summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Master/texmf-dist/source/latex
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKarl Berry <karl@freefriends.org>2008-03-14 00:26:22 +0000
committerKarl Berry <karl@freefriends.org>2008-03-14 00:26:22 +0000
commit8df6f8b096486d3886fc2a42ba79a6f5a4c587f7 (patch)
tree6ff8b7ceae6c40b7db55ed005ba81e49ecd490ad /Master/texmf-dist/source/latex
parent3d96fa2455c0dbac611ab90f9ae59854fb40d3d9 (diff)
new latex package sagetex (12mar08)
git-svn-id: svn://tug.org/texlive/trunk@6962 c570f23f-e606-0410-a88d-b1316a301751
Diffstat (limited to 'Master/texmf-dist/source/latex')
-rw-r--r--Master/texmf-dist/source/latex/sagetex/sagetexpackage.dtx1339
-rw-r--r--Master/texmf-dist/source/latex/sagetex/sagetexpackage.ins93
2 files changed, 1432 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/source/latex/sagetex/sagetexpackage.dtx b/Master/texmf-dist/source/latex/sagetex/sagetexpackage.dtx
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..95be02d58d0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Master/texmf-dist/source/latex/sagetex/sagetexpackage.dtx
@@ -0,0 +1,1339 @@
+% \iffalse meta-comment
+%
+% Copyright (C) 2008 by Dan Drake <ddrake@member.ams.org>
+% -------------------------------------------------------
+%
+% See the "Copying and licenses" section for the terms under which this
+% source code and documentation may be modified and distributed.
+%
+% This package is not licensed under the LPPL, but it seems reasonable
+% to say:
+%
+% This work has the LPPL maintenance status `maintained'.
+%
+% The Current Maintainer of this work is Dan Drake.
+%
+% This work consists of the files sagetexpackage.dtx,
+% sagetexpackage.ins, example.tex, and the derived files sagetex.sty
+% and sagetex.py.
+%
+% \fi
+%
+% \iffalse
+%<*driver>
+\ProvidesFile{sagetexpackage.dtx}
+%</driver>
+%<latex>\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}
+%<latex>\ProvidesPackage{sagetex}
+%<*latex>
+ [2008/03/12 v1.4 embedding Sage into LaTeX documents]
+%</latex>
+%<*driver>
+\documentclass{ltxdoc}
+\usepackage{sagetex}
+\usepackage{xspace}
+\usepackage{tikz}
+\usepackage{hyperref}
+\EnableCrossrefs
+\CodelineIndex
+\RecordChanges
+\begin{document}
+ \DocInput{sagetexpackage.dtx}
+ \PrintChanges
+ \PrintIndex
+\end{document}
+%</driver>
+% \fi
+%
+% \CheckSum{0}
+%
+% \CharacterTable
+% {Upper-case \A\B\C\D\E\F\G\H\I\J\K\L\M\N\O\P\Q\R\S\T\U\V\W\X\Y\Z
+% Lower-case \a\b\c\d\e\f\g\h\i\j\k\l\m\n\o\p\q\r\s\t\u\v\w\x\y\z
+% Digits \0\1\2\3\4\5\6\7\8\9
+% Exclamation \! Double quote \" Hash (number) \#
+% Dollar \$ Percent \% Ampersand \&
+% Acute accent \' Left paren \( Right paren \)
+% Asterisk \* Plus \+ Comma \,
+% Minus \- Point \. Solidus \/
+% Colon \: Semicolon \; Less than \<
+% Equals \= Greater than \> Question mark \?
+% Commercial at \@ Left bracket \[ Backslash \\
+% Right bracket \] Circumflex \^ Underscore \_
+% Grave accent \` Left brace \{ Vertical bar \|
+% Right brace \} Tilde \~}
+%
+% \changes{v1.0}{2008/03/03}{Initial version}
+% \changes{v1.1}{2008/03/05}{Wrapped user-provided Sage code in
+% try/except clauses; plotting now has optional format argument.}
+% \changes{v1.2}{2008/03/07}{Imagemagick option; better documentation}
+% \changes{v1.3.1}{2008/03/10}{Internal variables renamed; fixed typos}
+% \changes{v1.4}{2008/03/11}{MD5 fix, percent sign macro, CTAN upload}
+%
+% \GetFileInfo{sagetexpackage.dtx}
+%
+% \DoNotIndex{\newcommand,\newenvironment,\the}
+%
+% \newcommand{\ST}{\textsf{sagetex}\xspace}
+% \iffalse
+% so I don't have to put \ or {} after \LaTeX:
+% \fi
+% \newcommand{\LTX}{\LaTeX\xspace}
+%
+% \iffalse
+% For some reason, getting a blackslash in a typewriter font to print
+% inside an fbox is really hard. Verbatim stuff doesn't work because
+% it's fragile. This code works; it's copied out of Scott Pakin's
+% dtxtut.tex.
+%
+% There is \textbackslash but I don't like how that looks.
+% \fi
+% {\catcode`\|=0 \catcode`\\=12
+% |gdef|bslash{\}}
+%
+% \title{The \ST{} package\thanks{This document
+% corresponds to \textsf{sagetex}~\fileversion, dated \filedate.}}
+% \author{Dan Drake (\texttt{ddrake@member.ams.org}) and others}
+%
+% \maketitle
+%
+% \section{Introduction}
+%
+% Why should the Haskell folks have all the fun?
+%
+% \href{http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Literate_programming}{Literate
+% Haskell} is a popular way to mix Haskell source code and \LTX
+% documents. (Well, actually any kind of text or document, but here
+% we're concerned only with \LTX.) You can even embed Haskell code in
+% your document that writes part of your document for you.
+%
+% The \ST package allows you to do (roughly) the same thing with the
+% Sage mathematics software suite (see \url{http://sagemath.org}) and
+% \LTX. (If you know how to write literate Haskell: the |\eval| command
+% corresponds to |\sage|, and the |code| environment to the |sageblock|
+% environment.) As a simple example, imagine in your document you are
+% writing about how to count license plates with three letters and three
+% digits. With this package, you can write something like this:
+% \begin{quote}
+% |There are $26$ choices for each letter, and $10$ choices for|\\
+% |each digit, for a total of $26^3*10^3 = \sage{26^3*10^3}$|\\
+% |license plates.|
+% \end{quote}
+% and it will produce
+% \begin{quote}
+% There are $26$ choices for each letter, and $10$ choices for each
+% digit, for a total of $\sage{26^3 * 10^3}$ license plates.
+% \end{quote}
+% The great thing is, you don't have to do the multiplication. Sage does
+% it for you. This process mirrors one of the great aspects of
+% \LTX: when writing a \LTX document, you can concentrate on the
+% logical structure of the document and trust \LTX and its army of
+% packages to deal with the presentation and typesetting. Similarly,
+% with \ST, you can concentrate on the mathematical
+% structure (``I need the product of $26^3$ and $10^3$'') and let Sage
+% deal with the base-$10$ presentation of the number.
+%
+% A less trivial, and perhaps more useful example is plotting. You can
+% include a plot of the sine curve without manually producing a plot,
+% saving an EPS or PDF file, and doing the |\includegraphics|
+% business with the correct filename yourself. If you write this:
+% \begin{quote}
+% |Here is a lovely graph of the sine curve:|
+%
+% |\sageplot{plot(sin(x), x, 0, 2*pi)}|
+% \end{quote}
+% in your \LTX file, it produces
+% \begin{quote}
+% Here is a lovely graph of the sine curve:
+%
+% \sageplot{plot(sin(x), x, 0, 2*pi)}
+% \end{quote}
+% Again, you need only worry about the logical/mathematical structure of
+% your document (``I need a plot of the sine curve over the interval
+% $[0, 2\pi]$ here''), while \ST{} takes care of the gritty details of
+% producing the file and sourcing it into your document.
