diff options
author | Karl Berry <karl@freefriends.org> | 2012-12-08 17:16:40 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Karl Berry <karl@freefriends.org> | 2012-12-08 17:16:40 +0000 |
commit | d5550a5b1dfc527de0b394ca1af3dff46548c6e3 (patch) | |
tree | c75e4296b600e2d2effb0dd168a9c3e6aacf229d /Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-chicago/cms-trad-sample.tex | |
parent | d70e4e2f7daa386b9f77c0ff1d5a61b0c2c4b7f3 (diff) |
biblatex-chicago (6dec12)
git-svn-id: svn://tug.org/texlive/trunk@28472 c570f23f-e606-0410-a88d-b1316a301751
Diffstat (limited to 'Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-chicago/cms-trad-sample.tex')
-rw-r--r-- | Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-chicago/cms-trad-sample.tex | 510 |
1 files changed, 510 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-chicago/cms-trad-sample.tex b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-chicago/cms-trad-sample.tex new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e63610c0f46 --- /dev/null +++ b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-chicago/cms-trad-sample.tex @@ -0,0 +1,510 @@ +\documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{report} +\usepackage[T1]{fontenc} +\usepackage{textcomp} +%\usepackage{endnotes} +\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc} +\usepackage[german,french,american]{babel} +\usepackage[autostyle]{csquotes} +%\usepackage[document]{ragged2e} +\usepackage[authordate-trad,backend=biber,babel=hyphen,% +bibencoding=latin1,strict]{biblatex-chicago} +% \usepackage[style=chicago-authordate,backend=biber,usecompiler=true,% +% babel=hyphen,bibencoding=auto,sorting=nyt,cmslos,autocite=inline]{biblatex} +%\DeclareLanguageMapping{german}{cms-german} +%\DeclareLanguageMapping{american}{cms-american} +%\DeclareLanguageMapping{french}{cms-french} +%\renewcommand*{\rmdefault}{fgn}% The font (gentium) used for pdf +\usepackage{ifthen} +\usepackage{setspace} +\usepackage{vmargin} \setpapersize{A4} +\setmarginsrb{1in}{20pt}{1in}{.5in}{1pt}{2pt}{0pt}{2mm} +% \renewcommand*{\biburlsetup}{% +% \Urlmuskip=0mu plus 2mu\relax +% \mathchardef\UrlBreakPenalty=200\relax +% \mathchardef\UrlBigBreakPenalty=100\relax +% \mathchardef\UrlEmergencyPenalty=9000\relax +% \appto\UrlSpecials{% +% \do\0{\mathchar`\0\penalty\UrlEmergencyPenalty}% +% \do\1{\mathchar`\1\penalty\UrlEmergencyPenalty}% +% \do\2{\mathchar`\2\penalty\UrlEmergencyPenalty}% +% \do\3{\mathchar`\3\penalty\UrlEmergencyPenalty}% +% \do\4{\mathchar`\4\penalty\UrlEmergencyPenalty}% +% \do\5{\mathchar`\5\penalty\UrlEmergencyPenalty}% +% \do\6{\mathchar`\6\penalty\UrlEmergencyPenalty}% +% \do\7{\mathchar`\7\penalty\UrlEmergencyPenalty}% +% \do\8{\mathchar`\8\penalty\UrlEmergencyPenalty}% +% \do\9{\mathchar`\9\penalty\UrlEmergencyPenalty}}% +% \def\UrlBreaks{% +% \do\.\do\@\do\/\do\\\do\!\do\_\do\|\do\;\do\>\do\]\do\)\do\}% +% \do\,\do\?\do\'\do\+\do\=\do\#\do\$\do\&\do\*\do\^\do\"}% +% \def\UrlBigBreaks{\do\:\do\-}} +\usepackage{url} +\urlstyle{rm} +\appto\bibsetup{\sloppy} +\hyphenation{evans-ton clem-ens} +\setlength{\dimen\footins}{9.5in} +\setlength{\parindent}{0pt} +\setlength{\parskip}{5pt} +\setcounter{biburlnumpenalty}{9000} +\setcounter{biburlucpenalty}{9000} +\setcounter{biburllcpenalty}{9000} +\protected\def\onethird{{\scriptsize\raisebox{.7ex}{1}% + \hspace{-0.1em}\raisebox{.2ex}{/}\hspace{-0.03em}3}} +\newcommand{\cmd}[1]{\texttt{\textbackslash #1}} +\usepackage[colorlinks,urlcolor=blue,citecolor=black, +plainpages=false,breaklinks=true]{hyperref} +\bibliography{dates-test} +%%\onehalfspacing +\begin{document} + +\section*{The Chicago authordate-trad Specification} +\label{sec:spec} + +\subsection*{Important