proposal (19feb13)

git-svn-id: svn://tug.org/texlive/trunk@29174 c570f23f-e606-0410-a88d-b1316a301751

1 files changed, 59 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/proposal/examples/fetopenstrep/methodology.tex b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/proposal/examples/fetopenstrep/methodology.tex
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..4614aeee0da
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/proposal/examples/fetopenstrep/methodology.tex
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+\svnInfo $Id: methodology.tex 22870 2012-01-02 11:01:58Z kohlhase $
+\svnKeyword $HeadURL: https://svn.kwarc.info/repos/kwarc/doc/macros/forCTAN/proposal/eu/examples/fetopenstrep/methodology.tex $
+\section[S/T Methodology]{S/T Methodology\footnote{Note that, whereas the scientific and technological methodology is evaluated
+under the criteria ‘S/T quality’, the quality of the
+actual workplan is evaluated under FET-Open under the criteria ‘Implementation’.}}\label{sec:methodology}
+\begin{todo}{from the proposal template}
+Provide a detailed description of the scientific and technological approach or methodology
+by which you will attempt to reach your objectives. Demonstrate that you are aware of the
+level and nature of the risks of failure, and that you have a good idea on how to address
+these risks. Describe a progression of crucial milestones and decision points for your
+project, and their expected timing. What would constitute success? What would you learn
+from an eventual failure? Where relevant, show how your approach takes into account the
+difficulties inherent to the multi-disciplinary nature of the idea or approach that you
+are proposing. 
+ A detailed work plan should be presented, broken down into work
+packages\footnote{A work package is a major sub-division of the proposed project with a
+  verifiable end-point – normally a deliverable or an important milestone in the overall
+  project.} (WPs) which should follow the logical phases of the implementation of the
+project, and include consortium management and assessment of progress and results. (Note
+that your overall approach to management will be described later, in Section 2).
+
+Notes: The number of work packages used must be appropriate to the complexity of the work
+and the overall value of the proposed project. The planning should be sufficiently
+detailed to justify the proposed effort and allow progress monitoring by the Commission.
+
+\end{todo}
+\newpage\input{workplan}
+
+\newpage
+\subsection{Work Package List}\label{sec:wplist}
+
+\begin{todo}{from the proposal template}
+Please indicate one activity per work package:
+RTD = Research and technological development; DEM = Demonstration; MGT = Management of the consortium
+\end{todo}
+
+%\makeatletter\wp@total@RM{management}\makeatother
+\wpfig[pages,type]
+
+\newpage\input{../strep/deliverables}
+\newpage\input{../strep/milestones}
+
+\subsection{Work Package Descriptions}\label{sec:workpackages}
+\begin{workplan}
+\input{../strep/wp-management}\newpage
+\input{../strep/wp-dissem}\newpage
+\input{../strep/wp-class}\newpage
+\input{../strep/wp-temple}\newpage
+\end{workplan}
+\newpage\input{../strep/risks}
+
+
+%%% Local Variables: 
+%%% mode: latex
+%%% TeX-master: "propB"
+%%% End: 
+
+% LocalWords: workplan newpage wplist makeatletter makeatother wpfig
+% LocalWords:  workpackages wp-dissem wp-class wp-temple