generic 1

git-svn-id: svn://tug.org/texlive/trunk@613 c570f23f-e606-0410-a88d-b1316a301751

3 files changed, 327 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/tex/generic/misc/mproof.tex b/Master/texmf-dist/tex/generic/misc/mproof.tex
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..aac809db3ab
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Master/texmf-dist/tex/generic/misc/mproof.tex
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+% To produce proof sheets from MetaPost output (includes date and time):
+% tex mproof <MetaPost output file names>
+
+\input epsf
+\font\textt=cmtex10 \textt
+\def\okbreak{\vfil\penalty2000\vfilneg}
+
+\def\today{\ifcase\month\or
+  January\or February\or March\or April\or May\or June\or
+  July\or August\or September\or October\or November\or December\fi
+  \space\number\day, \number\year}
+\newcount\m \newcount\n
+\n=\time \divide\n 60 \m=-\n \multiply\m 60 \advance\m \time
+\def\hours{\twodigits\n\twodigits\m}
+\def\twodigits#1{\ifnum #1<10 0\fi \number#1}
+
+\footline={\sevenrm\today\ at \hours\hss\tenrm\folio\hss}
+
+\def\endit{\\}
+\def\munch#1 {\def\next{#1}\ifx\next\endit\endit
+  \else#1$$\epsfverbosetrue\epsfbox{#1}$$\par\okbreak\fi\munch}
+
+\def\\{\let\munch=\relax\def\\{}}
+
+\everypar{\everypar{}\munchline}
+
+\obeylines\def\munchline#1
+{\catcode`\^^M=5 \munch#1\\ \vfill\end}%
diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/tex/generic/misc/null.tex b/Master/texmf-dist/tex/generic/misc/null.tex
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..b53b0f4ff11
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Master/texmf-dist/tex/generic/misc/null.tex
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+% This is an empty TeX source file. Why do you want it? Because if TeX says
+% `Please type another input file name:' and if you don't have one in mind,
+% you can just say `null' and TeX will get out of its loop.
diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/tex/generic/misc/texnames.sty b/Master/texmf-dist/tex/generic/misc/texnames.sty
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..454726c3653
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Master/texmf-dist/tex/generic/misc/texnames.sty
@@ -0,0 +1,296 @@
+% /u/sy/beebe/tex/texnames/texnames.sty, Sat Oct 26 11:19:21 1991
+% Edit by Nelson H. F. Beebe <beebe@magna.math.utah.edu>
+%%% ====================================================================
+%%%  @TeX-style-file{
+%%%     author          = "Nelson H. F. Beebe",
+%%%     version         = "1.10",
+%%%     date            = "02 March 1998",
+%%%     time            = "08:36:13 MST",
+%%%     filename        = "texnames.sty",
+%%%     address         = "Center for Scientific Computing
+%%%                        Department of Mathematics
+%%%                        South Physics Building
+%%%                        University of Utah
+%%%                        Salt Lake City, UT 84112
+%%%                        USA
+%%%                        Tel: (801) 581-5254
+%%%                        FAX: (801) 581-4148",
+%%%     checksum        = "27723 296 1385 12423",
+%%%     email           = "beebe@magna.math.utah.edu (Internet)",
+%%%     codetable       = "ISO/ASCII",
+%%%     keywords        = "TeX names",
+%%%     supported       = "yes",
+%%%     docstring       = "This style file for AmSTeX, LaTeX, and TeX
+%%%                        defines macros for the names of TeX
+%%%                        and METAFONT programs, in several
+%%%                        letter-case variants:
+%%%
+%%%                        \AMSTEX, \AMSTeX, \AmSTeX
+%%%                        \BIBTEX, \BIBTeX, \BibTeX
+%%%                        \LAMSTeX, \LAmSTeX
+%%%                        \LaTeX, \LATEX
+%%%                        \METAFONT, \MF
+%%%                        \SLITEX, \SLITeX, \SLiTeX, \SliTeX
+%%%
+%%%                        It will NOT redefine any macro that
+%%%                        already exists, so it can be included
+%%%                        harmlessly after other style files.
