Choosing a bibliography style
A large proportion of people are satisfied with one of Patashnik’s
original “standard” styles, plain, unsrt,
abbrv and alpha. However, no style in that set
supports the “author-date” citation style that is popular in many
fields; but there are a very large number of contributed styles
available, that do support the format.
(Note that author-date styles arose because the simple and clear
citation style that plain produces is so awkward in a
traditional manuscript preparation scenario. However, TeX-based
document production does away with all those difficulties, leaving us
free once again to use the simple option.)
Fortunately, help is at hand, on the Web, with this problem:
- a sample text, showing the sorts of style choices available, can
be found on
Ken Turner’s web site;
- an excellent survey, that lists a huge variety of styles,
sorted into their nominal topics as well as providing a good range
of examples, is the Reed College
“Choosing a BibTeX style”.
Of course, these pages don’t cover everything; the problem the
inquisitive user faces, in fact, is to find what the various available
styles actually do. This is best achieved (if the links above don’t
help) by using xampl.bib from the BibTeX documentation
distribution: one can get a pretty good feel for any style one has to
hand using this “standard” bibliography. For style
my-style.bst, the simple LaTeX document:
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
\bibliographystyle{my-style}
\nocite{*}
\bibliography{xampl}
\end{document}
will produce a representative sample of the citations the style will
produce. (Because xampl.bib is so extreme in some of its
“examples”, the BibTeX run will also give you an interesting
selection of BibTeX’s error messages...)
- xampl.bib
- biblio/bibtex/distribs/doc/xampl.bib
This question on the Web: http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=whatbst