+%
+% \paragraph{But \texttt{\bslash sageplot} isn't magic} I just tried to
+% convince you that \ST makes putting nice graphics into your document
+% very easy; let me turn around and warn you that using graphics
+% \emph{well} is not easy, and no \LTX package or Python script will
+% ever make it easy. What \ST does is make it easy to \emph{use Sage}
+% to create graphics; it doesn't magically make your graphics good,
+% appropriate, or useful. (For instance, look at the sine plot above---I
+% would say that a truly lovely plot of the sine curve would not mark
+% integer points on the $x$-axis, but rather $\pi/2$, $\pi$, $3\pi/2$,
+% and $2\pi$.)
+%
+% Till Tantau has some good commentary on the use of graphics in
+% \href{http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/graphics/pgf/}{section 6 of the
+% \textsc{pgf} manual}. You should always give careful thought and
+% attention to creating graphics for your document; I have in mind that
+% a good workflow for using \ST for plotting is something like this:
+%
+% \begin{enumerate}
+% \item Figure out what sort of graphic you need to communicate your
+% ideas or information.
+% \item Fiddle around in Sage until you get a graphics object and set
+% of options that produce the graphic you need.
+% \item Copy those commands and options into \ST commands in your
+% \LTX document.
+% \end{enumerate}
+%
+% The \ST{} package's plotting capabilities don't help you find those
+% Sage commands to make your lovely plot, but they do eliminate the need
+% to muck around with saving the result to a file, remembering the
+% filename, including it into your document, and so on. In
+% \autoref{s:usage}, we will see what what we can do with \ST.
+%
+%
+% \section{Installation}
+%
+% The simplest way to ``install'' \ST is to copy the files
+% |sagetex.sty| and |sagetex.py| into the same directory
+% as your document. This will always work, as \LTX and Python search the
+% current directory for files. It is also convenient for zipping up a
+% directory to send to a colleague who is not yet enlightened enough to
+% be using \ST.
+%
+% Rather than make lots of copies of those files, you can keep them in
+% one place and update the TEXINPUTS and PYTHONPATH environment
+% variables appropriately.
+%
+% Perhaps the best solution is to put the files into a directory
+% searched by \TeX{} and friends, and then edit the |sagetex.sty| file
+% so that the |.sage| files we generate update Python's path
+% appropriately---look for ``Python path'' in |sagetex.sty|. This is
+% suitable for a system-wide installation, or if you are the kind of
+% person who keeps a |texmf| tree in your home directory.
+%
+%
+% \section{Usage} \label{s:usage}
+%
+% Let's begin with a rough description of how \ST works. Naturally the
+% very first step is to put |\usepackage{sagetex}| in the preamble of
+% your document. When you use macros from this package and run \LTX on
+% your file, along with the usual zoo of auxiliary files, a |.sage| file
+% is written. This is a Sage source file that uses the Python module
+% from this package and when you run Sage on that file, it will produce
+% a |.sout| file. That file contains \LTX code which, when you run \LTX
+% on your source file again, will pull in all the results of Sage's
+% computation.
+%
+% All you really need to know is that to typeset your document, you need
+% to run \LTX, then run Sage, then run \LTX again.
+%
+% Also keep in mind that everything you send to Sage is done within one
+% Sage session. This means you can define variables and reuse them
+% throughout your \LTX document; if you tell Sage that |foo| is
+% $12$, then anytime afterwards you can use |foo| in your Sage code and
+% Sage will remember that it's $12$---just like in a regular Sage
+% session.
+%
+% Now that you know that, let's describe what macros \ST provides and
+% how to use them. If you are the sort of person who can't be bothered
+% to read documentation until something goes wrong, you can also just
+% look through the |example.tex| file included with this
+% package.\footnote{Then again, if you're such a person, you're probably
+% not reading this, and are already fiddling with
+% \texttt{example.tex}\dots}
+%
+% \subsection{Inline Sage}
+%
+% \DescribeMacro{\sage}
+% \fbox{\texttt{\bslash sage}\marg{Sage code}}
+%
+% \noindent takes whatever Sage code you give it, runs Sage's |latex|
+% function on it, and puts the result into your document.
+%
+% For example, if you do |\sage{matrix([[1, 2], [3,4]])^2}|, then that
+% macro will get replaced by
+% \begin{quote}
+% |\left(\begin{array}{rr}|\\
+% |7 & 10 \\|\\
+% |15 & 22|\\
+% |\end{array}\right)|
+% \end{quote}
+% in your document---that \LTX code is exactly exactly what you get
+% from doing
+% \begin{center}
+% |latex(matrix([[1, 2], [3,4]])^2)|
+% \end{center}
+% in Sage.
+%
+% Note that since \LTX will do macro expansion on whatever you give
+% to |\sage|, you can mix \LTX variables and Sage variables! If
+% you have defined the Sage variable |foo| to be $12$ (using, say, the
+% |sageblock| environment), then you can do something like this:
+% \begin{quote}
+% |The prime factorization of the current page plus foo is|\\
+% |$\sage{factor(foo + \thepage)}$|.
+% \end{quote}
+% Here, I'll do just that right now: the prime factorization of the
+% current page plus $12$ is $\sage{factor(\thepage + 12)}$.
+%
+% The |\sage| command doesn't automatically use math mode for its
+% output, so be sure to use dollar signs or a displayed math environment
+% as appropriate.\\
+%
+% \DescribeMacro{\percent} If you are doing modular arithmetic or string
+% formatting and need a percent sign in a call to |\sage| (or
+% |\sageplot|), you can use |\percent|. Using a bare percent sign won't
+% work because \LTX will think you're starting a comment and get
+% confused; prefixing the percent sign with a backslash won't work
+% because then ``|\%|'' will be written to the |.sage| file and Sage
+% will get confused. The |\percent| macro makes everyone happy.
+%
+% Note that using |\percent| inside the verbatim-like environments
+% described in \autoref{s:codeblockenv} isn't necessary; a literal
+% ``\percent'' inside such an environment will get written, uh, verbatim
+% to the |.sage| file.
+%
+% \subsection{Graphics and plotting}
+%
+% \noindent \DescribeMacro{\sageplot}
+% \fbox{\texttt{\bslash sageplot}\oarg{ltx opts}\oarg{fmt}\{\meta{graphics
+% obj}, \meta{keyword args}\}}
+%
+% \noindent plots the given Sage graphics object and runs an
+% |\includegraphics| command to put it into your document. It does not
+% have to actually be a plot of a function; it can be any Sage graphics
+% object. The options are described in \autoref{t:sageplotopts}.
+%
+% \begin{table}[h]
+% \centering
+% \begin{tabular}{l p{8cm}}
+% Option & Description \\
+% \hline
+% \meta{ltx options} & Any text here is passed directly into the
+% optional arguments (between the square brackets) of an
+% |\includegraphics| command. If not specified,
+% ``|width=.75\textwidth|'' will be used.\\
+% \meta{fmt} & You can optionally specify a file extension here; Sage
+% will then try to save the graphics object to a file with extension
+% \emph{fmt}. If not specified, \ST\ will save to EPS and PDF files.\\
+% \meta{graphics obj} & A Sage object on which you can call |.save()|
+% with a graphics filename.\\
+% \meta{keyword args} & Any keyword arguments you put here will
+% all be put into the call to |.save()|.