+%%%
+%%%                        In AmSTeX or Plain TeX, just do
+%%%
+%%%                        \input texnames.sty
+%%%
+%%%                        In LaTeX, do
+%%%
+%%%                        \documentstyle[...,texnames]{...}
+%%%
+%%%                        This file grew out of original work by
+%%%
+%%%                        Richard Furuta
+%%%                        Department of Computer Science
+%%%                        University of Maryland
+%%%                        College Park, MD  20742
+%%%
+%%%                        furuta@mimsy.umd.edu
+%%%                        seismo!umcp-cs!furuta
+%%%
+%%%                        22 October 1986, first release (1.00)
+%%%
+%%%                        1 April 1987 (1.01): Modified by William
+%%%                        LeFebvre, Rice University to include
+%%%                        definitions for BibTeX and SLiTeX, as they
+%%%                        appear in the LaTeX Local User's Guide
+%%%                        template (the file latex/local.tex in
+%%%                        standard distributions)
+%%%
+%%%                        26 October 1991 (1.02): Modified by
+%%%                        Nelson H. F. Beebe <beebe@math.utah.edu> to
+%%%                        add several new macro names, and adapt for
+%%%                        use with Plain TeX and AmSTeX.
+%%%
+%%%                        26 October 1991 (1.03): Add \LaTeX and
+%%%                        \LATEX
+%%%
+%%%                        25 November 1991 (1.04): Add \LamSTeX
+%%%                        and \LAMSTeX
+%%%
+%%%                        27 January 1991 (1.05 and 1.06): Add slanted
+%%%                        font support for \MF.  Make several comment
+%%%                        changes.  Add a couple of missing % at end
+%%%                        of line, and replace blank lines by empty
+%%%                        comments.
+%%%
+%%%                        30 December 1992 (1.07): Use \TeX in
+%%%                        definitions of \BibTeX and \LaTeX.  Remove
+%%%                        occurrences of \rm.  Change \sc to use
+%%%                        \scriptfont instead of hardwiring cmcsc10.
+%%%                        Use \cal for \LAMSTeX.
+%%%
+%%% 			   1 March 1993 (1.08): Consolidate \ifx's onto
+%%% 			   single lines for brevity.  Add
+%%% 			   \spacefactor1000 to definitions for \TeX and \MF.
+%%%
+%%%                        16 March 1993 (1.09): Add \AmS, \AMS, \AmSLaTeX,
+%%%                        and \AMSLaTeX.
+%%%
+%%%                        02 March 1998 (1.10): Add \LaTeXe.
+%%%
+%%%                        The checksum field above contains a CRC-16
+%%%                        checksum as the first value, followed by the
+%%%                        equivalent of the standard UNIX wc (word
+%%%                        count) utility output of lines, words, and
+%%%                        characters.  This is produced by Robert
+%%%                        Solovay's checksum utility.",
+%%%
+%%%  }
+%%% ====================================================================
+%
+\immediate\write16{This is texnames.sty, Version 1.10 <02 March 1998>}%
+%
+% This has a chance of working in different styles and sizes, although
+% it's not perfect.  If \sc actually selects a caps-and-small caps font,
+% we want to use lowercase letters (to get the small caps).  But if \sc
+% selects a smaller point size, we want to use uppercase letters.
+% \uppercasesc is called on every letter we typeset in \sc, so both
+% forms can be accommodated.
+\ifx\sc\undefined
+    \def\sc{%
+      % If there is no \scriptfont for the current family, use a fixed
+      % font.  What more can we do?
+      \expandafter\ifx\the\scriptfont\fam\nullfont
+        \font\temp = cmr7 \temp
+      \else
+        \the\scriptfont\fam
+      \fi
+      \def\uppercasesc{\char\uccode`}%
+    }%
+\fi
+\ifx\uppercasesc\undefined
+  \let\uppercasesc = \relax
+\fi
+%
+% In the following, we first give the ``official'' definition,
+% then follow it with spelling variants.  Alternate definitions
+% are discarded in favor of the official one.  Each family is
+% separated by a line like the following one.
+%
+%=======================================================================
+%
+% Only change from plain.tex is the \spacefactor assignment (suggested
+% by Phil Taylor), so that \TeX at the end of a sentence isn't treated
+% as an abbreviation.
