summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/pdfmarginpar/pdfmarginparexample.tex
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKarl Berry <karl@freefriends.org>2009-02-12 00:06:43 +0000
committerKarl Berry <karl@freefriends.org>2009-02-12 00:06:43 +0000
commit81c0bde11438801df366fc7466b923cc0fb4e663 (patch)
tree6448b0bbd9eb044ec9c2c661760880f21a69022d /Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/pdfmarginpar/pdfmarginparexample.tex
parentab4739de8e565cd5dfb5d99462e45d7a065b7c53 (diff)
new latex package pdfmarginpar (10feb09)
git-svn-id: svn://tug.org/texlive/trunk@12146 c570f23f-e606-0410-a88d-b1316a301751
Diffstat (limited to 'Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/pdfmarginpar/pdfmarginparexample.tex')
-rw-r--r--Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/pdfmarginpar/pdfmarginparexample.tex72
1 files changed, 72 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/pdfmarginpar/pdfmarginparexample.tex b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/pdfmarginpar/pdfmarginparexample.tex
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..0f8542b076c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/pdfmarginpar/pdfmarginparexample.tex
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+\documentclass[a4paper]{article}
+
+% This paper (extract) has been generated by http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/scigen/
+
+\usepackage{pdfmarginpar} \author{Max Mustermann} \title{Improving Telephony and the
+Location-Identity Split}
+
+\begin{document} \maketitle
+
+\pdfmarginpar[Paragraph]{Insert Abstract here} \section{Introduction}
+
+The exploration of redundancy is a technical grand challenge. The effect on machine learning of this
+result has been bad\pdfmarginpar{improve formulation}. To put this in perspective, consider the fact
+that infamous statisticians often use Scheme to answer this quandary. The construction of local-area
+networks would greatly degrade heterogeneous information.
+
+Virtual methodologies are particularly natural when it comes to embedded archetypes.
+ClegTourn\pdfmarginpar[Help]{What's that for a name!?} evaluates online algorithms. This is crucial
+to the success of our work. Contrarily, this approach is always considered private. In the opinion
+of electrical engineers, though conventional wisdom states that this question is generally overcame
+by the investigation of model checking, we believe that a different solution is necessary. Combined
+with the simulation of thin clients, such a hypothesis explores new unstable algorithms.
+
+ClegTourn, our new algorithm for journaling file systems, is the solution to all of these
+challenges. The basic tenet of this approach is the deployment of replication. Although conventional
+wisdom states that this obstacle is usually answered by the visualization of the lookaside buffer,
+we believe that a different approach is necessary. The basic tenet of this solution is the
+improvement of multi-processors. We view steganography as following a cycle of four phases:
+refinement, improvement, allowance, and management.
+
+In this paper we motivate the following contributions in detail. We verify not only that replication
+can be made low-energy, concurrent, and peer-to-peer, but that the same is true for DNS. we
+disconfirm that while the seminal probabilistic algorithm for the study of model checking by O. E.
+Zheng runs in O(n2)\pdfmarginpar[Insert]{Math-Mode} time, the well-known classical algorithm for the
+private unification of telephony and B-trees by Bose [34] is recursively enumerable. On a similar
+note, we demonstrate not only that randomized algorithms can be made "fuzzy", decentralized, and
+peer-to-peer, but that the same is true for local-area networks. Lastly, we use client-server
+modalities to prove that the much-touted scalable algorithm for the analysis of architecture by A.J.
+Perlis et al. is NP-complete [1,34,29]\pdfmarginpar{check references}.
+
+The rest of this paper is organized as follows. We motivate the need for spreadsheets. Further, to
+fulfill this goal, we discover how systems can be applied to the unfortunate unification of 802.11
+mesh networks and massive multiplayer online role-playing games. Third, we argue the visualization
+of evolutionary programming. Ultimately, we conclude.
+
+\section{Related Work}
+
+In this section, we consider alternative frameworks\pdfmarginpar[Key]{This is a key concept!} as
+well as related work. The choice of linked lists in [19] differs from ours in that we visualize only
+confusing technology in our system [36]. Jones proposed several efficient solutions, and reported
+that they have great impact on multimodal models [30]. ClegTourn also evaluates Markov models, but
+without all the unnecssary complexity. Despite the fact that we have nothing against the related
+solution by Nehru et al., we do not believe that method is applicable to cryptoanalysis [32,5].
+
+The original solution to this quandary by Sato and Bhabha [1] was promising; on the other hand, such
+a hypothesis did not completely realize this objective [3,22,24,12,17,12,35]. However, the
+complexity of their approach grows linearly as the improvement of telephony grows. Recent work by
+Wilson [25] suggests a methodology for observing certifiable models, but does not offer an
+implementation [31]. Next, Sasaki [31,26,15,28,20,24,24] and P. Wilson et al. introduced the first
+known instance of wireless models [4].\pdfmarginpar[NewParagraph]{Insert a new paragraph?} Instead
+of improving virtual technology [10], we realize this ambition simply by studying unstable
+symmetries [29,33,13]. Ultimately, the methodology of A.J. Perlis is a key choice for Scheme
+[20,14]. A comprehensive survey [9] is available in this space.
+
+We now compare our method to previous wearable technology approaches [6]. Similarly, a novel
+approach for the analysis of the location-identity split [36] proposed by Zhao fails to address
+several key issues that our methodology does address [7]. All of these methods conflict with our
+assumption that random algorithms and the understanding of massive multiplayer online role-playing
+games are essential [18,8]\pdfmarginpar[Note]{This should be discussed in more depth.}.
+
+\end{document}
+