+% \end{tabular}
+% \caption{Explanation of options for the \texttt{\bslash sageplot}
+% command.}
+% \label{t:sageplotopts}
+% \end{table}
+%
+% This setup allows you to control both the Sage side of things, and the
+% \LTX side. For instance, the command
+% \begin{quote}
+% |\sageplot[angle=30, width=5cm]{plot(sin(x), 0, pi), axes=False,|\\
+% |chocolate=True}|
+% \end{quote}
+% will run the following command in Sage:
+% \begin{quote}
+% |sage: plot(sin(x), 0, pi).save(filename=autogen, axes=False,|\\
+% |chocolate=True)|
+% \end{quote}
+% Then, in your \LTX file, the following command will be issued
+% automatically:
+% \begin{center}
+% |\includegraphics[angle=30, width=5cm]{autogen}|
+% \end{center}
+% You can specify a file format if you like. This must be the
+% \emph{second} optional argument, so you must use empty brackets if
+% you're not passing anything to |\includegraphics|:
+% \begin{center}
+% |\sageplot[][png]{plot(sin(x), x, 0, pi)}|
+% \end{center}
+% The filename is automatically generated, and unless you specify a
+% format, both EPS and PDF files will be generated. This allows you to
+% freely switch between using, say, a DVI viewer (many of which have
+% support for automatic reloading, source specials and make the writing
+% process easier) and creating PDFs for posting on the web or emailing
+% to colleagues.
+%
+% If you ask for, say, a PNG file, keep in mind that ordinary |latex|
+% and DVI files have no support for DVI files; \ST detects this and will
+% warn you that it cannot find a suitable file if using |latex|. If you
+% use |pdflatex|, there will be no problems because PDF files can
+% include PNG graphics.
+%
+% When \ST cannot find a graphics file, it inserts this into your
+% document:
+%
+% \begin{center}
+% \framebox[2cm]{\rule[-1cm]{0cm}{2cm}\textbf{??}}
+% \end{center}
+%
+% \noindent That's supposed to resemble the image-not-found graphics
+% used by web browsers and use the traditional ``\textbf{??}'' that \LTX
+% uses to indicate missing references.
+%
+% You needn't worry about the filenames; they are automatically
+% generated and will be put into the directory
+% |sage-plots-for-filename.tex|. You can safely delete that directory
+% anytime; if \ST can't find the files, it will warn you to run Sage to
+% regenerate them.\\
+%
+% \noindent\fbox{\parbox{\textwidth}{\textbf{WARNING!} When you run Sage
+% on your |.sage| file, all files in the
+% \texttt{sage-plots-for-filename.tex} directory \emph{will be deleted!}
+% Do not put any files into that directory that you do not want to get
+% automatically deleted.}}
+%
+% \subsubsection{3D plotting}
+%
+% Right now there is, to put it nicely, a bit of tension between the
+% sort of graphics formats supported by |latex| and |pdflatex|, and the
+% graphics formats supported by Sage's 3D plotting systems.\footnote{We
+% use a typewriter font here to indicate the binaries which produce DVI
+% and PDF files, respectively, as opposed to ``\LTX'' which refers to
+% the entire typesetting system.} \LTX is happiest, and produces the
+% best output, with EPS and PDF files, which are vector formats.
+% Tachyon, Sage's 3D plotting system, produces bitmap formats like BMP
+% and PNG.
+%
+% Because of this, when producing 3D plots with |\sageplot|,
+% \emph{you must specify a file format}. The PNG format is compressed
+% and lossless and is by far the best choice, so use that whenever
+% possible. (Right now, it is always possible.) If you do not specify a
+% file format, or specify one that Tachyon does not understand, it will
+% produce files in the Targa format with an incorrect extension and \LTX
+% (both |latex| and |pdflatex|) will be profoundly confused. Don't do
+% that.
+%
+% Since |latex| does not support PNGs, when using 3D plotting (and
+% therefore a bitmap format like PNG), \ST will \emph{always} issue a
+% warning about incompatible graphics if you use |latex|, provided
+% you've processed the |.sage| file and the PNG file exists. (Running
+% |pdflatex| on the same file will work, since PDF files can include PNG
+% files.)
+%
+% \paragraph{The imagemagick option} As a response to the above issue,
+% the \ST package has one option: |imagemagick|. If you specify this
+% option in the preamble of your document with the usual
+% ``|\usepackage[imagemagick]{sagetex}|'', then when you are compiling
+% your document using |latex|, any |\sageplot| command which requests a
+% non-default format will cause the \ST Python script to convert the
+% resulting file to EPS using the Imagemagick |convert| utility. It does
+% this by executing ``|convert filename.EXT filename.eps|'' in a
+% subshell. It doesn't add any options, check to see if the |convert|
+% command exists or belongs to Imagemagick---it just runs the command.
+%
+% The resulting EPS files are not very high quality, but they will work.
+% This option is not intended to produce good graphics, but to allow you
+% to see your graphics when you use |latex| and DVI files while writing
+% your document.
+%
+% \paragraph{But that's not good enough!} \label{s:notgoodenough}
+% The |\sageplot| command tries to be both flexible and easy to use, but
+% if you are just not happy with it, you can always do things manually:
+% inside a |sagesilent| environment (see the next section) you could do
+% \begin{quote}
+% |your special commands|\\
+% |x = your graphics object|\\
+% |x.save(filename=myspecialfile.ext, options, etc)|
+% \end{quote}
+% and then, in your source file, do your own |\includegraphics| command.
+% The \ST package gives you full access to Sage and Python and doesn't
+% turn off anything in \LTX, so you can always do things manually.
+%
+% \subsection{Verbatim-like environments}
+% \label{s:codeblockenv}
+%
+% The \ST package provides several environments for typesetting and
+% executing Sage code.\\
+%
+% \DescribeEnv{sageblock} Any text between |\begin{sageblock}| and
+% |\end{sageblock}| will be typeset into your file, and also written into
+% the |.sage| file for execution. This means you can do something like
+% this:
+% \begin{quote}
+% |\begin{sageblock}|\\
+% | var('x')|\\
+% | f = sin(x) - 1|\\
+% | g = log(x)|\\
+% | h = diff(f(x) * g(x), x)|\\
+% |\end{sageblock}|
+% \end{quote}
+% and then anytime later write in your source file
+% \begin{quote}
+% |We have $h(2) = \sage{h(2)}$, where $h$ is the derivative of|\\
+% |the product of $f$ and $g$.|
+% \end{quote}
+% and the |\sage| call will get correctly replaced by $\sage{
+% diff((sin(x) - 1)*log(x), x)(1)}$. You can use any Sage or Python
+% commands inside a |sageblock|; all the commands get sent directly to
+% Sage.\\
+%
+% \iffalse meta-comment
+% Sadly, we can't use sageblock or similar environments in this file!
+% If you prefix the lines inside the environment with percent signs,
+% then those percent signs get written to your .sage file. If you
+% *don't* prefix the lines with percent signs, those lines get written
+% into the .sty or .py file. It's just too tricky to get docstrip and
+% the verbatim stuff to play nicely together. I'd have to redefine how
+% those environments work, and get them to strip off initial percents.
+% \fi
+%
+% \DescribeEnv{sagesilent} This environment is like |sageblock|, but it
+% does not typeset any of the code; it just writes it to the |.sage|
+% file. This is useful if you have to do some setup in Sage that is not
+% interesting or relevant to the document you are writing.\\
+%
+% \DescribeEnv{sageverbatim} This environment is the opposite of the one
+% above: whatever you type will be typeset, but not written into the
+% |.sage| file. This allows you to typeset psuedocode, code that will
+% fail, or take too much time to execute, or whatever.\\
+%
+% \DescribeEnv{comment} Logically, we now need an environment that
+% neither typesets nor executes your Sage code\ldots but the |verbatim|
+% package, which is always loaded when using \ST, provides such an
+% environment: |comment|. Another way to do this is to put stuff between
+% |\iffalse| and |\fi|.\\
+%
+% \DescribeMacro{\sagetexindent} There is one final bit to our
+% verbatim-like environments: the indentation. The \ST package defines a
+% length |\sagetexindent|, which controls how much the Sage code is
+% indented when typeset. You can change this length however you like
+% with |\setlength|: do |\setlength{\sagetexindent}{6ex}| or whatever.
+%
+%
+% \section{Other notes}
+%
+% Here are some other notes on using \ST.