Note} +\label{bibernote} + +Starting with \textsf{biblatex} version 1.5, in order to adhere to the +author-date specification you will need to use \textsf{Biber} to +process your .bib files, as \textsc{Bib}\TeX\ (and its more recent +variants) will no longer provide all the features you need. I highly +recommend, therefore, that you upgrade either to \textsf{Biber} 0.9.9 +and to \textsf{biblatex} 1.7, which are designed to work together, or +to \textsf{Biber} 1.4 and \textsf{biblatex} 2.4, which latter two are +the newest releases and are likewise designed to work as a matched +pair. The advice that follows in this document assumes that you are +using \textsf{Biber}; if you wish to continue using \textsc{Bib}\TeX\ +then you need \textsf{biblatex} version 1.4c and +\textsf{biblatex-chicago} 0.9.7a. (Please contact me at the email +address in \textsf{biblatex-chicago.pdf} if you have any difficulty +obtaining a copy of this earlier release.) + +\subsection*{Editions} +\label{editions} + +This file documents the \textsf{authordate-trad} specification which, +as envisaged by the \emph{Manual} \autocite*[15.45]{chicago:manual}, +grafts the traditional Chicago author-date title formatting onto the +current, 16th-edition recommendations for the remainder of the +reference apparatus. This newest edition implemented significant +changes to what the author-date specification has, historically, +recommended, and there are certain to be users who prefer the older +format with titles capitalized sentence-style and not, in the case of +most un-book-like entries, enclosed in quotation marks. I have +implemented the \textsf{authordate-trad} style for such users. To +compare it with the standard style, please see +\textsf{cms-dates-sample.pdf}. You can also still use the +15th-edition style files from \textsf{biblatex-chicago}, which have +been updated with some improvements borrowed from the 16th edition. +(See \textsf{biblatex-chicago15.pdf} and +\textsf{cms15-dates-sample.pdf}.) I would encourage all users, +however, to switch to one of the 16th-edition styles as soon as +possible, as I am concentrating nearly all of my development time +there. + +\subsection*{Usage} +\label{usage} + +As a general rule, you'll probably want to use the \cmd{autocite} +command for most citations. For most sources, the result will be +exactly as you expect it to be. A few examples: +\autocite{adorno:benj}; \autocite{ashbrook:brain}; +\autocite{babb:peru}; \autocite{barcott:review:15}. Any page +references should also appear as you expect: \autocite[338]{batson}; +\autocite[79]{beattie:crime}; \autocite[36]{boxer:china}. + +\subsection*{Repeated citations} +\label{sec:ibidem} + +Repeated citations are somewhat complicated. The Chicago author-date +style doesn't use \enquote{\emph{Ibid},} but in general a repeated +citation on the same page will print only the page reference: +\autocite{browning:aurora}; \autocite[45]{browning:aurora}. +Technically, this should only occur when a source is cited +\enquote{more than once in one paragraph} +\autocite[15.26]{chicago:manual}, so you can use the \cmd{citereset} +command from \textsf{biblatex} to achieve the greatest compliance, as +the package only offers automatic resetting on part, chapter, section, +and subsection boundaries, while \textsf{biblatex-chicago} +automatically resets the tracker at page breaks: + +\citereset\cmd{citereset}\ \autocite[15.27]{chicago:manual}. If you +are going to repeat a source, make sure that the cite command provides +a postnote --- from this release of \textsf{biblatex-chicago} you'll +no longer get any annoying empty parentheses, but you