summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/resphilosophica/rpsample.tex
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKarl Berry <karl@freefriends.org>2013-12-13 22:07:13 +0000
committerKarl Berry <karl@freefriends.org>2013-12-13 22:07:13 +0000
commitbb69c6ad45c96b1cf0b5fa79318c64e26b1c9bcd (patch)
treeee517eb9ecacfeda7ef5a8accc66c219393a3318 /Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/resphilosophica/rpsample.tex
parent1965df58ffe4e19a18e219430bc2d4e9ac345f4f (diff)
resphilosophica (13dec13)
git-svn-id: svn://tug.org/texlive/trunk@32404 c570f23f-e606-0410-a88d-b1316a301751
Diffstat (limited to 'Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/resphilosophica/rpsample.tex')
-rw-r--r--Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/resphilosophica/rpsample.tex38
1 files changed, 25 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/resphilosophica/rpsample.tex b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/resphilosophica/rpsample.tex
index b38cb15a40b..b7f67c29900 100644
--- a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/resphilosophica/rpsample.tex
+++ b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/resphilosophica/rpsample.tex
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
%\documentclass[screen]{resphilosophica}
%\documentclass[manuscript]{resphilosophica}
%\documentclass[preprint]{resphilosophica}
-%\documentclass[forthcoming]{resphilosophica}
-\documentclass{resphilosophica}
+\documentclass[forthcoming]{resphilosophica}
+%\documentclass{resphilosophica}
\usepackage{kantlipsum}
\title[A Sample Paper: A Template]{A Sample Paper:\\ A
Template}
@@ -11,8 +11,9 @@
\volumenumber{90}
\issuenumber{1--2}
\publicationyear{2012}
-\publicationmonth{January--February}
+\publicationmonth[Jan--Feb]{January--February}
\papernumber{2}
+\onlinedate{January 1 2013}
%\doinumber{}
\author{Boris Veytsman}
\address{Computational Materials Science Center, MS 6A2\\
@@ -31,6 +32,10 @@
Germany}
\thanks{The work on this package was supported by Sant Lois University}
+\TCSelect{0,1}
+\TCSelect[cyan]{blueline}
+\ECSelect{0,1}
+
\begin{document}
%
% Paper information
@@ -41,7 +46,7 @@
% Abstract must PRECEDE \maketitle
\begin{abstract}
- The things in themselves are what first give rise to reason, as is
+ The things in \TC{themselves are what first} give rise to reason, as is
proven in the ontological manuals. By virtue of natural reason, let
us suppose that the transcen- dental unity of apperception abstracts
from all content of knowledge; in view of these considerations, the
@@ -52,6 +57,8 @@
\end{abstract}
\maketitle
+\kant[4]
+
\setcounter{footnote}{0}
\section{Introduction}
@@ -62,8 +69,8 @@
The reader should be careful to observe that the objects in
space and time are the clue to the discovery of, certainly,
our a priori knowledge, by means of analytic unity. Our
- faculties abstract from all content of knowledge; for these
- reasons, the discipline of human reason stands in need of
+ faculties abstract \TC[blueline]{from all content of knowledge; for these
+ reasons, the discipline of human reason stands} in need of
the transcendental aesthetic.
\em \citep{Gregorio:Kantlipsum}
\EditorialComment{Is this quotation necessary?}
@@ -82,8 +89,9 @@
paralogisms, time. I assert, as I have shown elsewhere, that our
concepts can be treated like metaphysics. See also \citep{Landau5},
\citep{Hoff10}, \citep{Rao07:BeliefPropagation}, \citep{faga06a},
- \citep{bochnga}, \citep{aqui51a}, \citep{Mapas12}, \citep{ande97a} and
- \citep{Knuth94:TheTeXbook}.}
+ \citep{bochnga}, \citep{aqui51a}, \citep{Mapas12}, \citep{ande97a},
+ and \citep{Knuth94:TheTeXbook}.}\EditorialComment[1]{Are all quotes
+ here relevant?}
\section{Discussion}
\label{sec:discussion}
@@ -109,9 +117,9 @@ the existence of the Antinomies in general.\footnote{The never-ending
is that, then, the transcendental aesthetic, in reference to ends,
would thereby be made to contradict the Transcendental Deduction.
The architectonic of practical reason has nothing to do with our
- ideas; however, time can never furnish a true and demonstrated
+ ideas; \TC[1]{however, time can never furnish a true and demonstrated
science, because, like the Ideal, it depends on hypothetical
- principles. Space has nothing to do with the Antinomies, because of
+ principles.} Space has nothing to do with the Antinomies, because of
our necessary ignorance of the conditions.}
@@ -134,11 +142,15 @@ the existence of the Antinomies in general.\footnote{The never-ending
\kant[17-20]
\kant*[21]\footnote{As is shown in the writings of Hume, it remains a
- mystery why our judgements exclude the possibility of the
- transcendental aesthetic.}
-
+ mystery why our judgements exclude the possibility of the
+ transcendental aesthetic.}
+\begin{notes}{Bibliography notes}
+ \kant[4-8]
+\end{notes}
+
+
\bibliography{rpsample}