+%
+% \paragraph{Using Beamer} The \textsc{beamer} package does not play
+% nicely with verbatim-like environments. To use code block environments
+% in a \textsc{beamer} presentation, do:
+% \begin{quote}
+% |\begin{frame}[fragile]|\\
+% |\begin{sageblock}|\\
+% |# sage stuff|\\
+% |# more stuff \end{sageblock}|\\
+% |\end{frame}|\\
+% \end{quote}
+% For some reason, \textsc{beamer} inserts an extra line break at the
+% end of the environment; if you put the |\end{sageblock}| on the same
+% line as the last line of your code, it works properly.
+%
+% Thanks to Franco Saliola for reporting this.
+%
+% \paragraph{Plotting from Mathematica, Maple, etc.} Sage can use
+% Mathematica, Maple, and friends and can tell them to do plotting, but
+% since it cannot get those plots into a Sage graphics object, you
+% cannot use |\sageplot| to use such graphics. You'll need to use the
+% method described in ``But that's not good enough!''
+% (\hyperref[s:notgoodenough]{page~\pageref*{s:notgoodenough}}) with
+% some additional bits to get the directory right---otherwise your file
+% will get saved to someplace in a hidden directory.
+%
+% For Mathematica, you can do something like this inside a |sagesilent|
+% or |sageblock| environment:
+% \begin{quote}
+% |mathematica('plot = commands to make your plot')|\\
+% |mathematica('Export["%s/graphicsfile.eps", plot]' % os.getcwd())|
+% \end{quote}
+% then put |\includegraphics[opts]{graphicsfile}| in your file.
+%
+% For Maple, you'll need something like
+% \begin{quote}
+% |maple('plotsetup(ps, plotoutput=`%s/graphicsfile.eps`, \|\\
+% | plotoptions=`whatever`);' % os.getcwd())|\\
+% |maple('plot(function, x=1..whatever);')|
+% \end{quote}
+% and then |\includegraphics| as necessary.
+%
+% These interfaces, especially when plotting, can be finicky. The above
+% commands are just meant to be a starting point.
+%
+%
+% \StopEventually{}
+%
+% \section{Implementation}
+%
+% There are two pieces to this package: a \LTX style file, and a
+% Python module. They are mutually interdependent, so it makes sense to
+% document them both here.
+%
+% \subsection{The style file}
+%
+% \iffalse
+% tell docstrip to put code into the .sty file
+%<*latex>
+% \fi
+%
+% All macros and counters intended for use internal to this package
+% begin with ``|ST@|''.
+%
+% Let's begin by loading some packages. The key bits of |sageblock| and
+% friends are stol---um, adapted from the |verbatim| package manual. So
+% grab the |verbatim| package.
+% \begin{macrocode}
+\RequirePackage{verbatim}
+% \end{macrocode}
+% Unsurprisingly, the |\sageplot| command works poorly without graphics
+% support.
+% \begin{macrocode}
+\RequirePackage{graphicx}
+% \end{macrocode}
+% The |makecmds| package gives us a |\provideenvironment| which we need,
+% and we use |ifpdf| and |ifthen| in |\sageplot| so we know what kind of
+% files to look for.
+% \begin{macrocode}
+\RequirePackage{makecmds}
+\RequirePackage{ifpdf}
+\RequirePackage{ifthen}
+% \end{macrocode}
+%
+% Next set up the counters and the default indent.
+% \begin{macrocode}
+\newcounter{ST@inline}
+\newcounter{ST@plot}
+\setcounter{ST@inline}{0}
+\setcounter{ST@plot}{0}
+\newlength{\sagetexindent}
+\setlength{\sagetexindent}{5ex}
+% \end{macrocode}
+%
+% \begin{macro}{\ST@epsim}
+% By default, we don't use ImageMagick to create EPS files when a
+% non-default format is specified.
+% \begin{macrocode}
+\newcommand{\ST@epsim}{False}
+% \end{macrocode}
+% The expansion of that macro gets put into a Python function call, so
+% it works to have it be one of the strings ``|True|'' or ``|False|''.
+% \end{macro}
+%
+% Declare the |imagemagick| option and process it:
+% \begin{macrocode}
+\DeclareOption{imagemagick}{\renewcommand{\ST@epsim}{True}}
+\ProcessOptions\relax
+% \end{macrocode}
+% The |\relax| is a little incantation suggested by the ``\LaTeXe{} for
+% class and package writers'' manual, section 4.7.
+%
+% It's time to deal with files. Open the |.sage| file:
+% \begin{macrocode}
+\newwrite\ST@sf
+\immediate\openout\ST@sf=\jobname.sage
+% \end{macrocode}
+%
+% \begin{macro}{\ST@wsf}
+% We will write a lot of stuff to that file, so make a convenient
+% abbreviation, then use it to put the initial commands into the |.sage|
+% file. If you know what directory |sagetex.py| will be kept in, delete
+% the |\iffalse| and |\fi| lines in the generated style file
+% (\emph{don't} do it in the |.dtx| file) and change the directory
+% appropriately. This is useful if you have a |texmf| tree in your home
+% directory or are installing \ST system-wide; then you don't need to
+% copy |sagetex.py| into the same directory as your document.
+% \begin{macrocode}
+\newcommand{\ST@wsf}[1]{\immediate\write\ST@sf{#1}}
+\iffalse
+%% To get .sage files to automatically change the Python path to find
+%% sagetex.py, delete the \iffalse and \fi lines surrounding this and
+%% change the directory below to where sagetex.py can be found.
+\ST@wsf{import sys}
+\ST@wsf{sys.path.insert(0, 'directory with sagetex.py')}
+\fi
+\ST@wsf{import sagetex}
+\ST@wsf{sagetex.openout('\jobname')}
+% \end{macrocode}
+% \end{macro}
+% Pull in the |.sout| file if it exists, or do nothing if it doesn't. I
+% suppose we could do this inside an |AtBeginDocument| but I don't see
+% any particular reason to do that. It will work whenever we load it.
+% \begin{macrocode}
+\InputIfFileExists{\jobname.sout}{}{}
+% \end{macrocode}
+%
+% Now let's define the cool stuff.
+%
+% \begin{macro}{\sage}
+% This macro combines |\ref|, |\label|, and Sage all at once. First, we
+% use Sage to get a \LTX representation of whatever you give this
+% function. The Sage script writes a |\newlabel| line into the |.sout|
+% file, and we read the output using the |\ref| command. Usually, |\ref|
+% pulls in a section or theorem number, but it will pull in arbitrary
+% text just as well.
+%
+% The first thing it does it write its argument into the |.sage| file,
+% along with a counter so we can produce a unique label. We wrap a
+% try/except around the function call so that we can provide a more
+% helpful error message in case something goes wrong. (In particular, we
+% can tell the user which line of the |.tex| file contains the offending
+% code.)
+% \begin{macrocode}
+\newcommand{\sage}[1]{%
+\ST@wsf{try:}%
+\ST@wsf{ sagetex.inline(\theST@inline, #1)}%
+\ST@wsf{except:}%
+\ST@wsf{ sagetex.goboom(\the\inputlineno)}%
+% \end{macrocode}
+% Our use of |\newlabel| and |\ref| seems awfully clever until you load
+% the |hyperref| package, which gleefully tries to hyperlink the hell
+% out of everything. This is great until it hits one of our special
+% |\newlabel|s and gets deeply confused. Fortunately the |hyperref|
+% folks are willing to accomodate people like us, and give us a
+% |NoHyper| environment.
+% \begin{macrocode}
+\begin{NoHyper}\ref{@sagelabel\theST@inline}\end{NoHyper}%
+% \end{macrocode}
+% Now check to see if the label has already been defined. (The internal
+% implementation of labels in \LTX involves defining a function
+% ``|r@@labelname|''.) If it hasn't, we set a flag so that we can tell
+% the user to run Sage on the |.sage| file at the end of the run.