will get another +standard citation, which may add too much clutter: +\autocite{chicago:manual}. If you don't need to cite a specific page, +then it may be better, or at least more concise, only to use one +citation command rather than two. + +\subsection*{Other citation commands} +\label{sec:other} + +The other citation commands from \textsf{biblatex} also work fine: + +\cmd{textcite}: \textcite{conley:fifthgrade}; \cmd{autocite*}: +\autocite*{connell:chronic}; \cmd{cite}: \cite{conway:evolution}; +\cmd{cite*}: \cite*{davenport:attention}; \cmd{foot\-note} with +\cmd{autocite};\footnote{\autocite{donne:var:15}.}\ \cmd{footcite} +(=\cmd{cite} inside a \cmd{footnote}). \footcite{dunn:revolutions} + +Multicites should work as you expect, too: + +\cmd{autocites}: \autocites{dyna:browser}{eliot:pound}; +\cmd{autocites} by the same author: +\autocites{pirumova}{pirumova:russian}; \cmd{autocites} by the same +author with postnotes: \autocites{pirumova}[14]{pirumova:russian}; +\cmd{textcites} by the same author with postnotes: +\textcites[37]{pirumova}{pirumova:russian}. + +\subsection*{Shorthands} +\label{sec:shorthands} + +Chicago's author-date style only seems to recommend the use of +shorthands as abbreviations for long authors' names, particularly +institutional names \autocite[15.36]{chicago:manual}. By default, I +have followed this recommendation: \cmd{autocites}: +\autocites{bsi:abbreviation}{iso:electrodoc}; \cmd{textcites}: +\textcites{bsi:abbreviation}{iso:electrodoc}. This \textsf{shorthand} +will by default appear at the head of the entry in the list of +references, followed by the parenthesized expansion of the shorthand, +taken from the \textsf{author} field. (This is a change from the 15th +edition.) You will usually also need a \textsf{sortkey} field to make +sure that the entry is alphabetized by the \textsf{shorthand} rather +than by the \textsf{title}. If you use a \cmd{printshorthands} +command, the list of shorthands will still be printed, so you now have +a variety of options available for presenting the expansions depending +on your specific requirements. Please note, also, that you can get +back something approaching the \enquote{standard} behavior of +shorthands if you give the \texttt{cmslos=false} option to +\textsf{biblatex-chicago} in your document preamble. + +\subsection*{Mildly problematic entries} +\label{sec:problematic} + +In most entries, the absence of an author can be supplied by, e.g., an +editor or a translator: \autocite{chaucer:alt}; +\autocite{silver:gawain}. Sometimes an anonymous work's author is +known or can be guessed: \autocite{horsley:prosodies}; +\autocite{cook:sotweed}. Alternatively, in some cases the +\textsf{title} may appear in place of the \textsf{author}: +\autocite{anon:stanze}; \autocite{virginia:plantation}. The 16th +edition is less than enthusiastic about the use of +\enquote{\texttt{Anon.}}\ as author. + +With \textsf{Biber}, in most entry types, an absent \textsf{date} will +automatically provoke it into searching for other sorts of dates in +the entry, in the order \textsf{year, eventyear, origyear, urlyear}: +e.g., \autocite{evanston:library}, which only has a \textsf{urlyear}. +In three entry types --- \textsf{Music}, \textsf{Review}, and +\textsf{Video} --- this search order is \textsf{eventyear, origyear, + year, urlyear}, as in these types the earliest year should take +precedence (cf.\ page~\pageref{sec:audiovisual}, below). You can +eliminate some of these dates from the running, or change the search +order, using the \cmd{DeclareLabelyear} command in your preamble, but +please be aware that I have hard-coded this order into the author-date +style in order to cope with some tricky corners of the specification. +If you reorder these dates, and your references enter these tricky +corners, the results might be surprising. (Cf.