1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
|
\documentclass[12pt]{article}
% Ruby markup renewal
\usepackage[overlap, CJK]{ruby}
\renewcommand{\rubysep}{-0.3ex}
\renewcommand{\rubysize}{0.6}
% automatically wraps characters from specific unicode blocks with the relevant font tag
\usepackage{fontwrap}
% in this example, fontwrap is only allowed to process content for 'ruby' tags.
\setfontwrapallowedmacros{ruby}
% The main font is a somewhat bland font.
\setmainfont{Times New Roman}
% always good to have, in case a sentence is unmanageable and needs to be rewritten.
\overfullrule=5pt
% document start
\begin{document}
% ---------------------------------------------------------
%
% In the first part of what is effectively a unit test,
% we set the font handling for characters from the Latin
% unicode blocks to the 'Palatino Linotype' font. For
% characters from the CJK unicode blocks, we use the
% 'kiloji' font, which is a playful font for Japanese.
%
% ---------------------------------------------------------
\section{Before we start:}
\setunicodegroupfont{Latin}{Palatino Linotype}
\setunicodegroupfont{CJK}{kiloji}
Before the test text is generated, \textbackslash unicodegroupLatinFont is set to '\unicodegroupLatinFont',
and \textbackslash unicodegroupCJKFont is set to '\unicodegroupCJKFont'.
% ---------------------------------------------------------
%
% In our unit test, the first section must look identical
% to the second section.
%
% ---------------------------------------------------------
\section{This:}
\fontwrap{
test 1: \emph{- 仕 -}, test2: \ruby{ruby base text}{- 仕 -}\ どうぞ.
}
\section{Should look like this:}
\fontspec{\unicodegroupLatinFont}test 1: \emph{- 仕 -}, test2: \ruby{ruby
base text}{- \fontspec{\unicodegroupCJKFont}仕\fontspec{\unicodegroupLatinFont}
-}\ \fontspec{\unicodegroupCJKFont}どうぞ\fontspec{\unicodegroupLatinFont}.
% ---------------------------------------------------------
%
% In the second part of our test, we issue font changes.
% We set the font handling for characters from the Latin
% unicode blocks to the 'Arial' font, which is distinctly
% different from the Palatino Linotype font, and we set
% the CJK font to 'Ume Mincho', a "clinical" Japanese font.
%
% ---------------------------------------------------------
\section{Before we continue:}
\setunicodegroupfont{Latin}{Arial}
\setunicodegroupfont{CJK}{Ume Mincho}
Then, before we continue our test, \textbackslash unicodegroupLatinFont is set to '\unicodegroupLatinFont',
and \textbackslash unicodegroupCJKFont is set to '\unicodegroupCJKFont'.
% ---------------------------------------------------------
%
% Again, the first section must look identical to the
% second section.
%
% ---------------------------------------------------------
\section{And more elaborately, this:}
\fontwrap{
This is a paragraph on the Japanese language, written \ruby{日本語}{nihongo}. The pronunciation above
the Japanese is a romanisation of the Japanese syllabic word にほんご, which is a combination of 'ni',
'ho', 'n' and 'go'. The last syllable is a voicing of the syllable こ, 'ko', denoted with two tickmarks
in the upper right.
Adding a pronunciation key to written Japanese is a common practice. A simple example of this would
be the aforementioned \ruby{日本語}{にほんご}, this time with Japanese in the pronunciation key.
The type of writing that is used to mark pronunciation is called \ruby{振り仮名}{ふりがな}\ in Japanese,
which translates to something like 'sprinkled (syllabic) writing'.
}
\section{Should look like:}
\fontspec{\unicodegroupLatinFont}This is a paragraph on the Japanese language, written \ruby{\fontspec{\unicodegroupCJKFont}日本語\fontspec{\unicodegroupLatinFont}}{nihongo}. The pronunciation above
the Japanese is a romanisation of the Japanese syllabic word \fontspec{\unicodegroupCJKFont}にほんご\fontspec{\unicodegroupLatinFont}, which is a combination of 'ni',
'ho', 'n' and 'go'. The last syllable is a voicing of the syllable \fontspec{\unicodegroupCJKFont}こ\fontspec{\unicodegroupLatinFont}, 'ko', denoted with two tickmarks
in the upper right.
Adding a pronunciation key to written Japanese is a common practice. A simple example of this would
be the aforementioned \ruby{\fontspec{\unicodegroupCJKFont}日本語\fontspec{\unicodegroupLatinFont}}{\fontspec{\unicodegroupCJKFont}にほんご\fontspec{\unicodegroupLatinFont}}, this time with Japanese in the pronunciation key.
The type of writing that is used to mark pronunciation is called \ruby{\fontspec{\unicodegroupCJKFont}振り仮名\fontspec{\unicodegroupLatinFont}}{\fontspec{\unicodegroupCJKFont}ふりがな\fontspec{\unicodegroupLatinFont}}\ in Japanese,
which translates to something like 'sprinkled (syllabic) writing'.
% ---------------------------------------------------------
%
% In the third part of our test, we check whether fontwrap
% respects our environment declarations. Because we'll use
% a verbatim group, we make sure to call verbatimfontwrap
% as well, to preserve the whitespace precisely.
%
% ---------------------------------------------------------
\section{Again, before we continue:}
\setunicodegroupfont{Latin}{Arial}
\setunicodegroupfont{CJK}{kiloji}
For the final test, \textbackslash unicodegroupLatinFont is set to \unicodegroupLatinFont\
and \textbackslash unicodegroupCJKFont is kept at '\unicodegroupLatinFont', for contrast.
The verbatim block will not support Japanese, so we'll see gaps in it.
\section{This:}
\begin{verbatimfontwrap}
\fontwrap{
This is some text with English and 日本語 in it (\ruby{正解}{せいかい}), with a
\begin{verbatim}
Verbatim Block Inside It.
Also With English And 日本語 Text.
(Don't mind the capitals. The point was there
should not be any fontspec tags)
\end{verbatim}
After which some more 日本語 and English.
}
\end{verbatimfontwrap}
\section{Should look like this:}
\fontspec{\unicodegroupLatinFont}This is some text with English and
\fontspec{\unicodegroupCJKFont}日本語\fontspec{\unicodegroupLatinFont}\ in it (\ruby{\fontspec{\unicodegroupCJKFont}正解\fontspec{\unicodegroupLatinFont}}{\fontspec{\unicodegroupCJKFont}せいかい\fontspec{\unicodegroupLatinFont}}), with a
\begin{verbatim}
Verbatim Block Inside It.
Also With English And 日本語 Text.
(Don't mind the capitals. The point was there
should not be any fontspec tags)
\end{verbatim}
After which some more \fontspec{\unicodegroupCJKFont}日本語\fontspec{\unicodegroupLatinFont}\ and English.
% ---------------------------------------------------------
%
% And that concludes the unit test.
%
% ---------------------------------------------------------
\end{document}
|