+% Finally, step the counter.
+% \begin{macrocode}
+\@ifundefined{r@@sagelabel\theST@inline}{\gdef\ST@rerun{x}}{}%
+\stepcounter{ST@inline}}
+% \end{macrocode}
+% \end{macro}
+% The user might load the |hyperref| package after this one (indeed, the
+% |hyperref| documentation insists that it be loaded last) or not at
+% all---so when we hit the beginning of the document, provide a dummy
+% |NoHyper| environment if one hasn't been defined by the |hyperref|
+% package.
+% \begin{macrocode}
+\AtBeginDocument{\provideenvironment{NoHyper}{}{}}
+% \end{macrocode}
+%
+% \begin{macro}{\percent}
+% A macro that inserts a percent sign. This is more-or-less stolen from the
+% \textsf{Docstrip} manual; there they change the catcode inside a group
+% and use |gdef|, but here we try to be more \LaTeX y and use
+% |\newcommand|.
+% \begin{macrocode}
+\catcode`\%=12
+\newcommand{\percent}{%}
+\catcode`\%=14
+% \end{macrocode}
+% \end{macro}
+%
+% \begin{macro}{\ST@plotdir}
+% A little abbreviation for the plot directory. We don't use
+% |\graphicspath| because it's
+% \href{http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=graphicspath}{
+% apparently slow}---also, since we know right where our plots are
+% going, no need to have \LTX looking for them.
+% \begin{macrocode}
+\newcommand{\ST@plotdir}{sage-plots-for-\jobname.tex}
+% \end{macrocode}
+% \end{macro}
+%
+% \tikzstyle{box}=[draw, shape=rectangle, thick]
+%
+% \begin{macro}{\sageplot}
+% \changes{v1.3}{2008/03/08}{Iron out warnings, cool Ti\emph{k}Z flowchart}
+% This function is similar to |\sage|. The neat thing that we take
+% advantage of is that commas aren't special for arguments to \LTX
+% commands, so it's easy to capture a bunch of keyword arguments that
+% get passed right into a Python function.
+%
+% This macro has two optional arguments, which can't be defined using
+% \LTX's |\newcommand|; we use Scott Pakin's brilliant
+% \href{http://tug.ctan.org/tex-archive/support/newcommand/}{|newcommand|}
+% package to create this macro; the options I fed to his script were
+% similar to this:
+%\begin{center}
+% |MACRO sageplot OPT[#1={width}] OPT[#2={notprovided}] #3|
+%\end{center}
+% Observe that we are using a Python script to write \LTX code which
+% writes Python code which writes \LTX code. Crazy!
+%
+% Here's the wrapper command which does whatever magic we need to get
+% two optional arguments.
+% \begin{macrocode}
+\newcommand{\sageplot}[1][width=.75\textwidth]{%
+ \@ifnextchar[{\ST@sageplot[#1]}{\ST@sageplot[#1][notprovided]}%]
+}
+% \end{macrocode}
+% That percent sign followed by a square bracket seems necessary; I have
+% no idea why.
+%
+% The first optional argument |#1| will get shoved right into the
+% optional argument for |\includegraphics|, so the user has easy control
+% over the \LTX aspects of the plotting. We define a
+% default size of $3/4$ the textwidth, which seems reasonable. (Perhaps
+% a future version of \ST will allow the user to specify in the package
+% options a set of default options to be used throughout.) The
+% second optional argument |#2| is the file format and allows us to tell
+% what files to look for. It defaults to ``notprovided'', which tells
+% the Python module to create EPS and PDF files. Everything in |#3| gets
+% put into the Python function call, so the user can put in keyword
+% arguments there which get interpreted correctly by Python.
+%
+% \begin{macro}{\ST@sageplot} Let's see the real code here. We write a
+% couple lines to the |.sage| file, including a counter, input line
+% number, and all of the mandatory argument; all this is wrapped in
+% another try/except. Note that the |\write| gobbles up line endings, so
+% the |sageplot| bits below get written to the |.sage| file as one line.
+% \begin{macrocode}
+\def\ST@sageplot[#1][#2]#3{%
+\ST@wsf{try:}%
+\ST@wsf{ sagetex.initplot('\jobname')}%
+\ST@wsf{ sagetex.plot(\theST@plot, #3, format='#2', epsmagick=\ST@epsim)}%
+\ST@wsf{except:}%
+\ST@wsf{ sagetex.goboom(\the\inputlineno)}%
+% \end{macrocode}
+% Now we include the appropriate graphics file. Because the user might
+% be producing DVI or PDF files, and have supplied a file format or not,
+% and so on, the logic we follow is a bit complicated.
+% \autoref{f:sageplottree} shows what we do; for completeness, we show
+% what |\ST@inclgrfx| does in \autoref{f:stig}. This entire
+% complicated business is intended to avoid doing an |\includegraphics|
+% command on a file that doesn't exist, and to issue warnings
+% appropriate to the situation.
+%
+% \tikzstyle{box}=[draw, shape=rectangle, thick]
+%
+% \begin{figure}
+% \centering
+% \begin{tikzpicture}
+% \tikzstyle{level 1}=[sibling distance=6cm]
+% \tikzstyle{level 2}=[sibling distance=3cm]
+% \node [box] {DVI or PDF?}
+% child {node [box] {Format provided?}
+% child {node [box] {STig EPS}
+% edge from parent node[left] {no}}
+% child {node [box] {IM option set?}
+% child {node [box, text width=3cm] {Warn that DVI + PNG = bad}
+% edge from parent node[left] {no}}
+% child {node [box] {STig EPS}
+% edge from parent node[right] {yes}}
+% edge from parent node[right] {yes}}
+% edge from parent node[left] {DVI}}
+% child {node [box] {Format provided?}
+% child {node [box] {STig PDF}
+% edge from parent node[left] {no}}
+% child {node [box] {STig \texttt{\#2}}
+% edge from parent node[right] {yes}}
+% edge from parent node[right] {PDF}};
+% \end{tikzpicture}
+% \caption{The logic tree that \texttt{\bslash sageplot} uses to
+% decide whether to run \texttt{\bslash includegraphics} or to yell at
+% the user. ``Format'' is the \texttt{\#2} argument to \texttt{\bslash
+% sageplot}, ``STig ext''
+% means a call to \texttt{\bslash ST@inclgrfx} with ``ext'' as the
+% second argument, and ``IM'' is Imagemagick.}
+% \label{f:sageplottree}
+% \end{figure}
+%
+% If we are creating a PDF, we check to see if the user asked for a
+% different format, and use that if necessary:
+% \begin{macrocode}
+\ifpdf
+ \ifthenelse{\equal{#2}{notprovided}}%
+ {\ST@inclgrfx{#1}{pdf}}%
+ {\ST@inclgrfx{#1}{#2}}%
+% \end{macrocode}
+% Otherwise, we are creating a DVI file, which only supports EPS. If the
+% user provided a format anyway, don't include the file (since it won't
+% work) and warn the user about this. (Unless the file doesn't exist, in
+% which case we do the same thing that |\ST@inclgrfx| does.)
+% \begin{macrocode}
+\else
+ \ifthenelse{\equal{#2}{notprovided}}%
+ {\ST@inclgrfx{#1}{eps}}%
+% \end{macrocode}
+% If a format is provided, we check to see if we're using the
+% imagemagick option. If so, try to include an EPS file anyway.
+% \begin{macrocode}
+ {\ifthenelse{\equal{\ST@epsim}{True}}
+ {\ST@inclgrfx{#1}{eps}}%
+% \end{macrocode}
+% If we're not using the imagemagick option, we're going to issue some
+% sort of warning, depending on whether the file exists yet or not.