\ section~4.5.2 in +\textsf{biblatex.pdf} and section~5.2, s.v.\ \enquote{date} in +\textsf{biblatex-chicago.pdf} for the details.) + +In most entry types, the absence of all four possible dates will +automatically produce \mbox{\enquote{\texttt{n.d.}\hspace{-2pt}}} +instead: \autocite{bernstein:shostakovich}. You can also give it +yourself in the form \cmd{bibstring\{nodate\}}: +\autocite{ross:thesis}. A date that can be guessed should appear +within square brackets: \autocite{clark:mesopot}. Forthcoming works +are straightforward, assuming you remember to use the \cmd{autocap} +macro so that the word appears correctly in both citations and the +list of references: \autocite{author:forthcoming}; +\autocite{contrib:contrib}. + +The 16th edition of the \emph{Manual} has changed the rules for +entries with more than one date \autocite[15.38]{chicago:manual}. +First, \textsf{Music} and \textsf{Video} entries have their own rules, +which are applied automatically. (Once again, see +page~\pageref{sec:audiovisual}, below.) For other entry types, there +are two options, corresponding to two different states of the +\texttt{cmsdate} entry option. The default is \texttt{cmsdate=off}: +\autocite{maitland:equity}. Here, setting the \textsf{pubstate} field +to \texttt{reprint} ensures that a notice of the original publication +date will be printed at the end of the reference list entry. +Alternatively, you can use \texttt{cmsdate=both}: +\autocite{emerson:nature}; \autocite{maitland:canon}. +\texttt{cmsdate=new} and \texttt{cmsdate=old} are both now synonyms of +\texttt{both}, while \texttt{cmsdate=on} is still available even +though it falls outside the specification: +\autocite{james:ambassadors}. These options, in combination with +others available in your .bib files, can cover a wide range of +difficult cases. Please see the next section below, the documentation +in \textsf{biblatex-chicago.pdf}, and also the following entries in +\textsf{dates-test.bib}: +\autocites{schweitzer:bach}{white:russ}{white:ross:memo}. + +\subsection*{Corners of the specification} +\label{sec:corners} + +In some cases, the \emph{Manual} isn't altogether clear about how to +present entries in the author-date style. I'm pretty certain about +most of what follows, but if you interpret the specification +differently please let me know. + +\subsubsection*{InReference entries} +\label{sec:inref} + +These present several peculiarities: the title of the work should +always take the place of any author, no +\enquote{\texttt{n.d.}\hspace{-2pt}} will automatically be provided, +and any postnote field will be enclosed in quotation marks preceded by +\enquote{\texttt{s.v.}\hspace{-2pt}} for \enquote{\emph{sub verbo}.} +This allows you to refer to alphabetized articles in well-known +reference works: \autocite[Hume, David]{ency:britannica}; +\autocite[Sibelius, Jean]{grove:sibelius}; +\autocite[BibTeX]{wikiped:bibtex}. + +\subsubsection*{Author-less Article, Review, and Manual entries} +\label{sec:authless:art} + +In \textsf{Article} and \textsf{Review} entries with the +\texttt{magazine} entrysubtype, the absence of an author automatically +places the \textsf{journaltitle} of the periodical in citations and at +the head of the entry in the list of references: +\autocite{gourmet:052006}. You can cite newspaper and magazine +articles entirely within the text, i.e., without them appearing in the +reference list \autocite[15.47]{chicago:manual}, if you set the +\texttt{cmsdate=full} entry option: \autocite{lakeforester:pushcarts}; +\autocite{nyt:trevorobit}. In \textsf{Manual} entries, the +\textsf{organization} field does the same: \autocite{dyna:browser}. +If you wish to present an abbreviated form of the journal (or +organization) name only in citations, then the \textsf{shortauthor} +field --- or in other cases the \textsf{shorthand} field --- is the +place for it, making sure to include formatting: +\autocite{unsigned:ranke}; \autocite{bsi:abbreviation}. + +\subsubsection*{Misc entries with an entrysubtype} +\label{sec:misc} + +When citing individual letter-like pieces from an unpublished archive +where only an \textsf{origdate} is present, you no longer need to set +the \texttt{cmsdate} option in your .bib entry, as \textsf{Biber} and +\textsf{biblatex-chicago} now handle this automatically: +\autocite{creel:house}. Non-letters, e.g., interviews, use the +\textsf{date} field, so you don't need \texttt{cmsdate} there, either: +\autocite{spock:interview}. For undated pieces you can put +\cmd{bibstring\{nodate\}} in the \textsf{year} field: +\autocite{dinkel:agassiz}. For citing whole collections, see the next +section. + +\subsubsection*{entrysubtype = \{classical\}} +\label{sec:classical} + +This option's name derives from its use for citing texts from +classical antiquity, though in the author-date style especially it can +be put to use in several other contexts. In a nutshell, any entry +with such an \textsf{entrysubtype} will be treated, in citations only, +not as author-date but as author-title. (Entries in the list of +references, e.g., a particular edition of Aristotle, will still appear +in standard author-date format.) A \cmd{cite*} or \cmd{autocite*} +command will, in such a case, produce the title rather than the year. +Some examples should make this clearer: + +Classical works: without abbreviation: +\autocite{aristotle:metaphy:trans}; with abbreviation: +\autocite{aristotle:metaphy:gr}; \autocite{plato:republic:gr}; using +standard pagination: \autocite*[3.2.996b5--8]{aristotle:metaphy:gr}; +\autocite*[420e]{plato:republic:gr}; work cited by page of a modern +edition, i.e., without \textsf{entrysubtype}: +\autocite[198]{euripides:orestes}. + +Sacred works, e.g., the Bible and the Qur'an: +\autocite[25:19--36:43]{genesis}. + +An unpublished archive, from which more than one work has been cited: +\autocite[file 12]{house:papers}. (Both this and the previous example +use a Misc entry with \texttt{classical} \textsf{entrysubtype}.) + +\subsubsection*{Comments inside citations} +\label{sec:comments} + +If you wish to include a comment inside the parentheses of a citation, +it will need to be separated by a semicolon +\autocite[15.23]{chicago:manual}. If you have a \textsf{postnote}, +then you can manually provide the punctuation and comment in that +field, e.g., \autocite[4; the unrevised trans.]{stendhal:parma}. +Without a \textsf{postnote}, you'll need a separate \textsf{Misc} or +\textsf{CustomC} entry containing just the text of the comment in the +\textsf{title} field, \textsf{entrysubtype} \texttt{classical}, and +\textsf{options} \texttt{skipbib}. An \cmd{autocites} command calling +both the main text and the comment will do the trick, e.g., +\autocites{chicago:manual}{chicago:comment}. + +\subsubsection*{Multiple authors} +\label{sec:multiple} + +The default settings in \textsf{biblatex-chicago} are +\texttt{maxnames=3,minnames=1} in citations and +\texttt{max\-bibnames=10,minbibnames=7} in the list of references +(these latter parameters set in \textsf{biblatex-chicago.sty}). In +practice, this means that an entry like hlatky:hrt, with 5 authors, +will present all of them in the list of references but will truncate +to one in citations, like so: \autocite{hlatky:hrt}. For the vast +majority of circumstances, these settings are exactly right for the +Chicago author-date specification. However, if \enquote{a reference + list includes another work \emph{of the same date} that would also + be abbreviated as [\enquote{Hlatky et al.