rm backgammon, nonfree license

git-svn-id: svn://tug.org/texlive/trunk@12796 c570f23f-e606-0410-a88d-b1316a301751

3 files changed, 0 insertions, 70 deletions

diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/backgammon/description.ps.gz b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/backgammon/description.ps.gz
deleted file mode 100644
index 73d6ae03c9b..00000000000
--- a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/backgammon/description.ps.gz
+++ /dev/null
diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/backgammon/sampletext.dvi b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/backgammon/sampletext.dvi
deleted file mode 100644
index 156f2881d3a..00000000000
--- a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/backgammon/sampletext.dvi
+++ /dev/null
diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/backgammon/sampletext.tex b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/backgammon/sampletext.tex
deleted file mode 100644
index 77d39ee571c..00000000000
--- a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/backgammon/sampletext.tex
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,70 +0,0 @@
-\documentstyle[12pt,bg]{article}
-
-\begin{document}
-
-\setlength{\parindent}{0pt}
-\setlength{\parskip}{1em}
-
-This is a discussion of a position from the newsgroup rec.games.backgammon:
-
-\begin{position}
-\smallboard
-\whitepoint{2}{2}
-\whitepoint{3}{2}
-\whitepoint{4}{2}
-\whitepoint{5}{2}
-\whitepoint{6}{5}
-\whitepoint{9}{1}
-\whitepoint{23}{2}
-\blackpoint{1}{2}
-\blackpoint{4}{2}
-\blackpoint{5}{3}
-\blackpoint{6}{2}
-\blackpoint{8}{3}
-\blackpoint{12}{1}
-\blackpoint{24}{2}
-\middlecube{1}
-
-\boardcaption{Score 0-0 in a 3 point match: White to play 5-4}
-\whiteonmove
-\shownumbers
-\showcube
-
-\end{position}
-
-{\bf Carl Nielsen (nlscar01@uctvax.uct.ac.za) wrote:}
-
-I played 23-14. X rolled 4-2 and played 17-23. I couldn't get back on and 
-ended up losing to a gammon. Did I play wrong? Should I have left moving my 
-runners till later and moved 9-4 6-2 or something like that?
-
-Suggestions please.
-
-{\bf Kit Woolsey (kwoolsey@netcom.com) wrote:}
-
-Your play looks ok to me.  You have to get moving sometime and your 
-opponent has plenty of time if you play the waiting game, so it is 
-probably best to run now before you have an accident and are forced to 
-lose your board by rolling too many threes and fours.  You were just 
-unlucky.  Btw, what is that cube doing in the center?  You have a clear 
-advantage with some threats, so you have a strong double.  Maybe your 
-opponent will pass, and maybe he should pass!
-
-Kit
-
-{\bf Kent Goulding (kg1@netcom.com) wrote:}
-
-Biggest error here, by FAR, is the failure to double.  As is so often the 
-case, the cube errors are the costly ones while checker plays are no big 
-deal.  I think your opponent should pass.  As far as the checker play 
-goes, it looks pretty close.  Running now gives your opponent a crack at 
-grabbing TWO of your checkers, while waiting will likely expose only 
-one.  Your home board is actually not in great danger of breaking right 
-away. You can't play 5s and 6s there, and you will likely run from your 
-anchor the next chance you get.  Also, it's nice to spread out some 
-builders for your ace point in case your opponent runs (either forced or 
-by choice).  I'm inclined to sit tight and see what happens next.
-
---KG
-
-\end{document}