+% \begin{macrocode}
+ {\IfFileExists{\ST@plotdir/plot-\theST@plot.#2}%
+ {\framebox[2cm]{\rule[-1cm]{0cm}{2cm}\textbf{??}}%
+ \PackageWarning{sagetex}{Graphics file
+ \ST@plotdir/plot-\theST@plot.#2\space on page \thepage\space
+ cannot be used with DVI output. Use pdflatex or create an EPS
+ file. Plot command is}}%
+ {\framebox[2cm]{\rule[-1cm]{0cm}{2cm}\textbf{??}}%
+ \PackageWarning{sagetex}{Graphics file
+ \ST@plotdir/plot-\theST@plot.#2\space on page \thepage\space
+ does not exist}%
+ \gdef\ST@rerun{x}}}}%
+\fi
+% \end{macrocode}
+% Finally, step the counter and we're done.
+% \begin{macrocode}
+\stepcounter{ST@plot}}
+% \end{macrocode}
+% \end{macro}
+% \end{macro}
+%
+% \begin{macro}{\ST@inclgrfx}
+% This command includes the requested graphics file (|#2| is the
+% extension) with the requested options (|#1|) if the file exists. Note
+% that it just needs to know the extension, since we use a counter for
+% the filename.
+% \begin{macrocode}
+\newcommand{\ST@inclgrfx}[2]{%
+ \IfFileExists{\ST@plotdir/plot-\theST@plot.#2}%
+ {\includegraphics[#1]{\ST@plotdir/plot-\theST@plot.#2}}%
+% \end{macrocode}
+% If the file doesn't exist, we insert a little box to indicate it
+% wasn't found, issue a warning that we didn't find a graphics file,
+% then set a flag that, at the end of the run, tells the user to run
+% Sage again.
+% \begin{macrocode}
+ {\framebox[2cm]{\rule[-1cm]{0cm}{2cm}\textbf{??}}%
+ \PackageWarning{sagetex}{Graphics file
+ \ST@plotdir/plot-\theST@plot.#2\space on page \thepage\space does not
+ exist}%
+ \gdef\ST@rerun{x}}}
+% \end{macrocode}
+% \autoref{f:stig} makes this a bit clearer.
+% \begin{figure}
+% \centering
+% \begin{tikzpicture}
+% \tikzstyle{level 1}=[sibling distance=4cm]
+% \node [box] {Does EXT file exist?}
+% child {node [box, text width = 2.125cm] {Warn user to rerun Sage}
+% edge from parent node[left] {no}}
+% child {node [box] {Use \texttt{includegraphics}}
+% edge from parent node[right] {yes}};
+% \end{tikzpicture}
+% \caption{The logic used by the \texttt{\bslash ST@inclgrfx}
+% command.}
+% \label{f:stig}
+% \end{figure}
+% \end{macro}
+%
+% \begin{macro}{\ST@beginsfbl}
+% This is ``begin |.sage| file block'', an internal-use abbreviation
+% that sets things up when we start writing a chunk of Sage code to the
+% |.sage| file. It begins with some \TeX{} magic that fixes spacing,
+% then puts the start of a try/except block in the |.sage| file---this
+% not only allows the user to indent code without Sage/Python
+% complaining about indentation, but lets us tell the user where things
+% went wrong. The last bit is some magic from the |verbatim| package
+% manual that makes \LTX respect line breaks.
+% \begin{macrocode}
+\newcommand{\ST@beginsfbl}{%
+ \@bsphack%
+ \ST@wsf{sagetex.blockbegin()}%
+ \ST@wsf{try:}%
+ \let\do\@makeother\dospecials\catcode`\^^M\active}
+% \end{macrocode}
+% \end{macro}
+%
+% \begin{macro}{\ST@endsfbl}
+% The companion to |\ST@beginsfbl|.
+% \begin{macrocode}
+\newcommand{\ST@endsfbl}{%
+\ST@wsf{except:}%
+\ST@wsf{ sagetex.goboom(\the\inputlineno)}%
+\ST@wsf{sagetex.blockend()}}
+% \end{macrocode}
+% \end{macro}
+%
+% Now let's define the ``verbatim-like'' environments. There are four
+% possibilities, corresponding to two independent choices of
+% typesetting the code or not, and writing to the |.sage| file or not.
+%
+% \begin{environment}{sageblock}
+% This environment does both: it typesets your code and puts it into the
+% |.sage| file for execution by Sage.
+% \begin{macrocode}
+\newenvironment{sageblock}{\ST@beginsfbl%
+% \end{macrocode}
+% The space between |\ST@wsf{| and |\the| is crucial! It, along with the
+% ``|try:|'', is what allows the user to indent code if they like.
+% This line sends stuff to the |.sage| file.
+% \begin{macrocode}
+\def\verbatim@processline{\ST@wsf{ \the\verbatim@line}%
+% \end{macrocode}
+% Next, we typeset your code and start the verbatim environment.
+% \begin{macrocode}
+\hspace{\sagetexindent}\the\verbatim@line\par}%
+\verbatim}%
+% \end{macrocode}
+% At the end of the environment, we put a chunk into the |.sage| file
+% and stop the verbatim environment.
+% \begin{macrocode}
+{\ST@endsfbl\endverbatim}
+% \end{macrocode}
+% \end{environment}
+%
+% \begin{environment}{sagesilent}
+% This is from the |verbatim| package manual. It's just like the above,
+% except we don't typeset anything.
+% \begin{macrocode}
+\newenvironment{sagesilent}{\ST@beginsfbl%
+\def\verbatim@processline{\ST@wsf{ \the\verbatim@line}}%
+\verbatim@start}%
+{\ST@endsfbl\@esphack}
+% \end{macrocode}
+% \end{environment}
+%
+% \begin{environment}{sageverbatim}
+% The opposite of |sagesilent|. This is exactly the same as the verbatim
+% environment, except that we include some indentation to be consistent
+% with other typeset Sage code.
+% \begin{macrocode}
+\newenvironment{sageverbatim}{%
+\def\verbatim@processline{\hspace{\sagetexindent}\the\verbatim@line\par}%
+\verbatim}%
+{\endverbatim}
+% \end{macrocode}
+% \end{environment}
+%
+% Logically, we now need an environment which neither typesets
+% \emph{nor} writes code to the |.sage| file. The verbatim package's
+% |comment| environment does that.\\
+%
+% Now we deal with some end-of-file cleanup.
+%
+% We tell the Sage script to write some information to the |.sout| file,
+% then check to see if |ST@rerun| ever got defined. If not, all the
+% inline formulas and plots worked, so do nothing.
+% \begin{macrocode}
+\AtEndDocument{\ST@wsf{sagetex.endofdoc()}%
+\@ifundefined{ST@rerun}{}%
+% \end{macrocode}
+% Otherwise, we issue a warning to tell the user to run Sage on the
+% |.sage| file. Part of the reason we do this is that, by using |\ref|
+% to pull in the inlines, \LTX will complain about undefined
+% references if you haven't run the Sage script---and for many \LTX
+% users, myself included, the warning ``there were undefined
+% references'' is a signal to run \LTX again. But to fix these
+% particular undefined references, you need to run \emph{Sage}. We also
+% suppressed file-not-found errors for graphics files, and need to tell
+% the user what to do about that.
+%
+% At any rate, we tell the user to run Sage if it's necessary.
+% \begin{macrocode}
+{\PackageWarningNoLine{sagetex}{There were undefined Sage formulas
+and/or plots}%
+\PackageWarningNoLine{sagetex}{Run Sage on \jobname.sage, and then run
+LaTeX on \jobname.tex again}}}
+% \end{macrocode}
+%
+%
+% \subsection{The Python module}
+%
+% \iffalse
+% Hey, docstrip! Stop putting code into the .sty file, and start
+% putting it into the .py file.
+%</latex>
+%<*python>
+% Thanks.
+% \fi
+%
+% The style file writes things to the |.sage| file and reads them from
+% the |.sout| file. The Python module provides functions that help
+% produce the |.sout| file from the |.sage| file.
