summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Master/texmf-doc/doc/english/FAQ-en/html/FAQ-minxampl.html
blob: 75e9c7b1b0f6f089193ac26be40cd64840dcb184 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
<head>
<title>UK TeX FAQ -- question label minxampl</title>
</head><body>
<h3>How to make a &ldquo;minimum example&rdquo;</h3>
<p/><a href="FAQ-askquestion.html">Our advice on asking questions</a>
suggests that you prepare a &ldquo;minimum example&rdquo; (also commonly known
as a &ldquo;<em>minimal</em> example&rdquo;) of failing behaviour,
as a sample to post with your question.  If you have a problem in a
two hundred page document, it may be unclear how to proceed from this
problem to a succinct demonstration of your problem.
<p/>There are two valid approaches to this task: building up, and hacking
down.
<p/>
<b><em>Building up</em></b> starts
with a basic document structure
(for LaTeX, this would have <code>\</code><code>documentclass</code>,
<code>\</code><code>begin{document}</code>, <code>\</code><code>end{document}</code>) and adds
things.  First to add is a paragraph or so around the actual point
where the problem occurs.  (It may prove difficult to find the actual
line that&rsquo;s provoking the problem.  If the original problem is an
error, reviewing 
<a href="FAQ-errstruct.html">&ldquo;the structure of TeX errors&rdquo;</a>
may help.)
<p/>Note that there are things that can go wrong in one part of the
document as a result of something in another part: the commonest is
problems in the table of contents (from something in a section title,
or whatever), or the list of &lt;<i>something</i>&gt; (from something in a
<code>\</code><code>caption</code>).  In such a case, include the section title or caption
(the caption probably needs the <code>figure</code> or
<code>table</code> environment around it, but it <em>doesn&rsquo;t</em> need
the figure or table itself).
<p/>If this file you&rsquo;ve built up shows the problem already, then you&rsquo;re done.
Otherwise, try adding packages; the optimum is a file with only one
package in it, but you may find that the guilty package won&rsquo;t even load
properly unless another package has been loaded.  (Another common case
is that package <i>A</i> only fails when package <i>B</i> has been
loaded.)
<p/>
<b><em>Hacking down</em></b> starts
with your entire document, and
removes bits until the file no longer fails (and then of course
restores the last thing removed).  Don&rsquo;t forget to hack out any
unnecessary packages, but mostly, the difficulty is choosing what to
hack out of the body of the document; this is the mirror of the
problem above, in the &ldquo;building up&rdquo; route.
<p/>If you&rsquo;ve added a package (or more than one), add <code>\</code><code>listfiles</code> to
the preamble too: that way, LaTeX will produce a list of the
packages you&rsquo;ve used and their version numbers.  This information may
be useful evidence for people trying to help you.
<p/>What if your document simply doesn&rsquo;t fail in any of these cut-down
scenarios?  Whatever you do, don&rsquo;t post the whole of the document: if
you can, it may be useful to make a copy available on the web
somewhere: people will probably understand if it&rsquo;s impossible ... 
or inadvisable, in the case of something confidential.
<p/>If the whole document is necessary, it could be that it&rsquo;s an overflow
of some sort; the best you can do is to post the code &ldquo;around&rdquo; the
error, and (of course) the full text of the error.
<p/>It may seem that all this work is rather excessive for preparing a
simple post.  There are two responses to that, both based on the
relative inefficiency of asking a question on the internet.
<p/>First, preparing a minimum document very often leads <em>you</em> to the
answer, without all the fuss of posting and looking for responses.
<p/>Second, your prime aim is to get an answer as quickly as possible; a
well-prepared example stands a good chance of attracting an answer
&ldquo;in a single pass&rdquo;: if the person replying to your post finds she
needs more information, you have to find that request, post again, and
wait for your benefactor to produce a second response.
<p/>All things considered, a good example file can save you a day, for
perhaps half an hour&rsquo;s effort invested.
<p/>The above advice, differently phrased, may also be read on the web at
<a href="http://www.minimalbeispiel.de/mini-en.html">http://www.minimalbeispiel.de/mini-en.html</a>; source of that
article may be found at <a href="http://www.minimalbeispiel.de/">http://www.minimalbeispiel.de/</a>, in
both German and English.
<p/><p>This question on the Web: <a href="http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=minxampl">http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=minxampl</a>
</body>