}] but whose coauthors are + different persons or listed in a different order, the text citations + must distinguish between them} \autocite[15.28]{chicago:manual}. +The new (\textsf{Biber}-only) \textsf{biblatex} option +\texttt{uniquelist}, set for you in \textsf{biblatex-chicago.sty}, +will automatically handle many of these situations for you, but it is +as well to understand that it does so by temporarily suspending the +limits, listed above, on how many names to print in a citation. +Without \texttt{uniquelist}, \textsf{biblatex} would present such a +work as, e.g., (Hlatky et al. 2002b), while hlatky:hrt would be +(Hlatky et al. 2002a). This does distinguish between them, but +inaccurately, as it suggests that the two different author lists are +exactly the same. With \texttt{uniquelist}, the two citations might +look like (Hlatky, Boothroyd et al.\ 2002) and (Hlatky, Smith et al.\ +2002), which is what the specification requires. + +If, however, the distinguishing name occurs further down the author +list --- in fourth or fifth position in our examples --- then the +default settings would produce citations with all 4 or 5 names +printed, which can become awkwardly long. In such a situation, you +can provide \textsf{shortauthor} fields that look like this: +\{\{Hlatky et al., Quality of life,\}\} and \{\{Hlatky et al., +Depressive symptoms,\}\}, using a shortened title to distinguish the +references. This would produce (Hlatky et al., Quality of life, 2002) +and (Hlatky et al., Depressive symptoms, 2002), as the spec +recommends. There is, unfortunately, no simpler way that I know of to +deal with this situation. + +\subsubsection*{Audiovisual entries} +\label{sec:audiovisual} + +According to the \emph{Manual}, \enquote{Chicago recommends a more + comprehensive approach to dating audiovisual materials than in + previous editions.} This means, for instance, that, even when +consulting a digital copy, \enquote{it is generally useful to give + information about the original source.} Also, \enquote{the date of + the original recording should be privileged in the citation} +\autocite[15.53]{chicago:manual}. The rather more book-like entries +are generally unaffected by these changes, so published +(\textsf{Audio}) and unpublished (\textsf{Misc}) scores are no problem +at all: \autocite{schubert:muellerin}; \autocite{verdi:corsaro}; +\autocite{shapey:partita:15}. The dating of online materials has been +enhanced: \autocite{coolidge:speech:trad}; +\autocite{horowitz:youtube}; \autocite{pollan:plant}. The most +significant changes, however, appear in \textsf{Music} and +\textsf{Video} entries, where every effort should be made to find +date(s) for sources: \autocite{auden:reading}; +\autocite{friends:leia}; \autocite{handel:messiah}; +\autocite{holiday:fool}; \autocite{nytrumpet:art}. Others perhaps +require further information in the entry or genuinely are better +suited to presentation in running text: \autocite{beethoven:sonata29}. +The standard \textsf{biblatex} tools for subdividing reference lists +are all available if you want to follow the \emph{Manual's} +recommendations on presenting this kind of material separately from +other sources. + +\subsection*{Further examples (mainly for testing purposes)} +\label{testing} + +Article: \autocite{assocpress:gun}; \autocite{brown:bremer}; +\autocite{chu:panda}; \autocite{conley:fifthgrade}; +\autocite{connell:chronic}; \autocite{ellis:blog}; +\autocite{friedman:learning}; \autocite{garaud:gatine}; +\autocite{garrett:15}; \autocite{gibbard:15}; \autocite{kern}; +\autocite{kimluu:diethyl:15}; \autocite{lewis:15}; +\autocite{loften:hamlet}; \autocite{loomis:structure:15}; +\autocite{morgenson:market}; \autocite{osborne:poison:15}; +\autocite{reaves:rosen}; \autocite{rozner:liberation}; +\autocite{schneider:mittelpleistozaene}; \autocite{sewall:letter}; +\autocite{stenger:privacy}; \autocite{terborgh:preservation}; +\autocite{wall:radio}; \autocite{warr:ellison}; +\autocite{white:callimachus}. + +Artwork: \autocite{leo:madonna}. + +Audio: \autocite{greek:filmstrip}; \autocite{weed:flatiron}. + +Book: \autocite{barrows:reading}; \autocite{churchill:letters}; +\autocite{cohen:schiff}; \autocite{cotton:manufacture}; +\autocite{creasey:ashe:blast}; \autocite{creasey:morton:hide}; +\autocite{creasey:york:death}; \autocite{davenport:attention}; +\autocite{feydeau:farces}; \autocite{furet:passing:eng}; +\autocite{furet:passing:fr}; \autocite{harley:cartography}; +\autocite{hopp:attalid}; \autocite{howell:marriage}; +\autocite{lach:asia}; \autocite{lecarre:quest}; +\autocite{levistrauss:savage}; \autocite{lynch:webstyle}; +\autocite{maisonneuve:relations}; \autocite{mchugh:wake:15}; +\autocite{menchu:crossing}; \autocite{meredith:letters}; +\autocite{michelangelo:poems}; \autocite{mla:style}; +\autocite{natrecoff:camera}; \autocite{palmatary:pottery}; +\autocite{pelikan:christian}; \autocite{rodman:walk}; +\autocite{schellinger:novel}; \autocite{sechzer:women}; +\autocite{sereny:cries}; \autocite{soltes:georgia}; +\autocite{stendhal:parma}; \autocite{suangtho:tectona}; +\autocite{thompson:making}; \autocite{tillich:system}; +\autocite{times:guide}; \autocite{turabian:manual}; +\autocite{walker:columbia}; \autocite{wauchope:ceramics}; +\autocite{weber:saugetiere}; \autocite{weresz}; +\autocite{white:total}; \autocite{wright:evolution}; +\autocite{wright:theory}. + +BookInBook: \autocite{bernard:boris}. + +Collection: \autocite{brush:ornithology}; \autocite{kamrany:economic}; +\autocite{prairie:state}; \autocite{zukowsky:chicago}. + +Image: \autocite{bedford:photo}. + +InBook: \autocite{ashbrook:brain}; \autocite{phibbs:diary}; +\autocite{will:cohere}. + +InCollection: \autocite{centinel:letters}; \autocite{ellet:galena}; +\autocite{keating:dearborn}; \autocite{lippincott:chicago}; +\autocite{sirosh:visualcortex}; \autocite{wiens:avian}. + +InProceedings: \autocite{frede:inproc}. + +InReference: \autocite[absolute]{oed:cdrom}. + +Manual: \autocite{dyna:browser}. + +Misc: \autocite{roosevelt:speech:trad}. + +Music: \autocite{floyd:atom}; \autocite{mozart:figaro}; +\autocite{rubinstein:chopin}. + +Online: \autocite{harwood:biden}; \autocite{powell:email}. + +Patent: \autocite{petroff:impurity}. + +Periodical: \autocite{good:wholeissue}; \autocite{whittington:water}. + +Report: \autocite{herwign:office}. + +Review: \autocite{ac:comment:trad}; \autocite{bundy:macneil}; +\autocite{Clemens:letter}; \autocite{kozinn:review}; +\autocite{ratliff:review:15}; \autocite{wallraff:word}. + +SuppBook: \autocite{friedman:intro}; \autocite{polakow:afterw}; +\autocite{prose:intro}. + +Thesis: \autocite{murphy:silent:15}. + +Unpublished: \autocite{nass:address}. + +Video: \autocite{cleese:holygrail}; \autocite{hitchcock:nbynw}. + + +% \printshorthands % No longer necessary in author-date. +% \nocite{*} +\printbibliography[title=References] + +\end{document} +%%% Local Variables: +%%% mode: latex +%%% TeX-master: t +%%% End: |