+%
+% \paragraph{A note on Python and \textsf{Docstrip}} There is one tiny
+% potential source of confusion when documenting Python code with
+% \textsf{Docstrip}: the percent sign. If you have a long line of Python
+% code which includes a percent sign for string formatting and you break
+% the line with a backslash and begin the next line with a percent sign,
+% that line \emph{will not} be written to the output file. This is only
+% a problem if you \emph{begin} the line with a percent sign; there are
+% no troubles otherwise.\\
+%
+% On to the code:
+%
+% The |sagetex.py| file is intended to be used as a module and doesn't
+% do anything useful when called directly, so if someone does that, warn
+% them. We do this right away so that we print this and exit before
+% trying to import any Sage modules; that way, this error message gets
+% printed whether you run the script with Sage or with Python.
+% \begin{macrocode}
+import sys
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+ print("""This file is part of the SageTeX package.
+It is not meant to be called directly.
+
+This file will be used by Sage scripts generated from a LaTeX document
+using the sagetex package. Keep it somewhere where Sage and Python can
+find it and it will automatically be imported.""")
+ sys.exit()
+% \end{macrocode}
+% We start with some imports and definitions of our global variables.
+% This is a relatively specialized use of Sage, so using global
+% variables isn't a bad idea. Plus I think when we import this module,
+% they will all stay inside the |sagetex| namespace anyway.
+% \begin{macrocode}
+from sage.misc.latex import latex
+import os
+import os.path
+import hashlib
+import traceback
+import subprocess
+import shutil
+initplot_done = False
+dirname = None
+filename = ""
+% \end{macrocode}
+%
+% \begin{macro}{progress}
+% This function justs prints stuff. It allows us to not print a
+% linebreak, so you can get ``|start...|'' (little time spent
+% processing) ``|end|'' on one line.
+% \begin{macrocode}
+def progress(t,linebreak=True):
+ if linebreak:
+ print(t)
+ else:
+ sys.stdout.write(t)
+% \end{macrocode}
+% \end{macro}
+%
+% \begin{macro}{openout}
+% This function opens a |.sout.tmp| file and writes all our output to
+% that. Then, when we're done, we move that to |.sout|. The
+% ``autogenerated'' line is basically the same as the lines that get put
+% at the top of preparsed Sage files; we are automatically generating a
+% file with Sage, so it seems reasonable to add it.
+% \begin{macrocode}
+def openout(f):
+ global filename
+ filename = f
+ global _file_
+ _file_ = open(f + '.sout.tmp', 'w')
+ s = '% This file was *autogenerated* from the file ' + \
+ os.path.splitext(filename)[0] + '.sage.\n'
+ _file_.write(s)
+ progress('Processing Sage code for %s.tex...' % filename)
+% \end{macrocode}
+% \end{macro}
+%
+% \begin{macro}{initplot}
+% We only want to create the plots directory if the user actually plots
+% something. This function creates the directory and sets the
+% |initplot_done| flag after doing so. We make a directory based on the
+% \LTX file being processed so that if there are multiple |.tex|
+% files in a directory, we don't overwrite plots from another file.
+% \begin{macrocode}
+def initplot(f):
+ global initplot_done
+ if not initplot_done:
+ progress('Initializing plots directory')
+ global dirname
+% \end{macrocode}
+% We hard-code the |.tex| extension, which is fine in the overwhelming
+% majority of cases, although it does cause minor confusion when
+% building the documentation. If it turns out lots of people use, say, a
+% |ltx| extension or whatever, I think we could find out the correct
+% extension, but it would involve a lot of irritating mucking around.
+% \begin{macrocode}
+ dirname = 'sage-plots-for-' + f + '.tex'
+ if os.path.isdir(dirname):
+ shutil.rmtree(dirname)
+ os.mkdir(dirname)
+ initplot_done = True
+% \end{macrocode}
+% \end{macro}
+%
+% \begin{macro}{inline}
+% This function works with |\sage| from the style file to put Sage
+% output into your \LTX file. Usually, when you use |\label|, it
+% writes a line such as
+% \begin{center}
+% |\newlabel{labelname}{{section number}{page number}}|
+% \end{center}
+% to the |.aux| file. When you use the |hyperref| package, there are
+% more fields in the second argument, but the first two are the same.
+% The |\ref| command just pulls in what's in the first field, so we can
+% hijack this mechanism for our own nefarious purposes. The function
+% writes a |\newlabel| line with a label made from a counter and the
+% text from running Sage on |s|.
+%
+% We print out the line number so if something goes wrong, the user can
+% more easily track down the offending |\sage| command in the source
+% file.
+%
+% That's a lot of explanation for a very short function:
+% \begin{macrocode}
+def inline(counter, s):
+ progress('Inline formula %s' % counter)
+ _file_.write('\\newlabel{@sagelabel' + str(counter) + '}{{' + \
+ latex(s) + '}{}{}{}{}}\n')
+% \end{macrocode}
+% We are using five fields, just like |hyperref| does, because that
+% works whether or not |hyperref| is loaded. Using two fields, as in plain
+% \LTX, doesn't work if |hyperref| is loaded.
+% \end{macro}
+%
+% \begin{macro}{blockbegin}
+% \begin{macro}{blockend}
+% This function and its companion used to write stuff to the |.sout|
+% file, but now they just update the user on our progress evaluating a
+% code block.
+% \begin{macrocode}
+def blockbegin():
+ progress('Code block begin...', False)
+def blockend():
+ progress('end')
+% \end{macrocode}
+% \end{macro}
+% \end{macro}
+%
+% \begin{macro}{plot}
+% I hope it's obvious that this function does plotting. As mentioned in
+% the |\sageplot| code, we're taking advantage of two things: first,
+% that \LTX doesn't treat commas and spaces in macro arguments
+% specially, and second, that Python (and Sage plotting functions) has
+% nice support for keyword arguments. The |#3| argument to |\sageplot|
+% becomes |p| and |**kwargs| below.
+% \begin{macrocode}
+def plot(counter, p, format='notprovided', epsmagick=False, **kwargs):
+ global dirname
+ progress('Plot %s' % counter)
+% \end{macrocode}
+% If the user says nothing about file formats, we default to producing
+% PDF and EPS. This allows the user to transparently switch between
+% using a DVI previewer (which usually automatically updates when the
+% DVI changes, and has support for source specials, which makes the
+% writing process easier) and making PDFs.
+% \begin{macrocode}
+ if format == 'notprovided':
+ formats = ['eps', 'pdf']
+ else:
+ formats = [format]
+ for fmt in formats:
+ plotfilename = os.path.join(dirname, 'plot-%s.%s' % (counter, fmt))
+ #print(' plotting %s with args %s' % (plotfilename, kwargs))
+ p.save(filename=plotfilename, **kwargs)
+% \end{macrocode}
+% If the user provides a format \emph{and} specifies the |imagemagick|
+% option, we try to convert the newly-created file into EPS format.
+% \begin{macrocode}
+ if format != 'notprovided' and epsmagick is True:
+ print('Calling Imagemagick to convert plot-%s.%s to EPS' % \
+ (counter, format))
+ toeps(counter, format)
+% \end{macrocode}
+% \end{macro}
+%
+% \begin{macro}{toeps}
+% This function calls the Imagmagick utility |convert| to, well, convert
+% something into EPS format. This gets called when the user has
+% requested the ``|imagemagick|'' option to the \ST\ style file and is
+% making a graphic file with a nondefault extension.
+% \begin{macrocode}
+def toeps(counter, ext):
+ global dirname
+ subprocess.check_call(['convert',\
+ '%s/plot-%s.%s' % (dirname, counter, ext), \
+ '%s/plot-%s.eps' % (dirname, counter)])
+% \end{macrocode}
+% We are blindly assuming that the |convert| command exists and will do
+% the conversion for us; the |check_call| function raises an exception
+% which, since all these calls get wrapped in try/excepts in the |.sage|
+% file, should result in a reasonable error message if something strange
+% happens.