+%
+\def\TeX{T\kern-.1667em\lower.5ex\hbox{E}\kern-.125emX\spacefactor1000 }%
+%
+%=======================================================================
+% From the AMS tex/ams/amslatex/fontsel/nfssinst.tex file:
+
+\ifx\AmS\undefined
+    \def\AmS{{\the\textfont2 A}\kern-.1667em\lower.5ex\hbox
+        {\the\textfont2 M}\kern-.125em{\the\textfont2 S}}
+\fi
+\ifx\AMS\undefined \let\AMS=\AmS \fi
+\ifx\AmSLaTeX\undefined
+    \def\AmSLaTeX{\AmS-\LaTeX}
+\fi
+\ifx\AMSLaTeX\undefined \let\AMSLaTeX=\AmSLaTeX \fi
+%=======================================================================
+%
+% Mike Spivak's amstex/amstex.tex 1.1d [26-Aug-1988] has
+% \def\AmSTeX{{\textfontii A}\kern-.1667em\lower.5ex\hbox
+%             {\textfontii M}\kern-.125em{\textfontii S}-\TeX}
+% and 2.1 [05-Apr-1991] has an equivalent definition.
+% AmSTeX's \textfontii is exactly the same as \cal, which
+% all TeX variants understand.
+%
+\ifx\AmSTeX\undefined
+    \def\AmSTeX{$\cal A$\kern-.1667em\lower.5ex\hbox{$\cal M$}%
+            \kern-.125em$\cal S$-\TeX}%
+\fi
+%
+% Leslie Lamport's latex/tmanual.tex [10-Jul-1984] (an early
+% draft of the book) defines it in uppercase with the standard
+% definition.
+\ifx\AMSTEX\undefined \let\AMSTEX=\AmSTeX \fi
+%
+% Barbara Beeton's latex/deproc.sty [24-Apr-1986] and inputs/tugbot.sty
+% [11-Jan-1988] uses this spelling, but the definition
+% \leavevmode\hbox{$\cal A\kern-.2em\lower.376ex \hbox{$\cal
+% M$}\kern-.2em\cal S$-\TeX}
+\ifx\AMSTeX\undefined \let\AMSTeX=\AmSTeX \fi
+%
+%=======================================================================
+%
+% The definitions of \BibTeX and \SLiTeX in Leslie Lamport's
+% latex/local.tex lower the E by 0.7ex, while \TeX in plain.tex lowers
+% it by 0.5ex.  Oren Patashnik's bibtex/btxdoc.tex and bibtex/btxhak.tex
+% [08-Feb-1988] and bibtex/bibtex.web 0.99c [xx-Feb-1988] use this same
+% name and definition, but Oren said using \TeX here is ok.  (Curiously,
+% LaTeX itself does not define macros for any TeXware except LaTeX and
+% TeX!)
+\ifx\BibTeX\undefined
+    \def\BibTeX{B{\sc \uppercasesc i\kern-.025em \uppercasesc b}\kern-.08em
+                \TeX}%
+\fi
+%
+% Leslie Lamport uses this spelling in latex.tex, but not as a
+% macro.  We include it for consistency with AMSTeX.
+\ifx\BIBTeX\undefined \let\BIBTeX=\BibTeX \fi
+%
+% Leslie Lamport's latex/slides.tex [05-Jun-1984],
+% latex/tmanual.tex [10-Jul-1984] (an early draft of the book),
+% and latex/lerrata.tex [23-Jul-1985] have this spelling, but the
+% definition BIB\kern-.1em\TeX.
+\ifx\BIBTEX\undefined \let\BIBTEX=\BibTeX \fi
+%
+%=======================================================================
+%
+% From tugboat.com 1.08 [24-Oct-1990].
+\ifx\LAMSTeX\undefined
+    \def\LAMSTeX{L\raise.42ex\hbox{\kern-.3em\the\scriptfont2 A}%
+                 \kern-.2em\lower.376ex\hbox{\the\textfont2 M}%
+                 \kern-.125em {\the\textfont2 S}-\TeX}%
+\fi
+%
+\ifx\LamSTeX\undefined \let\LamSTeX=\LAMSTeX \fi
+%
+% This variant seems likely to appear:
+\ifx\LAmSTeX\undefined \let\LAmSTeX=\LAMSTeX \fi
+%
+%=======================================================================
+%
+% The definition from latex.tex (LATEX VERSION 2.09 <14 January 1991>)
+% and bibtex.web 0.99c [xx-Feb-1988] lowers the E slightly more than
+% \TeX, but consistency seems more desirable.  See comments at \BibTeX.
