From b114d96898098a66dc02ad51ec93d68b835e2a93 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Karl Berry <karl@freefriends.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 00:23:14 +0000
Subject: biblatex-chicago (16feb11)

git-svn-id: svn://tug.org/texlive/trunk@21454 c570f23f-e606-0410-a88d-b1316a301751
---
 .../latex/biblatex-chicago/cms-dates-sample.tex    | 58 +++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

(limited to 'Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-chicago/cms-dates-sample.tex')

diff --git a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-chicago/cms-dates-sample.tex b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-chicago/cms-dates-sample.tex
index 87d8620f5b4..7df4a169382 100644
--- a/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-chicago/cms-dates-sample.tex
+++ b/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex-chicago/cms-dates-sample.tex
@@ -91,13 +91,19 @@ institutional names \autocite[17.47]{chicago:manual}.  By default, I
 have followed this recommendation: \cmd{autocites}:
 \autocites{bsi:abbreviation}{iso:electrodoc}; \cmd{textcites}:
 \textcites{bsi:abbreviation}{iso:electrodoc}.  It suggests placing the
-expansion of the abbreviation into the reference list itself, a
-procedure that I shall implement in the next release of
-\textsf{biblatex-chicago}.  For now, the list of shorthands will
-present the expansion.  Please note, also, that you can get back
-something approaching the \enquote{standard} behavior of shorthands if
-you give the \texttt{cmslos=false} option to \textsf{biblatex-chicago}
-in your document preamble.
+expansion of the abbreviation into an alphabetized cross-reference
+inside the reference list itself, a procedure that I have now
+implemented for \textsf{biblatex-chicago}.  To use this, you need a
+\textsf{CustomC} entry containing the expansion, and either a
+\textsf{userc} field in the parent entry or a \cmd{nocite} command to
+make sure it is printed in the reference list.  If you use a
+\cmd{printshorthands} command, the list of shorthands will still be
+printed, so you now have a variety of options available for presenting
+the expansions depending on your specific requirements.  Please note,
+also, that you can get back something approaching the
+\enquote{standard} behavior of shorthands if you give the
+\texttt{cmslos=false} option to \textsf{biblatex-chicago} in your
+document preamble.
 
 \subsection*{Mildly problematic entries}
 \label{sec:problematic}
@@ -212,6 +218,21 @@ An unpublished archive, from which more than one work has been cited:
 \autocite[file 12]{house:papers}.  (Both this and the previous example
 use a Misc entry with \texttt{classical} \textsf{entrysubtype}.)
 
+\subsubsection*{Comments inside citations}
+\label{sec:comments}
+
+If you wish to include a comment inside the parentheses of a citation,
+it will need to be separated by a semicolon
+\autocite[16.111]{chicago:manual}.  If you have a \textsf{postnote},
+then you can manually provide the punctuation and comment in that
+field, e.g., \autocite[4; the unrevised trans.]{stendhal:parma}.
+Without a \textsf{postnote}, you'll need a separate Misc or CustomC
+entry containing just the text of the comment in the \textsf{title}
+field, \textsf{entrysubtype} \texttt{classical}, and \textsf{options}
+\texttt{skipbib}.  An \cmd{autocites} command calling both the main
+text and the comment will do the trick, e.g.,
+\autocites{chicago:manual}{chicago:comment}.
+
 \subsubsection*{Multiple authors}
 \label{sec:multiple}
 
@@ -249,6 +270,24 @@ shortened title to distinguish the references.  This would produce
 There is, unfortunately, no simpler way that I know of to deal with
 this situation.
 
+\subsubsection*{Audiovisual entries}
+\label{sec:audiovisual}
+
+According to the \emph{Manual}, \enquote{the author-date system is
+  inappropriate for most audiovisual materials\ldots\ Such materials
+  are best mentioned in running text and grouped in the reference list
+  under a subhead\ldots} \autocite[17.265]{chicago:manual}.  Some
+entries work perfectly well: \autocite{auden:reading};
+\autocite{hitchcock:nbynw}; \autocite{handel:messiah}.  Others perhaps
+require further information in the entry or genuinely are better
+suited to presentation in running text: \autocite{beethoven:sonata29};
+\autocite{nytrumpet:art}.  Published (\textsf{Audio}) and unpublished
+(\textsf{Misc}) scores, for their part, are no problem at all:
+\autocite{schubert:muellerin}; \autocite{verdi:corsaro};
+\autocite{shapey:partita}.  The standard \textsf{biblatex} tools for
+subdividing reference lists are all available if you want to follow
+the \emph{Manual's} recommendations on that front.
+
 \subsection*{Further examples (mainly for testing purposes)}
 \label{testing}
 
@@ -307,6 +346,8 @@ InCollection: \autocite{centinel:letters}; \autocite{ellet:galena};
 \autocite{keating:dearborn}; \autocite{lippincott:chicago};
 \autocite{sirosh:visualcortex}; \autocite{wiens:avian}.
 
+InReference: \autocite[absolute]{oed:cdrom}.
+
 Manual: \autocite{dyna:browser}.
 
 Online: \autocite{powell:email}.
@@ -325,9 +366,10 @@ Thesis: \autocite{murphy:silent}.
 Unpublished: \autocite{nass:address}.
 
 
-\printshorthands
+% \printshorthands % No longer necessary in author-date.
 \nocite{*}
 \printbibliography[title=References,maxnames=10,minnames=7]
+
 \end{document}
 %%% Local Variables: 
 %%% mode: latex
-- 
cgit v1.2.3

