, there <em>is</em> a typeset sign of the
character: <i>dvips</i> produces a black rectangle of whatever