+% Different definitions are given by latex/deproc.sty [24-Apr-1986],
+% amstex/man.sty [15-Dec-1986] inputs/tugbot.sty [11-Jan-1988], and
+% latex/tugboat.com 1.08 [24-Oct-1990].
+%
+\ifx\LaTeX\undefined
+    \def\LaTeX{L\kern-.36em\raise.3ex\hbox{\sc \uppercasesc a}\kern-.15em\TeX}%
+\fi
+%
+% latex/slides.tex [05-Jun-1984] and latex/lerrata.tex [23-Jul-1985]
+% have this spelling, but different definitions
+\ifx\LATEX\undefined \let\LATEX=\LaTeX \fi
+\ifx\LaTeXe\undefined
+    \def\LaTeXe{\LaTeX{}\kern.05em2$_{\textstyle\varepsilon}$}
+\fi
+%
+%=======================================================================
+%
+% Don Knuth's mf.web 2.7 [xx-Sep-1990] and Barbara Beeton's
+% latex/deproc.sty [24-Apr-1986] use an equivalent of this definition.
+% The font is variously named \logo, \manfnt, and \mf.  plain.tex
+% preloads \manfnt.  manfnt has the letters A, E, F, M, N, O, T in
+% various sizes plus extra symbols for Don Knuth's books Computers and
+% Typesetting, and Concrete Mathematics, while logo10 has only those
+% letters in one size.  AmSTeX uses \logo in amsppt.sty and imappt.sty,
+% so we should avoid it, and tugboat.com uses \mf for {\smc Metafont}.
+% We therefore use \manfnt here, defining it if necessary.  QUESTION:
+% should we use manfnt, or logo10?
+\ifx\MF\undefined
+    \ifx\manfnt\undefined
+            \font\manfnt=logo10
+    \fi
+    \ifx\manfntsl\undefined
+            \font\manfntsl=logosl10
+    \fi
+    \def\MF{{\ifdim\fontdimen1\font>0pt \let\manfnt = \manfntsl \fi
+      {\manfnt META}\-{\manfnt FONT}}\spacefactor1000 }%
+\fi
+%
+% I cannot find any `official' uses of this alternate, but it
+% seems likely that people will use it.
+\ifx\METAFONT\undefined \let\METAFONT=\MF \fi
+%
+%=======================================================================
+%
+% Leslie Lamport's latex/slides.tex [05-Jun-1984].  His
+% latex/lerrata.tex [23-Jul-1985] and latex/tmanual.tex
+% [10-Jul-1984] (an early draft of the book) define it as
+% SLI\TeX!  The LaTeX User's Guide and Reference Manual (1986)
+% appears to use small caps, and possibly kerning, for Sli.
+% I need to ask Leslie to suggest a preferred definition.
+\ifx\SLITEX\undefined
+    \def\SLITEX{S\kern-.065em L\kern-.18em\raise.32ex\hbox{i}\kern-.03em\TeX}%
+\fi
+%
+% latex/local.tex (sample Local Guide) [27-Oct-1988] uses
+% this name, but defines it as
+% {\rm S\kern-.06em{\sc l\kern-.035emi}\kern-.06em T\kern
+%   -.1667em\lower.7ex\hbox{E}\kern-.125emX}
+% with an extra-low E, and kerned Sli in small caps.  Is this
+% what the LaTeX User's Guide and Reference Manual (1986) used?
+\ifx\SLiTeX\undefined \let\SLiTeX=\SLITEX \fi
+%
+% latex/slitex.tex [08-Jun-1988] uses SliTeX in typeouts,
+% but not as a macro -- what a way to confuse the user.
+\ifx\SliTeX\undefined \let\SliTeX=\SLITEX \fi
+%
+% I cannot find a use of this one, but it seems a likely
+% candidate anyway, and is consistent with AMSTeX and BIBTeX.
+\ifx\SLITeX\undefined \let\SLITeX=\SLITEX \fi
+%
+\endinput
+%=========================[End of texnames.sty]=========================