+% \end{macro}
+%
+% \begin{macro}{goboom}
+% When a chunk of Sage code blows up, this function bears the bad news
+% to the user. Normally in Python the traceback is good enough for this,
+% but in this case, we start with a |.sage| file (which is
+% autogenerated) which autogenerates a |.py| file---and the tracebacks
+% the user sees refer to that file, whose line numbers are basically
+% useless. We want to tell them where in the \LTX file things went
+% bad, so we do that, give them the traceback, and exit after removing
+% the |.sout.tmp| file.
+% \begin{macrocode}
+def goboom(line):
+ global filename
+ print('\n**** Error in Sage code on line %s of %s.tex! Traceback\
+ follows.' % (line, filename))
+ traceback.print_exc()
+ print('\n**** Running Sage on %s.sage failed! Fix %s.tex and try\
+ again.' % (filename, filename))
+ os.remove(filename + '.sout.tmp')
+ sys.exit(1)
+% \end{macrocode}
+% \end{macro}
+%
+% \begin{macro}{endofdoc}
+% When we're done processing, we have a couple little cleanup tasks. We
+% want to put the MD5 sm of the |.sage| file that produced the |.sout|
+% file we're about to write into the |.sout| file, so that external
+% programs that build \LTX documents can tell if they need to call Sage
+% to update the |.sout| file. But there is a problem: we write line
+% numbers to the |.sage| file so that we can provide useful error
+% messages---but that means that adding, say, a line break to your
+% source file will change the MD5 sum, and your program will think it
+% needs to rerun Sage even though none of the actual calls to Sage have
+% changed.
+%
+% How do we include line numbers for our error messages but still allow
+% a program to discover a ``genuine'' change to the |.sage| file?
+%
+% The answer is to only find the MD5 sum of \emph{part} of the |.sage|
+% file. By design, the source file line numbers only appear in calls to
+% |goboom|, so we will strip those lines out. Basically we are doing
+% \begin{center}
+% \verb+grep -v '^ sagetex.goboom' filename.sage | md5sum+
+% \end{center}
+% (In fact, what we do below produces exactly the same sum.)
+% \begin{macrocode}
+def endofdoc():
+ global filename
+ sagef = open(filename + '.sage', 'r')
+ m = hashlib.md5()
+ for line in sagef:
+ if line[0:15] != ' sagetex.goboom':
+ m.update(line)
+ s = '%' + m.hexdigest() + '% md5sum of .sage file (minus "goboom" \
+lines) that produced this\n'
+ _file_.write(s)
+% \end{macrocode}
+% Now, we do issue warnings to run Sage on the |.sage| file and an
+% external program might look for those to detect the need to rerun
+% Sage, but those warnings do not quite capture all situations. (If
+% you've already produced the |.sout| file and change a |\sage| call, no
+% warning will be issued since all the |\ref|s find a |\newlabel|.)
+% Anyway, I think it's easier to grab an MD5 sum out of the end of the
+% file than parse the output from running |latex| on your file. (The
+% regular expression |^%[0-9a-f]{32}%| will find the MD5 sum.)
+%
+% Now we are done with the |.sout| file. Close it, rename it, and tell
+% the user we're done.
+% \begin{macrocode}
+ _file_.close()
+ os.rename(filename + '.sout.tmp', filename + '.sout')
+ progress('Sage processing complete. Run LaTeX on %s.tex again.' %\
+ filename)
+% \end{macrocode}
+% \end{macro}
+%
+% \section{Credits and acknowledgements}
+%
+% According to the original README file, this system was originally
+% done by Gonzalo Tornaria and Joe Wetherell. Later Harald Schilly made
+% some improvements and modifications. Almost all the examples in the
+% |example.tex| file are from Harald.
+%
+% Dan Drake rewrote and extended the style file (there is almost zero
+% original code there), made significant changes to the Python module,
+% put both files into \textsf{Docstrip} format, and wrote all the
+% documentation.
+%
+% Many thanks to Jason Grout for his numerous comments, suggestions, and
+% feedback.
+%
+% \section{Copying and licenses}
+%
+% The \emph{source code} of the \ST package may be redistributed and/or
+% modified under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
+% published by the Free Software Foundation, either version 2 of the
+% License, or (at your option) any later version. To view a copy of this
+% license, see \url{http://www.gnu.org/licenses/} or send a letter to
+% the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor,
+% Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA.
+%
+% The \emph{documentation} of the \ST package is licensed under the
+% Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 License. To
+% view a copy of this license, visit
+% \url{http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/} or send a
+% letter to Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San
+% Francisco, California, 94105, USA.
diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/source/latex/sagetex/sagetexpackage.ins b/Master/texmf-dist/source/latex/sagetex/sagetexpackage.ins
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..b91433f7b34
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Master/texmf-dist/source/latex/sagetex/sagetexpackage.ins
@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
+%% This is `sagetexpackage.ins', part of the sagetex package.
+%
+%% Copyright (C) 2008 by Dan Drake <ddrake@member.ams.org>
+%%
+%% This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
+%% it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+%% the Free Software Foundation, either version 2 of the License, or (at
+%% your option) any later version.
+%%
+%% This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
+%% WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+%% MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
+%% General Public License for more details.
+%%
+%% You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+%% along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>
+
+\input docstrip.tex
+\keepsilent
+
+\usedir{tex/latex/sagetex}
+
+\declarepreamble\defaultpreamble
+
+This is a generated file.
+
+Copyright (C) 2008 by Dan Drake <ddrake@member.ams.org>
+
+This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify it
+under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the
+Free Software Foundation, either version 2 of the License, or (at your
+option) any later version.
+
+This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
+WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
+General Public License for more details.
+
+You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along
+with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>
+
+\endpreamble
+
+% We use a name other than `sagetex' because when using the sagetex
+% package in a file called `foo.dtx', a file `foo.py' will be produced
+% -- and below, we generate a file called sagetex.py. Thus we use a name
+% other than `sagetex.dtx' so that building the documentation doesn't
+% clobber the very Python file we need to build the documentation!
+
+\generate{\file{sagetex.sty}{\from{sagetexpackage.dtx}{latex}}}
+
+
+% Some trickery to get triple quotes around the {pre,post}amble. This is
+% a modification of what the Docstrip manual suggests; their method
+% resulted in some bits being printed twice because, I think, of a
+% problem in \declare{pre,post}amble. At any rate, this gives us a
+% properly commented Python file with the same preamble as the .sty
+% file.
+
+\edef\defaultpreamble{"""^^J%
+ \defaultpreamble^^J%
+ """}
+\edef\defaultpostamble{"""^^J%
+ \defaultpostamble^^J%
+ """}
+
+\generate{\file{sagetex.py}{\from{sagetexpackage.dtx}{python}}}
+
+\obeyspaces
+\Msg{******************************************************************}
+\Msg{* *}
+\Msg{* To finish the installation, move the following files *}
+\Msg{* into directories searched by TeX and Sage, respectively. *}
+\Msg{* *}
+\Msg{* sagetex.sty *}
+\Msg{* sagetex.py *}
+\Msg{* *}
+\Msg{* See the documentation for complete installation details. *}
+\Msg{* *}
+\Msg{* To produce the documentation run the file sagetex.dtx through *}
+\Msg{* LaTeX. To produce the change history, run *}
+\Msg{* *}
+\Msg{* makeindex -s gglo.ist -o sagetexpackage.gls sagetexpackage.glo *}
+\Msg{* *}
+\Msg{* and to get the regular index, do *}
+\Msg{* *}
+\Msg{* makeindex -s gind.ist -o sagetexpackage.ind sagetexpackage.idx *}
+\Msg{* *}
+\Msg{* Happy TeXing...and, uh, Saging? *}
+\Msg{* *}
+\Msg{******************************************************************}
+
+\endbatchfile