diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Master/texmf-dist/doc/generic/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-fuzzy-gs.html')
-rw-r--r-- | Master/texmf-dist/doc/generic/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-fuzzy-gs.html | 10 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/generic/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-fuzzy-gs.html b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/generic/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-fuzzy-gs.html index 848da58ff4f..4beba331f60 100644 --- a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/generic/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-fuzzy-gs.html +++ b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/generic/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-fuzzy-gs.html @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ </head><body> <h3>Fuzzy fonts because <i>Ghostscript</i> too old</h3> <!-- crippled blurry --> -<p/>So you’ve done everything the FAQ has told you that you need, +<p/>So you’ve done everything the FAQ has told you that you need, correct fonts properly installed and appearing in the <i>dvips</i> output, but <em>still</em> you get fuzzy character output after distilling with <i>ghostscript</i>. @@ -14,13 +14,13 @@ script such as <i>ps2pdf</i> (distributed with Though <i>ghostscript</i> was capable of distillation from version 5.50, that version could only produce bitmap Type 3 output of any font other than the fundamental 35 fonts (<i>Times</i>, -<i>Helvetica</i>, etc.). Later versions added ‘complete’ -distillation, but it wasn’t until version 6.50 that one could rely on +<i>Helvetica</i>, etc.). Later versions added ‘complete’ +distillation, but it wasn’t until version 6.50 that one could rely on it for everyday work. <p/>So, if your PDF output still looks fuzzy in <i>Acrobat</i> <i>Reader</i>, upgrade <i>ghostscript</i>. The new version -should be at least version 6.50, of course, but it’s usually good +should be at least version 6.50, of course, but it’s usually good policy to go to the most recent version (version 8.12 at the time of -writing — 2003). +writing — 2003). <p/><p>This question on the Web: <a href="http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=fuzzy-gs">http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=fuzzy-gs</a> </body> |