diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Build/source/utils/t1utils/configure')
| -rwxr-xr-x | Build/source/utils/t1utils/configure | 168 |
1 files changed, 166 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/Build/source/utils/t1utils/configure b/Build/source/utils/t1utils/configure index b74b0816e82..90a9b9b2852 100755 --- a/Build/source/utils/t1utils/configure +++ b/Build/source/utils/t1utils/configure @@ -2424,7 +2424,7 @@ ac_configure="$SHELL $ac_aux_dir/configure" # Please don't use this var. -am__api_version='1.13' +am__api_version='1.14' # Find a good install program. We prefer a C program (faster), # so one script is as good as another. But avoid the broken or @@ -3740,6 +3740,65 @@ ac_compile='$CC -c $CFLAGS $CPPFLAGS conftest.$ac_ext >&5' ac_link='$CC -o conftest$ac_exeext $CFLAGS $CPPFLAGS $LDFLAGS conftest.$ac_ext $LIBS >&5' ac_compiler_gnu=$ac_cv_c_compiler_gnu +ac_ext=c +ac_cpp='$CPP $CPPFLAGS' +ac_compile='$CC -c $CFLAGS $CPPFLAGS conftest.$ac_ext >&5' +ac_link='$CC -o conftest$ac_exeext $CFLAGS $CPPFLAGS $LDFLAGS conftest.$ac_ext $LIBS >&5' +ac_compiler_gnu=$ac_cv_c_compiler_gnu +{ $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking whether $CC understands -c and -o together" >&5 +$as_echo_n "checking whether $CC understands -c and -o together... " >&6; } +if ${am_cv_prog_cc_c_o+:} false; then : + $as_echo_n "(cached) " >&6 +else + cat confdefs.h - <<_ACEOF >conftest.$ac_ext +/* end confdefs.h. */ + +int +main () +{ + + ; + return 0; +} +_ACEOF + # Make sure it works both with $CC and with simple cc. + # Following AC_PROG_CC_C_O, we do the test twice because some + # compilers refuse to overwrite an existing .o file with -o, + # though they will create one. + am_cv_prog_cc_c_o=yes + for am_i in 1 2; do + if { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: $CC -c conftest.$ac_ext -o conftest2.$ac_objext" >&5 + ($CC -c conftest.$ac_ext -o conftest2.$ac_objext) >&5 2>&5 + ac_status=$? + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); } \ + && test -f conftest2.$ac_objext; then + : OK + else + am_cv_prog_cc_c_o=no + break + fi + done + rm -f core conftest* + unset am_i +fi +{ $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: result: $am_cv_prog_cc_c_o" >&5 +$as_echo "$am_cv_prog_cc_c_o" >&6; } +if test "$am_cv_prog_cc_c_o" != yes; then + # Losing compiler, so override with the script. + # FIXME: It is wrong to rewrite CC. + # But if we don't then we get into trouble of one sort or another. + # A longer-term fix would be to have automake use am__CC in this case, + # and then we could set am__CC="\$(top_srcdir)/compile \$(CC)" + CC="$am_aux_dir/compile $CC" +fi +ac_ext=c +ac_cpp='$CPP $CPPFLAGS' +ac_compile='$CC -c $CFLAGS $CPPFLAGS conftest.$ac_ext >&5' +ac_link='$CC -o conftest$ac_exeext $CFLAGS $CPPFLAGS $LDFLAGS conftest.$ac_ext $LIBS >&5' +ac_compiler_gnu=$ac_cv_c_compiler_gnu + + depcc="$CC" am_compiler_list= { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking dependency style of $depcc" >&5 @@ -3947,6 +4006,10 @@ mkdir_p='$(MKDIR_P)' # in the wild :-( We should find a proper way to deprecate it ... AMTAR='$${TAR-tar}' + +# We'll loop over all known methods to create a tar archive until one works. +_am_tools='gnutar pax cpio none' + am__tar='$${TAR-tar} chof - "$$tardir"' am__untar='$${TAR-tar} xf -' @@ -3954,6 +4017,48 @@ am__tar='$${TAR-tar} chof - "$$tardir"' am__untar='$${TAR-tar} xf -' +# POSIX will say in a future version that running "rm -f" with no argument +# is OK; and we want to be able to make that assumption in our Makefile +# recipes. So use an aggressive probe to check that the usage we want is +# actually supported "in the wild" to an acceptable degree. +# See automake bug#10828. +# To make any issue more visible, cause the running configure to be aborted +# by default if the 'rm' program in use doesn't match our expectations; the +# user can still override this though. +if rm -f && rm -fr && rm -rf; then : OK; else + cat >&2 <<'END' +Oops! + +Your 'rm' program seems unable to run without file operands specified +on the command line, even