diff options
author | Karl Berry <karl@freefriends.org> | 2010-10-11 00:15:03 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Karl Berry <karl@freefriends.org> | 2010-10-11 00:15:03 +0000 |
commit | ea0ac2d1bc725a9e159c3709bc8e775d77dc65bd (patch) | |
tree | 3a5d0fc88ff32f76f3c6e0bba488d0251b4213bd /Master/texmf-dist/tex/latex/bidi/extletter-xetex-bidi.def | |
parent | e8dde3fdf371b3f9c7443830b0613ad123cc735b (diff) |
bidi update (10oct10)
git-svn-id: svn://tug.org/texlive/trunk@20046 c570f23f-e606-0410-a88d-b1316a301751
Diffstat (limited to 'Master/texmf-dist/tex/latex/bidi/extletter-xetex-bidi.def')
-rw-r--r-- | Master/texmf-dist/tex/latex/bidi/extletter-xetex-bidi.def | 76 |
1 files changed, 70 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/tex/latex/bidi/extletter-xetex-bidi.def b/Master/texmf-dist/tex/latex/bidi/extletter-xetex-bidi.def index 0960b08b450..03b5e1a45a9 100644 --- a/Master/texmf-dist/tex/latex/bidi/extletter-xetex-bidi.def +++ b/Master/texmf-dist/tex/latex/bidi/extletter-xetex-bidi.def @@ -1,9 +1,13 @@ %% %% This is file `extletter-xetex-bidi.def', - +%% generated with the docstrip utility. +%% +%% The original source files were: +%% +%% bidi.dtx (with options: `extletter-xetex-bidi.def') %% -%% __________________________________ -%% Copyright © 2009-2010 Vafa Khalighi +%% ______________________________________ +%% Copyright © 2009–2010 Vafa Khalighi %% %% License information appended. %% @@ -44,15 +48,75 @@ \hrule \@width .4\columnwidth \kern .6\p@}\hfil\endR}} %% -%% Copyright © 2009-2010 by Vafa Khalighi <vafakh84@gmail.com> +%% Copyright © 2009–2010 Vafa Khalighi <vafakhlgh@gmail.com> %% -%% Distributable under the LaTeX Project Public License, +%% It may be distributed and/or modified under the LaTeX Project Public License, %% version 1.3c or higher (your choice). The latest version of %% this license is at: http://www.latex-project.org/lppl.txt %% -%% This work is "maintained" (as per LPPL maintenance status) +%% This work is “author-maintained” (as per LPPL maintenance status) %% by Vafa Khalighi. %% +%% In addition to the terms of LPPL any distributed version +%% (unchanged or modified) of bidi has to keep the statement +%% about the moral obligation for using bidi. In case of major +%% changes where this would not be appropriate the author of the +%% changed version should contact the copyright holder. +%% +%% +%% +%% Moral obligation for using bidi: +%% ____________________________________ +%% +%% Users of bidi who wish to include or use bidi or a modified +%% version in a proprietary and commercially market product are asked +%% under certain conditions (see below) for the payment of a license +%% fee. The size of this fee is to be determined, in each instance, +%% by the commercial user, depending on his/her judgment of the value of +%% bidi for his/her product. +%% +%% +%% The conditions for this are as follows: +%% +%% The producer of a proprietary and commercially market product +%% that involves typesetting using bidi is asked to determine +%% the value of a license fee for using bidi if +%% +%% - the product is a document and the producer has decided to +%% include bidi to typeset (parts of) the document or has +%% directed the author of the document to include bidi (for +%% example, by providing a class file to be used by the author) +%% +%% - the product is a LaTeX class or package that includes bidi +%% +%% +%% There is no moral obligation in case +%% +%% - the product is a document but producer has not directed +%% the author to include bidi (in that case the moral obligation +%% lies with the author of the document) +%% +%% - the product does not involve typesetting, e.g., consists, for +%% example, of distributing bidi and its documentation. +%% +%% - the product is not proprietary, i.e., is made available as free +%% software itself (which doesn't prohibit its commercial marketing) +%% +%% - bidi is used for non-commercial purposes +%% +%% +%% Determinating a license fee might result in a license fee of zero +%% (i.e., no payment) in case a producer has determined that the use +%% of bidi has no enhancing effect on the product. This is a +%% plausible scenario, i.e., in the above two cases the producer is +%% only asked to evaluate the value of bidi for the product +%% not for the payment of a license fee per se (which might or might +%% not follow from this evaluation). +%% +%% The license fee, if any, can be payed to the author of +%% the program who can be contacted at +%% +%% vafakhlgh@gmail.com %% %% %% |