diff options
author | Karl Berry <karl@freefriends.org> | 2007-01-09 23:28:00 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Karl Berry <karl@freefriends.org> | 2007-01-09 23:28:00 +0000 |
commit | 05a8f80af6c9e9a0944f35400a753913d0bbd8b2 (patch) | |
tree | 5adbabe564a8869e9a0979bfad1010c8cc815b2d /Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/seminar/semsamp1.tex | |
parent | d7fea5018397ca7792a6102e3f90cbea36c1e8a7 (diff) |
remove seminar, nonfree
git-svn-id: svn://tug.org/texlive/trunk@3278 c570f23f-e606-0410-a88d-b1316a301751
Diffstat (limited to 'Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/seminar/semsamp1.tex')
-rw-r--r-- | Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/seminar/semsamp1.tex | 98 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 98 deletions
diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/seminar/semsamp1.tex b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/seminar/semsamp1.tex deleted file mode 100644 index 365e26d5b85..00000000000 --- a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/seminar/semsamp1.tex +++ /dev/null @@ -1,98 +0,0 @@ -%% BEGIN semsamp1.tex -% -% This is a sample document for seminar.sty, v0.93 (and maybe later). -% -% Try this with and without the article option: - -\documentstyle[fancybox,article]{seminar} - -\def\printlandscape{\special{landscape}} % Works with dvips. - -\articlemag{1} - -%\twoup % Try me. - -\newpagestyle{327}% - {Economics 327 \hspace{\fill}\rightmark \hspace{\fill}\thepage}{}% -\pagestyle{327} - -\markright{Choice under uncertainty} - -\slideframe{Oval} - -\newcommand{\heading}[1]{% - \begin{center} - \large\bf - \shadowbox{#1}% - \end{center} - \vspace{1ex minus 1ex}} - -\newcommand{\BF}[1]{{\bf #1:}\hspace{1em}\ignorespaces} - -\begin{document} - - -\begin{slide} -\heading{A heading} - -One thing this example illustrates is how the {\tt article} style option is -good for printing slides two-up, for distribution to a seminar audience or -class, or just for proofreading. - -\BF{Definition} -$p$ (weakly) first-order stochastically dominates $q$ if for every $\bar z\in -Z$, -\[ - p(z\leq \bar z) \leq q(z\leq \bar z) -\] -\end{slide} - - -\begin{slide} -\heading{Problems with stochastic dominance as a DT} - -\begin{center} - \begin{tabular}{|r|l|}\hline - $z$ & $p(z)$\\ \hline - \$999 & .01\\ \hline - \$1,000,000 & .99 \\ \hline - \end{tabular}% - \hspace{1cm}% - \begin{tabular}{|r|l|}\hline - $z$ & $q(z)$\\ \hline - \$1,000 & 1\\ \hline - \end{tabular} -\end{center} -\end{slide} - -\begin{slide} -\heading{Candidate Theory \#3: Expected utility} - -Let $Z$ be an arbitrary set of outcomes. Let $u:Z\rightarrow R$ be a utility -representation of the DM's preferences over the elements of $Z$ as certain -outcomes. (I.e., $u(y)\geq u(z)$ iff $y \geq z$.) - -\end{slide} - - -\begin{slide} -\heading{Expected utility \& the St.\ Petersburg Paradox} - -This can get around even St.\ Petersburg Paradox, because we don't require -that utility be linear in money: - -\begin{center} - \begin{tabular}{r|c|c|c|c|c}\cline{2-6} - Prize & \$2 & \$4 & \$8 & \$16 & $\ldots$\\ \cline{2-6} - $u(z)=\log_2(z)$ & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & $\ldots$ \\ \cline{2-6} - Prob. & 1/2 & 1/4 & 1/8 & 1/16 & $\ldots$\\ \cline{2-6} - \end{tabular} -\end{center} - -Expected utility is $\sum_{k=1}^\infty k/2^k = 2$, and so lottery gives same -expected utility as getting \$4 for sure. -\end{slide} - - -\end{document} -%% END semsamp1.tex |