when the '-f' option is present. This is contrary +to the behaviour of most rm programs out there, and not conforming with +the upcoming POSIX standard: <http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=542> + +Please tell bug-automake@gnu.org about your system, including the value +of your $PATH and any error possibly output before this message. This +can help us improve future automake versions. + +END + if test x"$ACCEPT_INFERIOR_RM_PROGRAM" = x"yes"; then + echo 'Configuration will proceed anyway, since you have set the' >&2 + echo 'ACCEPT_INFERIOR_RM_PROGRAM variable to "yes"' >&2 + echo >&2 + else + cat >&2 <<'END' +Aborting the configuration process, to ensure you take notice of the issue. + +You can download and install GNU coreutils to get an 'rm' implementation +that behaves properly: <http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/>. + +If you want to complete the configuration process using your problematic +'rm' anyway, export the environment variable ACCEPT_INFERIOR_RM_PROGRAM +to "yes", and re-run configure. + +END + as_fn_error $? "Your 'rm' program is bad, sorry." "$LINENO" 5 + fi +fi + { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles" >&5 $as_echo_n "checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... " >&6; } # Check whether --enable-maintainer-mode was given. @@ -4600,6 +4705,65 @@ ac_compile='$CC -c $CFLAGS $CPPFLAGS conftest.$ac_ext >&5' ac_link='$CC -o conftest$ac_exeext $CFLAGS $CPPFLAGS $LDFLAGS conftest.$ac_ext $LIBS >&5' ac_compiler_gnu=$ac_cv_c_compiler_gnu +ac_ext=c +ac_cpp='$CPP $CPPFLAGS' +ac_compile='$CC -c $CFLAGS $CPPFLAGS conftest.$ac_ext >&5' +ac_link='$CC -o conftest$ac_exeext $CFLAGS $CPPFLAGS $LDFLAGS conftest.$ac_ext $LIBS >&5' +ac_compiler_gnu=$ac_cv_c_compiler_gnu +{ $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking whether $CC understands -c and -o together" >&5 +$as_echo_n "checking whether $CC understands -c and -o together... " >&6; } +if ${am_cv_prog_cc_c_o+:} false; then : + $as_echo_n "(cached) " >&6 +else + cat confdefs.h - <<_ACEOF >conftest.$ac_ext +/* end confdefs.h. */ + +int +main () +{ + + ; + return 0; +} +_ACEOF + # Make sure it works both with $CC and with simple cc. + # Following AC_PROG_CC_C_O, we do the test twice because some + # compilers refuse to overwrite an existing .o file with -o, + # though they will create one. + am_cv_prog_cc_c_o=yes + for am_i in 1 2; do + if { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: $CC -c conftest.$ac_ext -o conftest2.$ac_objext" >&5 + ($CC -c conftest.$ac_ext -o conftest2.$ac_objext) >&5 2>&5 + ac_status=$? + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + (exit $ac_status); } \ + && test -f conftest2.$ac_objext; then + : OK + else + am_cv_prog_cc_c_o=no + break + fi + done + rm -f core conftest* + unset am_i +fi +{ $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: result: $am_cv_prog_cc_c_o" >&5 +$as_echo "$am_cv_prog_cc_c_o" >&6; } +if test "$am_cv_prog_cc_c_o" != yes; then + # Losing compiler, so override with the script. + # FIXME: It is wrong to rewrite CC. + # But if we don't then we get into trouble of one sort or another. + # A longer-term fix would be to have automake use am__CC in this case, + # and then we could set am__CC="\$(top_srcdir)/compile \$(CC)" + CC="$am_aux_dir/compile $CC" +fi +ac_ext=c +ac_cpp='$CPP $CPPFLAGS' +ac_compile='$CC -c $CFLAGS $CPPFLAGS conftest.$ac_ext >&5' +ac_link='$CC -o conftest$ac_exeext $CFLAGS $CPPFLAGS $LDFLAGS conftest.$ac_ext $LIBS >&5' +ac_compiler_gnu=$ac_cv_c_compiler_gnu + + depcc="$CC" am_compiler_list= { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking dependency style of $depcc" >&5 @@ -6838,7 +7002,7 @@ $as_echo X"$mf" | DEPDIR=`sed -n 's/^DEPDIR = //p' < "$mf"` test -z "$DEPDIR" && continue am__include=`sed -n 's/^am__include = //p' < "$mf"` - test -z "am__include" && continue + test -z "$am__include" && continue am__quote=`sed -n 's/^am__quote = //p' < "$mf"` # Find all dependency output files, they are included files with # $(DEPDIR) in their names. We invoke sed twice because it is the |